[ANN][ICO] EHF eHealth First

[hanshammer]

EHF team will attend Invest Forum in Moscow and will present eHealth First Project and ICO.
Save the date - April 26, 2018!
It would be great, if you come and we can get acquainted personally.
Welcome!

Have we some Russian people here?

Of course there are) And a happy coincidence at this time I will be in Moscow, on the job, if it's to emerge successfully, I will definitely attend this event!

Great that this guy attend so many conferences and events. I think this will attract some big investors at the end.

[Vansire]

There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.

[levyashin]

There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.

Well, most of them were overhyped. And they hurt their investors at the end. I really not sure any ico raised more than 100m $ and make their investors happy at the end.

[Vansire]

There have been other ICOs last year that raised more than 100 million. It's not impossible. But those project were hyped. I don't see such a big hype for EHF yet.

Well, most of them were overhyped. And they hurt their investors at the end. I really not sure any ico raised more than 100m $ and make their investors happy at the end.

EOS is not doing so bad, it's already beaten Litecoin.

Hey do u know what happened with filecoin, wasn't it the biggest ICO yet, is it already on CMC?

[hicaribou]

In a span of 2 months a lot will happen eHealth may become the best ICO to invest in and it may also be the worst depending on the team, how they will handle the project.

Yes, everhything will depend on the development of the project. If the team able to promote and get a lot of attentions from investors, the chance to be success is exist.

Even in the next few years during the development progress, it can be the best coin to buy. The thing is there will be many more people buying the token if the progress always shows interesting things.

[Trrrt]

Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

[Piggy]

Yes i also think that the sucess of the ehf ico depend of the visbility and the marketing of the project. A lot of sucessfull ico was a sucess because of a good management of the communication and marketing by the team. I think ehf team handle the hype well, it will now depend of the future developpement.

I'm quite curios to see the mvp they will come up with. Plus i hope they will have more blockchain convention they plan to participate, to promote the project.

[batako]

Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.

I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.

A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

[Frickeladm]

Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.

I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.

A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

Marketing and developement are 2 completly different things. Thats why usually a salesman is hired at some point. But that might be a bit expensive for this project.
Selling a project only on the base of its developement is hard but I'm sure the team can handle that. There are already many publications and interviews.

[jonnytracker]

Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.

I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.

A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

When it started it seems to me like Ehealth was just a one man project, but slowly the team and partner grew, but I still have the impression of lack in marketing and community management.

[omwibya]

Yes the team seems to be really busy right now, maybe it’s normal cause there is a lot of things to develop and I don’t now if they have the time to change the bitcointalk. Also the roadmap is on very long term, maybe it’s realistic for a health care project , so they have time to change and work more on bitcointalk.

I think the main reason is the preparation for pre-sales. Before the start of sales remains very little.

Let them work the most important thing is that they make a good working project. Marketing etc will come later. Better to create marketing when you have a good project and good product.

I agree, I guess investors now often prefer ICO's with a MVP or at least a demo version but it also depends on the teams efforts to set up a successful ICO.

A successful project will depend on many things including good teamwork and something that can be used as a reference like demo version. Ehealth should be able to combine all the good stuffs therefore they will have a chance to bring the platform work as expected.

When it started it seems to me like Ehealth was just a one man project, but slowly the team and partner grew, but I still have the impression of lack in marketing and community management.

EHF has always had people working on it, but it's a long term project so it's natural to have the team develop over time.

[matjas]

a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

[jonnytracker]

a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

How can you say its high, What if the project need that much for progress.

[Piggy]

a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

[king_of_alts]

a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

100 mil is certainly on the higher end of the spectrum and only if there's a huge bull market it could be achieved but who knows.

[MandatoryOption]

a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

100 mil is certainly on the higher end of the spectrum and only if there's a huge bull market it could be achieved but who knows.

I don't see any ICO raise 100M again in the near future. But eHealth also doesn't need that much money. The primary goal should be to reach the softcap, which I think will be achieved easily. Then we will see.

[Frickeladm]

a lot of attention is also needed, the hartcap is probably quite high. so 100 millionen?

yes but unsold tokens will be burned. so its reasonable to set a high hardcap, so you have a lot of tokens (which will be created on coin creation, irreversebly) for investors and raising the coinvalue by burning the unsold tokens.

That's actually a very good point, I never thought about it in this way. But on the other hand, hardcaps shouldn't be too high, because then they simply seem unrealistic and discourage investors from investing.

$ 100 million is a lot but in December almost any whitepaper could achieve that. given the scope and the long roadmap $100 million does not sound so unrealistic.

I am not sure about it.

If it was a security and giving out dividends it may reach but for a utility, 100m is a hard target to reach.

I agree, 100 mil is too high, but then again as long as the project continues it doesn't matter to me if it's achieved.

I hope they have working scenarios for cases when they collect less than hardcap, because 100 mil is a huge amount of money and in current market conditions I'm being rather skeptic of them being able to raise that much.

There is actually a lot of time to go till the end of the ico, plus they could find some big investor which see the value of the project, 100 mil is very hard but not impossible.

100 mil is certainly on the higher end of the spectrum and only if there's a huge bull market it could be achieved but who knows.

I don't see any ICO raise 100M again in the near future. But eHealth also doesn't need that much money. The primary goal should be to reach the softcap, which I think will be achieved easily. Then we will see.

yeah the softcap will be easy, i think. its kind of hard to really trust crypto at the moment. and many people are scared off. but i think there are still some investers which will make good use of the current market situation, so not everything is forsaken.

[cantdecide]

The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.

[levyashin]

The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.

Yeah, you are right.

It can cause a bad first impression for possible investors.

[king_of_alts]

The pictures in the opening post are still missing... It would be nice if the team could arrange a reupload.

Yeah, you are right.

It can cause a bad first impression for possible investors.

I agree. They should fix this asap because it would give a wrong impression. The team is quite active but maybe overworked.