Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 07:48:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 586 »
  Print  
Author Topic: HashFast announces specs for new ASIC: 400GH/s  (Read 880232 times)
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 08:06:45 AM
 #1341

That is a long ways out.  They got themselves covered by having you pay a lot up front then and you getting little in return later for all that extra hashrate which doesn't come till much later.

IM not saying it will take them that long, but clearly the ToS protect Hashfast far better than the MPP protects its customers.
1714117729
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714117729

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714117729
Reply with quote  #2

1714117729
Report to moderator
"I'm sure that in 20 years there will either be very large transaction volume or no volume." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714117729
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714117729

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714117729
Reply with quote  #2

1714117729
Report to moderator
Paladin69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 08:09:21 AM
 #1342

What I think Paladin69 is trying to say is that HF has clearly showed us that is really outstanding from other asic manufactures by having nice contracts with the best factorys out there, the MPP , having the software prepared in andvance...but we are really close to what they marked as "time to ship" the units and we still havent seen any photo. Not the case, not the pcbs, not even any other part as the cooling solution that they have been simulating with. For the moment as a customer I  want to believe

I saw what you wrote earlier so I screamed at them earlier today. They promised me they will have pictures for you soon.

I'm surprised more haven't been screaming for actual photos since you're close to Oct 20th.
Paladin69
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 08:11:28 AM
 #1343

That is a long ways out.  They got themselves covered by having you pay a lot up front then and you getting little in return later for all that extra hashrate which doesn't come till much later.

IM not saying it will take them that long, but clearly the ToS protect Hashfast far better than the MPP protects its customers.

It is kinda strange.  You'd be better off buying two units up front without MPP than buying one with MPP.
SolarSilver
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 08:14:49 AM
 #1344

The BabyJet has room for only 2 modules in total (as that maxes out the Raspberry Pi), you need to upgrade the old power supply as well (which is included in the expansion upgrade you bought).
If the full MPP kicks in, you would get 4 extra modules so you will need to look for an extra case, power supply and a cgminer running CPU (rPi, PC, laptop) with a USB connector for each module

Besides, the MPP modules will only ship out in 2014, you'll get your bought expansion board in December

This isn't right.

It doesn't max out Raspi, it maxes out space. Remember the cool thing about the modules is that they daisy chain together. This is why in the Sierra you can string 3 modules together with 1USB feed to an external controller of your choice.

Sure, it maxes out space, cooling and power supply in the (beefed up) BabyJet, but it will also push the rPi to it's limits so that is why HF in PM recommends:

Quote
We don't want to risk overloading the limited resources of a Raspberry Pi by running more than two mini-boards (formerly 'modules') off one of them.

So we recommend something more powerful for one or more Sierras.

cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 08:22:46 AM
 #1345

Sure, it maxes out space, cooling and power supply in the (beefed up) BabyJet, but it will also push the rPi to it's limits so that is why HF in PM recommends:

Quote
We don't want to risk overloading the limited resources of a Raspberry Pi by running more than two mini-boards (formerly 'modules') off one of them.

So we recommend something more powerful for one or more Sierras.



Well, there is an inconsistency in what they've written as there is 2 versus 3 modules in a BJ versus a Sierra.

Amy has assured me that the Sierra can be run by a Raspi. If not, use an old laptop.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 08:33:34 AM
 #1346

So this will be interesting.

Because I'm already repackaging my BJ's as sierras because of space considerations, you will be able to use me as an experiment to work these issues out such as what a Raspi may or may not be able to handle. Sounds like 3 modules right now or one per Sierra. I'll run that by engineering.

itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1075


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 10:49:25 AM
 #1347

What I think Paladin69 is trying to say is that HF has clearly showed us that is really outstanding from other asic manufactures by having nice contracts with the best factorys out there, the MPP , having the software prepared in andvance...but we are really close to what they marked as "time to ship" the units and we still havent seen any photo. Not the case, not the pcbs, not even any other part as the cooling solution that they have been simulating with. For the moment as a customer I  want to believe

I saw what you wrote earlier so I screamed at them earlier today. They promised me they will have pictures for you soon.

I'm surprised more haven't been screaming for actual photos since you're close to Oct 20th.

We are not screaming for actual photos because we are not KnC FUD-spreaders like you and Puppet. Anyone can click on the "last posts" in the profiles of both of you and see that you are heavily shilling for KnC in their thread, and came here to spread FUD. Unlike KnC who are assembling their products in empty warehouse, HashFast has contracted the factory which will assemble and deliver all 500 batch #1 machines in half a day. Since they have 1200 units capacity a day, they will be probably be over with batch #2 on the first day of production before going home for dinner. Have KnC assembled their batch #1 now, two weeks later? I thought so. Since HF stated it will take 5 days from receiving chips to production day, it makes no sense to ask for pictures of chips since they aren't any, they should be in HF headquarters on 26-27th October for delivery to be in October. Asking for photos before that date makes no sense.
GalaxyASIC
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 130
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 11:26:18 AM
 #1348

Seeing how few KnC units blowup I have to ask: where does it say anything about the warranty on HasFast products?

I bought 2 units, but forgot to look it up and can't find any info on warranty.

HashFast REFUND ! I am a HashFast's Batch 1 customer and I want full 100% BTC refund.
Puppet
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 980
Merit: 1040


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 12:10:24 PM
 #1349

. Anyone can click on the "last posts" in the profiles of both of you and see that you are heavily shilling for KnC in their thread,
wait, what lol? me a knc shill?
rofl. please post my best knc cheerleading and I will temporarily unignore you.
itod
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1974
Merit: 1075


^ Will code for Bitcoins


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 12:43:08 PM
 #1350

. Anyone can click on the "last posts" in the profiles of both of you and see that you are heavily shilling for KnC in their thread,
wait, what lol? me a knc shill?
rofl. please post my best knc cheerleading and I will temporarily unignore you.


How did you see that when I'm on your ignore list? You don't recall organizing ignore-raid on anyone who dared to say anything realistic about KnC on their thread? I got my yellow tag because of people like you.
FCTaiChi
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


decentralizedhashing.com


View Profile WWW
October 14, 2013, 12:44:17 PM
 #1351

Seeing how few KnC units blowup I have to ask: where does it say anything about the warranty on HasFast products?

I bought 2 units, but forgot to look it up and can't find any info on warranty.
I've read in this thread that there is a 10 day.

Mining Equipment Comparison Table                               Bitcoin News                             1nKAizrhGzvLfWBVfX8fGLAs6kxKV7aXM
Micky25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 974
Merit: 1000



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 01:26:53 PM
 #1352


HashFast will be providing all MPP customers (Batches 1, 2, and 3) with additional ASICs in the form of complete mini-boards.


I really appreciate this, thank you. It's good to see an ASIC company that recognizes, that their first customers took the greatest risks and paid the most.
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:18:38 PM
 #1353

Remember the cool thing about the modules is that they daisy chain together.

Not saying this is or isn't true but, you are the only person that has claimed this will be possible.  There haven't been any postings from HF accounts in this thread at least claiming they will work this way.
Daminqn
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 38
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:33:03 PM
 #1354

Thanks for reporting on the specifications of the power supply.

What are the specifications of liquid cooling equipment?
SolarSilver
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1112
Merit: 1000


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 02:59:01 PM
 #1355

Well, there is an inconsistency in what they've written as there is 2 versus 3 modules in a BJ versus a Sierra.

Amy has assured me that the Sierra can be run by a Raspi. If not, use an old laptop.

Frankly I don't really care that much, those rPi are so cheap and small that I don't mind adding one for each module

It's just the cable mess that increases with all those power supplies...
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:34:51 PM
 #1356

Well, there is an inconsistency in what they've written as there is 2 versus 3 modules in a BJ versus a Sierra.

Amy has assured me that the Sierra can be run by a Raspi. If not, use an old laptop.

Frankly I don't really care that much, those rPi are so cheap and small that I don't mind adding one for each module

It's just the cable mess that increases with all those power supplies...

just talked to Simon.

don't go out and buy a bunch of Raspis.  you may need far less than even i anticipated.
cypherdoc
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1764
Merit: 1002



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:35:14 PM
 #1357

Remember the cool thing about the modules is that they daisy chain together.

Not saying this is or isn't true but, you are the only person that has claimed this will be possible.  There haven't been any postings from HF accounts in this thread at least claiming they will work this way.

you don't have to believe me but...
pmorici
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 479
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 04:58:23 PM
 #1358

Remember the cool thing about the modules is that they daisy chain together.

Not saying this is or isn't true but, you are the only person that has claimed this will be possible.  There haven't been any postings from HF accounts in this thread at least claiming they will work this way.
you don't have to believe me but...

Even if you can daisy chain them the maximum number of USB devices a computer can support is 127 which sounds like a lot but many physical devices have multiple logical USB devices within them so if the things can be daisy chained they will count for at least 2 USB devices each one for the actual ASIC miner and another for the hub device that provides the chaining port.  So for someone like you that expects to have like 50+ of the things I wouldn't expect to chain them all and have it just work.
MrTeal
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1274
Merit: 1004


View Profile
October 14, 2013, 05:06:15 PM
 #1359

Remember the cool thing about the modules is that they daisy chain together.

Not saying this is or isn't true but, you are the only person that has claimed this will be possible.  There haven't been any postings from HF accounts in this thread at least claiming they will work this way.
you don't have to believe me but...

Even if you can daisy chain them the maximum number of USB devices a computer can support is 127 which sounds like a lot but many physical devices have multiple logical USB devices within them so if the things can be daisy chained they will count for at least 2 USB devices each one for the actual ASIC miner and another for the hub device that provides the chaining port.  So for someone like you that expects to have like 50+ of the things I wouldn't expect to chain them all and have it just work.
Depending on how they implemented the daisy chaining, you might not get even close to 127. The traditional way would be to have the first module plug into the USB port, with the module itself being one device and the "output" to the next device being a hub. There are limits to hub depth though (usually 5), so you might not be able to chain more than a few HF modules together.
cedivad
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001



View Profile
October 14, 2013, 05:19:15 PM
 #1360

Anyway who would be stupid enough to add point of failures this way?

My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive:
Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)
Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
Pages: « 1 ... 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 [68] 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 ... 586 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!