Bitcoin Forum
November 19, 2018, 05:55:44 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.17.0 [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... 171 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] dstm's ZCash / Equihash Nvidia Miner v0.6.2 (Linux / Windows)  (Read 219708 times)
RealSwissMiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 15


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2017, 01:15:25 PM
 #1001

Hello anyone tested the new 1070ti on this miner? It should get very decent results. My preorder is delayed unfortunatelly Sad But I expect it should hit over 570 sols.

Please report someone thanks! .)

Why should the new dstm release change anything about the hash rate? Here are my results with v.0.5.2 GPU0 = GTX 1070 Ti the rest GTX 1070


+35 GPU, +500 Memory, 70% PL for the TI, 68% PL for the regular 1070.

Mining and investment blog - https://swisscryptominer.blogspot.ch
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1542606945
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542606945

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542606945
Reply with quote  #2

1542606945
Report to moderator
1542606945
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542606945

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542606945
Reply with quote  #2

1542606945
Report to moderator
1542606945
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1542606945

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1542606945
Reply with quote  #2

1542606945
Report to moderator
mountaintoy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 8
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 01:37:04 PM
 #1002

Here's mine for what it's worth. Efficiency isn't quite as good, but it's stable enough for a little web browsing on the side. Using the Voltage/Frequency curve seems to be a little more stable for me. 1070 Gaming X

https://imgur.com/8EmeqnT
Gans888
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 02:19:45 PM
 #1003

New Version 0.5.4

fix: device selection
fix: latency reporting
add logfile support
add option to disable auto reconnect
handle disconnect periods in web/json stats
add basic GPU responsiveness infrastructure
ui: change timestamps to ISO 8601 format
webui: report: uptime contime server user port
json: report: uptime contime server user port version


I've restructured some internal parts of zm in this release so pls report if anything doesn't work as expected. Terminal ui has some minor changes most notable the timestamp format - I've changed it to ISO 8601 since it's easier to parse. Logfiles are always appended such that you never lose your previous logs - if you don't want this just delete the previous logfile before starting zm in your scripts.
In this version can miner write only error information? Or write full info from monitor?

in this version is the speed of the miner increased?
Brzina
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 20


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 02:21:08 PM
 #1004

Here's mine for what it's worth. Efficiency isn't quite as good, but it's stable enough for a little web browsing on the side. Using the Voltage/Frequency curve seems to be a little more stable for me. 1070 Gaming X



Could you post a screenshot of your curve ? I have never overclocked like that. Could you give please more tips. I have Asus Strix 1070 8g
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 02:29:42 PM
 #1005

Hello anyone tested the new 1070ti on this miner? It should get very decent results. My preorder is delayed unfortunatelly Sad But I expect it should hit over 570 sols.

Please report someone thanks! .)

Why should the new dstm release change anything about the hash rate? Here are my results with v.0.5.2 GPU0 = GTX 1070 Ti the rest GTX 1070


+35 GPU, +500 Memory, 70% PL for the TI, 68% PL for the regular 1070.

That is awfully low I am getting 485 sols @ 135W with normal 1070 cards. You should play with your settings. Also Power Limit is not unified and is totally different for each card so it does not really say anything. The same applies for increases since each card has different stock clocks.

EDIT: I see in the miner your cards are running around 115W thats why the low hashrate.

Bitrated user: Kompik.
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 02:40:07 PM
 #1006

Here's mine for what it's worth. Efficiency isn't quite as good, but it's stable enough for a little web browsing on the side. Using the Voltage/Frequency curve seems to be a little more stable for me. 1070 Gaming X



Could you post a screenshot of your curve ? I have never overclocked like that. Could you give please more tips. I have Asus Strix 1070 8g
This is good I would be very interested in 1070ti results at such settings.

Bitrated user: Kompik.
RealSwissMiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 15


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2017, 02:57:24 PM
 #1007

Hello anyone tested the new 1070ti on this miner? It should get very decent results. My preorder is delayed unfortunatelly Sad But I expect it should hit over 570 sols.

Please report someone thanks! .)

Why should the new dstm release change anything about the hash rate? Here are my results with v.0.5.2 GPU0 = GTX 1070 Ti the rest GTX 1070


+35 GPU, +500 Memory, 70% PL for the TI, 68% PL for the regular 1070.

That is awfully low I am getting 485 sols @ 135W with normal 1070 cards. You should play with your settings. Also Power Limit is not unified and is totally different for each card so it does not really say anything. The same applies for increases since each card has different stock clocks.

EDIT: I see in the miner your cards are running around 115W thats why the low hashrate.

Right now these are the optimal efficiency settings for me. Next month electricity costs will be lower and I might change my settings.
The 5 GTX 1070 are identical (at least on paper) and the GPU frequency varies only slightly. But at these settings the 1070 Ti GPU is clocked 100 Mhz lower than the regular version.

Mining and investment blog - https://swisscryptominer.blogspot.ch
VSVfreedom
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 04:17:04 PM
 #1008

Hello!
After update the pool statistc at flypool does not show a name of rig! Could you fix it

Sorry! Was my mistake. All working good Smiley
Brzina
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 60
Merit: 20


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 05:24:25 PM
 #1009

There is nice 1070 TI TEST. Use these setings. He is using EWBF. With Zm miner he would get 20-30 more sols......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tQDcwZA7GQ&t=75s
MostWanted
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 15
Merit: 0


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 05:47:26 PM
 #1010

Why --logfile C:\ZEC-dstm\minerlog.txt don't work? I need txt extension.
RealSwissMiner
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 15


View Profile WWW
November 05, 2017, 08:08:18 PM
 #1011

@Kompik: Thanks for questioning. I changed my settings and here are the results:



Efficiency is still good but all cards hashing higher. GTX 1070 and GTX 1070 Ti have similar GPU frequency. I will leave the settings like this Smiley

Mining and investment blog - https://swisscryptominer.blogspot.ch
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1022


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 11:04:21 PM
 #1012

There is nice 1070 TI TEST. Use these setings. He is using EWBF. With Zm miner he would get 20-30 more sols......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tQDcwZA7GQ&t=75s

 He had almost identical results to my testing of the 1070 ti - though I tested more settings than he did, the 60% TDP (106 watt) +200 core +700 memory settings in Afterburner were the most efficient I found as well for the EVGA SC card.
 Cooling on that card is very very good - I never got it over 66C at about 72% fan no matter WHAT I tried on it (though I didn't go over 100% of factory TDP (180 watts) at any point in my testing).

 I didn't think to test it on DSTM, as my results to date on my very limited testing of DTSM gave LOWER hashrate at the same settings on the same card vs EBWF.



I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Kompik
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 447
Merit: 250


View Profile
November 05, 2017, 11:08:12 PM
 #1013

There is nice 1070 TI TEST. Use these setings. He is using EWBF. With Zm miner he would get 20-30 more sols......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2tQDcwZA7GQ&t=75s

 He had almost identical results to my testing of the 1070 ti - though I tested more settings than he did, the 60% TDP (106 watt) +200 core +700 memory settings in Afterburner were the most efficient I found as well for the EVGA SC card.
 Cooling on that card is very very good - I never got it over 66C at about 72% fan no matter WHAT I tried on it (though I didn't go over 100% of factory TDP (180 watts) at any point in my testing).

 I didn't think to test it on DSTM, as my results to date on my very limited testing of DTSM gave LOWER hashrate at the same settings on the same card vs EBWF.




There should be significant increases with the DTSM miner for the 1070. Not for the 1080 though.

Bitrated user: Kompik.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 06, 2017, 09:26:39 AM
 #1014

dstm, what about problem with incorrect API info (in case of disconnect and crashing of GPU) - have you fixed it in the recent version?

Telemetry reflects this properly now.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 06, 2017, 09:27:50 AM
 #1015

New Version 0.5.4

fix: device selection
fix: latency reporting
add logfile support
add option to disable auto reconnect
handle disconnect periods in web/json stats
add basic GPU responsiveness infrastructure
ui: change timestamps to ISO 8601 format
webui: report: uptime contime server user port
json: report: uptime contime server user port version


I've restructured some internal parts of zm in this release so pls report if anything doesn't work as expected. Terminal ui has some minor changes most notable the timestamp format - I've changed it to ISO 8601 since it's easier to parse. Logfiles are always appended such that you never lose your previous logs - if you don't want this just delete the previous logfile before starting zm in your scripts.
Ok, thank you.
But no upgrade about the hashrate we are allway at the 0.5.2 version level ?
Improving the hashrate is still the most important.

Most likely not, however keep in mind - there are limits to it.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 06, 2017, 09:28:47 AM
 #1016

Speed is nice but i have problem it still reconnecting +- 3 min over and over.... anyone now how to fix it?

2017-11-05 13:31:03|#  connection closed by server r:0
2017-11-05 13:31:03|#  reconnecting
2017-11-05 13:31:13|#  GPU0  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:15|#  GPU1  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:17|#  GPU2  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:18|#  GPU3  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:20|#  GPU4  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:21|#  GPU5  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618
2017-11-05 13:31:24|#  GPU6  connected to: zen.suprnova.cc:3618

You might try a different server to make sure it's not your network - some servers might have temporary issues.
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 06, 2017, 09:29:30 AM
 #1017

Why --logfile C:\ZEC-dstm\minerlog.txt don't work? I need txt extension.

I guess you forgot the '=' sign, try : '--logfile=C:\ZEC-dstm\minerlog.txt'
dstm
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 126


View Profile
November 06, 2017, 09:33:01 AM
 #1018

Hello!
After update the pool statistc at flypool does not show a name of rig! Could you fix it

Sorry! Was my mistake. All working good Smiley

Thx for reporting it back, this saves time for development.
crazydane
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 467
Merit: 152



View Profile
November 06, 2017, 04:01:22 PM
 #1019

I upgraded all my rigs to 0.5.4 and the only issue I have noticed is that my 1050Ti rig is not reporting power usage via the telemetry interface.

I see it here:



But not here:



The odd thing is that none of my other rigs have this issue:



Go figure.
QuintLeo
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1246
Merit: 1022


View Profile
November 06, 2017, 05:12:05 PM
 #1020


There should be significant increases with the DTSM miner for the 1070. Not for the 1080 though.

 1070 ti is a lot closer to the 1080 than the 1070.

 It's a "one compute unit disabled" 1080 GPU with GDDR5 instead of GDDR5x for ram.

I'm no longer legendary just in my own mind!
Like something I said? Donations gratefully accepted. LYLnTKvLefz9izJFUvEGQEZzSkz34b3N6U (Litecoin)
1GYbjMTPdCuV7dci3iCUiaRrcNuaiQrVYY (Bitcoin)
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 [51] 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 ... 171 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!