Bitcoin Forum
June 02, 2020, 06:21:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.19.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 [422] 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 879474 times)
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 3944



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:25:33 PM
 #8421

The bottom line is that money is power.
Well, hey, some of us still have money here, and their 90%-100% losses on HF so far haven't left them broke.  Is there some slot where I can insert money and receive justice? I too am unhappy with them getting away with the fraud— even more so than my financial loss. I'm willing to double down on my losses if I was reasonably confident that the result would be them not getting away with it, because I'm very concerned with the long term effects on the mining ecosystem if its possible for hardware vendors to freely get away with fraud. What I don't have an abundance of is time.

I was thinking of perhaps funding some bounties for things like most effective community action to prevent others from getting defrauded by hashfast, but I'm not sure I have time to administer it— and esp. in terms of figuring how how to convince people that I'm being serious when I say that I really don't want anything illegal done.
1591122103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591122103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591122103
Reply with quote  #2

1591122103
Report to moderator
1591122103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591122103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591122103
Reply with quote  #2

1591122103
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1591122103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591122103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591122103
Reply with quote  #2

1591122103
Report to moderator
1591122103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591122103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591122103
Reply with quote  #2

1591122103
Report to moderator
1591122103
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1591122103

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1591122103
Reply with quote  #2

1591122103
Report to moderator
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:26:58 PM
 #8422

Just out of curiosity, you stated in the other thread that your deadline was the 31 of January. Batch 1 deadline was the 31 of December, so you are batch 2, right?
In the case of Morici, HashFast had another ToS live in their website, not the one that they retroactively imposed to batch 1 customers.

A few people in this thread ordered with the first, non recognized version (see: http://hashfast.org/Terms_of_Sale/8_August_2013 and the ToS was later unilaterally changed to: http://hashfast.org/Terms_of_Sale/25_August_2013).

Useless to note, HashFast is denying this detail.
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #YxVBdgqoqqJ26awz

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 3944



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:31:37 PM
 #8423

Just out of curiosity, you stated in the other thread that your deadline was the 31 of January. Batch 1 deadline was the 31 of December, so you are batch 2, right?
Gah no. I started to type January 1st and then realized the actual date was Dec 31st and didn't fix the month. My purchases were August 14th and September 1st, both Batch 1. (thanks for pointing that out, I fixed it)

They sent the revised terms to me on 08/21. I just personally consider them binding both due to the second purchase and because I talked to them after, considered immediately demanding a refund but didn't— because frankly the revised terms seemed more realistic to me... I was worried that they'd be a day late and get slammed with refunds and that didn't strike me as fair or wise. So if anything the contract revision increased my confidence... how foolish I was.
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:31:53 PM
 #8424

HashFast's behavior has been completely unacceptable by any measure. The fact that they seem to be getting away with it irks me to no end.

The bottom line is that money is power.
A pre-order is you giving that power to a counterparty based on trust, promises and a sales contract.
The counterparty can decide to default on their contract/promises and proceed to use that power against you.
HF has been doing exactly that by hiring Strategic Counsel Corp. and Zuber Lawler & Del Duca.



The bottom line is that the law isnt up to date when it comes to bitcoin and especially bitcoin mining.

Bitcoin mining is a very complicated situation when it comes to refunds and delivery dates etc and there is simply no law speaking yet that takes care of this.

So HF is basically misusing the traditional law of customer protection to fraud their customers, cause in a usual customer protection situation there is nothing wrong with offering a US$ refund.

So there is a gap in lawmaking and HF is using this gap to commit fraud.
gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 3944



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:35:40 PM
 #8425

So there is a gap in lawmaking and HF is using this gap to commit fraud.
I don't really agree there. This is what contracts exist for. The law doesn't have to forsee in advance every possible business contingency.  There is no basis in law that says that you can just ignore a contract when it suits you.
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:48:14 PM
 #8426

So there is a gap in lawmaking and HF is using this gap to commit fraud.
I don't really agree there. This is what contracts exist for. The law doesn't have to forsee in advance every possible business contingency.  There is no basis in law that says that you can just ignore a contract when it suits you.

Yes, i hope you are right and as HF stated explicit BTC-refunds i think you got a chance there.

I see a gap in lawmaking more as a general problem when it comes to mining and late deliveries, cause in a traditional customer protection way of thinking there is nothing wrong with not delivering and offering a refund after 6 months. And this fits perfectly to maybe a purchase of a BMW or whatever but it doesnt fit the purchase of a Bitcoin-miner. And thats where i see a gap in lawmaking.

Edit: Basically the Bitcoin-Miner-Manufacturer misuses his customers as a way of Bitcoin-Call-Option. If BTC/Fiat stays the same they deliver, if it raises they choose not to deliver and to offer you a US$ refund.
Syke
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3304
Merit: 1046


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 09:56:01 PM
 #8427

Yes, i hope you are right and as HF stated explicit BTC-refunds i think you got a chance there.

I see a gap in lawmaking more as a general problem when it comes to mining and late deliveries, cause in a traditional customer protection way of thinking there is nothing wrong with not delivering and offering a refund after 6 months. And this fits perfectly to maybe a purchase of a BMW or whatever but it doesnt fit the purchase of a Bitcoin-miner. And thats where i see a gap in lawmaking.

Deals denominated in something other than fiat currency are not new. I think the law is just fine. For example, a judge ordered CoinLab to deliver bitcoins to Bitvestment, and not some USD-equivilent.

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/11/07/judge-orders-coinlab-to-pay-up-in-bitcoin/

Buy & Hold
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:00:58 PM
 #8428

Yes, i hope you are right and as HF stated explicit BTC-refunds i think you got a chance there.

I see a gap in lawmaking more as a general problem when it comes to mining and late deliveries, cause in a traditional customer protection way of thinking there is nothing wrong with not delivering and offering a refund after 6 months. And this fits perfectly to maybe a purchase of a BMW or whatever but it doesnt fit the purchase of a Bitcoin-miner. And thats where i see a gap in lawmaking.

Deals denominated in something other than fiat currency are not new. I think the law is just fine. For example, a judge ordered CoinLab to deliver bitcoins to Bitvestment, and not some USD-equivilent.

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/11/07/judge-orders-coinlab-to-pay-up-in-bitcoin/


Yes, i think we have to distinguish here between orders placed with Bitcoin and orders placed with US$.

Orders placed in BTC have a chance imo to get their BTCs back, but whats the situation for those that paid in US$?

They are of course offered a US$ refund but as i already stated thats a situation very close to fraud, cause they basically are able to choose what suits them best. Like a BTC-call-option.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:03:55 PM
 #8429

Order placed in USD can choose between USD refunds or hardware. What could be better than that?
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #jRf9TlEjf9uU0HpE

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
seriouscoin
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 500


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:27:09 PM
 #8430

Yes, i hope you are right and as HF stated explicit BTC-refunds i think you got a chance there.

I see a gap in lawmaking more as a general problem when it comes to mining and late deliveries, cause in a traditional customer protection way of thinking there is nothing wrong with not delivering and offering a refund after 6 months. And this fits perfectly to maybe a purchase of a BMW or whatever but it doesnt fit the purchase of a Bitcoin-miner. And thats where i see a gap in lawmaking.

Deals denominated in something other than fiat currency are not new. I think the law is just fine. For example, a judge ordered CoinLab to deliver bitcoins to Bitvestment, and not some USD-equivilent.

http://blogs.wsj.com/moneybeat/2013/11/07/judge-orders-coinlab-to-pay-up-in-bitcoin/


Yes, i think we have to distinguish here between orders placed with Bitcoin and orders placed with US$.

Orders placed in BTC have a chance imo to get their BTCs back, but whats the situation for those that paid in US$?

They are of course offered a US$ refund but as i already stated thats a situation very close to fraud, cause they basically are able to choose what suits them best. Like a BTC-call-option.

Had Hashfast just accepted BTC as a form of payment like many vendors out there, yes you should not expect full refund in BTC. However, HashFast team had been advertising and giving ppl a sale agreement that they WOULD refund the full BTC amount if they couldnt deliver the products.

Its clearly the contract that they now refused to abide.
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:49:25 PM
Last edit: March 16, 2014, 12:25:22 AM by RoadStress
 #8431

The bottom line is that money is power.
Well, hey, some of us still have money here, and their 90%-100% losses on HF so far haven't left them broke.  Is there some slot where I can insert money and receive justice? I too am unhappy with them getting away with the fraud— even more so than my financial loss. I'm willing to double down on my losses if I was reasonably confident that the result would be them not getting away with it, because I'm very concerned with the long term effects on the mining ecosystem if its possible for hardware vendors to freely get away with fraud. What I don't have an abundance of is time.

I was thinking of perhaps funding some bounties for things like most effective community action to prevent others from getting defrauded by hashfast, but I'm not sure I have time to administer it— and esp. in terms of figuring how how to convince people that I'm being serious when I say that I really don't want anything illegal done.

BFL got away with a lot of crap, but they never promised full BTC refunds so this is why HF's case is so interesting.

Edit: This is just too good to not quote it for history:

Why did you promise full btc refunds if either:

a. You don't understand the volatility of bitcoin

or

b. You don't hold all btc payments in full in case of refunds.

If HashFast had enough resources to build your machine without your money, we would have simply kept the machines for ourselves and not taken the unnecessary (and risky) step of involving customers.

"Full BTC refunds" means a full refund of the price (which is always denominated in USD) via the exchange medium of BTC.

Unfortunately, the decision of a few disgruntled customers to lawyer up and go the legal route forced HashFast to issue refunds solely in USD.

gmaxwell
Moderator
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3066
Merit: 3944



View Profile
March 16, 2014, 06:26:49 AM
 #8432

i think you got a chance there.
Sadly, I don't because I simple don't have the time— or emotional tolerance— to see these guys through to court. Fortunately other people are already in the process of suing them, so some amount of justice may still be served.

I started the heavy prodding in public when I saw they were soliciting more rubes to screw over, with only a mild hope that I'd ever see a dollar or a Bitcoin out of them— that maybe if they saw they they were going to be able to get away with the highly profitable task of pulling in more victims without complaint they might try to rescue things with their past customers.  I think that at least the recent noise has been successful at increasing a lot of awareness, and maybe saved some people a $6k loss, so thats all good.

If there is anything someone thinks I can easily do to help them recover please let me know.
Gyrsur
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2492
Merit: 1301


I, Quant


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 06:41:23 AM
Last edit: March 16, 2014, 04:48:28 PM by Gyrsur
 #8433



Why did you promise full btc refunds if either:

a. You don't understand the volatility of bitcoin

or

b. You don't hold all btc payments in full in case of refunds.

If HashFast had enough resources to build your machine without your money, we would have simply kept the machines for ourselves and not taken the unnecessary (and risky) step of involving customers.

"Full BTC refunds" means a full refund of the price (which is always denominated in USD) via the exchange medium of BTC.

Unfortunately, the decision of a few disgruntled customers to lawyer up and go the legal route forced HashFast to issue refunds solely in USD.

not believe a single word of HF!

Micky25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 974
Merit: 1000



View Profile
March 17, 2014, 09:23:40 AM
 #8434

Quote from: Bitcoin Forum
A reply of yours, quoted below, was deleted by the starter of a self-moderated topic. There are no rules of self-moderation, so this deletion cannot be appealed. Do not continue posting in this topic if the topic-starter has requested that you leave.

You can create a new topic if you are unsatisfied with this one. If the topic-starter is scamming, post about it in Scam Accusations.

Quote
the times you are online makes we wonder where you work from, probably not the US. Who are you HashLast_CL?
RoadStress
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1862
Merit: 1002


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 12:41:21 PM
 #8435

MPP is coming SoonTM.  Sit tight and be patient.  Great things come to those who wait!   Wink

This epic full retard has to be here for posterity. HOW ABOUT YOU SIT AND BE PATIENT WHILE YOU LOSE MONEY EVERY DAY YOU MORONIC DUMBFUCK IDIOT???

MANofthePEOPLE
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 12:58:37 PM
 #8436

MPP is coming SoonTM.  Sit tight and be patient.  Great things come to those who wait!   Wink

This epic full retard has to be here for posterity. HOW ABOUT YOU SIT AND BE PATIENT WHILE YOU LOSE MONEY EVERY DAY YOU MORONIC DUMBFUCK IDIOT???

Well at least I doubt he's making much anymore. Can't be many people buying from ScamFast now.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
March 17, 2014, 12:59:55 PM
 #8437

Well at least I doubt he's making much anymore. Can't be many people buying from ScamFast now.

This is why they will have to move away from preorders, in favour of shipping in stock products...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #3DH3EVs92vNVsWwH

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
edgie13
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 01:14:08 PM
 #8438

MPP is coming SoonTM.  Sit tight and be patient.  Great things come to those who wait!   Wink

This epic full retard has to be here for posterity. HOW ABOUT YOU SIT AND BE PATIENT WHILE YOU LOSE MONEY EVERY DAY YOU MORONIC DUMBFUCK IDIOT???

She really used to get under my skin, also.  ...not anymore.

BTC Scotch fund: 1GFZos2WGknCeVgDtjpHwo3jeJ4tSLVrXS
klondike_bar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1918
Merit: 1001

ASIC Wannabe


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 01:39:39 PM
 #8439

Well at least I doubt he's making much anymore. Can't be many people buying from ScamFast now.

This is why they will have to move away from preorders, in favour of shipping in stock products...
Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #3DH3EVs92vNVsWwH

or they have paid the R&D costs and now have access to thier own hardware production line for cheap.  Bitfury did this - thats why Dave has an $8M/month farm while the only equipment for sale is about $10/GH

24" PCI-E cables with 16AWG wires and stripped ends - great for server PSU mods, best prices https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=563461
No longer a wannabe - now an ASIC owner!
SolarSilver
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1110
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 17, 2014, 01:45:14 PM
 #8440

I might as well crosspost here because our replies in the other thread will be deleted as soon as Hashfast_CL is waken up at 10am by his/her mom to get breakfast

MPP is coming SoonTM

First see, then believe

You have not shipped Upgrade kits or Sierra's too, so why would we believe you?

Sit tight and be patient.  Great things come to those who wait!   Wink

Are you seriously going taunt us and laugh in our face?

The MPP should have shipped out the 1st of Feb. The Upgrade kits should have shipped in December. As should the Sierras. And the BBJets were also 2 months late

the only thing to come to those who wait is an increase in diffulty
Pages: « 1 ... 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 [422] 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!