Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2018, 03:55:06 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 163 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.1 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 205234 times)
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 19, 2017, 12:23:50 PM
 #161

Thanks for new miner software  Smiley

On my initial testing this seems slightly faster than ewbf's.

If need more ssh access to test stuff, i can provide it too. Have some 1060/1080/ti.

Keep up the good work!

ps. benchmark option would be really nice, helps a lot to find best clocks for cards...

O.


Benchmark mode is already on my todo list Smiley

For performance measurements / best clocks settings for cards:
Don't look at the solution rate, it's probabilistic, that's why it's jumping all the time. Look at the iterations per second (I/s) that the GPU is doing, it measures the raw performance of the GPU and that's why I've included it into the output.
1527090906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090906
Reply with quote  #2

1527090906
Report to moderator
1527090906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090906
Reply with quote  #2

1527090906
Report to moderator
1527090906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090906
Reply with quote  #2

1527090906
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1527090906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090906
Reply with quote  #2

1527090906
Report to moderator
1527090906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090906
Reply with quote  #2

1527090906
Report to moderator
1527090906
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090906

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090906
Reply with quote  #2

1527090906
Report to moderator
cogswap
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2017, 01:58:38 PM
 #162

Hello!!!
Are you going to release version for windows ??
I'm sick of ewbf miner's failures.

Thx !!
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 19, 2017, 02:07:35 PM
 #163

Hello!!!
Are you going to release version for windows ??
I'm sick of ewbf miner's failures.

Thx !!

Yes, as soon as the linux build runs perfectly stable, there are currently some corner cases that need improvement.
cogswap
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 14
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2017, 03:19:59 PM
 #164

Thx!!!!!!

grunoff
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 48
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 19, 2017, 03:22:05 PM
 #165

Hello!!!
Are you going to release version for windows ??
I'm sick of ewbf miner's failures.

Thx !!

Yes, as soon as the linux build runs perfectly stable, there are currently some corner cases that need improvement.

Our rigs are waiting!!!!
Dirard
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 13
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 20, 2017, 02:33:22 PM
 #166

Is it possible to run Linux miner on Windows?))
scryptr
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1344
Merit: 1000



View Profile WWW
September 20, 2017, 02:46:56 PM
 #167

Is it possible to run Linux miner on Windows?))

NO, BUT YOU CAN SET UP A DUAL-BOOT SYSTEM--

Ubuntu will allow a user to set up a dual-boot, Windows and Linux system.  It is relatively simple, and 32GB of hard-drive space is about all you would need.  This would be practical if you would like to try mining on a single system.  I have two Win 7 x64 rigs with a small partition set aside for Linux.  I can test Linux miners when needed.

My other rigs are all Linux.       --scryptr

TIPS:  BTC - 1Fs4uZ6a9ABYBTaHGUfqcwCQmeBRxkKRQT
          DASH - XrK81tW31SLsVvZ2WX9VhTjpT6GXJPLdbQ
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 20, 2017, 06:48:38 PM
 #168

New Version 0.4.4

fix: Sol/W might have produced wrong values
fix: Sum not show if --dev was used
fix: memory leak on reconnection
improve stability

Thx to NameTaken for reporting and testing
tazmako
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 266
Merit: 100



View Profile
September 20, 2017, 10:15:32 PM
 #169

wait for  windows version too.

Tavittcoin(TVC) Token Sales
MarketGamer
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 04:33:13 AM
 #170

Running 0.4.4 for about 5 hours now, so far so good.

Is there a reason the GPUs slowly change order in the output, can they be fixed in place instead so always output in order 0,1,2,3.... etc.?
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 09:52:51 AM
 #171

Running 0.4.4 for about 5 hours now, so far so good.

Is there a reason the GPUs slowly change order in the output, can they be fixed in place instead so always output in order 0,1,2,3.... etc.?

The GPU that finishes first prints it's output first, they are all independent. So you're able to see how things actually behave on your system. This can be changed if it's important.
garytheasshole
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 103


Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2017, 03:47:16 PM
 #172

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 04:21:33 PM
 #173

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.
Nokia555
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2017, 04:39:15 PM
 #174

Can i include linux version with EthControl Linux when it's done? (https://ethmonitoring.com/site/eth-control)

Also windows version, when you release it. Is there API support coming?

dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 21, 2017, 04:55:21 PM
 #175

Can i include linux version with EthControl Linux when it's done? (https://ethmonitoring.com/site/eth-control)
Yes

Quote
Also windows version, when you release it. Is there API support coming?
Windows, I'll start working on it soon. API, do you mean something like RPC to get stats? If this is something that people would like to have I'll implement it.
Nokia555
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com


View Profile WWW
September 21, 2017, 04:58:04 PM
 #176

Can i include linux version with EthControl Linux when it's done? (https://ethmonitoring.com/site/eth-control)
Yes

Quote
Also windows version, when you release it. Is there API support coming?
Windows, I'll start working on it soon. API, do you mean something like RPC to get stats? If this is something that people would like to have I'll implement it.

API for stats info yes, to get GPU temps, fan speeds, hashrates for remote monitoring. I can help you with that, if you have any questions let me know.

ShowMeCoins
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 07:40:51 AM
 #177

I just plugged in my 7th 1080ti and 'zm' doesn't seem to like it
Code:
---snippet---
   GPU0 51°C  Sol/s: 454.5  Sol/W: 2.43  Avg: 499.1  I/s: 245.3  Sh/s: 0.120  +
   GPU1 56°C  Sol/s: 451.2  Sol/W: 2.36  Avg: 489.5  I/s: 240.4  Sh/s: 0.060
   GPU2 52°C  Sol/s: 448.3  Sol/W: 2.52  Avg: 476.3  I/s: 237.7  Sh/s: 0.100  ++
   GPU3 49°C  Sol/s: 444.2  Sol/W: 2.43  Avg: 470.3  I/s: 236.7  Sh/s: 0.160  +
   GPU4 52°C  Sol/s: 450.3  Sol/W: 2.36  Avg: 467.3  I/s: 239.4  Sh/s: 0.080
   GPU5 50°C  Sol/s: 445.2  Sol/W: 2.45  Avg: 453.3  I/s: 236.9  Sh/s: 0.080  +
   GPU6 48°C  Sol/s: 442.5  Sol/W: 2.37  Avg: 442.6  I/s: 236.5  Sh/s: 0.040  +
   ========== Sol/s: 3136.2 Sol/W: 2.42  Avg: 3298.4 I/s: 1672.8 Sh/s: 0.640
---snippet---

Same setting, different miner (EWBF):
Code:
---snippet---
INFO 09:30:58: GPU4 Accepted share 26ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:30:59: GPU5 Accepted share 18ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:31:01: GPU5 Accepted share 30ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 25ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 19ms [A:4, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 49C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 49C GPU3: 46C GPU4: 49C GPU5: 47C GPU6: 46C
GPU0: 725 Sol/s GPU1: 751 Sol/s GPU2: 736 Sol/s GPU3: 746 Sol/s GPU4: 731 Sol/s GPU5: 730 Sol/s GPU6: 725 Sol/s
Total speed: 5144 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    244W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    222W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    224W     |  3.29 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    248W     |  3.01 Sol/W  |
|  4  |    215W     |  3.40 Sol/W  |
|  5  |    240W     |  3.04 Sol/W  |
|  6  |    244W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
INFO 09:31:06: GPU3 Accepted share 24ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:09: GPU2 Accepted share 25ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 09:31:16: GPU1 Accepted share 80ms [A:4, R:0]
INFO 09:31:17: GPU5 Accepted share 16ms [A:4, R:0]
---snippet---




░░░█▀▀▀█░█▀▀▀█░█░░░░░░▄▀▄░░█▀▀▀█░█░█▀▀▀█░░░█▀  FAIRLY DISTRIBUTED & DECENTRALIZED NATURE OF CRYPTOCURRENCY      ▀█▀  Telegram  ▀█
░░░▀▀█▄▄░█░░░█░█░░░▄░█▄▄▄█░█░▄▀░░█░▀▀█▄▄░░░       SOLARIS XLR▬▬▬▬▬ LAUNCHED 17 MARCH ▬▬▬▬▬SOLARIS XLR                   Slack     
░░░█▄▄▄█░░▀▄▄█░░▀▄▄█░█░░░█░█░░▀▄░█░█▄▄▄█░░░█▄ ASIC RESISTANT, Xevan (LESS ENERGY/STRONGER SECURITY) GPU MINING ▄█▄    Twitter   ▄█
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 10:58:07 AM
 #178

I just plugged in my 7th 1080ti and 'zm' doesn't seem to like it
Code:
---snippet---
   GPU0 51°C  Sol/s: 454.5  Sol/W: 2.43  Avg: 499.1  I/s: 245.3  Sh/s: 0.120  +
   GPU1 56°C  Sol/s: 451.2  Sol/W: 2.36  Avg: 489.5  I/s: 240.4  Sh/s: 0.060
   GPU2 52°C  Sol/s: 448.3  Sol/W: 2.52  Avg: 476.3  I/s: 237.7  Sh/s: 0.100  ++
   GPU3 49°C  Sol/s: 444.2  Sol/W: 2.43  Avg: 470.3  I/s: 236.7  Sh/s: 0.160  +
   GPU4 52°C  Sol/s: 450.3  Sol/W: 2.36  Avg: 467.3  I/s: 239.4  Sh/s: 0.080
   GPU5 50°C  Sol/s: 445.2  Sol/W: 2.45  Avg: 453.3  I/s: 236.9  Sh/s: 0.080  +
   GPU6 48°C  Sol/s: 442.5  Sol/W: 2.37  Avg: 442.6  I/s: 236.5  Sh/s: 0.040  +
   ========== Sol/s: 3136.2 Sol/W: 2.42  Avg: 3298.4 I/s: 1672.8 Sh/s: 0.640
---snippet---

Same setting, different miner (EWBF):
Code:
---snippet---
INFO 09:30:58: GPU4 Accepted share 26ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:30:59: GPU5 Accepted share 18ms [A:2, R:0]
INFO 09:31:01: GPU5 Accepted share 30ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 25ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:03: GPU4 Accepted share 19ms [A:4, R:0]
Temp: GPU0: 49C GPU1: 53C GPU2: 49C GPU3: 46C GPU4: 49C GPU5: 47C GPU6: 46C
GPU0: 725 Sol/s GPU1: 751 Sol/s GPU2: 736 Sol/s GPU3: 746 Sol/s GPU4: 731 Sol/s GPU5: 730 Sol/s GPU6: 725 Sol/s
Total speed: 5144 Sol/s
+-----+-------------+--------------+
| GPU | Power usage |  Efficiency  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
|  0  |    244W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
|  1  |    222W     |  3.38 Sol/W  |
|  2  |    224W     |  3.29 Sol/W  |
|  3  |    248W     |  3.01 Sol/W  |
|  4  |    215W     |  3.40 Sol/W  |
|  5  |    240W     |  3.04 Sol/W  |
|  6  |    244W     |  2.97 Sol/W  |
+-----+-------------+--------------+
INFO 09:31:06: GPU3 Accepted share 24ms [A:3, R:0]
INFO 09:31:09: GPU2 Accepted share 25ms [A:1, R:0]
INFO 09:31:16: GPU1 Accepted share 80ms [A:4, R:0]
INFO 09:31:17: GPU5 Accepted share 16ms [A:4, R:0]
---snippet---







Could you please provide more information?

How did you start zm? (parameters)
What CPU are you on? CPU usage?
GPU usage?
garytheasshole
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 294
Merit: 103


Chosŏn Minjujuŭi Inmin Konghwaguk


View Profile WWW
September 22, 2017, 11:08:44 AM
 #179

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.

That's what I did man, but it's still not working

Code:
# ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)

root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i

dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
September 22, 2017, 11:19:23 AM
 #180

Would it be possible to statically link openssl-1.0.0? Having really hard time under fedora 26, they ditched 1.0.0 in favor for 1.1.0

My early versions used 1.1.0, I had to downgrade to 1.0.0 because ubuntu still uses the old version. I don't really like to link it statically because of the security implications and licensing. It's pretty easy to compile 1.0.0 and use LD_LIBRARY_PATH until ubuntu finally updates it's libraries. If there are any difficulties I might provide a version which is linked against openssl 1.1.0.

That's what I did man, but it's still not working

Code:
# ./zm
./zm: /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)
./zm: /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0: no version information available (required by ./zm)

root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 19 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libcrypto.so.1.0.0 -> libcrypto.so.1.0.0i
[root@localhost stan]# ls -al /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 16 сеп 21 14:32 /lib64/libssl.so.1.0.0 -> libssl.so.1.0.0i


I'll compile a new version against openssl 1.1.0 and pm it to you. I'll come up with a better solution later.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 ... 163 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!