can bitmain close my wallet?
can bitmain charge me to open a btc wallet in future?
can bitmain exclude countries from using the network?
NO,NO,NO and they cant do this on btc or bch
The whole concept of btc is built from miners, they get rewards for their work...wtf are blockstream doing to get a slice aswell?
your missing the point, apart from the tech on both coins...im more concerned with blockstream owning the whole crypto ecosystem, something your either ignoring or dont understand.
Can Bitmain refuse to verify my transactions?
Can Bitmain take steps to charge me outrageous fees?
Can Bitmain use a backdoor in my miner to get me to stop mining?
Yes,Yes, Yes...
but they can also do this on btc....You are so focused on Blockstream that you are willing to follow Bitmain along in their plans to do a total takeover, of both chains. I guess manufacturing and selling 70% of the Asics and running several pools that have a lion's share of the Hashrate isn't good enough. Now he can control two coins, and pit them against each other so that he can profit even more.
theres only two choices really, and i choose the side closer to the version i have always used.
as for bitmain, so what if they control so much today, before them someone else did and after them so will others...maybe even govs start mining farms and competing..this is how bitcoin gains value.
blockstream on the other hand is a complete dif story and yes i am very focused on them and their agenda on how to profit from all of US.
Just a thought..why is btc so slow and blocks have been full and expensive...who is causing this...
im now convinced its blockstream,segwitcore...they dont want seg2x , its 100% clear...its in their interest to keep it at 1mb full , so people have to use segwit.
2x wont happen, core doesnt want bigger blocks, if it were up to them, we would be on 250kb and paying $100 per tx
0-yes votes
https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Segwit_supportlook closely...
No doesn't support (but might or might not go along with it with sufficient community support)
Prefer it is what he would choose if it was only up to him and no outside influences
Aff* Segwit itself Deployment methods Hardfork bundles (Silbert agreement)
BIP 141 BIP 148 BIP 149 BIP 91
Segwit2x COOP
Matt Corallo Core Prefer No Acceptable
LOL Mark Friedenbach BIP 68/112 Prefer Prefer No Acc. until July
LOL Nope Peter Todd Prefer Deficient Wanting Acc. until July
LOL these are the two dominant choices....to many bitcoiners are hoping for "might or might not go along with it with sufficient community support"
but in reality the devs have already made it clear on what they want, by choosing prefer. no segwit2x
not only have they all said no, the response from these guys...LOL, really!
so whats next for segwitcoin...where will it go, what happens in nov.....
i say let all these guys go, move on and stick to satoshi's vision and trade and hodl like we always have, but faster and cheaper than ever, with no 2nd layer ,3rd party.