p3yot33at3r
|
|
February 12, 2016, 10:09:26 PM |
|
Maybe toomin was loading up classic on his nodes...........
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
February 13, 2016, 05:03:48 AM |
|
Where can I download the source for the latest version of Bitcoind that might work? 0.11.2 is useless.
|
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
February 13, 2016, 02:34:18 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
February 13, 2016, 05:44:40 PM Last edit: February 13, 2016, 06:02:29 PM by lightfoot |
|
Sweet. Compiled up and firing up p2pool to see if it's stable. The older clients resulted in lots of downtime and very slow getblocktemplates (30 seconds, etc).
Edit: Drat, still getting "Warning: LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for 2.6 minutes! Check that it isn't frozen or dead!" messages even with bitcoin-cli getinfo being fine and only 16 network connections.
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
February 13, 2016, 06:40:58 PM |
|
use XT with mempool limiter instead ... or rise relay fees on normal Core release.
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
February 13, 2016, 06:41:30 PM |
|
Sweet. Compiled up and firing up p2pool to see if it's stable. The older clients resulted in lots of downtime and very slow getblocktemplates (30 seconds, etc).
Edit: Drat, still getting "Warning: LOST CONTACT WITH BITCOIND for 2.6 minutes! Check that it isn't frozen or dead!" messages even with bitcoin-cli getinfo being fine and only 16 network connections.
12 has proven to be much more efficient than previous versions, perhaps it's catching up?
|
|
|
|
notbatman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
|
|
February 13, 2016, 07:56:18 PM |
|
Running a full node takes practice these days. One receives some amount of "resistance" taken for granted.
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
February 13, 2016, 11:27:02 PM |
|
Running a full node takes practice these days. One receives some amount of "resistance" taken for granted.
Indeed. Totally rebuilt p2pool from scratch, It might be running, my stale rate is 50% after a few hours. Will give it a day.
|
|
|
|
nonnakip
|
|
February 14, 2016, 02:19:35 AM |
|
"Expected" by OgNasty, was no doubt calculated based on accepted shares, which is how every pool calculates it, and makes p2pool look better than it really is since accepted is so low on p2pool due to rejected being 10 times a normal pool.
NastyPoP "expected" is calculated based on 100% perfect mathematical mining environment. Just as any correct miner calculator. It has nothing to do with P2Pool. If you took a minute to do that calculation you would see that it matches the NastyPoP "expected" values. I do not sugar coat any NastyPoP (or P2Pool) numbers.
|
|
|
|
kano
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4592
Merit: 1851
Linux since 1997 RedHat 4
|
|
February 14, 2016, 03:04:32 AM |
|
"Expected" by OgNasty, was no doubt calculated based on accepted shares, which is how every pool calculates it, and makes p2pool look better than it really is since accepted is so low on p2pool due to rejected being 10 times a normal pool.
NastyPoP "expected" is calculated based on 100% perfect mathematical mining environment. Just as any correct miner calculator. It has nothing to do with P2Pool. If you took a minute to do that calculation you would see that it matches the NastyPoP "expected" values. I do not sugar coat any NastyPoP (or P2Pool) numbers. Read what I said again. Yes you do. ... or did you just ignore reading my post explaining it? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=18313.msg13846873#msg13846873
|
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
|
February 14, 2016, 10:43:28 AM Last edit: February 14, 2016, 12:36:01 PM by p3yot33at3r |
|
Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK! Hopefully there will be a few more before the halving, when I'll be switching off my miners Interesting factoid: The last p2pool block was the first one found by a Bitcoinclassic node.......
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
February 14, 2016, 02:29:20 PM |
|
Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK!
+1 A lot of rented hash power just pointed at P2Pool to support Classic
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 2258
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
February 14, 2016, 02:38:55 PM |
|
Nice to wake up to a long overdue BLOCK! Hopefully there will be a few more before the halving, when I'll be switching off my miners Interesting factoid: The last p2pool block was the first one found by a Bitcoinclassic node....... It's because I came back of course. Anyway it's looking like it settled down to 94% or so with a .3s latency that seems to be constant. Nice!
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
February 15, 2016, 11:40:19 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
wariner
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1250
Merit: 1004
pool.sexy
|
|
February 16, 2016, 10:28:05 AM |
|
you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core? or need change something on this line? p2pool/p2pool/work.py 372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4),
|
Pool.sexy - Pool ETH-ETC-EXP-UBQ-ZEC-DBIX..and more low fee Discussionmy BTC: 1KiMpRAWscBvhRgLs8jDnqrZEKJzt3Ypfi
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
|
February 16, 2016, 12:18:47 PM |
|
As far as I'm aware it's a straight swap - no changes needed. I tried the classic client for a few hours, but the latency was higher & a bit erratic, so I reverted back to core again.
|
|
|
|
windpath
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1258
Merit: 1027
|
|
February 16, 2016, 03:37:57 PM |
|
you confirm me that for bitcoin classic it's enough use bitcoin classic instead of bitcoin core? or need change something on this line? p2pool/p2pool/work.py 372 version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 4), You need to change the version in the line you quoted (372 in work.py) to: version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 0x30000000), or version=min(self.current_work.value['version'], 805306368), Both work.
|
|
|
|
p3yot33at3r
|
|
February 16, 2016, 06:34:02 PM |
|
Ah, sorry. I misunderstood your question......
|
|
|
|
Meuh6879
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012
|
|
February 17, 2016, 12:28:08 AM |
|
looking good ... (refreshed local blockchain + refreshed shares of P2Pool)
|
|
|
|
|