Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 08:07:04 AM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 [664] 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 ... 744 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2035609 times)
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 06:52:28 AM
 #13261

XT or Core ... whichever works best i go.

ah ha & a BLOCK !
1481443624
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481443624

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481443624
Reply with quote  #2

1481443624
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 01:04:39 PM
 #13262

Sounds like a drug dealer Smiley
... come on ... you can change your mind later ... just try it ... it wont do anything ...
Um, if it does nothing, why bother?

Drug dealer? Really?

Quote
right now it's 0 risk and a way to support a block size increase.

And that's essentially what it is. A vote with hash power.

TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686

FUN > ROI


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 01:17:09 PM
 #13263

Just keep in mind that the default code base and the released binaries of XT include more than just the block size changes.  'Voting for' XT is a vote in favor of all changes, not just the block size ones.

windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 01:24:00 PM
 #13264

Just keep in mind that the default code base and the released binaries of XT include more than just the block size changes.  'Voting for' XT is a vote in favor of all changes, not just the block size ones.

True, here's Mike's list:
Code:
    Bigger blocks
    Double spend relaying
    Better DoS attack defences
    BIP 65 / getutxos support
    DNS seed list refresh

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bitcoin-xt/_YeEuaUu3Xk

kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1932


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 01:42:25 PM
 #13265

Just keep in mind that the default code base and the released binaries of XT include more than just the block size changes.  'Voting for' XT is a vote in favor of all changes, not just the block size ones.
... and just using it is a vote in favour of it ...
Which is why I made the drug dealer reference.
It's not just "try it to see that it's OK" since there is nothing to see, it's: "try it and thus you may not realise it but you are voting for it"
Trying it is voting to use it.
So people should decide that before trying it - since you won't see anything by trying it.

Pool: https://kano.is BTC: 1KanoiBupPiZfkwqB7rfLXAzPnoTshAVmb
CKPool and CGMiner developer, IRC FreeNode #ckpool and #cgminer kanoi
Help keep Bitcoin secure by mining on pools with Stratum, the best protocol to mine Bitcoins with ASIC hardware
jtoomim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 555


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 02:09:55 PM
 #13266

1. I have been testing P2Pool with BitcoinXT on my development node, it works as expected with really no performance differences at all.

2. In the next couple weeks(TM) I'll be releasing Chain Query (alpha: http://chainquery.com) on Github, once thats done I plan to rewrite my P2Pool node front end to use Chain Query and MySQL (the core P2Pool code does not need to be altered) and will relaunch http://minefast.CoinCadence.com on BitcoinXT with the new front end. I will release the full source for the new front end on Github.

The switch to XT is a personal decision, and shows my support for scaling Bitcoin. I believe it is the right path.

...

Is stratum+tcp://minefast.CoinCadence.com:9332 or stratum+tcp://minefast2.CoinCadence.com:9332 on XT yet? I'm getting a few people on my reddit/r/bitcoin and reddit/r/bitcoinxt threads who want to join my XT node, and I'd like to give them other options too.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3h6nh0/toomim_bros_bitcoin_mining_concern_supports/
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3h6lk8/toomim_bros_supports_democracy_and_bitcoin_xt/

Hosting bitcoin miners for $75 to $90/kW/month on clean, cheap hydro power.
http://Toom.im
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 02:37:15 PM
 #13267

1. I have been testing P2Pool with BitcoinXT on my development node, it works as expected with really no performance differences at all.

2. In the next couple weeks(TM) I'll be releasing Chain Query (alpha: http://chainquery.com) on Github, once thats done I plan to rewrite my P2Pool node front end to use Chain Query and MySQL (the core P2Pool code does not need to be altered) and will relaunch http://minefast.CoinCadence.com on BitcoinXT with the new front end. I will release the full source for the new front end on Github.

The switch to XT is a personal decision, and shows my support for scaling Bitcoin. I believe it is the right path.

...

Is stratum+tcp://minefast.CoinCadence.com:9332 or stratum+tcp://minefast2.CoinCadence.com:9332 on XT yet? I'm getting a few people on my reddit/r/bitcoin and reddit/r/bitcoinxt threads who want to join my XT node, and I'd like to give them other options too.

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/3h6nh0/toomim_bros_bitcoin_mining_concern_supports/
https://www.reddit.com/r/bitcoinxt/comments/3h6lk8/toomim_bros_supports_democracy_and_bitcoin_xt/
It's not up yet, still core. I'll post here when it's up and running...

jonnybravo0311
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1008


Mine at Jonny's Pool


View Profile WWW
August 16, 2015, 03:22:32 PM
 #13268

So the Mac binary for XT is pretty poorly put together... it's not even an app, it's just a compiled tarball with some executables in it.  I might have to rectify that.  Of course, I'll have to get by the configure file claiming I don't have BDB, even though I do - and it's in the standard location - and can compile Core without issue.

Compilation from source on Ubuntu went flawlessly.

I will probably test this out on my node... but won't get to it today.

Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow!  Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets!  No SPV cheats.  No empty blocks.
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 03:53:42 PM
 #13269

Just keep in mind that the default code base and the released binaries of XT include more than just the block size changes.  'Voting for' XT is a vote in favor of all changes, not just the block size ones.

He also released a fork of core with just the big blocks patched. that's the version I'll be running.

1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
TheRealSteve
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686

FUN > ROI


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 04:38:12 PM
 #13270

He also released a fork of core with just the big blocks patched. that's the version I'll be running.
Sort of.  There is a code base with only the big block bits, with some caveats:

[...] the program you get by compiling that branch calls itself Bitcoin Core, even though it isn't. Distributing a program that uses the brand name of that project whilst including changes the developers disagree with seems kind of like a dick move to me; and if Bitcoin Core was a trademark it'd also cause legal issues.
So that's why Bitcoin XT has a separate brand.
Now, that problem can be easily resolved by inventing yet another new name, adapting the XT rebranding patch, and then setting up that new alternative brand with its own website, etc. But it turns out to be a lot of work to do that, especially if you want builds for every platform, gitian reproducibility, code signing etc. I don't have the energy to do it all twice over. If someone else wants to though, go for it.

[- Mike Hearn]

Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 06:24:55 PM
 #13271

He also released a fork of core with just the big blocks patched. that's the version I'll be running.
Sort of.  There is a code base with only the big block bits, with some caveats:

[...] the program you get by compiling that branch calls itself Bitcoin Core, even though it isn't. Distributing a program that uses the brand name of that project whilst including changes the developers disagree with seems kind of like a dick move to me; and if Bitcoin Core was a trademark it'd also cause legal issues.
So that's why Bitcoin XT has a separate brand.
Now, that problem can be easily resolved by inventing yet another new name, adapting the XT rebranding patch, and then setting up that new alternative brand with its own website, etc. But it turns out to be a lot of work to do that, especially if you want builds for every platform, gitian reproducibility, code signing etc. I don't have the energy to do it all twice over. If someone else wants to though, go for it.

[- Mike Hearn]

Hmm. Wonder what's involved in the rebranding. I'd probably be willing to share but I hadn't thought of the rebranding and it would be Linux only (probably).

1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266



View Profile
August 16, 2015, 11:28:06 PM
 #13272

YaY! Another 2 blocks within 24 hours........ Grin
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 11:44:15 PM
 #13273

recent block got a no entry sign on it with 0.01% ?
http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

i got paid....
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
August 16, 2015, 11:48:03 PM
 #13274

YaY! Another 2 blocks within 24 hours........ Grin

Dang. Curse League of Legends.

1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938


View Profile WWW
August 17, 2015, 01:24:38 AM
 #13275

recent block got a no entry sign on it with 0.01% ?
http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

i got paid....

It's fixed, thanks for the heads up.

Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
August 17, 2015, 05:24:05 AM
 #13276

Under controlled conditions, no league of legend ping time problems. Must have been Comcast being crappy.

1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
vulgartrendkill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2015, 09:00:38 AM
 #13277

my payouts were a solid .03 to .086 per block,  now dropped to .006?  exactly same hashrate. Colour me confused....
yslyung
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1064


Mine Mine Mine


View Profile
August 17, 2015, 10:37:41 AM
 #13278

my payouts were a solid .03 to .086 per block,  now dropped to .006?  exactly same hashrate. Colour me confused....

did you stop hashing or continuously ?
vulgartrendkill
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 518



View Profile WWW
August 17, 2015, 01:31:46 PM
 #13279

my payouts were a solid .03 to .086 per block,  now dropped to .006?  exactly same hashrate. Colour me confused....

did you stop hashing or continuously ?

Not that I know of...
squidicuz
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 50


View Profile
August 17, 2015, 05:08:27 PM
 #13280

my payouts were a solid .03 to .086 per block,  now dropped to .006?  exactly same hashrate. Colour me confused....
Have you been finding less shares?

Your payout may change based on the amount of shares you find, and the variation of the pools hashrate.  If the pool hashrate goes down, the pools [share] difficulty goes down and you will earn a little more due to finding more shares.  If the pools hashrate increases, you will earn less.  The other side of this is as the pools hashrate increases, more blocks should be found; and as the pools hashrate decreases less blocks would be found. 

So your payout may change based on the pools hashrate, if your hashrate stays the same.
Pages: « 1 ... 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622 623 624 625 626 627 628 629 630 631 632 633 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 [664] 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 ... 744 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!