murraypaul
|
|
September 17, 2013, 02:43:59 PM |
|
Well it has just been dumped down below 0.000125, the buy side is looking very grim at the moment. If you want lots more, now is the time to buy.
|
BTC: 16TgAGdiTSsTWSsBDphebNJCFr1NT78xFW SRC: scefi1XMhq91n3oF5FrE3HqddVvvCZP9KB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Bitcoin: mining our own business since 2009" -- Pieter Wuille
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
Eli0t
|
|
September 17, 2013, 06:50:55 PM |
|
my best guess, somebody bought/used 100 MH worth of cpu power mined 10,000 then dumped to cash out. some people just want to drive all coins to 0
|
LTC: LKpJf3uk7KsHU73kxq8iFJrP1AAKN7Yni7 DGC: DKXGvEbj3Rwgrm2QQbRyNPDDZDYoq4Y44d XPM: AWV5AKfLFyoBaMjg9C77rGUBhuFxz5DGGL
|
|
|
bogidu
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
Marketplace for sensor data
|
|
September 17, 2013, 09:16:23 PM |
|
Ok, noob question.
I sent some coins to a stablecoin address (there's getting to be too many coins!) are they gone for good?
|
|
|
|
Hazard
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 980
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 17, 2013, 09:17:45 PM |
|
just import the private key associated with the stablecoin address
|
|
|
|
bogidu
Member
Offline
Activity: 89
Merit: 10
Marketplace for sensor data
|
|
September 17, 2013, 09:27:47 PM |
|
Ah! Thank you! Like I said . . . .
|
|
|
|
gwedo
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 10
|
|
September 18, 2013, 10:35:00 PM |
|
Well it has just been dumped down below 0.000125, the buy side is looking very grim at the moment. If you want lots more, now is the time to buy.
Unfortunately I was at work without good access to exchange. I missed it. But the price is still cheap, I think. Everything under 0.00040000 is good I would say. I am sure Securecoin will be among winners of autumn race when the rallye beginns. But besides all this I love the core idea of securecoin and all of its functions. In my opinion developers did excellent work and made very strong coin with unique features.
|
Hello world
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
September 18, 2013, 11:45:06 PM |
|
Watching the Cryptsy market, someone has just pumped SRC from 0.00048 to 0.00075 in two large buys!
yeah its crazy theres no big buywalls at a decent price just massive pumps every few days It's not pumping. This is someone accumulating 1000's of coins while the price is still low. Yep that was me back then, not pumping, buying up, 8 BTC worth so far. i found it hard to buy, as its in dribs and draps and bots gobble it up. Secure coin will kick ass on ave and i think its gunna give DGC a run for its money. a user named ikarus bought everything up to 0.0006 many times and i had luckily set my orders over and over at 0.0005999 meanwhile current sell prices were way lower ..i'm mining them so i have them coming in regardless that guy hasn't done that in a few days i think now though, but i have in the last week or two sorta been saving what i mine and buying more and more and with the lower prices lately i've been buying more than normal.. occasionally i sell some for a very small profit but i'm holding them long term i've easily got over a thousand so you may not being fighting with a bot for them.. more than likely it's me
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
Snail2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1000
|
|
September 19, 2013, 02:13:51 PM |
|
getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<
This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out. Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA
|
|
|
|
baloo_kiev
|
|
September 19, 2013, 03:16:00 PM |
|
getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<
This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out. Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA Try sending in smaller parts or use raw transaction API for fine tuning: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Raw_Transactions
|
|
|
|
SpaceCadet
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 165
Merit: 100
Just mining my own business...
|
|
September 19, 2013, 06:53:33 PM |
|
getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<
This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out. Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA Use a pool that accumulates those small payments into a larger, single transaction (i.e., not p2pool)...
|
|
|
|
|
testz
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1764
Merit: 1018
|
|
September 22, 2013, 04:11:02 PM |
|
Nice idea to combine exchange with mining pool's, but if you place useful information about available CPU/GPU miners, donwload links and command line parameters for mining with your pool probably you will get even more users. Keep growing, good luck!
|
|
|
|
Arros
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
September 24, 2013, 02:24:20 AM |
|
The multiple algorithms listed for this coin, are they all used in every block of the blockchain, or do they take turns and individual block only gets worked on with one or two of the algorthms?
(Sorry if the question has been asked before.)
|
|
|
|
markn
Member
Offline
Activity: 81
Merit: 10
|
|
September 24, 2013, 09:22:53 AM |
|
great work, good job, thank you
|
|
|
|
Neisklar
Member
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 10
|
|
September 24, 2013, 01:17:02 PM |
|
getting a lot of "transaction is too large, transaction cannot be created" errors for some reason, can't even send 30 SRC :<
This is probably due to p2pool payments. You are getting too many fractions of payments so it affects the way you can pay out. Same issue here after using a p2pool for long enough. Are there any solution? TIA Also, if any of p2pool node hosters here are interested, I can post my networks.py so we can turn our separate nodes into true p2pool.
Thats one of the reasons why i blocked the p2p port of my pool. I also discussed this with other p2pool operators for QRK a while ago and we agreed that with the lower diff we still have, it's ok to have separate standalone pools. Creating one big p2pool network would create even more tiny fractions than standalone pools. Also if it's one big decentralized p2pool network, or many seperate p2pools both is a decentralization and good for the coin network The wallet has that nasty behavior when sending out money to behave like the following: If it finds a received transaction with the exact amount you try to send, it uses this. If not it tries to assemle the needed amount from smaller amounts IMHO starting at the smalles amount it has. That way the final transaction will consists of thousend mini-inputs and will be to large. So as stated you will need to send smaller transactions (smaller in the amount of inputs, i think you can look that up in the logfile of the wallet). After that transaction succeded all used mini-imputs are now consolidated as a new bigger input for the next transaction. The multiple algorithms listed for this coin, are they all used in every block of the blockchain, or do they take turns and individual block only gets worked on with one or two of the algorthms?
(Sorry if the question has been asked before.)
For every block all of those hashing algorithms are used sequentially and often more than once. That more than once thing is determined randomly simplified spoken.
|
BTC: 1LZQkJCojCiomDb1FdFXN5g1Gtc6n95acB - QRK: QRrcffSmb6jqw6RmZLtJ6skg71AXRG3S6y
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
September 25, 2013, 04:07:39 AM |
|
ya he's right.. toying with a miner you can get some accepted shares 50% of the time by dropping half the algo work which is proof that all algos are not used at all times.. like he said its random ..at least i think so too. (lot of the algo stuff is over my head) reading first page it seems like block reward will always be 5 is that correct ? (it's not going to halve or what ever ?) difficulty is getting high these days
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
paymetodostuff
Member
Offline
Activity: 88
Merit: 10
|
|
September 25, 2013, 01:55:44 PM |
|
ya he's right.. toying with a miner you can get some accepted shares 50% of the time by dropping half the algo work which is proof that all algos are not used at all times.. like he said its random ..at least i think so too. (lot of the algo stuff is over my head) reading first page it seems like block reward will always be 5 is that correct ? (it's not going to halve or what ever ?) difficulty is getting high these days Wouldn't you find less blocks overall though if you drop some of the algos? Have you seen any performance gains pool/solo mining by doing this? This is a very interesting find indeed. Thank you for sharing.
|
|
|
|
kyher
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
September 25, 2013, 02:40:31 PM |
|
great work, good job, thank you This pool was great sadly users 2many280s and spoetnik ruined it by coming in huge hashrate (5 Mh/s and more) without ever finding any block! They just keep most of the profits for themselves without real contribution while the honest miner are finding block but earning only a very low amount of SRC (about 1/10 of the normal gain when those people were not on the pool). Clearly there is a problem and I hope it comes from the pool and not from the coin. There really is a security flaw somewhere about accepting hashs that are not producive to block finding in the appropriate statistical amount... Meanwhile I had to change pool until this problem is solved.
|
|
|
|
Spoetnik
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 1011
FUD Philanthropist™
|
|
September 25, 2013, 04:57:36 PM |
|
great work, good job, thank you This pool was great sadly users 2many280s and spoetnik ruined it by coming in huge hashrate (5 Mh/s and more) without ever finding any block! They just keep most of the profits for themselves without real contribution while the honest miner are finding block but earning only a very low amount of SRC (about 1/10 of the normal gain when those people were not on the pool). Clearly there is a problem and I hope it comes from the pool and not from the coin. There really is a security flaw somewhere about accepting hashs that are not producive to block finding in the appropriate statistical amount... Meanwhile I had to change pool until this problem is solved. your a lying sack of shit ! security flaw ? what called Github where buddy posted his fucking code ? every occur to you i'm hashing more because i have faster hardware ? 2many280's OWNS SERVERS he has SERVER HARDWARE and he has given me hash for testing occasionally.. this is not an exploit idiot its called mining. and go look at that pool dumb ass.. the one you quoted and tell me who found the last block.. that would be me by myself with a fucking core 2 duo 7500 your an idiot and i don't appreciate the accusations.
|
FUD first & ask questions later™
|
|
|
captainfuture
|
|
September 25, 2013, 05:00:46 PM |
|
we have it on our list to investigate that.
|
|
|
|
|