RavenX
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
May 28, 2014, 02:40:59 AM |
|
I hope this problem gets solved soon. This is my main coin when not in Multipools...
|
|
|
|
|
stahanov
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 18
Merit: 0
|
|
June 06, 2014, 06:46:52 PM |
|
Yep, great news. Let's trade some SRC!
|
|
|
|
Jude Austin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1140
Merit: 1000
The Real Jude Austin
|
|
June 08, 2014, 04:32:23 PM |
|
SecureCoin is doing really well on P2Pool.org! Check it out! http://p2pool.org:9372/static/Hitting over 600Mhs at times!
|
Buy or sell $100 of Crypto and get $10!
|
|
|
Jude Austin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1140
Merit: 1000
The Real Jude Austin
|
|
June 08, 2014, 05:02:27 PM |
|
Great . Thanks, SecureCoin seems to be doing very well. Keep it up!
|
Buy or sell $100 of Crypto and get $10!
|
|
|
harrp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2014, 08:22:02 PM |
|
cryptsy is fine BUT we have another problem from SRC wallet!!!
it just not get the confirmation after 3 days !!
i REinstal the wallet / REstore the wallet on different pcs but same ZERO!!
Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 08.06.2014 12:13
i^m telling you this coin is dead!
|
|
|
|
Hilux74
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 912
Merit: 1000
|
|
June 11, 2014, 08:28:20 PM |
|
cryptsy is fine BUT we have another problem from SRC wallet!!!
it just not get the confirmation after 3 days !!
i REinstal the wallet / REstore the wallet on different pcs but same ZERO!!
Status: 0/unconfirmed Date: 08.06.2014 12:13
i^m telling you this coin is dead!
Lol. Did you try running with the -salvagewallet command? That solves stuck sends in 99.9% of cases for 99.9% of coins.
|
|
|
|
harrp
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
June 11, 2014, 09:08:41 PM Last edit: June 19, 2014, 11:25:54 AM by harrp |
|
|
|
|
|
rix5
|
|
June 25, 2014, 06:59:34 AM |
|
is this coin dead? Why not?
|
|
|
|
xyjcoin
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2014, 06:13:17 AM |
|
A p2pool with 0 fee
202.114.196.97:9641
|
|
|
|
HR
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1011
Transparency & Integrity
|
|
July 17, 2014, 07:40:14 AM |
|
What do you use for a failover?
|
|
|
|
Psynpase
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2014, 12:02:38 AM |
|
/home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/main.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/leveldb.o: In function `CLevelDB::CLevelDB(boost::filesystem3::path const&, unsigned long, bool, bool)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:37: undefined reference to `leveldb::Options::Options()' obj/leveldb.o: In function `GetOptions': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:28: undefined reference to `leveldb::Options::Options()' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:29: undefined reference to `leveldb::NewLRUCache(unsigned long)' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:31: undefined reference to `leveldb::NewBloomFilterPolicy(int)' obj/leveldb.o: In function `CLevelDB::CLevelDB(boost::filesystem3::path const&, unsigned long, bool, bool)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:56: undefined reference to `leveldb::DB::Open(leveldb::Options const&, std::string const&, leveldb::DB**)' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:46: undefined reference to `leveldb::Env::Default()' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:46: undefined reference to `leveldb::NewMemEnv(leveldb::Env*)' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:51: undefined reference to `leveldb::DestroyDB(std::string const&, leveldb::Options const&)' /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:58: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/leveldb.o: In function `CLevelDB::WriteBatch(CLevelDBBatch&, bool)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.cpp:76: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `Write<std::pair<char, uint256>, CDiskTxPos>': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch::~CLevelDBBatch()': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<char, uint256>(char const&, uint256&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<char, int>(char const&, int&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Exists<char>(char const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:123: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<char, int>(char const&, int const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<char, char>(char const&, char const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Erase<char>(char const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:51: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Delete(leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<char, uint256>(char const&, uint256 const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Erase<std::pair<char, uint256> >(std::pair<char, uint256> const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:51: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Delete(leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Exists<std::pair<char, uint256> >(std::pair<char, uint256> const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:123: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<std::pair<char, std::string>, char>(std::pair<char, std::string> const&, char&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<std::pair<char, std::string>, char>(std::pair<char, std::string> const&, char const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<char, CBigNum>(char const&, CBigNum const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<std::pair<char, uint256>, CDiskTxPos>(std::pair<char, uint256> const&, CDiskTxPos&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<std::pair<char, uint256>, CDiskBlockIndex>(std::pair<char, uint256> const&, CDiskBlockIndex const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<char, CBigNum>(char const&, CBigNum&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<std::pair<char, int>, CBlockFileInfo>(std::pair<char, int> const&, CBlockFileInfo&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `bool CLevelDB::Read<std::pair<char, uint256>, CCoins>(std::pair<char, uint256> const&, CCoins&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:94: undefined reference to `leveldb::Status::ToString() const' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<std::pair<char, uint256>, CCoins>(std::pair<char, uint256> const&, CCoins const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `void CLevelDBBatch::Write<std::pair<char, int>, CBlockFileInfo>(std::pair<char, int> const&, CBlockFileInfo const&)': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:42: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::Put(leveldb::Slice const&, leveldb::Slice const&)' obj/txdb.o: In function `CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::WriteBatch()' obj/txdb.o: In function `~CLevelDBBatch': /home/ubuntu/src/leveldb.h:23: undefined reference to `leveldb::WriteBatch::~WriteBatch()' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
chmod +x src/leveldb/build_detect_platform The OP shouldnt have used braindead format like zip to distribute source code. Still doesn't want to work on my ubuntu 12.04 64bit platforms make clean -f makefile.unix Then try again I am on ubuntu 14.04 64bit and after doing the above I am still receiving this error. Anyone come across this?
|
|
|
|
Psynpase
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2014, 03:06:46 AM |
|
First, do you have all the libraries installed? In particular the leveldb library? If not, install it (use 4.8 instead of 5.1, this is an old coin...): sudo apt-get install libdb4.8-dev libdb4.8++-dev Second, compile create the leveldb files used by securecoin: cd /home/ubuntu/securecoin/src/leveldb #(assuming this is where your src/leveldb directory is installed) make clean #(just in case) make libleveldb.a libmemenv.a
Then finish compiling either the QT or the headless. The coin I am trying to build is here https://github.com/bizcointeam/bizcoin/blob/master/doc/build-unix.txtVersions used in this release: GCC 4.3.3 OpenSSL 0.9.8g Berkeley DB 4.8.30.NC Boost 1.37 miniupnpc 1.6 Dependency Build Instructions: Ubuntu & Debian ---------------------------------------------- sudo apt-get install build-essential sudo apt-get install libssl-dev sudo apt-get install libdb++-dev sudo apt-get install libboost-all-dev sudo apt-get install libqrencode-dev If using Boost 1.37, append -mt to the boost libraries in the makefile. How do I append -mt to the boost libraries in the makefile? I have makefile open and I am not sure where to add the "-mt."
|
|
|
|
Psynpase
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 17
Merit: 0
|
|
July 18, 2014, 03:49:45 AM |
|
It has worked. I have no idea why now, after I have been trying different things all day.
It must have been the chant to the east and the ritualistic smoke infused tea.
GiGa whatever spells you cast to make this magic happen thank you.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
July 27, 2014, 12:36:51 PM |
|
prediction: dead within a week.
I'll wager 930 PHS that it won't be dead within a week... -tb- correction: without baritus's 200 m/h and army of blind sheep, the coin will be dead in a week. you really think this guy isn't gonna do exactly what he did with DGC and ARG(flash mined the shit out of each and made bank pumping them on cryptsy) hell the only reason this coin hasn't been released yet is because he's gotta make a gpu miner for it. duh timeless
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
August 03, 2014, 08:51:12 PM |
|
funny how some piece of shit newbie loser decided to take the SRC trade symbol for an IPO scam coin.. many of us warned the coin ipo poster faaaar in advance too and he said he would change it.. he didn't.. hmmm wonder why ? the exchange Poloniex is so god damn noob operation too, they added Source coin as the symbol SRC and when i told them they didn't even care.. stupid fucking retards need to use the search function before cloning IPO scam coins lol the REAL "SRC" a dead coin ? uhhh no lol the pool i was on before is still alive and kickin' here is the top 5 users hashing numbers.. Rank Donor User Name KH/s SRC/Day BTC/Day 1 anonymous 929,989 1,630.815 0.3996 2 ngoctuong 829,857 1,455.225 0.3565 3 anonymous 271,399 475.922 0.1166 4 anonymous 266,758 467.783 0.1146 5 anonymous 158,349 277.678 0.0680
So i wonder what kind of hash rate that stupid little noob clown has on his scammy IPO bullshit coin "Source Coin" ? hahhaha First off, the IPO was not for SourceCoin, the IPO was for Coins Source INC, a registered company. SourceCoin is a promotional crypto gateway into www.coinssource.com. That's your first mistake. Second of all, we've already heard your requests and we are changing SRC that's already in process. Before you start accusing anyone of a scam or cheat, do your homework because you are appearing a straight moron. Lastly, securecoin is dead. There is virtually community backing and the digital coin team has abandoned it. It's subject to little rises and gains throughout the months, but there is no real future as a monetary system for this coin. You must have some large stakes in Securecoin, should of did more research before making such a commitment. I'd advise you checking out our site, www.coinssource.comand lastly, Whitecoin misses you.. respond to your coin community i have said 50 times because "FIRST OF ALL" you already said you had no idea and that you would change it, 2 fucking months ago....... NOW your playing dumb . so why in gods name would there even need to be a request made in the first place ? explain that to me ?? a dozen of us laughed our ass off at you and told you.. wtf are are you doing noob ?? r e m e m b e r t h a t cut the little bullshit crap and fix your deliberate mess you made ON PURPOSE ! no requested is needed ..you shouldn't have pulled a scammy stunt on an IPO clone coin anyway. and you would have gotten away with it and Poloniex kidiots too had i not made a stink about it and shown everyone what a dumb fuck move that is. AND how you have played dumb about it and gotten your lap dogs to attack me for stating the moronically retard obvious.. WHICH IS.. don't use existing Trade Symbol's & Reputation's from existing big name unique coin's, by well known dev's to push your own scammy IPO clone coin's and capitalize on other peoples honest work to push your deceitful scammy IPO bullshit.. WHEN YOU HAD ALREADY BEEN TOLD ..faaaaaaar before it went on any exchanges like 2 fucking months ago ! you and POLO are morons and scammy kiddiots ones too boot.. and i want everyone to know about it loud and clear. busted.. noob. When you register here in January and decide to push your new "foundation" and your IPO clones do your homework and use the search button bump 'cause this scammer is skulking around with endless little scams.. he know think he is starting a Trust Index system. I guess this noob thinks it's HIS job now to decide what coins are trust worthy.. hmm ya scammy idiot noob pushing IPO scam clone coins is handing out Trust Ratings ? LOL oh and it's been about 5/6 months since he started this crap with SRC and Poloniex never did take the coin of their site ! It's still sitting on Polo and it's still listed as SRC on there.. i just checked right now.
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
beitris.dwlul
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:03:01 PM |
|
wallet optimized build on linux ~220 on a10-5800k ~270 with minerd
|
|
|
|
|
amarian12
|
|
December 21, 2014, 02:30:48 PM |
|
|
Imagine a future where IT infrastructures monitor themselves, are able to predict and respond to future business needs and can protect and heal themselves automatically.
|
|
|
mrben77
|
|
December 22, 2014, 07:07:56 PM |
|
coin is still mining , when does pow is end dev ? i don't think coin is dead , but price is coming down more 25 times from it appear on cryptsy , so sad
|
|
|
|
|