Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2024, 09:06:15 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 [684] 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2591631 times)
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023


Mine at Jonny's Pool


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2015, 03:32:58 PM
 #13661

To those thinking there might be a bug... it's called variance.  Take off the tinfoil hats. Tongue

p3yot33at3r, I haven't merge mined any coins for a while.  However, when I was, I only ever found 2 NMC blocks (maybe it was 3).  Back then, a block of NMC was actually worth a little bit of coin on the exchanges.  Not sure if jtoomin is merge mining, but it appears he's got the most hash, so he'd have a better chance of finding a block of NMC.  Here's from jedimstr earlier:

Regarding NMC - If you're using the Namecoin client version 3.80 or older, you won't be able to find a block.
Only the newer Namecoin Core clients are supported after BIP66 was implemented.  I stopped merge-mining NMC since they haven't had a working client for Mac (yet).
I was helping them test new Mac versions a few months back, but the devs were arguing about whether or not to continue to support bitcoin derived QT GUI or another GUI and the test clients they made for me failed at merge-mining (including the namecoind daemon client).

BIP66 started to be enforced in July.

There are beta clients available for Windows and Linux, but only from the Namecoin forums and not the main Namecoin site which only hosts the now useless legacy Namecoin clients:

Details here: https://forum.namecoin.info/viewtopic.php?f=7&t=2354

Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow!  Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets!  No SPV cheats.  No empty blocks.
1714770375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770375
Reply with quote  #2

1714770375
Report to moderator
1714770375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770375
Reply with quote  #2

1714770375
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714770375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770375
Reply with quote  #2

1714770375
Report to moderator
1714770375
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714770375

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714770375
Reply with quote  #2

1714770375
Report to moderator
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 04:06:32 PM
 #13662

Yeah, I found a few NMC blocks myself prior to the code change to the newer core client, but nothing since then, and from what I can see, neither has anyone else. I'm not saying there is definitely a problem with the core client & p2pool - but think it's worth looking into, just in case.
jonnybravo0311
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1023


Mine at Jonny's Pool


View Profile WWW
October 30, 2015, 04:39:50 PM
 #13663

Well, as long as the implementation of the auxpow code hasn't been touched in the new NMC codebase, then it should work as it previously did.  I believe Eligius is still merge mining blocks of NMC successfully.

Maybe forrestv could take a look into it to see if there's an issue.

Of course, my next question: if you are merge mining, have you found a share high enough to solve a block of NMC, but the block didn't get submitted?

Jonny's Pool - Mine with us and help us grow!  Support a pool that supports Bitcoin, not a hardware manufacturer's pockets!  No SPV cheats.  No empty blocks.
squidicuz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 30, 2015, 07:05:49 PM
 #13664

Well, as long as the implementation of the auxpow code hasn't been touched in the new NMC codebase, then it should work as it previously did.  I believe Eligius is still merge mining blocks of NMC successfully.

Maybe forrestv could take a look into it to see if there's an issue.

Of course, my next question: if you are merge mining, have you found a share high enough to solve a block of NMC, but the block didn't get submitted?
Namecoin merge mining works, but there is no sharechain so it basically solomining.  There haven't been changes to auxpow.
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 30, 2015, 07:59:50 PM
 #13665

Namecoin merge mining works

I'm not so sure, can you confirm you found a block merge mining with the core client & p2pool?

there is no sharechain so it basically solomining

Yes, I'm aware of that.

There haven't been changes to auxpow

There have been many changes to auxpow, see the github page:    https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-core/tree/auxpow

Again, I'm not saying that there is definitely a problem with merge mining NMC with p2pool, I just want to confirm that there isn't a problem with it, & until someone can report finding a block while merge mining NMC there simply isn't any proof. I find it strange that since the implementation of namecoin-core, nobody has found one. I think it's just too much of a coincidence & want to make sure.

As I said earlier:


I remember that forrestv had to make a few changes to p2pool to accommodate the new code, & am now wondering if maybe there was something we missed?

https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool/issues/270


...yet everyone assumed it was working fine then also, only it wasn't. If we missed something before, we could quite easily have missed something else, either in the NMC code or p2pool (but I suspect NMC tbh, as all my other merge mined coins are working normally).
squidicuz
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 58
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 01:06:54 AM
 #13666

Namecoin merge mining works

I'm not so sure, can you confirm you found a block merge mining with the core client & p2pool?

there is no sharechain so it basically solomining

Yes, I'm aware of that.

There haven't been changes to auxpow

There have been many changes to auxpow, see the github page:    https://github.com/namecoin/namecoin-core/tree/auxpow

Again, I'm not saying that there is definitely a problem with merge mining NMC with p2pool, I just want to confirm that there isn't a problem with it, & until someone can report finding a block while merge mining NMC there simply isn't any proof. I find it strange that since the implementation of namecoin-core, nobody has found one. I think it's just too much of a coincidence & want to make sure.

As I said earlier:


I remember that forrestv had to make a few changes to p2pool to accommodate the new code, & am now wondering if maybe there was something we missed?

https://github.com/p2pool/p2pool/issues/270


...yet everyone assumed it was working fine then also, only it wasn't. If we missed something before, we could quite easily have missed something else, either in the NMC code or p2pool (but I suspect NMC tbh, as all my other merge mined coins are working normally).

I have not found a namecoin block and would have to look deeper to see if any of my shares met the target.  I figure it is working since it says it is receiving work in the logs... Sorry I thought you meant changes to auxpow in p2pool.

Perhaps something is wrong?..
Polyatomic
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 257
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 31, 2015, 01:21:35 AM
Last edit: October 31, 2015, 01:43:56 AM by Polyatomic
 #13667

In a desperate attempt for answers, you could ask in #p2pool on Freenode.
Though the channel appears to be a remnant of a great era now.
e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 01:47:10 AM
 #13668

Who knows what we are still verifying ?

Code:
2015-11-01 04:40:47.880774  Pool: 1311TH/s Stale rate: 20.0% Expected time to block: 2.4 days
17402 shares in chain (17406 verified/17406 total)

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 01:59:52 AM
 #13669

Khm..and this is decreasing

Code:
2015-11-01 04:58:25.163393 P2Pool: 17328 shares in chain (17332 verified/17332 total)

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
November 01, 2015, 02:36:06 AM
 #13670

Who knows what we are still verifying ?

Code:
2015-11-01 04:40:47.880774  Pool: 1311TH/s Stale rate: 20.0% Expected time to block: 2.4 days
17402 shares in chain (17406 verified/17406 total)

I'm not sure I fully understand you question but a maximum of the last 8,640 shares are paid (often less) when a block is found...
e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 02:52:27 AM
 #13671

Thank you for reply.  Actually I am not expert and I thought that we should find block before (or when) all shares in chain will be verified and found.   For example 2 days ago there was this count in p2pool log file
Code:
2015-10-29 21:21:25.788644 P2Pool: 17367 shares in chain (10488 verified/17371 total)
But for present moment all shares in chain were verified according to log file, what does it mean?

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 11:24:16 AM
 #13672

Thank you for reply.  Actually I am not expert and I thought that we should find block before (or when) all shares in chain will be verified and found.   For example 2 days ago there was this count in p2pool log file
Code:
2015-10-29 21:21:25.788644 P2Pool: 17367 shares in chain (10488 verified/17371 total)
But for present moment all shares in chain were verified according to log file, what does it mean?

It means your node is still verifying shares - it can take a while if you have recently downloaded the sharechain.

Regarding NMC merge mining - I have posted about my concerns in the NMC forum:

https://forum.namecoin.info/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2371&p=15989#p15989

Hopefully domob or another dev will look into it. In the meantime, if anyone does actually find an NMC block - please report it, thanks.
xyzzy099
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 1062
Merit: 1041



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 01:00:48 PM
 #13673


Regarding NMC merge mining - I have posted about my concerns in the NMC forum:

https://forum.namecoin.info/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2371&p=15989#p15989

Hopefully domob or another dev will look into it. In the meantime, if anyone does actually find an NMC block - please report it, thanks.

I would think that whether or not anyone has actually FOUND a block is not really the question at hand.  The real question is "Do you have a best share higher than the current NMC difficulty AND that share did not mine a block?"

If the answer to that question is yes, there is a problem.

Libertarians:  Diligently plotting to take over the world and leave you alone.
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 01:25:25 PM
 #13674

Or even more accurately "Does anyone have a best share higher than the current NMC difficulty AND that share did not mine a block?"

I would say probably, yes. But without seeing everyones log it's hard to say. I'm pretty sure that in the months that p2pool users have been using the namecoin-core client for merge mining with p2pool - somebody would have found a valid share & been paid for it......I'd love to hear from that person  Wink
nicklello
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 03:43:36 PM
 #13675

Has it really been over 5 days since the last block was found ?
e46btc
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 157
Merit: 103


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 04:10:04 PM
 #13676

Looks like it was 8 and even 12 days before http://p2pool.info/

https://txid.io https://double-spending.com - Automatic BTC double-spending tool.  Legacy, Segwit and Bech32 supported.
https://dgb256.online - Digibyte mining pool , https://combine.dgb256.online - DGB mining payouts consolidation service.
https://sha256.io , https://solomining.io - DGB, BTC, BCH SOLO pools, Instant payouts, AsicBoost supported
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 05:17:56 PM
 #13677

Looks like it was 8 and even 12 days before http://p2pool.info/

Do NOT use p2pool.info - it hasn't worked properly for at least 7 months.

Use   http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 07:36:56 PM
 #13678

Or even more accurately "Does anyone have a best share higher than the current NMC difficulty AND that share did not mine a block?"

I would say probably, yes. But without seeing everyones log it's hard to say. I'm pretty sure that in the months that p2pool users have been using the namecoin-core client for merge mining with p2pool - somebody would have found a valid share & been paid for it......I'd love to hear from that person  Wink

Update on this - I just got the stats through from cassini on the NMC thread - the last NMC block mined by p2pool was exactly 3 months ago, which pretty much matches up with what I thought:

https://forum.namecoin.info/viewtopic.php?f=6&t=2371&p=15993#p15993

I think we need to look a little deeper into the namecoin-core code to try & find the cause - only I don't have a clue where to start  Cheesy
cassini
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112
Merit: 10



View Profile
November 01, 2015, 08:54:26 PM
 #13679

was exactly 3 months ago
Sorry for creating confusion with my slightly unclear post at forum.namecoin.info. Actually it was 3 months ago when the miners had the last chance to mine a NMC block using one of the old Namecoin clients. However, there was a p2pool-mined NMC block six weeks ago, and another one five weeks ago. Both using the new Namecoin Core client.

2015-08-02 23:21 UTC, NMC block 242312, mined by ghash.io. This was the last time an old NMC client was able to sucessfully mine a non-orphaned block.
2015-10-13 21:17 UTC, NMC block 253122, mined by p2pool miner 1GqdAgC1zmzLFMg3XyYctSECWUjkbT7Nv9 using the new Namecoin Core client
2015-10-19 05:10 UTC, NMC block 253874, mined by p2pool miner 14N4xNSDtNYatfCgHhyRaAhdZtaczUBnAa using the new Namecoin Core client
nicklello
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 01, 2015, 09:00:51 PM
 #13680

Looks like it was 8 and even 12 days before http://p2pool.info/

Do NOT use p2pool.info - it hasn't worked properly for at least 7 months.

Use   http://minefast.coincadence.com/p2pool-stats.php

WOW! Really 9 days without a block !

Is this due to lack of hashpower in the pool vs others (ie: everyone else is beating us to it) or simply really really bad luck..
Pages: « 1 ... 634 635 636 637 638 639 640 641 642 643 644 645 646 647 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 [684] 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!