Bitcoin Forum
December 11, 2016, 12:07:59 PM *
News: Latest stable version of Bitcoin Core: 0.13.1  [Torrent].
 
   Home   Help Search Donate Login Register  
Pages: « 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 ... 205 »
  Print  
Author Topic: bitHopper: Python Pool Hopper Proxy  (Read 333384 times)
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84



View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:26:32 PM
 #2421

have you tried it without bithopper as an immediate (and different worker names)?

i still get some connection errors, but not that much as before (atm 1 conn errorevery minute - which bh ignores) - maybe you get more (as you have more getworks in general) - and therefor bh disabled bclockers faster?.

Yep, no bithopper+new ip+new account = bitclockers work semi stable <1gh , total wackjob >1gh , with bithopper+new ip+new account = bitclockers exact same results.

Im still 99.9% sure its a getwork per worker issue.

I think I agree.  I more than doubled my hashrate according to bitclockers by creating a new worker and running two instances of bithopper instead of one, each pointing to its own worker.  Still only around half what it should be though.

I drink it up!
1481458079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481458079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481458079
Reply with quote  #2

1481458079
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1481458079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481458079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481458079
Reply with quote  #2

1481458079
Report to moderator
1481458079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481458079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481458079
Reply with quote  #2

1481458079
Report to moderator
1481458079
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1481458079

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1481458079
Reply with quote  #2

1481458079
Report to moderator
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:28:56 PM
 #2422

I moved it. I put a modified version back.

EDIT: How did you get it to try and load index.html. What scheduler were you using?

Cow, could you add sorting by name (ryo had that in his fork) , it just makes it more natural to read through the webui Tongue

Even better, sort by name based on mine: A-Z , backup: A-Z , mine_slush: A-Z , nmc: A-Z, disable: A-Z, info: A-Z.

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:32:48 PM
 #2423

yes c00ws is stable.

bitclockers is a great pool which is why we try so hard. I barely push 300 and they go red all the time.

btcmp doesnt work. You can search this thread for why.

+1 to sorting by name

mooo for rent
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84



View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:35:08 PM
 #2424

This might be part of the problem with bitclockers:

Code:
[15:32:09] RPC request [c2577000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:32:14] Server change to bitclockers, telling client with LP
[15:32:14] LP triggered serving miner
[15:32:14] LP triggered serving miner
[15:32:15] writing to database
[15:32:15] LP Call pool3.bitclockers.com:8332/LP
[15:32:15] slush: 117863
[15:32:15] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:32:16] RPC request [4ef05000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:32:16] btcmonkey: 3137405
[15:32:25] bitclockers: 6019
[15:32:27] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:32:31] nofeemining: 4323061
[15:32:32] triple: 2656095
[15:32:38] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:32:42] slush: 132366
[15:32:44] btcmonkey: 3137421
[15:32:44] btcpool24: 712236
[15:32:46] RPC request [52393000] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:32:50] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:32:59] triple: 2656319
[15:33:01] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:33:03] nofeemining: 4323274
[15:33:09] rfc: 567957
[15:33:09] slush: 146966
[15:33:12] btcmonkey: 3137445
[15:33:13] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:33:15] writing to database
[15:33:18] bclc: 5237051
[15:33:26] bitclockers: 8684
[15:33:26] triple: 2656742
[15:33:27] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com

Why are there so many getworks being sent to bitclockers?  I literally have 4x as many getworks as shares submitted everytime I connect.

The last time I hopped to bitclockers I submitted 9 getworks and 3 shares on one of my workers.  The other worker was similar.  Do normal miners do this?

I drink it up!
flower1024
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


luck is just a share away


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:35:28 PM
 #2425

Cow, could you add sorting by name (ryo had that in his fork) , it just makes it more natural to read through the webui Tongue

Even better, sort by name based on mine: A-Z , backup: A-Z , mine_slush: A-Z , nmc: A-Z, disable: A-Z, info: A-Z.

if you take the slice method: it has still my sorting method which is doing exactly as you described (sort by role and then by name)

but i only tested it in firefox...
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:37:14 PM
 #2426

Cow, could you add sorting by name (ryo had that in his fork) , it just makes it more natural to read through the webui Tongue

Even better, sort by name based on mine: A-Z , backup: A-Z , mine_slush: A-Z , nmc: A-Z, disable: A-Z, info: A-Z.

if you take the slice method: it has still my sorting method which is doing exactly as you described (sort by role and then by name)

but i only tested it in firefox...

Your slice method has been removed for some reason, only the altslice is left and that doesnt sort. Ive used it up till recent update from c00ws hopper version and now its giving some error same as dynamicpenalty(which isnt implemented yet) so it seems it was removed o_0

...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
flower1024
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 868


luck is just a share away


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:38:52 PM
 #2427


Your slice method has been removed for some reason, only the altslice is left and that doesnt sort.

i am referring to the new default method in c00w which is called SlicedScheduler
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476


moOo


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:46:03 PM
 #2428

Quote
I have bitclockers working fine for myself.


C00w been meaning to ask.. what do you mine with? software-wise

do you use poclbm or pheonix

mooo for rent
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:47:55 PM
 #2429

SliceScheduler is now the default scheduler.
The old default scheduler is now OldDefaultScheduler.
The websites have been moved and renamed.

I would use poclbm because it doesn't have a memory leak but it gives up on getworks really quickly. So I use phoenix with the memory leak for real mining and poclbm for my dev laptop.

EDIT: I have almost all of them installed though because I keep having to fix bugs which appear with specific miners.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:48:48 PM
 #2430

Getting this occasionally this morning:

[05:47:43] received lp from: bcpool
Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 361, in c
allback
    self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 455, in _
startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 542, in _
runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1076, in
gotResult
    _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1020, in
_inlineCallbacks
    result = g.send(result)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\work.py", line 71, in jsonrpc_lpcall
    lp.receive(text,server)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\lp.py", line 30, in receive
    response = json.loads(body)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 326, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 366, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 384, in raw_decode
    raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")
exceptions.ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
[05:47:46] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
muyoso
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 84



View Profile
August 04, 2011, 07:50:04 PM
 #2431

Its gotta be getwork related with bitclockers.

Code:
[15:46:04] Server change to bitclockers, telling client with LP
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:04] LP triggered serving miner
[15:46:08] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:09] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:10] LP Call pool3.bitclockers.com:8332/LP
[15:46:15] writing to database
[15:46:15] RPC request [00668000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:46:20] RPC request [081ca000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:46:21] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:21] RPC request [602ed000] submitted to bitcoin.cz
[15:46:23] RPC request [getwork] submitted to bitclockers.com
[15:46:25] Server change to rfc, telling client with LP

Cleaned out the non-relevant lines.  4 getworks within 15 seconds and an immediate change to rfc.  

I drink it up!
c00w
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:00:07 PM
 #2432

I added some more logging to the Lp messages so I can figure out why json decoding is dieing. If they appear again tell me.

1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:04:24 PM
 #2433

I added some more logging to the Lp messages so I can figure out why json decoding is dieing. If they appear again tell me.

[06:03:23] received lp from: digbtc <html>
<head><title>504 Gateway Time-out</title></head>
<body bgcolor="white">
<center><h1>504 Gateway Time-out</h1></center>
<hr><center>nginx/0.8.54</center>
</body>
</html>

Unhandled error in Deferred:
Unhandled Error
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 361, in c
allback
    self._startRunCallbacks(result)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 455, in _
startRunCallbacks
    self._runCallbacks()
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 542, in _
runCallbacks
    current.result = callback(current.result, *args, **kw)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1076, in
gotResult
    _inlineCallbacks(r, g, deferred)
--- <exception caught here> ---
  File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\defer.py", line 1020, in
_inlineCallbacks
    result = g.send(result)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\work.py", line 71, in jsonrpc_lpcall
    lp.receive(text,server)
  File "G:\Handies\bitHopper\bitHopper\lp.py", line 30, in receive
    response = json.loads(body)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\__init__.py", line 326, in loads
    return _default_decoder.decode(s)
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 366, in decode
    obj, end = self.raw_decode(s, idx=_w(s, 0).end())
  File "C:\Python27\lib\json\decoder.py", line 384, in raw_decode
    raise ValueError("No JSON object could be decoded")
exceptions.ValueError: No JSON object could be decoded
[06:03:30] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:31] RPC request [b5d06000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [getwork] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [c42f6000] submitted to RFCPool.com
[06:03:32] RPC request [df638000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] RPC request [a6c4d000] submitted to BitcoinPool.com
[06:03:35] slush: 653949
[06:03:35] triple: 2672266
[06:03:35] bitp: 2346962
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:07:16 PM
 #2434

Ok crazy idea here so don't shoot me. Was thinking about the bitclocker issue. What if we set the backup pools on each instance of poclbm or phoenix to mine on bitclockers when the primary pool is down (bitHopper). Then when bitHopper switches to bitclocker pool have bitHopper simulate a pool that has gone down so the miners will switch to backup pools (bitclocker).

Only problem is not being able to count the shares submitted to the pool by the miners.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2011, 08:11:28 PM
 #2435

and bithopper isn't down so the pool isn't down so the poclbm backup won't kick in.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
gnaget
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 112


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:14:17 PM
 #2436

Is bitcoin.lc fucking with their stats?  I just saw them drop to 500,000 shares, and their site said the current round has been going for an hour. 
hawks5999
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 168



View Profile WWW
August 04, 2011, 08:16:22 PM
 #2437

further on bitclockers (I'm your resident control sample, if you will):
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.

I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.



There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.

■ ▄▄▄
■ ███
■ ■  ■               
LEDGER  WALLET    ████
■■■ ORDER NOW! ■■■
              LEDGER WALLET
Smartcard security for your BTCitcoins
■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■
Decentralized. Open. Secure.
djex
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:19:28 PM
 #2438

and bithopper isn't down so the pool isn't down so the poclbm backup won't kick in.

bitHopper would have to be coded to disconnect / reject connection from the miners (simulate) being down when bitclocker pool is switched to. Just an idea I had.

Smiley  : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3
simonk83
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 896


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:26:35 PM
 #2439


There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.

Certainly seems that way.
Clipse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 504


View Profile
August 04, 2011, 08:27:56 PM
 #2440

further on bitclockers (I'm your resident control sample, if you will):
Using Cherry for about 2 days now and have had 0 issues with BitClockers. I'm running about 2.4 Gh/s (bitclockers actually reports up to 3000+) and I'm having <.7% stales.

I haven't changed my account or IP.
I'm using 1 miner account with 10 GPUs going to it.



There is something still giving away bithopper, IMHO.

Bithopper is requesting more getworks than poclbm / phoenix on its own (since cherrypicker relies on getwork requests from miner)


...In the land of the stale, the man with one share is king... >> Clipse

We pay miners at 130% PPS | Signup here : Bonus PPS Pool (Please read OP to understand the current process)
Pages: « 1 ... 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 [122] 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 ... 205 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!