[ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/Cuckaroo29z miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 16.4.9

[mineoneone]

Only been running it a short while but Sol/s reports slightly lower but more accurate when compared to the pool website.

I have two identical rigs but for the last few versions one was always 20 Sol/s slower, now it's a litter higher and the other is lower in the console and the pool is tracking both to a 2-4 Sol/s variance.

Also, I don't know what you're doing but with every few updates you manage to cool my cards a degree or two which is always helpful 

Bminer & Z-Enemy are killing it right now 

[1715170575]

1715170575

[1715170575]

1715170575

[realbminer]

[Hi Guru:

Thank you so much for your feedback, here is the reason.
The algorithm for mining Ethereum on nicehash pool is DaggerHashimoto rather than ethash.
Please see: https://www.nicehash.com/help/ethereum-mining?lang=en
Bminer doesn't support DaggerHashimoto algorithm yet.

Thank you for pointing this out. Do you have any plans to implement DaggerHashimoto anytime soon? Most other miners work well with ethash=daggerhashimoto

Unfortunately it does not really help - still creating DAGs over and over:

BMiner.exe -api 127.0.0.1:1880 -uri ethash://UselessGuru.BlackBox:x@europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020 -uri2 blake14r://3JQt8RezoGeEmA5ziAKNvxk34cM9JWsMCo.BlackBox:x@decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354 -dual-intensity 40 -watchdog=false -no-runtime-info -nofee -devices 0

Code:

[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Turning on experimental support for Ethash & DCR/XVG Dual-mining
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Bminer: When Crypto-mining Made Fast (v8.0.0-32928c5)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Watchdog has started.
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Starting miner on devices [0]
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Connected to europe.ethash-hub.miningpoolhub.com:17020
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Starting miner on device 0...
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Subscribed to stratum server
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Connected to decred.eu.nicehash.com:3354
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Started miner on device 0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Subscribed to stratum server
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Authorized
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Set diff to 2.00 (target to 000000007fff8000) (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:35+02:00] Received new job 0000006aee3a1769 (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:36+02:00] Authorized
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:36+02:00] Set diff to 1.00 (target to 00000000ffb24c4e)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:36+02:00] Received new job c37e
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:36+02:00] [D0] Tuning dual-mining parameters
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:36+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:36+02:00] Starting the management API at 127.0.0.1:1880
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:40+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:43+02:00] Set diff to 4.00 (target to 000000003fffc000) (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:43+02:00] Received new job 0000006aee3a1861 (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:44+02:00] Received new job c37f
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:44+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:49+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[WARN] [2018-05-30T08:23:49+02:00] Rejected share #4 ([21,"incorrect size of nonce"])
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:23:51+02:00] [D0] Solver 0 recorded speed of 27.43 MH/s
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:01+02:00] [D0] Solver 1 recorded speed of 52.29 MH/s
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:05+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 50.24 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Temp: 70C Fan: 56% Power: 223W 0.23 MH/J
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:06+02:00] Total 50.24 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Accepted shares 0/0 Rejected shares 1/0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:21+02:00] [D0] Solver 2 recorded speed of 50.33 MH/s
[WARN] [2018-05-30T08:24:22+02:00] Rejected share #5 ([21,"incorrect size of nonce"])
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:34+02:00] Received new job 0000006aee3a2381 (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:35+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 48.65 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Temp: 71C Fan: 56% Power: 230W 0.21 MH/J
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:36+02:00] [D0] Solver 3 recorded speed of 49.60 MH/s
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:36+02:00] [D0] Choosing solver 1 which records the speed of 52.29 MH/s
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:36+02:00] Total 48.65 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Accepted shares 0/0 Rejected shares 2/0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:40+02:00] Received new job c380
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:46+02:00] [D0] Setting intensity to 0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:51+02:00] [D0] Setting intensity to 0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:24:56+02:00] [D0] Chose solver 1 with intensity 0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:05+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 52.22 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Temp: 71C Fan: 56% Power: 218W 0.24 MH/J
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:06+02:00] Received new job c381
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:06+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:06+02:00] Total 52.22 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Accepted shares 0/0 Rejected shares 2/0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:10+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:19+02:00] Received new job c382
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:19+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:20+02:00] Received new job c383
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:20+02:00] Received new job c384
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:23+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:23+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:27+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:27+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:31+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:35+02:00] Received new job 0000006aee3a41ec (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:35+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 3.22 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Temp: 70C Fan: 56% Power: 226W 0.01 MH/J
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:36+02:00] Total 3.22 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Accepted shares 0/0 Rejected shares 2/0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:44+02:00] Received new job c385
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:44+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:48+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:53+02:00] Received new job c386
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:53+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:55+02:00] Received new job c387
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:57+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:25:57+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:01+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:05+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 13.44 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Temp: 70C Fan: 56% Power: 223W 0.06 MH/J
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:06+02:00] Total 13.44 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Accepted shares 0/0 Rejected shares 2/0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:07+02:00] Received new job c388
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:07+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:11+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[WARN] [2018-05-30T08:26:16+02:00] Rejected share #6 ([21,"incorrect size of nonce"])
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:31+02:00] Received new job c389
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:31+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:35+02:00] Set diff to 2.00 (target to 000000007fff8000) (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:35+02:00] [GPU 0] Speed: 23.26 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Temp: 70C Fan: 56% Power: 216W 0.11 MH/J
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:35+02:00] [D0] DAG has been created
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:36+02:00] Received new job 0000006aee3a576e (Blake14r)
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:36+02:00] Total 23.26 MH/s, 0.00MH/s Accepted shares 0/0 Rejected shares 3/0
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:41+02:00] Received new job c38a
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:41+02:00] [D0] Creating DAG
[INFO] [2018-05-30T08:26:43+02:00] Received new job c38b

Hi Guru, thanks for your feedback!
The nicehash pool is using the ethstratum protocol. Please use this protocol other than ethash to mine.
There is currently a small issue of Bminer mining on this nicehash pool, as you pointed out in another post. We will fix it in the next release soon.

[EPEMA]

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

[realbminer]

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

[xxxyyyzzz]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.   

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

[realbminer]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.   

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Hi, thanks for your feedback.
Would you please give me your log for me to detect what happens?

[EPEMA]

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

I am happy with the quick response. Good work. BTCZ already on June 16, this week switches to Equihash 144.5 Fork will take place on the block of 160,000 (if not mistaken). I also read in the tweeter that the BTG team thanked the developers of the BTCZ community for their assistance in combating asiks, which means that they also go over to 144.5 (I will not tell you in detail, I do not follow BTG). Development of the miner for Equichash 144.5 for the BTCZ community is carried out by renuzit (https://github.com/btcz/zhasher), Miner zhasher is currently very poorly optimized, it would be great if you implemented the support of Equihash 144.5 in your miner using your knowledge and experience ...

[xxxyyyzzz]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.   

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Hi, thanks for your feedback.
Would you please give me your log for me to detect what happens?

sure. where do you want it?

here is another 10h run...

A: 1040 - R: 18     
so 1.73%

i'm tracing packets via tcpview and i see 1058 packet sent, so all good, just have to work on reject shares a little.

[fabry1999]

I'm running bminer and I get this error:

Failed to retrive temperature from GPU 3
Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

I have check the GPU temp but is the same of other GPUs and is not high

do you know what is the problem and how to solve it ?

[newmz]

I'm running bminer and I get this error:

Failed to retrive temperature from GPU 3
Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

I have check the GPU temp but is the same of other GPUs and is not high

do you know what is the problem and how to solve it ?

Hi there - I have seen this on a few GPUs over the years on different miners & it was usually a bad riser, rather than the software - or sometimes if you are running overclocking software (like MSI Afterburner) at the same time as mining software it can interfere because the overclocking software is polling the card for temperature and the miner is trying to get temp at the same time.

Mostly though, as I said - it is a sign that a riser is dead or dying.

Do you see this (or any other problems) when running any other mining software or just Bminer?

[fabry1999]

I'm running bminer and I get this error:

Failed to retrive temperature from GPU 3
Miner died! It will be restarted soon...

I have check the GPU temp but is the same of other GPUs and is not high

do you know what is the problem and how to solve it ?

Hi there - I have seen this on a few GPUs over the years on different miners & it was usually a bad riser, rather than the software - or sometimes if you are running overclocking software (like MSI Afterburner) at the same time as mining software it can interfere because the overclocking software is polling the card for temperature and the miner is trying to get temp at the same time.

Mostly though, as I said - it is a sign that a riser is dead or dying.

Do you see this (or any other problems) when running any other mining software or just Bminer?

After a couple of reboot the problem was solved, In past I had the same problem with claymore miner but in that case there was a command option in order to ignore this kind of warning that in bminer is not present or I didn't find on documentation.

[realbminer]

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

I am happy with the quick response. Good work. BTCZ already on June 16, this week switches to Equihash 144.5 Fork will take place on the block of 160,000 (if not mistaken). I also read in the tweeter that the BTG team thanked the developers of the BTCZ community for their assistance in combating asiks, which means that they also go over to 144.5 (I will not tell you in detail, I do not follow BTG). Development of the miner for Equichash 144.5 for the BTCZ community is carried out by renuzit (https://github.com/btcz/zhasher), Miner zhasher is currently very poorly optimized, it would be great if you implemented the support of Equihash 144.5 in your miner using your knowledge and experience ...

Hi EPEMA:
Thanks again for the message.
We will follow BTCZ's movement closely and we will try the best to release Equihash 144.5 soon.

[Keko Fdez]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

[xxxyyyzzz]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

nope this is not me, v6 work perfecly for me, v7 has some bugs and v8 work ok.

dstm i never tested in way of rejected shares, only read what console outputs and its been 0.99% accpeted. so i guess 1% reject...  so far i dont know if this is ok or not.

[supermoew]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

What I feel suspicious is that why you blame this miner other than ewbf ...
I just checked your latest posts and you keep complaining about this miner is slower in mining equihash and no one else ever mentioned....

[supermoew]

Hello realbminer, will there be support for ZHash (Equihash 144.5). We should pay attention to this algorithm as it will be popular, except for BTCZ it is implemented by BTG and I suppose that ZCL too can pass to it, the developers of BTCZ previously cooperated with the ZCL team.
ZHash(Equihash 144,5) is a new algo made by the BTCz decentralized team : it is a equihash variant (more ASIC resistant than the currents versions).

Hi EPEMA:
Thank you so much for this message.
We will definitely provide support for (144, 5) once the community reaches consensus.
Please keep me updated if you got any news! thx!

I am happy with the quick response. Good work. BTCZ already on June 16, this week switches to Equihash 144.5 Fork will take place on the block of 160,000 (if not mistaken). I also read in the tweeter that the BTG team thanked the developers of the BTCZ community for their assistance in combating asiks, which means that they also go over to 144.5 (I will not tell you in detail, I do not follow BTG). Development of the miner for Equichash 144.5 for the BTCZ community is carried out by renuzit (https://github.com/btcz/zhasher), Miner zhasher is currently very poorly optimized, it would be great if you implemented the support of Equihash 144.5 in your miner using your knowledge and experience ...

Hi EPEMA:
Thanks again for the message.
We will follow BTCZ's movement closely and we will try the best to release Equihash 144.5 soon.

BTCZ community is going to do a hard forking to equihash 144,5 on June 15, really excited to see this move.
https://kryptocal.com/event/21529/zhash-forking

[Keko Fdez]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

nope this is not me, v6 work perfecly for me, v7 has some bugs and v8 work ok.

dstm i never tested in way of rejected shares, only read what console outputs and its been 0.99% accpeted. so i guess 1% reject...  so far i dont know if this is ok or not.

My mistake then, Post looked exactly similar anyway I apologise

[Keko Fdez]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

What I feel suspicious is that why you blame this miner other than ewbf ...
I just checked your latest posts and you keep complaining about this miner is slower in mining equihash and no one else ever mentioned....

First of all I don´t blame the miner I comment about it and my performance with it so it can be improved which is something different like the post I did a couple of days ago about the rejected shares that you were not able to see and commented back. Hope you were able to see the green lines by now because realbminer did and is trying to look at it.

Second I can´t say anything about ewbf because I have never used that miner, always used DSTM miner and it has always been faster for me not on the console were Bminer is faster but on the pool side with more constant hashrate and less rejected shares. So I can only talk about what I have used that is why you never see me talking about ewbf.

And finally, like many others I don´t give a shit about one miner or another don´t support any of them in particular don´t know the developers not friends why them so I just use the most convenient for me for what I want to get and like right now not using neither Bminer nor DSTM. Gave up on mining ZEC because the profit has drop like hell to 4.12 dollars/day for my rig and there are more coins out there to make bigger profits

[supermoew]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

What I feel suspicious is that why you blame this miner other than ewbf ...
I just checked your latest posts and you keep complaining about this miner is slower in mining equihash and no one else ever mentioned....

First of all I don´t blame the miner I comment about it and my performance with it so it can be improved which is something different like the post I did a couple of days ago about the rejected shares that you were not able to see and commented back. Hope you were able to see the green lines by now because realbminer did and is trying to look at it.

Second I can´t say anything about ewbf because I have never used that miner, always used DSTM miner and it has always been faster for me not on the console were Bminer is faster but on the pool side with more constant hashrate and less rejected shares. So I can only talk about what I have used that is why you never see me talking about ewbf.

And finally, like many others I don´t give a shit about one miner or another don´t support any of them in particular don´t know the developers not friends why them so I just use the most convenient for me for what I want to get and like right now not using neither Bminer nor DSTM. Gave up on mining ZEC because the profit has drop like hell to 4.12 dollars/day for my rig and there are more coins out there to make bigger profits

Then I apologize to you. I just saw realbminer's posts.

[Keko Fdez]

just an info from me..

i used to test v6, and it has a lot rejected shares, so i stop using it,
v7 never got working, some error popup up after initialization..
v8 is ok, but i see s lot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seams big....

now been running bminer for 14h and tih has about 1.5% rejects shares against accepted shares.  thats a really big amount... i used to test dstm for some time and i guess it was like 0.99%... 0.98%   for running like 24h or so...   this miner v6 ..8...  has a large number of rejection.  

didn't compare it on pool, but it can be just worse that what console says.

Is it you the same one that posted this in DSTM bitcointalk because is exactly the same wording with different numbers so it actually looks a bit suspicious. I copy paste here:

I used to test v5.5, and it has a lot of rejected shares, so I stop using dstm...
V0.6.0 never got working, some error popup up after initialization on all rigs
v0.6.1 is ok, but I see slot of rejected shares, didn't compare a real number with other miners but it seems big...

now been running DSTM for 24h and still has about 1.5-3 % rejects shares against accepted shares.  that's a really big amount...

Pretty much same message saying opposite things. What are you trying to achieve though I might be wrong but doesn’t look right, does it?

Both newbie account with 3 and 1 message...

What I feel suspicious is that why you blame this miner other than ewbf ...
I just checked your latest posts and you keep complaining about this miner is slower in mining equihash and no one else ever mentioned....

First of all I don´t blame the miner I comment about it and my performance with it so it can be improved which is something different like the post I did a couple of days ago about the rejected shares that you were not able to see and commented back. Hope you were able to see the green lines by now because realbminer did and is trying to look at it.

Second I can´t say anything about ewbf because I have never used that miner, always used DSTM miner and it has always been faster for me not on the console were Bminer is faster but on the pool side with more constant hashrate and less rejected shares. So I can only talk about what I have used that is why you never see me talking about ewbf.

And finally, like many others I don´t give a shit about one miner or another don´t support any of them in particular don´t know the developers not friends why them so I just use the most convenient for me for what I want to get and like right now not using neither Bminer nor DSTM. Gave up on mining ZEC because the profit has drop like hell to 4.12 dollars/day for my rig and there are more coins out there to make bigger profits

Then I apologize to you. I just saw realbminer's posts.

No need, no harm made