[1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool

[Meuh6879]

Though also in the log with the same error are the private IP of my p2pool node and the private IP of my router.

unlock (manually with rule on a fixed IP) the NAT : p2pool 9333 TCP

[Richy_T]

Though also in the log with the same error are the private IP of my p2pool node and the private IP of my router.

unlock (manually with rule on a fixed IP) the NAT : p2pool 9333 TCP

Not sure what you mean by unlock but I do already have 9333 port forwarded.

Been running gangbusters since starting with a fresh install of p2pool FWIW.

[rav3n_pl]

Port 9333 need to be open if you want (and you want) incoming connections from other nodes.
If you want allow others to mine on your node you also need forward port 9332.

[yslyung]

just posted on IRC asking whereisblock & a thx for the boost in p2pool.

Here it is :

BITCOIN BLOCK FOUND by 1NJJgrGhU7rTFCgD9ZbfktKoyj4vFHe4yB! @ 124482.10 GH/s

https://blockchain.info/block/000000000000000008a08fd6ec6625113a7013673847e5950ce57467aa09761b

i've also redirected some of my miners to the pool for a boost.

more to come soon

rav3n_pl any new updates on your p2p fork ? appreciate a link.

i;ve just updated to latest qt 11.1 so far so good.

[CartmanSPC]

you mean this one http://lnlb.sourceforge.net/ for example?

Maybe. I don't know enough about it. I would imagine that p2pool talking to bitcoind is simple enough that simple load balancing would be enough but I don't know enough to say for sure.

I have found crossroads as a load balancer possible able to do this work. I am going soon to test running two bitcoind with two independent internet connections and let my p2pool node to be connected to them over crossroads.

Let us know how it goes!

[igorwhite]

Hello!

Here's my post with all the firmware for antminer s5 ---- https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/blog/194/entry-337-proshivka-antminer-s5-cgminer-490-ot-kolivas/
Post in Russian language.
Install like normal firmware from BITMAN.
After rebooting cgminer no falls  

[p3yot33at3r]

Hello!

Here's my post with all the firmware for antminer s5 ---- https://forum.bits.media/index.php?/blog/194/entry-337-proshivka-antminer-s5-cgminer-490-ot-kolivas/
Post in Russian language.
Install like normal firmware from BITMAN.
After rebooting cgminer no falls  

Ah yes - I wondered where I got this firmware from, I noticed the "White" sig in the firmware release - many thanks for this work igorwhite.

I have used a webtranslator for your blog, but much of the details are lost in translation - can you tell me what firmware has queue 0 & submit stale?

Thanks  

Edit: Also, is there a queue 1 & submit stale?

[igorwhite]

For p2pool only better CGM 4.9.0 queue 0
submit stale it is to reduce the orphan (do not know exactly how to say in English) but this is not good because at p2pool also pay for orphan

[p3yot33at3r]

For p2pool only better CGM 4.9.0 queue 0
submit stale it is to reduce the orphan (do not know exactly how to say in English) but this is not good because at p2pool also pay for orphan

OK - so that is download number 1)?

First on the list?

Or number 3)?

Sorry, it's difficult to tell 

[igorwhite]

The latest firmware from Bitman (adjustable fan) cgminer 4.9.0 and queue 0 https://yadi.sk/d/9DZhkgcjjNKtZ
Previous firmware on the Bitman (without adjusting the fan) cgminer 4.9.0 and queue 0 https://yadi.sk/d/biL8s7URh59Zp

[p3yot33at3r]

The latest firmware from Bitman (adjustable fan) cgminer 4.9.0 and queue 0 https://yadi.sk/d/9DZhkgcjjNKtZ
Previous firmware on the Bitman (without adjusting the fan) cgminer 4.9.0 and queue 0 https://yadi.sk/d/biL8s7URh59Zp

Right, so as I understand it, the correct one to use for p2pool on your blog is the first one (No. 1). This uses a queue 0, lowmem & submit stale - am I correct?

Thanks again igorwhite - I will test & send you a tip to the BTC address on your blog  

[igorwhite]

Yes

[p3yot33at3r]

Yes

Cпacибo!! 

[p3yot33at3r]

Yes

Cпacибo!!  

OK - it's a little confusing, but here goes:

I inspected both downloads 1 & 3 and found that number 1 actually uses --no-submit-stale, while number 3 does not (this can be seen in the /etc/init.d/cgminer.sh file on line 69), which is where the confusion lies. So, the one to use is actually number 3 which is labelled SD-S5-20150107_cgm_4_9_0-queue_0_no-submit.tar.gz - as the "no-submit" part of the name actually means that it has been removed from the parameters & thus will submit stales.

It is also the one I uploaded here:   https://www.dropbox.com/s/gk6gva5e12g4qsr/SD-S5-20150107_cgm_4_9_0-queue_0_no-submit.tar.gz?dl=0

& igorwhite - it might be worthwhile swapping the names over to avoid any more confusion for native English speakers - or I can do an English translation for you if you like?

[Polyatomic]

Be careful to not offend him man! his english may be better than yours.
                       Edit --^
p3yot33at3r I was not saying yours is not good btw

[p3yot33at3r]

Be careful man! his english may be better than yours

  Probably true, my other half is always correcting me 

[idonothave]

you mean this one http://lnlb.sourceforge.net/ for example?

Maybe. I don't know enough about it. I would imagine that p2pool talking to bitcoind is simple enough that simple load balancing would be enough but I don't know enough to say for sure.

I have found crossroads as a load balancer possible able to do this work. I am going soon to test running two bitcoind with two independent internet connections and let my p2pool node to be connected to them over crossroads.

Let us know how it goes!

crossroads installed on my ubuntu with

Code:

sudo apt-get install crossroads

running it with

Code:

screen -d -m -S crossroads xr --web-interface 10.0.0.16:28332 --server tcp:127.0.0.1:18332 --backend 127.0.0.1:8332 --backend 10.0.0.16:8332 --backend 10.1.0.10:8332

to my p2pool run script I have added

Code:

--bitcoind-rpc-port 18332

crossroads can be controled from web browser at 10.0.0.16:28332
while p2pool gave me an error if I put more than one rpc login/password, I have changed all rpc login/password at all bitcoind servers to be the same
if one of bitcoind servers dies than another took his work automatically

[torepia]

Anyone getting good numbers with S7? Seem to lose 400-500 GH/s.





Big difference in what is reported in cgminer, and at the pool.

[Meuh6879]

4,8GH/s on pool ... 4,1GH/s on web interface, what the problem  web interface is a crappy thing after all. 

[igorwhite]

Hello!
torepia, you configure s7 btc_address/5000+16384 you do not know what values are needed for s5?