[LABCOIN] IPO [BTCT.CO] - Details/FAQ and Discussion (ASIC dev/sales/mining)

[dhenson]

Is it painfully obvious to anyone else that Labcoin needs to get 7 more involved in their Gen 1 project? 
  1) He's well respected.
  2) He seems to know what he is talking about and isn't afraid to admit when he doesn't.
  3) He communicates well.
  4) He is already on the payroll... use him.

[Puppet]

Just out of curiosity, do you have any idea what people actually do with these cell libraries?  I don't mean "design the chip" but actually how they physically use them?  Because it doesn't sound like you actually have any idea.

Are you serious? How do you "physically" use libraries? They are not collections of books you know.  Sure sounds like you are the one who has no idea what he is talking about. Go here for a primer:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Physical_design_(electronics)

See that? synthesis is automated.

Synthesizing is akin to compiling code. And what you are saying is akin to software development being automated because the computer does the compilation Thats great,  now if  only you can make it write the code

Look, believe what you want. Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part.

[AngelSky]

Is it painfully obvious to anyone else that Labcoin needs to get 7 more involved in their Gen 1 project? 
  1) He's well respected.
  2) He seems to know what he is talking about and isn't afraid to admit when he doesn't.
  3) He communicates well.
  4) He is already on the payroll... use him.

Agree.

[Pompobit]

Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part.

something similar has been asked to him yesterday:

[15:44] <[7]> does that 500th/s plan involve 65nm chips?
[15:44] <[7]> this weird TSMC document suggests they're planning to do 65nm in Q1 2014
...
[15:48] <[7]> I'm confident that the interface circuitry for 65nm will be finalized this year, but I have no idea who's even going to implement the hashing core.
[15:48] <[7]> if they want me to do that, it would take months, and I wouldn't be very confident that it's going to actually work well
[15:48] <[7]> it's a complete redesign from scratch. at least if their plans haven't changed.

[Puppet]

Why dont you ask TheSeven if there is a snowballs chance in hell this chip will be deployed this year. Im guessing you already did but didnt feel like posting that part.

something similar has been asked to him yesterday:

[15:44] <[7]> does that 500th/s plan involve 65nm chips?
[15:44] <[7]> this weird TSMC document suggests they're planning to do 65nm in Q1 2014
...
[15:48] <[7]> I'm confident that the interface circuitry for 65nm will be finalized this year, but I have no idea who's even going to implement the hashing core.
[15:48] <[7]> if they want me to do that, it would take months, and I wouldn't be very confident that it's going to actually work well
[15:48] <[7]> it's a complete redesign from scratch. at least if their plans haven't changed.

Gee, who'd have thought? IO might be done this year and thats by far the easiest and least critical part for a bitcoin chip.
Sounds like a tape out this year isnt even in the cards and that would make deployment by summer 2014  optimistic.  Well good luck labcoin investors!

[abuelau]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

[VolanicEruptor]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke..

[weaknesswaran]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Voldemort

[VolanicEruptor]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

Okay so from now on we refer to 300gh/s as "Valdemort".

Sorry, I don't watch Teddy Ruxpin so I don't get the joke..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lord_Voldemort

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dBxPZn0VsGQ&list=PLD2748F698F4B8C1C

[TMAN]

So guestimates what are we hashing at?

[radiumsoup]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

[TMAN]

So what's up with these payments?

[VolanicEruptor]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

[demzie]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

[VolanicEruptor]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

 oh okay..

[redbeans2012]

they sold one of these a couple months back, maybe more but I cant read whatever language he speaks

[demzie]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

 oh okay..

Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something..
Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75..

All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha

[damiano]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

 oh okay..

The payouts don't reflect the speed of 3 avalon's though...more likely 4 of them if anything but who really knows at this point. (but I get your point)

[BitThink]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

 oh okay..

Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something..
Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75..

All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha

So do you believe TheSwede and Sam? Who promised 28 hours ago 'will post an update TODAY'?

[BitThink]

Given the last 24 hours, the hash rate is about 300Gh/s at the mo.

It's insignificant and shouldn't be talked about.  That's what we refer to as "satoshi dust" after dividing it by 10,000,000 shares

of course it's significant - without additional information, the only method we have of measuring hash rate is though manual calculation when a deposit is made. You're saying that the resulting per share value is too low to be a significant source of dividends, but that's not what's being discussed. The actual rate of (apparent) hashing is what is important to investors, and gives us an insight into the status of the production line. That's why the hash rate discussion is taking place.

A picture was recently posted of a list of Labcoins Avalon rigs listed in their pool profile.  It would be impossible to dig these up though, this thread is too much of a mess.  Fact is, they're using a few ancient avalons, NOT their own production.  So this IS insignificant.  

I read every single post and never seen that picture, just bullshit.
Fud

 oh okay..

Hahahha shit you believe shit people post? If you believe something..
Read last posts of labcoin or theswede75..

All bullshit fud.. How would a forum member come by their login details to see that; hahaha

So do you believe TheSwede and Sam? Who promised 28 hours ago 'will post an update TODAY'? How long a day could be in their sence?