Bitcoin Forum
March 29, 2024, 10:07:39 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 26.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 [716] 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 ... 814 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [1500 TH] p2pool: Decentralized, DoS-resistant, Hop-Proof pool  (Read 2591584 times)
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 12, 2016, 10:09:26 PM
 #14301

Maybe toomin was loading up classic on his nodes...........
Bitcoin addresses contain a checksum, so it is very unlikely that mistyping an address will cause you to lose money.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1711706859
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1711706859

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1711706859
Reply with quote  #2

1711706859
Report to moderator
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 2222


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 13, 2016, 05:03:48 AM
 #14302

Where can I download the source for the latest version of Bitcoind that might work? 0.11.2 is useless.
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 10:01:00 AM
 #14303

Where can I download the source for the latest version of Bitcoind that might work? 0.11.2 is useless.

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 02:34:18 PM
 #14304

https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.12.0/
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 2222


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 13, 2016, 05:44:40 PM
Last edit: February 13, 2016, 06:02:29 PM by lightfoot
 #14305

Sweet. Compiled up and firing up p2pool to see if it's stable. The older clients resulted in lots of downtime and very slow getblocktemplates (30 seconds, etc).

Edit: Drat, still getting "Warning: LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for 2.6 minutes! Check that it isn't frozen or dead!" messages even with bitcoin-cli getinfo being fine and only 16 network connections.


Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 06:40:58 PM
 #14306

use XT with mempool limiter instead ... or rise relay fees on normal Core release.
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
February 13, 2016, 06:41:30 PM
 #14307

Sweet. Compiled up and firing up p2pool to see if it's stable. The older clients resulted in lots of downtime and very slow getblocktemplates (30 seconds, etc).

Edit: Drat, still getting "Warning: LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for 2.6 minutes! Check that it isn't frozen or dead!" messages even with bitcoin-cli getinfo being fine and only 16 network connections.




12 has proven to be much more efficient than previous versions, perhaps it's catching up?
notbatman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038



View Profile
February 13, 2016, 07:56:18 PM
 #14308

Running a full node takes practice these days. One receives some amount of "resistance" taken for granted.
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 2222


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 13, 2016, 11:27:02 PM
 #14309

Running a full node takes practice these days. One receives some amount of "resistance" taken for granted.
Indeed. Totally rebuilt p2pool from scratch, It might be running, my stale rate is 50% after a few hours. Will give it a day.
nonnakip
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 633
Merit: 591



View Profile
February 14, 2016, 02:19:35 AM
 #14310

"Expected" by OgNasty, was no doubt calculated based on accepted shares, which is how every pool calculates it, and makes p2pool look better than it really is since accepted is so low on p2pool due to rejected being 10 times a normal pool.

NastyPoP "expected" is calculated based on 100% perfect mathematical mining environment. Just as any correct miner calculator. It has nothing to do with P2Pool. If you took a minute to do that calculation you would see that it matches the NastyPoP "expected" values.

I do not sugar coat any NastyPoP (or P2Pool) numbers.
kano
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4452
Merit: 1798


Linux since 1997 RedHat 4


View Profile
February 14, 2016, 03:04:32 AM
 #14311

"Expected" by OgNasty, was no doubt calculated based on accepted shares, which is how every pool calculates it, and makes p2pool look better than it really is since accepted is so low on p2pool due to rejected being 10 times a normal pool.

NastyPoP "expected" is calculated based on 100% perfect mathematical mining environment. Just as any correct miner calculator. It has nothing to do with P2Pool. If you took a minute to do that calculation you would see that it matches the NastyPoP "expected" values.

I do not sugar coat any NastyPoP (or P2Pool) numbers.
Read what I said again.
Yes you do.

... or did you just ignore reading my post explaining it?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg13846873#msg13846873

Pool: https://kano.is - low 0.5% fee PPLNS 3 Days - Most reliable Solo with ONLY 0.5% fee   Bitcointalk thread: Forum
Discord support invite at https://kano.is/ Majority developer of the ckpool code - k for kano
The ONLY active original developer of cgminer. Original master git: https://github.com/kanoi/cgminer
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 14, 2016, 10:43:28 AM
Last edit: February 14, 2016, 12:36:01 PM by p3yot33at3r
 #14312

Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!  Smiley

Hopefully there will be a few more before the halving, when I'll be switching off my miners  Sad

Interesting factoid: The last p2pool block was the first one found by a Bitcoinclassic node.......
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
February 14, 2016, 02:29:20 PM
 #14313

Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!



+1

A lot of rented hash power just pointed at P2Pool to support Classic
lightfoot
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3080
Merit: 2222


I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)


View Profile
February 14, 2016, 02:38:55 PM
 #14314

Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!  Smiley

Hopefully there will be a few more before the halving, when I'll be switching off my miners  Sad

Interesting factoid: The last p2pool block was the first one found by a Bitcoinclassic node.......
It's because I came back of course. Anyway it's looking like it settled down to 94% or so with a .3s latency that seems to be constant.

Nice!
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
February 15, 2016, 11:40:19 AM
 #14315

0.12.0 RC5 is ready : https://bitcoin.org/bin/bitcoin-core-0.12.0/test/
wariner
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1250
Merit: 1004


pool.sexy


View Profile
February 16, 2016, 10:28:05 AM
 #14316

you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core?

or need change something on this line?

 p2pool/p2pool/work.py

Code:
372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4),

Pool.sexy - Pool ETH-ETC-EXP-UBQ-ZEC-DBIX..and more low fee Discussion

my BTC: 1KiMpRAWscBvhRgLs8jDnqrZEKJzt3Ypfi
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 16, 2016, 12:18:47 PM
 #14317

As far as I'm aware it's a straight swap - no changes needed. I tried the classic client for a few hours, but the latency was higher & a bit erratic, so I reverted back to core again.
windpath
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027


View Profile WWW
February 16, 2016, 03:37:57 PM
 #14318

you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core?

or need change something on this line?

 p2pool/p2pool/work.py

Code:
372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4),

You need to change the version in the line you quoted (372 in work.py) to:

Code:
version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 0x30000000),

or

Code:
version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 805306368),

Both work.
p3yot33at3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 250



View Profile
February 16, 2016, 06:34:02 PM
 #14319

Ah, sorry. I misunderstood your question...... Tongue
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1011



View Profile
February 17, 2016, 12:28:08 AM
 #14320

looking good ... (refreshed local blockchain + refreshed shares of P2Pool)

Pages: « 1 ... 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 [716] 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 755 756 757 758 759 760 761 762 763 764 765 766 ... 814 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!