Bitcoin Forum
May 23, 2018, 03:54:20 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.16.0  [Torrent]. (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 ... 163 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.1 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 205234 times)
eruman34
Newbie
*
Online Online

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 03, 2017, 06:05:28 PM
 #981

Hi,

When i mine for nicehash with this miner get a lot of rejected shares but no rejects at flypool am i missing something?

Thanks for such great miner still room for improvement.
1527090860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090860
Reply with quote  #2

1527090860
Report to moderator
1527090860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090860
Reply with quote  #2

1527090860
Report to moderator
1527090860
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1527090860

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1527090860
Reply with quote  #2

1527090860
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
ltc_bilic
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 111
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 03, 2017, 08:20:18 PM
 #982

I wasn't aware so many of you are using overclocked/unstable systems, however I'm currently working on an GPU responsiveness infrastructure - so this kind of things will improve.

Everyone has to overclock/underclock in order to max the profit,...most of the miners love to push the cards to their limit,...i personally love to find the perfect balance for each card,...ideal performance/watt ratio,...but in both scenarios you need a stable miner, which is flexible for stock and overclock/underclock settings,...it has to be stable otherwise it's no good,...that's the main reason I'm still sticking with ewbf,...because it's unstable on higher clocks,...but it has a good potential
ypsi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 158


The Wheel weaves as the Wheel wills


View Profile
November 03, 2017, 08:44:17 PM
 #983

"good" miner, w/o any correct statistic. I'm not sure, that you all, receiving on display what you have in reallity

after 1 GPU halted by overclock error, miner still show "total" as earler. and doesn't show any erorrs..
it's really, not a good


Since one of your GPUs crashed it stopped updating it's stats, there is no infrastructure to detect such situations currently so total numbers were still using the old values of the crashed GPU.

I wasn't aware so many of you are using overclocked/unstable systems, however I'm currently working on an GPU responsiveness infrastructure - so this kind of things will improve.
I don't think you should put too much effort into counter whatever overclocks people use. When I read here on bct I see a lot of people with no experience at all thinking they know what actually happens when you overclock.

--ypsi

dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
November 03, 2017, 08:51:20 PM
 #984

I wasn't aware so many of you are using overclocked/unstable systems, however I'm currently working on an GPU responsiveness infrastructure - so this kind of things will improve.

Everyone has to overclock/underclock in order to max the profit,...most of the miners love to push the cards to their limit,...i personally love to find the perfect balance for each card,...ideal performance/watt ratio,...but in both scenarios you need a stable miner, which is flexible for stock and overclock/underclock settings,...it has to be stable otherwise it's no good,...that's the main reason I'm still sticking with ewbf,...because it's unstable on higher clocks,...but it has a good potential

There is some misunderstanding here, it's not the miner that gets unstable, it's the hardware that gets unstable if you overclock it.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
November 03, 2017, 08:58:04 PM
 #985

Hi,

When i mine for nicehash with this miner get a lot of rejected shares but no rejects at flypool am i missing something?

Thanks for such great miner still room for improvement.

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2021765.msg23690108#msg23690108
Offroad3
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 10:44:43 AM
 #986

"good" miner, w/o any correct statistic. I'm not sure, that you all, receiving on display what you have in reallity

after 1 GPU halted by overclock error, miner still show "total" as earler. and doesn't show any erorrs..
it's really, not a good


Since one of your GPUs crashed it stopped updating it's stats, there is no infrastructure to detect such situations currently so total numbers were still using the old values of the crashed GPU.

I wasn't aware so many of you are using overclocked/unstable systems, however I'm currently working on an GPU responsiveness infrastructure - so this kind of things will improve.
since GPU not updating their stats, and send to hashed - you as i understand, can detect that GPU was crashed and remove it from overall stst, because many watchdogs tuned to overall stats...

don't forget, that you take 2% ...
mountaintoy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 03:32:53 PM
 #987

I wasn't aware so many of you are using overclocked/unstable systems, however I'm currently working on an GPU responsiveness infrastructure - so this kind of things will improve.

Everyone has to overclock/underclock in order to max the profit,...most of the miners love to push the cards to their limit,...i personally love to find the perfect balance for each card,...ideal performance/watt ratio,...but in both scenarios you need a stable miner, which is flexible for stock and overclock/underclock settings,...it has to be stable otherwise it's no good,...that's the main reason I'm still sticking with ewbf,...because it's unstable on higher clocks,...but it has a good potential

There is some misunderstanding here, it's not the miner that gets unstable, it's the hardware that gets unstable if you overclock it.

I'm curious what OC settings people are needing to change vs EWBF. The settings I use for EWBF are just as stable with a slightly higher rate on this one.
I'm running a single 1070 OC'd and slightly undervolted getting about 500-502 Sol/s.
ypsi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 158


The Wheel weaves as the Wheel wills


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 05:09:30 PM
 #988

I'm curious what OC settings people are needing to change vs EWBF. The settings I use for EWBF are just as stable with a slightly higher rate on this one.
I'm running a single 1070 OC'd and slightly undervolted getting about 500-502 Sol/s.
I'm experiencing the same, the exact values I use for EWBF works fine with dstm. So it seems people are using way too high OC and they just "barely" get away with it.

--ypsi

The_Immortal
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 05:37:17 PM
 #989

Still no new version with fixed API? Sad(((
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 119


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 06:05:47 PM
 #990

New Version 0.5.4

fix: device selection
fix: latency reporting
add logfile support
add option to disable auto reconnect
handle disconnect periods in web/json stats
add basic GPU responsiveness infrastructure
ui: change timestamps to ISO 8601 format
webui: report: uptime contime server user port
json: report: uptime contime server user port version


I've restructured some internal parts of zm in this release so pls report if anything doesn't work as expected. Terminal ui has some minor changes most notable the timestamp format - I've changed it to ISO 8601 since it's easier to parse. Logfiles are always appended such that you never lose your previous logs - if you don't want this just delete the previous logfile before starting zm in your scripts.
Nokia555
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 266

EthMonitoring.com


View Profile WWW
November 04, 2017, 06:35:44 PM
 #991

New Version 0.5.4

fix: device selection
fix: latency reporting
add logfile support
add option to disable auto reconnect
handle disconnect periods in web/json stats
add basic GPU responsiveness infrastructure
ui: change timestamps to ISO 8601 format
webui: report: uptime contime server user port
json: report: uptime contime server user port version


I've restructured some internal parts of zm in this release so pls report if anything doesn't work as expected. Terminal ui has some minor changes most notable the timestamp format - I've changed it to ISO 8601 since it's easier to parse. Logfiles are always appended such that you never lose your previous logs - if you don't want this just delete the previous logfile before starting zm in your scripts.

Great, updated EthMonitoring.com also to support latest version.

Brzina
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 20


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 06:52:00 PM
 #992

Already using it. Works so far Cheesy
Now, just work on future versions to try and squeeze more sols from these cards !!! So far, you're great
The_Immortal
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 04, 2017, 08:54:33 PM
 #993

dstm, what about problem with incorrect API info (in case of disconnect and crashing of GPU) - have you fixed it in the recent version?
xyburcoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 170
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 03:06:47 AM
 #994

Very nice addition to the telemetry stats... Thanks
VSVfreedom
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 05:24:45 AM
 #995

Hello!
After update the pool statistc at flypool does not show a name of rig! Could you fix it
Coin++
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 372


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 07:15:54 AM
 #996

New Version 0.5.4

fix: device selection
fix: latency reporting
add logfile support
add option to disable auto reconnect
handle disconnect periods in web/json stats
add basic GPU responsiveness infrastructure
ui: change timestamps to ISO 8601 format
webui: report: uptime contime server user port
json: report: uptime contime server user port version


I've restructured some internal parts of zm in this release so pls report if anything doesn't work as expected. Terminal ui has some minor changes most notable the timestamp format - I've changed it to ISO 8601 since it's easier to parse. Logfiles are always appended such that you never lose your previous logs - if you don't want this just delete the previous logfile before starting zm in your scripts.
Ok, thank you.
But no upgrade about the hashrate we are allway at the 0.5.2 version level ?
Improving the hashrate is still the most important.

pubix
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 98
Merit: 10


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 11:58:20 AM
 #997

What's the dev fee of this miner?
Brzina
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 53
Merit: 20


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 12:27:36 PM
 #998

What's the dev fee of this miner?

2%
K4MiL
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 5
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 12:38:43 PM
 #999

Speed is nice but i have problem it still reconnecting +- 3 min over and over.... anyone now how to fix it?

2017-11-05 13:31:03|#  connection closed by server r:0
2017-11-05 13:31:03|#  reconnecting
2017-11-05 13:31:13|#  GPU0  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:15|#  GPU1  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:17|#  GPU2  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:18|#  GPU3  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:20|#  GPU4  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:21|#  GPU5  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:24|#  GPU6  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 430
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 01:02:03 PM
 #1000

Hello anyone tested the new 1070ti on this miner? It should get very decent results. My preorder is delayed unfortunatelly Sad But I expect it should hit over 570 sols.

Please report someone thanks! .)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 ... 163 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!