dstm (OP)
|
|
August 28, 2017, 04:42:28 PM |
|
thx,hope you success! And if your miner if as the same speed with ewbf(more is better) I will turn to your and pay for it! keep going,man
if you success, you will get rich because so many miner pay for your devfee.
Thx Has someone done benchmarks on their hardware? New numbers would be very helpful.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
August 28, 2017, 08:32:43 PM |
|
OP bump
|
|
|
|
halker2010
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 532
Merit: 250
The harder your life is the more meaning it has.
|
|
August 28, 2017, 08:43:01 PM |
|
Interesting speeds the moments it hits windows i will put my pascal rigs on it.
|
|
|
|
Cereberus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 28, 2017, 08:44:10 PM |
|
I am mining Zcash with my Nvidia GTX 1060, 4x of them so I too am waiting for a Windows version. So far I am happy with EBWF Cuda Miner but in a world of competition between programmers the one to win surely will be the consumer/miner so I wish you the best and really hope you can do better than the actual miners, Claymore and EBWF.
|
|
|
|
yunihuni
Member
Offline
Activity: 70
Merit: 10
|
|
August 28, 2017, 08:44:35 PM |
|
If you release windows version, you will get a lot benchmarks and feedbacks I'm ready with 6x1080
|
|
|
|
Vokas123
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 73
Merit: 0
|
|
August 28, 2017, 10:57:50 PM |
|
+1 for Windows version Nvidia owners are too rich to bother setting up Linux although it's probably better than Windows.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
August 29, 2017, 06:57:27 AM |
|
Version 0.2, 1080 Ti, 220W: # GPU0 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU0 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU1 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU1 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU2 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU2 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU3 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU3 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU4 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 > GPU0 Sol/s: 711.4 Avg: 711.4 I/s: 379.6 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ # GPU4 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU5 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 GPU1 Sol/s: 732.6 Avg: 732.6 I/s: 392.1 Shares/s: 0.400 ++++ # GPU5 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... > GPU2 Sol/s: 727.4 Avg: 727.4 I/s: 392.6 Shares/s: 0.000 > GPU3 Sol/s: 726.3 Avg: 726.3 I/s: 383.7 Shares/s: 0.000 GPU0 Sol/s: 679.3 Avg: 695.3 I/s: 372.9 Shares/s: 0.100 GPU4 Sol/s: 721.7 Avg: 721.7 I/s: 382.5 Shares/s: 0.100 + GPU1 Sol/s: 727.1 Avg: 729.9 I/s: 385.2 Shares/s: 0.250 + > GPU5 Sol/s: 725.6 Avg: 725.6 I/s: 387.8 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ ==== Sol/s: 4307.3 Avg: 4326.1 I/s: 2304.6 Shares/s: 0.200 GPU2 Sol/s: 721.3 Avg: 724.4 I/s: 385.9 Shares/s: 0.050 + GPU3 Sol/s: 702.3 Avg: 714.3 I/s: 376.7 Shares/s: 0.000 GPU0 Sol/s: 720.7 Avg: 703.8 I/s: 371.9 Shares/s: 0.067 GPU4 Sol/s: 688.0 Avg: 704.9 I/s: 376.1 Shares/s: 0.050 GPU1 Sol/s: 730.8 Avg: 730.2 I/s: 384.6 Shares/s: 0.167 GPU5 Sol/s: 707.3 Avg: 716.4 I/s: 381.2 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ ==== Sol/s: 4270.4 Avg: 4293.9 I/s: 2276.5 Shares/s: 0.200 GPU2 Sol/s: 714.9 Avg: 721.2 I/s: 385.7 Shares/s: 0.033 GPU3 Sol/s: 712.9 Avg: 713.8 I/s: 375.8 Shares/s: 0.000 GPU0 Sol/s: 685.4 Avg: 699.2 I/s: 370.6 Shares/s: 0.050 GPU4 Sol/s: 708.3 Avg: 706.0 I/s: 375.0 Shares/s: 0.033 GPU1 Sol/s: 730.1 Avg: 730.1 I/s: 384.4 Shares/s: 0.125 GPU5 Sol/s: 705.5 Avg: 712.8 I/s: 380.1 Shares/s: 0.133 ==== Sol/s: 4257.0 Avg: 4283.1 I/s: 2271.7 Shares/s: 0.133 GPU2 Sol/s: 714.6 Avg: 719.5 I/s: 385.0 Shares/s: 0.050 + GPU3 Sol/s: 702.6 Avg: 711.0 I/s: 375.1 Shares/s: 0.000 GPU0 Sol/s: 690.1 Avg: 697.4 I/s: 370.8 Shares/s: 0.040 GPU4 Sol/s: 705.2 Avg: 705.8 I/s: 374.4 Shares/s: 0.075 ++ GPU1 Sol/s: 715.5 Avg: 727.2 I/s: 383.6 Shares/s: 0.140 ++ GPU5 Sol/s: 715.4 Avg: 713.4 I/s: 379.6 Shares/s: 0.100 ==== Sol/s: 4243.3 Avg: 4274.4 I/s: 2268.5 Shares/s: 0.100 GPU2 Sol/s: 718.4 Avg: 719.3 I/s: 384.7 Shares/s: 0.060 + GPU3 Sol/s: 695.9 Avg: 708.0 I/s: 374.7 Shares/s: 0.020 + GPU0 Sol/s: 699.7 Avg: 697.8 I/s: 370.0 Shares/s: 0.050 + GPU4 Sol/s: 698.7 Avg: 704.4 I/s: 373.8 Shares/s: 0.060 GPU1 Sol/s: 716.2 Avg: 725.4 I/s: 383.6 Shares/s: 0.117 GPU5 Sol/s: 716.0 Avg: 713.9 I/s: 379.0 Shares/s: 0.080 ==== Sol/s: 4244.9 Avg: 4268.7 I/s: 2265.8 Shares/s: 0.080 GPU2 Sol/s: 717.8 Avg: 719.1 I/s: 384.7 Shares/s: 0.067 + GPU3 Sol/s: 696.0 Avg: 706.0 I/s: 374.2 Shares/s: 0.017 GPU0 Sol/s: 702.8 Avg: 698.5 I/s: 369.7 Shares/s: 0.043 GPU4 Sol/s: 687.8 Avg: 701.6 I/s: 374.1 Shares/s: 0.067 + GPU1 Sol/s: 718.9 Avg: 724.5 I/s: 383.0 Shares/s: 0.100 GPU5 Sol/s: 715.5 Avg: 714.2 I/s: 379.2 Shares/s: 0.117 +++ ==== Sol/s: 4238.7 Avg: 4263.8 I/s: 2264.9 Shares/s: 0.117 GPU2 Sol/s: 719.4 Avg: 719.1 I/s: 384.5 Shares/s: 0.071 + GPU3 Sol/s: 700.2 Avg: 705.2 I/s: 374.2 Shares/s: 0.029 + GPU0 Sol/s: 692.3 Avg: 697.7 I/s: 369.7 Shares/s: 0.038 GPU4 Sol/s: 685.4 Avg: 699.3 I/s: 373.5 Shares/s: 0.071 + GPU1 Sol/s: 707.8 Avg: 722.4 I/s: 383.3 Shares/s: 0.100 + GPU5 Sol/s: 715.7 Avg: 714.4 I/s: 378.6 Shares/s: 0.100 ==== Sol/s: 4220.8 Avg: 4258.0 I/s: 2263.7 Shares/s: 0.100 GPU2 Sol/s: 726.2 Avg: 720.0 I/s: 384.3 Shares/s: 0.075 + GPU3 Sol/s: 698.9 Avg: 704.4 I/s: 374.2 Shares/s: 0.087 +++++ GPU0 Sol/s: 693.9 Avg: 697.3 I/s: 369.4 Shares/s: 0.056 ++ GPU4 Sol/s: 691.2 Avg: 698.3 I/s: 373.3 Shares/s: 0.075 + GPU1 Sol/s: 713.4 Avg: 721.4 I/s: 383.0 Shares/s: 0.100 + GPU5 Sol/s: 724.4 Avg: 715.7 I/s: 378.5 Shares/s: 0.100 + ==== Sol/s: 4248.0 Avg: 4257.0 I/s: 2262.6 Shares/s: 0.10
|
|
|
|
Nokia555
|
|
August 29, 2017, 07:44:24 AM |
|
If you get Windows version ready, let me know, i can list it for EthControl @ https://EthMonitoring.com also API support would be appreciated, but can manage without it also.
|
|
|
|
umine
|
|
August 29, 2017, 09:23:32 AM |
|
I don't see any positive difference with EWBF 0.3.4b There is actual hashrate for 1080Ti, 1080, 1070 on EWBF and it more efficient:
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
August 29, 2017, 11:50:03 AM |
|
Thx NameTaken, I'm really happy to have independent benchmarks. Concerning the comparison umine. You have to compare on the same hardware / same setup to have solid numbers. If you take a look at NameTaken's numbers you'll see that even on the same rig the gpus perform differently. GPU2 and GPU5 average at about 720 Sol/s while GPU0 and GPU4 average at about 698 Sol/s. However, this doesn't mean that your claim is wrong.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
August 30, 2017, 10:59:09 PM |
|
New Version 0.2.1 Performance improvements: about 4% on Maxwell about 1% on Pascal
|
|
|
|
djn053
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 36
Merit: 0
|
|
August 31, 2017, 05:47:29 AM |
|
good news. try to write a windows64 version,and you will get much more miner test.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
August 31, 2017, 07:34:56 AM Last edit: August 31, 2017, 09:36:27 AM by NameTaken |
|
Version 0.2.1, 1080 Ti, 220W: # GPU0 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU0 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU1 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU1 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU2 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU2 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU3 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU3 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU4 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU4 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... # GPU5 connected to: us1-zcash.flypool.org:3333 # GPU5 server set difficulty to: 00083126e978d4fdf3b645a1... GPU0 Sol/s: 705.4 Avg: 705.4 I/s: 374.3 Shares/s: 0.100 + GPU1 Sol/s: 727.6 Avg: 727.6 I/s: 388.7 Shares/s: 0.300 +++ GPU2 Sol/s: 728.6 Avg: 728.6 I/s: 390.1 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ GPU3 Sol/s: 701.2 Avg: 701.2 I/s: 380.9 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ GPU4 Sol/s: 705.2 Avg: 705.2 I/s: 380.0 Shares/s: 0.100 + GPU5 Sol/s: 722.8 Avg: 722.8 I/s: 384.0 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ ==== Sol/s: 4290.8 Avg: 4290.8 I/s: 2298.0 Shares/s: 0.200 GPU0 Sol/s: 704.7 Avg: 705.0 I/s: 372.5 Shares/s: 0.200 +++ GPU1 Sol/s: 722.1 Avg: 724.8 I/s: 384.8 Shares/s: 0.200 + GPU2 Sol/s: 709.6 Avg: 719.1 I/s: 387.0 Shares/s: 0.250 +++ GPU3 Sol/s: 708.2 Avg: 704.7 I/s: 377.6 Shares/s: 0.150 + GPU4 Sol/s: 712.7 Avg: 709.0 I/s: 377.6 Shares/s: 0.250 ++++ GPU5 Sol/s: 708.5 Avg: 715.7 I/s: 380.9 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ ==== Sol/s: 4265.8 Avg: 4278.3 I/s: 2280.4 Shares/s: 0.200 GPU0 Sol/s: 708.5 Avg: 706.2 I/s: 371.9 Shares/s: 0.300 +++++ GPU1 Sol/s: 720.6 Avg: 723.4 I/s: 385.3 Shares/s: 0.200 ++ GPU2 Sol/s: 730.9 Avg: 723.0 I/s: 386.6 Shares/s: 0.267 +++ GPU3 Sol/s: 702.7 Avg: 704.0 I/s: 377.4 Shares/s: 0.100 GPU4 Sol/s: 707.6 Avg: 708.5 I/s: 377.3 Shares/s: 0.267 +++ GPU5 Sol/s: 715.4 Avg: 715.6 I/s: 380.1 Shares/s: 0.167 + ==== Sol/s: 4285.8 Avg: 4280.8 I/s: 2278.5 Shares/s: 0.167 > GPU0 Sol/s: 684.6 Avg: 700.8 I/s: 371.4 Shares/s: 0.275 ++ > GPU1 Sol/s: 717.1 Avg: 721.9 I/s: 385.2 Shares/s: 0.225 +++ > GPU2 Sol/s: 715.1 Avg: 721.0 I/s: 386.1 Shares/s: 0.325 +++++ > GPU3 Sol/s: 694.8 Avg: 701.7 I/s: 377.5 Shares/s: 0.100 + > GPU4 Sol/s: 699.1 Avg: 706.2 I/s: 376.1 Shares/s: 0.200 > GPU5 Sol/s: 709.1 Avg: 714.0 I/s: 380.2 Shares/s: 0.150 + ==== Sol/s: 4219.8 Avg: 4265.5 I/s: 2276.5 Shares/s: 0.150 GPU0 Sol/s: 692.9 Avg: 699.2 I/s: 371.7 Shares/s: 0.280 +++ GPU1 Sol/s: 720.2 Avg: 721.5 I/s: 385.2 Shares/s: 0.180 GPU2 Sol/s: 728.5 Avg: 722.5 I/s: 387.1 Shares/s: 0.300 ++ GPU3 Sol/s: 704.8 Avg: 702.3 I/s: 377.3 Shares/s: 0.100 + GPU4 Sol/s: 701.7 Avg: 705.3 I/s: 375.0 Shares/s: 0.220 +++ GPU5 Sol/s: 706.2 Avg: 712.4 I/s: 380.1 Shares/s: 0.140 + ==== Sol/s: 4254.3 Avg: 4263.3 I/s: 2276.4 Shares/s: 0.140 GPU0 Sol/s: 705.3 Avg: 700.2 I/s: 370.5 Shares/s: 0.267 ++ GPU1 Sol/s: 706.7 Avg: 719.1 I/s: 383.9 Shares/s: 0.200 +++ GPU2 Sol/s: 725.9 Avg: 723.1 I/s: 385.6 Shares/s: 0.317 ++++ GPU3 Sol/s: 712.2 Avg: 704.0 I/s: 376.9 Shares/s: 0.117 ++ GPU4 Sol/s: 701.7 Avg: 704.7 I/s: 375.9 Shares/s: 0.200 + GPU5 Sol/s: 708.9 Avg: 711.8 I/s: 379.7 Shares/s: 0.150 ++
When running under systemd, it's not outputting to journald correctly so I had to append ExecStart=/usr/bin/stdbuf -oL
One suggestion I would make is have the link curl or wgetable from the CLI.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
August 31, 2017, 09:14:49 AM |
|
When running under systemd, it's not outputting to journald correctly so I had to append ExecStart=/usr/bin/stdbuf -oL
Thx, I'm trying to avoid any locking/synchronisation where possible, so I'm currently relying on line buffered output. It's on my todo list now. One suggestion I would make so have the link curl or wgetable from the CLI.
Javascript everywhere... I'm not aware about a filehoster that is not using javascript, any suggstions?
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
August 31, 2017, 09:22:43 AM |
|
When running under systemd, it's not outputting to journald correctly so I had to append ExecStart=/usr/bin/stdbuf -oL
Thx, I'm trying to avoid any locking/synchronisation where possible, so I'm currently relying on line buffered output. It's on my todo list now. One suggestion I would make so have the link curl or wgetable from the CLI.
Javascript everywhere... I'm not aware about a filehoster that is not using javascript, any suggstions? Github is probably the easiest.
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
August 31, 2017, 05:10:14 PM |
|
I'm thinking about useful features for miners to come next. If you have ideas pls. post them here. So far I'm thinking to implement: - temperature controller, you can set a temperature, the miner will adjust it's performance to hold the temperature constant. - support for encrypted connection to pools
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
August 31, 2017, 05:45:12 PM |
|
I'm thinking about useful features for miners to come next. If you have ideas pls. post them here. So far I'm thinking to implement: - temperature controller, you can set a temperature, the miner will adjust it's performance to hold the temperature constant. - support for encrypted connection to pools
Perhaps a benchmark mode and API. I noticed the miner doesn't say when it's mining for devfee so I'm assuming it does so in the background?
|
|
|
|
dstm (OP)
|
|
August 31, 2017, 06:07:54 PM |
|
I'm thinking about useful features for miners to come next. If you have ideas pls. post them here. So far I'm thinking to implement: - temperature controller, you can set a temperature, the miner will adjust it's performance to hold the temperature constant. - support for encrypted connection to pools
Perhaps a benchmark mode and API. I noticed the miner doesn't say when it's mining for devfee so I'm assuming it does so in the background? Benchmark mode is a good idea. What do u mean by API? Devfee is implemented like this. The Miner calculates solutions in rounds. Every 50th round it switches and calculates devfee-solutions so you have exactly 2% devfee. I don't print any information about defvee-shares, since I didn't want to clutter the main UI. If it's desired I will output detailed information about found defvee-shares.
|
|
|
|
NameTaken
|
|
August 31, 2017, 06:19:14 PM |
|
I'm thinking about useful features for miners to come next. If you have ideas pls. post them here. So far I'm thinking to implement: - temperature controller, you can set a temperature, the miner will adjust it's performance to hold the temperature constant. - support for encrypted connection to pools
Perhaps a benchmark mode and API. I noticed the miner doesn't say when it's mining for devfee so I'm assuming it does so in the background? Benchmark mode is a good idea. What do u mean by API? Devfee is implemented like this. The Miner calculates solutions in rounds. Every 50th round it switches and calculates devfee-solutions so you have exactly 2% devfee. I don't print any information about defvee-shares, since I didn't want to clutter the main UI. If it's desired I will output detailed information about found defvee-shares. API as in a TCP socket where external program can monitor and/or control the miner. I think having more transparency is good.
|
|
|
|
abudfv2008
|
|
August 31, 2017, 08:44:26 PM |
|
Hey dstm, I would also be interested in helping test on Windows, I have a 1080 and a 1080 Ti that I use for Zcash: These settings are used in the screenshot: 1080 TiBase Clock Offset +150 Memory Clock Offset +0 (P0 state) Power and Temperature Target 94% (~235W) 1080Base Clock Offset +150 Memory Clock Offset +0 (P0 state) Power and Temperature Target 76% (~180W) --ypsi How you enable P0 state?
|
|
|
|
|