Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2018, 06:32:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 171 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 219709 times)
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 05:03:06 AM
 #81

Will the hashrate be able to be increased in the future or is this about the best it's going to get?
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542609141
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542609141

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542609141
Reply with quote  #2

1542609141
Report to moderator
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 09:34:24 AM
 #82

Will the hashrate be able to be increased in the future or is this about the best it's going to get?


It's pretty well optimized currently. However the hardware is still not on it's theoretical limits. I have some more ideas I want to test later. I don't have access to testing hardware this week, I hope to be able to buy some GPUs soon, this should improve the development.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 10:06:23 AM
 #83

Since I've read it multiple time now.... Smiley There seems to be a confusion with terms here. Some people are speaking about 'hashrate'. In the case of equihash - we are solving the generalized birthday problem, and produce solutions to it. So it's more accurate to speak about the solutionrate, we are not producing any hashes, this is why it's abbreviated as 'Sol/s' int the output. In case it's interesting for someone Smiley
car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 11:40:42 AM
 #84

I run the latest version several minutes on GTX 1080ti, cannot say any hashrate improvement from EWBF_'s.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 11:49:59 AM
 #85

I run the latest version several minutes on GTX 1080ti, cannot say any hashrate improvement from EWBF_'s.

It performs slightly faster on my systmes, however there might be differences on other setups. Could you please provide some numbers how it compares on your system, it would be very helpful.
car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 01:25:21 PM
 #86

I run the latest version several minutes on GTX 1080ti, cannot say any hashrate improvement from EWBF_'s.

It performs slightly faster on my systmes, however there might be differences on other setups. Could you please provide some numbers how it compares on your system, it would be very helpful.

specs:
B85 mobo
G1840
4G ram
3*gtx 1080 ti cc+120 mc-1000
1*gtx 1080 cc+150 mc -1000
ubuntu 16.04 x64
cuda 8.0
driver: 384.59

EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
   GPU0 Sol/s: 433.7  Avg: 444.1  I/s: 237.4  Shares/s: 0.050  +
   GPU1 Sol/s: 668.1  Avg: 676.4  I/s: 362.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   GPU2 Sol/s: 689.6  Avg: 686.5  I/s: 364.5  Shares/s: 0.100
   GPU3 Sol/s: 677.5  Avg: 681.8  I/s: 362.2  Shares/s: 0.150  +++
   ==== Sol/s: 2468.9 Avg: 2488.7 I/s: 1326.5 Shares/s: 0.150
   GPU0 Sol/s: 445.0  Avg: 444.4  I/s: 237.3  Shares/s: 0.033
   GPU1 Sol/s: 670.9  Avg: 674.6  I/s: 361.3  Shares/s: 0.067  ++
   GPU2 Sol/s: 680.8  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 363.7  Shares/s: 0.100  +
   GPU3 Sol/s: 662.1  Avg: 675.2  I/s: 361.6  Shares/s: 0.133  +
   ==== Sol/s: 2458.8 Avg: 2478.7 I/s: 1323.8 Shares/s: 0.133


car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 01:27:43 PM
 #87

almost the same hashrate, if you can decrease dev fee to 1%, I'd like to use yours Grin
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 02:12:57 PM
 #88

almost the same hashrate, if you can decrease dev fee to 1%, I'd like to use yours Grin

How about improving the performance? I have some new ideas, however I don't have access to testing hardware this week, so I'll see how they perform next week.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                               
I was thinking about reducing the dev fee for people that are helping development, providing feedback etc. - still not sure about it.
xio13
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 35
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 02:29:30 PM
 #89



EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
 

2492 Sol/s vs 2508.5    .. hahah  . is no difference Smiley)   dstm's ZCash Cuda miner   is the fastest zcash miner!

waiting windows verson, and fee 1% (today 2%)
Juniormkl
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 76
Merit: 0


View Profile WWW
September 05, 2017, 02:43:04 PM
 #90

Looks promising, waiting for windows version, gj dude!
Xianantung
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 02:43:53 PM
 #91



EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
 

2492 Sol/s vs 2508.5    .. hahah  . is no difference Smiley)   dstm's ZCash Cuda miner   is the fastest zcash miner!

waiting windows verson, and fee 1% (today 2%)

That is just 1% difference. So it is comparable.
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 02:48:46 PM
 #92

Since I've read it multiple time now.... Smiley There seems to be a confusion with terms here. Some people are speaking about 'hashrate'. In the case of equihash - we are solving the generalized birthday problem, and produce solutions to it. So it's more accurate to speak about the solutionrate, we are not producing any hashes, this is why it's abbreviated as 'Sol/s' int the output. In case it's interesting for someone Smiley
I know the technical term is solutions but the difference does not matter for all intents and purposes to the miner and hashrate has become a generalized term for measurement regardless of algorithmic differences.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 02:51:50 PM
 #93


2492 Sol/s vs 2508.5    .. hahah  . is no difference Smiley)   dstm's ZCash Cuda miner   is the fastest zcash miner!

waiting windows verson, and fee 1% (today 2%)

You can't conclude that from these numbers. The solution rate is subjected to probability, it's inherent to equihash. You have to compare a lot more number and average them to have a more robust statement, this is why I'm computing an average in my output, so you can make better judgements how e.g. over/underclocking on your system affects the performance.
car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 03:27:54 PM
 #94

almost the same hashrate, if you can decrease dev fee to 1%, I'd like to use yours Grin

How about improving the performance? I have some new ideas, however I don't have access to testing hardware this week, so I'll see how they perform next week.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                               
I was thinking about reducing the dev fee for people that are helping development, providing feedback etc. - still not sure about it.

i can give you the ip address and password of my rig to test if you need, 3 1080ti and 1 1080.
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 03:36:14 PM
 #95

almost the same hashrate, if you can decrease dev fee to 1%, I'd like to use yours Grin

How about improving the performance? I have some new ideas, however I don't have access to testing hardware this week, so I'll see how they perform next week.                                                                                               
                                                                                                                               
I was thinking about reducing the dev fee for people that are helping development, providing feedback etc. - still not sure about it.

i can give you the ip address and password of my rig to test if you need, 3 1080ti and 1 1080.
https://www.teleconsole.com/
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/06/wormhole-fast-secure-way-send-files-users-cli
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 03:51:07 PM
 #96

Thx for the help, however all I need is an ssh terminal. I don't think it's worth the time to setup a new dev-environment. I want to finish some small things on the cpu-side this week, like temperature reporting, a temperature-controller, logfiles, some tesing with different pools.
abudfv2008
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 105


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 04:01:09 PM
 #97

3*gtx 1080 ti cc+120 mc-1000
1*gtx 1080 cc+150 mc -1000
ubuntu 16.04 x64
cuda 8.0
driver: 384.59

EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
Actually worst results I've ever seen.
1080 - usually gives 550-570
1080 - 730+
Even 1070 makes 460-470 Sol/s
car1999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 100


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 04:02:02 PM
 #98

Thx for the help, however all I need is an ssh terminal. I don't think it's worth the time to setup a new dev-environment. I want to finish some small things on the cpu-side this week, like temperature reporting, a temperature-controller, logfiles, some tesing with different pools.

You can connect to my rig via ssh.
I think the most important thing is hashrate, if you have ideas to improve hashrate, try them at first.
NameTaken
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 502


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 04:04:30 PM
 #99

3*gtx 1080 ti cc+120 mc-1000
1*gtx 1080 cc+150 mc -1000
ubuntu 16.04 x64
cuda 8.0
driver: 384.59

EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
Actually worst results I've ever seen.
1080 - usually gives 550-570
1080 - 730+
200W is 80% power assuming default is 250W.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
September 05, 2017, 07:23:40 PM
 #100

3*gtx 1080 ti cc+120 mc-1000
1*gtx 1080 cc+150 mc -1000
ubuntu 16.04 x64
cuda 8.0
driver: 384.59

EWBF 0.3.4b:

GPU0: 454 Sol/s GPU1: 672 Sol/s GPU2: 687 Sol/s GPU3: 679 Sol/s
Total speed: 2492 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    153W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    203W     |  3.31 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    198W     |  3.47 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    201W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+

yours:

>  GPU0 Sol/s: 454.4  Avg: 454.4  I/s: 240.1  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU1 Sol/s: 684.6  Avg: 684.6  I/s: 365.5  Shares/s: 0.000
>  GPU2 Sol/s: 683.4  Avg: 683.4  I/s: 367.8  Shares/s: 0.200  ++
>  GPU3 Sol/s: 686.0  Avg: 686.0  I/s: 365.4  Shares/s: 0.000
   ==== Sol/s: 2508.5 Avg: 2508.5 I/s: 1338.9 Shares/s: 0.000
Actually worst results I've ever seen.
1080 - usually gives 550-570
1080 - 730+
Even 1070 makes 460-470 Sol/s

Take a look at the numbers more carefully. The GPUs are not setup for max performance on this system.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 ... 171 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!