|
gnaget
|
 |
July 30, 2011, 03:35:06 AM |
|
uuuhh a shiver passed on my spine, this will be a little hopping beast guys. When it will reach critical mass I'm gonna see a handful of proud coders  Isn't critical mass bad? |
|
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:36:25 AM |
|
 Infinity percentage of rejects... hmm might effect my expected award a tad bit. |
mooo for rent
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:36:34 AM |
|
@gnaget depends on observers point of view...
if you go with the flow, I think not
|
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:37:41 AM |
|
 Infinity percentage of rejects... hmm might effect my expected award a tad bit. That is a good offset to my 5500 shares / 0 stales  |
|
|
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:38:18 AM |
|
Um... Oops? I expected the call to be in getwork_Store. Its fixed now although not turned on in bleeding edge.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:41:51 AM |
|
so far that is the only reject I have gotten and It came when i switched to your fork without turning off my miner.. but so far everything is looking golden.
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:50:30 AM |
|
Um... Oops? I expected the call to be in getwork_Store. Its fixed now although not turned on in bleeding edge.
It was a fair assumption by the rules of encapsulation. |
|
|
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2011, 03:53:20 AM |
|
I should write a style guide for bitHopper and then list the 60% of the code I want to rewrite to follow the style guide.
work.py is an especially big mess.
I don't have access to my test machine but has anyone been testing with trunk? If its working I can turn it on in the repo remotely.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:12:28 AM |
|
I should write a style guide for bitHopper and then list the 60% of the code I want to rewrite to follow the style guide.
work.py is an especially big mess.
I don't have access to my test machine but has anyone been testing with trunk? If its working I can turn it on in the repo remotely.
is working all right but dunno what to search for (the trunk you posted before) edit: whoa f...in nice, changing servers randomly and it doesn't loose the temper edit 2: just changed 3 servers (3-4 seconds on every one) and back to backup, it didn't loose 1 lame share, you gotta see this man |
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
c00w (OP)
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:13:38 AM |
|
Um obvious errors or a reject rate above 10%. Or bizarre behavior with regards to pool selection.
|
1HEmzeuVEKxBQkEenysV1yM8oAddQ4o2TX
|
|
|
joulesbeef
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 476
Merit: 250
moOo
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:16:49 AM |
|
everything awesome right now.. 0 rejects.. only one hop so far but it went without rejects.
looks more than good so far.
|
mooo for rent
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:18:41 AM |
|
Or bizarre behavior with regards to pool selection.
Did you include the mine_friendly role? 9000 shares, 0 stales for me, and that is with getting a lot of lagging out of rfc and switching servers. I'm impressed, but I haven't tried your version yet |
|
|
|
|
paraipan
In memoriam
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 924
Merit: 1004
Firstbits: 1pirata
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:24:01 AM
Last edit: July 30, 2011, 04:37:12 AM by paraipanakos |
|
Um obvious errors or a reject rate above 10%. Or bizarre behavior with regards to pool selection.
13 minutes running and 0 stales, normal behavior edit: I'm changing servers like crazy here just to see it fail, no luck by now edit2: looks like the "bad" merge was good after all, I miss the stales ppl, send me some, hehe just kidding |
BTCitcoin: An Idea Worth Saving - Q&A with bitcoins on rugatu.com - Check my rep
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:40:28 AM |
|
Holy carp on a stick. I'm up to 11,000 shares / 0 stales. I'm actually a little worried about the lack of stales. Plus, I have to stop it and move it over to a screen session, and I really don't want to interrupt this run
What is really amazing, and I don't understand how this is possible, I have the exact same memory usage with update and I did before. The new object should be pretty large
|
|
|
|
|
|
Keninishna
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:48:22 AM |
|
check the pool websites your mining at, rfc is showing 2% stales for me this round using your script but that could be for other reasons.
|
|
|
|
|
gooie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:49:00 AM |
|
updated to latest https://i.imgur.com/BMUTq.png7 also, what pools do you have switched on to mine at? i keep getting TCP error all the time and my hopper keeps switching pool every 40 sec :/ |
|
|
|
|
|
gnaget
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:52:25 AM |
|
updated to latest  7 also, what pools do you have switched on to mine at? i keep getting TCP error all the time and my hopper keeps switching pool every 40 sec :/ I think that is just rfc being rfc. There is a lot of lag on their server. The important thing is you don't get stales when you hop to and away from it |
|
|
|
|
|
djex
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:52:53 AM |
|
updated to latest 7 also, what pools do you have switched on to mine at? i keep getting TCP error all the time and my hopper keeps switching pool every 40 sec :/ Yeah mine has been getting periods of this for a few hours now. Rfc gets lagged easy. Also using this new code 1019 / 0. Working good.  |
 : 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3 |
|
|
gooie
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 28
Merit: 0
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:55:35 AM |
|
also, has anyone got polmine to work? i just get API error and 591402.50% shares.
|
|
|
|
|
|
djex
|
|
July 30, 2011, 04:57:35 AM |
|
also, has anyone got polmine to work? i just get API error and 591402.50% shares.
Working good for me. Haven't had an API error today with it. At 1087793 shares. |
: 1LbvSEJwtQZKLSQQVYxQJes8YneQk2yhE3 |
|
|
|
