Bitcoin Forum
April 27, 2024, 05:44:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 ... 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 355551 times)
flower1024
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:35:28 PM
 #2421

Cow, could you add sorting by name (ryo had that in his fork) , it just makes it more natural to read through the webui Tongue

Even better, sort by name based on mine: A-Z , backup: A-Z , mine_slush: A-Z , nmc: A-Z, disable: A-Z, info: A-Z.

if you take the slice method: it has still my sorting method which is doing exactly as you described (sort by role and then by name)

but i only tested it in firefox...
1714196661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714196661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714196661
Reply with quote  #2

1714196661
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714196661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714196661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714196661
Reply with quote  #2

1714196661
Report to moderator
1714196661
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714196661

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714196661
Reply with quote  #2

1714196661
Report to moderator
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:37:14 PM
 #2422

Cow, could you add sorting by name (ryo had that in his fork) , it just makes it more natural to read through the webui Tongue

Even better, sort by name based on mine: A-Z , backup: A-Z , mine_slush: A-Z , nmc: A-Z, disable: A-Z, info: A-Z.

if you take the slice method: it has still my sorting method which is doing exactly as you described (sort by role and then by name)

but i only tested it in firefox...

Your slice method has been removed for some reason, only the altslice is left and that doesnt sort. Ive used it up till recent update from c00ws hopper version and now its giving some error same as dynamicpenalty(which isnt implemented yet) so it seems it was removed o_0

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
flower1024
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1428
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:38:52 PM
 #2423


Your slice method has been removed for some reason, only the altslice is left and that doesnt sort.

i am referring to the new default method in c00w which is called SlicedScheduler
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


moOo


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:46:03 PM
 #2424

Quote
I have bitclockers working fine for myself.


C00w been meaning to ask.. what do you mine with? software-wise

do you use poclbm or pheonix

mooo for rent
c00w (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:47:55 PM
 #2425

SliceScheduler is now the default scheduler.
The old default scheduler is now OldDefaultScheduler.
The websites have been moved and renamed.

I would use poclbm because it doesn't have a memory leak but it gives up on getworks really quickly. So I use phoenix with the memory leak for real mining and poclbm for my dev laptop.

EDIT: I have almost all of them installed though because I keep having to fix bugs which appear with specific miners.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:48:48 PM
 #2426

Getting this occasionally this morning:

[05:47:43] received lp from: bcpool
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 361, in c
allback
    self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 455, in _
startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 542, in _
runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1076, in
gotResult
    _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1020, in
_inlineCallbacks
    result = g.send(result)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\work.py", line 71, in jsonrpc_lpcall
    lp.receive(text,server)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\lp.py", line 30, in receive
    response = json.loads(body)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 326, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 366, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 384, in raw_decode
    raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")
exceptions.ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
[05:47:46] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84
Merit: 10


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:50:04 PM
 #2427

Its gotta be getwork related with bitclockers.

Code:
[15:46:04] Server change to bitclockers, telling client with LP
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:08] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:09] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:10] LP Call pool3.bitclockers.com:8332/LP
[15:46:15] writing to database
[15:46:15] RPC request [00668000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:46:20] RPC request [081ca000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:46:21] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:21] RPC request [602ed000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:46:23] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:25] Server change to rfc, telling client with LP

Cleaned out the non-relevant lines.  4 getworks within 15 seconds and an immediate change to rfc.  

I drink it up!
c00w (OP)
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:00:07 PM
 #2428

I added some more logging to the Lp messages so I can figure out why json decoding is dieing. If they appear again tell me.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:04:24 PM
 #2429

I added some more logging to the Lp messages so I can figure out why json decoding is dieing. If they appear again tell me.

[06:03:23] received lp from: digbtc <html>
<head><title>504 Gateway Time-out</title></head>
<body bgcolor="white">
<center><h1>504 Gateway Time-out</h1></center>
<hr><center>nginx/0.8.54</center>
</body>
</html>

Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 361, in c
allback
    self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 455, in _
startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 542, in _
runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1076, in
gotResult
    _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1020, in
_inlineCallbacks
    result = g.send(result)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\work.py", line 71, in jsonrpc_lpcall
    lp.receive(text,server)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\lp.py", line 30, in receive
    response = json.loads(body)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 326, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 366, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 384, in raw_decode
    raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")
exceptions.ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
[06:03:30] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:31] RPC request [b5d06000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [c42f6000] submitted to RFCPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [df638000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] RPC request [a6c4d000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] slush: 653949
[06:03:35] triple: 2672266
[06:03:35] bitp: 2346962
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:07:16 PM
 #2430

Ok crazy idea here so don't shoot me. Was thinking about the bitclocker issue. What if we set the backup pools on each instance of poclbm or phoenix to mine on bitclockers when the primary pool is down (bitHopper). Then when bitHopper switches to bitclocker pool have bitHopper simulate a pool that has gone down so the miners will switch to backup pools (bitclocker).

Only problem is not being able to count the shares submitted to the pool by the miners.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2011, 08:11:28 PM
 #2431

and bithopper isn't down so the pool isn't down so the poclbm backup won't kick in.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
gnaget
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 154
Merit: 102


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:14:17 PM
 #2432

Is bitcoin.lc fucking with their stats?  I just saw them drop to 500,000 shares, and their site said the current round has been going for an hour. 
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168
Merit: 100



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2011, 08:16:22 PM
 #2433

further on bitclockers (I'm your resident control sample, if you will):
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.

I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.



There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:19:28 PM
 #2434

and bithopper isn't down so the pool isn't down so the poclbm backup won't kick in.

bitHopper would have to be coded to disconnect / reject connection from the miners (simulate) being down when bitclocker pool is switched to. Just an idea I had.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:26:35 PM
 #2435


There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.

Certainly seems that way.
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504
Merit: 502


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:27:56 PM
 #2436

further on bitclockers (I'm your resident control sample, if you will):
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.

I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.



There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.

Bithopper is requesting more getworks than poclbm / phoenix on its own (since cherrypicker relies on getwork requests from miner)


...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
msb8r
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 78
Merit: 10


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2011, 08:36:58 PM
 #2437

Is bitcoin.lc fucking with their stats?  I just saw them drop to 500,000 shares, and their site said the current round has been going for an hour. 

They have been doing this for some time (see bclc thread).
Round are announced 0-3600 seconds after completion. This means you will pretty much always miss out on sub 100k rounds, but still have time to get in before the 43.5% mark on longer rounds.
Despite this I still see decent profits on bclc

New Bitcoin directory @ http://btcdir.org/
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 798
Merit: 1000


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:57:37 PM
 #2438

I added some more logging to the Lp messages so I can figure out why json decoding is dieing. If they appear again tell me.

[06:03:23] received lp from: digbtc <html>
<head><title>504 Gateway Time-out</title></head>
<body bgcolor="white">
<center><h1>504 Gateway Time-out</h1></center>
<hr><center>nginx/0.8.54</center>
</body>
</html>

Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 361, in c
allback
    self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 455, in _
startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 542, in _
runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1076, in
gotResult
    _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1020, in
_inlineCallbacks
    result = g.send(result)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\work.py", line 71, in jsonrpc_lpcall
    lp.receive(text,server)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\lp.py", line 30, in receive
    response = json.loads(body)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 326, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 366, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 384, in raw_decode
    raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")
exceptions.ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
[06:03:30] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:31] RPC request [b5d06000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [c42f6000] submitted to RFCPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [df638000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] RPC request [a6c4d000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] slush: 653949
[06:03:35] triple: 2672266
[06:03:35] bitp: 2346962


Just received this as well:

[06:56:40] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:56:40] received lp from: bclc      {"id":1,"error":null,"result":{"midstate"
:"7f5de19404ca1a9e4b51b224c54def58ea36be4a0f109470c10c9e04d5b7c258","target":"ff
ffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff00000000","data":"00000001
94f86af18c9a84571d55e70147d0b63e8c885527331f91f1000000b10000000072581d052bc9569 d
d7d700d62dfdf5029aadfded57da7be77cd3e1f7f6ae3fac4e3b07861a08e1e5000000000000008 0
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 0
80020000","hash1":"0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
0000000008000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000010000"}}
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 296, in <module>
    main()
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\bitHopper.py", line 292, in main
    reactor.run()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1162, in r
un
    self.mainLoop()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 1171, in m
ainLoop
    self.runUntilCurrent()
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\base.py", line 793, in ru
nUntilCurrent
    call.func(*call.args, **call.kw)
exceptions.TypeError: pull_lp() takes exactly 3 arguments (2 given)
[06:56:40] LP triggered serving miner
[06:56:40] LP triggered serving miner
[06:56:45] triple: 2699312
[06:56:47] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
MaGNeT
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1002


Waves | 3PHMaGNeTJfqFfD4xuctgKdoxLX188QM8na


View Profile WWW
August 04, 2011, 09:06:53 PM
 #2439

Still getting some errors but at least it slice_jumps without any problems Smiley
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250


moOo


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 09:08:56 PM
 #2440

lol btcserv claims to have more hash than the entire network

Quote
Network Speed:   13.87 THash/s

anyone else hate going to the bitminers union website? sloooooooooooow

BTCPool24 took down their notice of stats and prop payment problems and yet i still have no coin from them.

signed up new user on bitclockers.. couldnt get a new IP as my isp is a jerk like that and wont give me a new one no matter how often i release and renew... tried all the pools.. still having issues.

I wonder if poclbm would be better than phoenix or perhaps it is guiminer.


anyone use poclbm and having problems? anyone not using guiminer and having problems?

mooo for rent
Pages: « 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 ... 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!