[ANN][SRC] Securecoin | A Fast and Secure Version of Bitcoin | 2013

[RoboCoder]

I made some updates on frontend of http://src.coinmine.pl which should reflect correct values of hasrates, etc.

So far pool is running very stable!

feeleep

Great job with this.. i like how you added the BTC/Day column to the stats. Adding a donation in addition to the fee!

Keep up the good work!

[1714202376]

1714202376

[1714202376]

1714202376

[1714202376]

1714202376

[1714202376]

1714202376

[gigawatt]

Well, it's official.  I've now uploaded my newest VPS mining guide, this time for pool mining SecureCoin.
If anybody is interested, feel free to check out the post over here.

The script even works on Amazon AWS!

[rpg]

Well, it's official.  I've now uploaded my newest VPS mining guide, this time for pool mining SecureCoin.
If anybody is interested, feel free to check out the post over here.

The script even works on Amazon AWS!

nice work. add the p2p pool in there as well

[murraypaul]

I made some updates on frontend of http://src.coinmine.pl which should reflect correct values of hasrates, etc.

Hashrate looks good. SRC/day and BTC/day are still wrong.
Est. Avg. Time per Round, Est. Shares this Round and Time Since Last Block all look good.

[gigawatt]

Has anybody had any luck with VanityGen and SRC?

The base58.h file reports the [urlhttps://github.com/securecoin/Securecoin/blob/master/src/base58.h#L275]PUBKEY_ADDRESS[/url] as 125, which should give you a resulting address that starts with s (which it does).

However, whenever I generate a privkey with vanitygen, the privkey always starts with "9", so SecureCoin reports it as invalid.
Whenever I dump a privkey from SecureCoin, it always starts with "L".

Any ideas?

edit:

It gets stranger.  According to http://gobittest.appspot.com/PrivateKey the keys generated by SecureCoin give the error "Private key is not on curve".
The keys generated from vanitygen report no such error.

What?

[whitepaint0909]

I made some updates on frontend of http://src.coinmine.pl which should reflect correct values of hasrates, etc.

Hashrate looks good. SRC/day and BTC/day are still wrong.
Est. Avg. Time per Round, Est. Shares this Round and Time Since Last Block all look good.

Currently using MinerD64_AVX.exe on Feeleeps pool I always display o Kh's and 0 shares, even though my miner is reporting otherwise. Im sure the user and password are correct and whatnot...

[gigawatt]

I made some updates on frontend of http://src.coinmine.pl which should reflect correct values of hasrates, etc.

Hashrate looks good. SRC/day and BTC/day are still wrong.
Est. Avg. Time per Round, Est. Shares this Round and Time Since Last Block all look good.

Currently using MinerD64_AVX.exe on Feeleeps pool I always display o Kh's and 0 shares, even though my miner is reporting otherwise. Im sure the user and password are correct and whatnot...

Is that hashrate as listed on the sidebar or as listed on the worker page?
The worker page is per-round, so it's not 100% accurate.

[Adamlm]

p2p is working well. 1.67259 worth of payouts in about 20 minutes. Seems to be working fine though still not too many people using it. I'm going to start bringing more hash here.

Working fine for me, payouts received
Very good work !!!

[thcst8]

Currently testing a p2pool node for SRC here : http://pool.bounceme.net:44397
You can join but it might needs some more tuning ...

akabane,

Ok i think I'm getting there slowly

Did you use the p2pool source from https://github.com/Neisklar/p2pool-quarkcoin/branches ?

I get this error: "exceptions.ImportError: No module named quark_hash"

2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 > Error handling message: (see RECV line)
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\tcp.py", line 215, in doRead
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     return self._dataReceived(data)
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\Python27\lib\site-packages\twisted\internet\tcp.py", line 221, in _dataReceived
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     rval = self.protocol.dataReceived(data)
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\files\p2pool\secure1\p2pool-quarkcoin-master\p2pool\util\p2protocol.py", line 27, in dataReceived
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     self.dataReceived2(data)
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\files\p2pool\secure1\p2pool-quarkcoin-master\p2pool\util\datachunker.py", line 40, in _DataChunker
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     wants = receiver.send(buf.get(wants))
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 > --- <exception caught here> ---
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\files\p2pool\secure1\p2pool-quarkcoin-master\p2pool\util\p2protocol.py", line 57, in dataReceiver
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     self.packetReceived(command, type_.unpack(payload, self.ignore_trailing_payload))
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\files\p2pool\secure1\p2pool-quarkcoin-master\p2pool\util\p2protocol.py", line 71, in packetReceived
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     handler(**payload2)
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\files\p2pool\secure1\p2pool-quarkcoin-master\p2pool\bitcoin\p2p.py", line 130, in handle_headers
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     header_hash = self.net.BLOCKHASH_FUNC(bitcoin_data.block_header_type.pack(header))
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >   File "C:\files\p2pool\secure1\p2pool-quarkcoin-master\p2pool\bitcoin\networks.py", line 20, in <lambda>
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 >     BLOCKHASH_FUNC=lambda data: pack.IntType(256).unpack(__import__('quark_hash').getPoWHash(data)),
2013-08-30 13:24:45.423000 > exceptions.ImportError: No module named quark_hash
2013-08-30 13:24:50.330000 > Error while requesting best block header:
2013-08-30 13:24:50.330000 > Traceback (most recent call last):
2013-08-30 13:24:50.330000 > Failure: twisted.internet.defer.TimeoutError: in ReplyMatcher

[Eli0t]

I made some updates on frontend of http://src.coinmine.pl which should reflect correct values of hasrates, etc.

So far pool is running very stable!

feeleep

whats the share diff on your pool? im sometimes going 7+ mins without a share (and missing rounds) with 550kh

[baritus]

It seems everything is going well. Both the price and the mining power are positive.

[turtle83]

Is there a block explorer up yet?

Basically i wanna query getdifficulty and getblockcount ... without accessing a real wallet.

[murraypaul]

It seems everything is going well. Both the price and the mining power are positive.

Yes, the price was dropping quite fast earlier this afternoon, but has picked up nicely.
I even managed to make a (very small) profit picking up some 'cheap' and waiting for the rally

[gigawatt]

Is there a block explorer up yet?

Basically i wanna query getdifficulty and getblockcount ... without accessing a real wallet.

Sign up at a pool like http://src.coinmine.pl/, then grab your API key.
Then just query http://src.coinmine.pl/index.php?page=api&action=getpoolstatus&api_key=KEY

[turtle83]

Is there a block explorer up yet?

Basically i wanna query getdifficulty and getblockcount ... without accessing a real wallet.

Sign up at a pool like http://src.coinmine.pl/, then grab your API key.
Then just query http://src.coinmine.pl/index.php?page=api&action=getpoolstatus&api_key=KEY

Yeah realized that... 5 seconds after posting...

In case anyone wants to do api calculations programatically....  heres some python code... this script updates my spreadsheet at ( https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AsoEvtUcZSjWdDJzd3Riek9Mb2RwUVhubUdrdEthclE#gid=0 )

Code:

import httplib2, json
from datetime import datetime

h = httplib2.Http()


r, c = h.request("http://176.221.46.81/chain/Quarkcoin/q/getdifficulty")
qrkdiff = float(c)
print qrkdiff

r,c = h.request("http://pubapi.cryptsy.com/api.php?method=marketdata")
data = json.loads(c)["return"]["markets"]
srcprice = data["SRC"]["lasttradeprice"]
qrkprice = data["QRK"]["lasttradeprice"]
print srcprice, qrkprice

r,c = h.request("http://176.221.46.81/chain/Quarkcoin/q/getblockcount")
qrkheight = int(c)
print qrkheight
qrkreward = 2048 >> (qrkheight + 1)//60480
print qrkreward

r, c = h.request("http://data.mtgox.com/api/1/BTCUSD/ticker")
btcusd =  float(json.loads(c)["return"]["last"]["value"])

r, c = h.request("http://src.coinmine.pl/index.php?page=api&action=getpoolstatus&api_key=xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx")
data = json.loads(c)
srcdiff = data["getpoolstatus"]["networkdiff"]
srcheight = data["getpoolstatus"]["nextnetworkblock"]
#srcreward = dont know how....
print srcdiff

[akabane]

Currently testing a p2pool node for SRC here : http://pool.bounceme.net:44397
You can join but it might needs some more tuning ...

I confirm that pool is working fine but local/graph hashrate are not good.
Payouts are OK so no problem for you to mine there if you want.

[thcst8]

I setup a p2pool (2%) for securecoin.  

Please join and provide any feedback!

Quick tutorial:
1. Get minerd64_sse4.exe here https://docs.google.com/file/d/0BxKqW4aMUczmaTVfWjZEdnpqLVk/edit?usp=sharing

2. Run this at cmd prompt but put in your Securecoin wallet address!

Code:

minerd64_sse4.exe -a quark -t 8 -o http://www.japool.com:17339 --userpass=YourSecurecoinWalletAddress:AnyPassword

*Change this "-t 8" to the number of cores you have I have 8.  If you have 4 cores change it to "-t 4" if you have 2 cores change it to "-t 2"

[feeleep]

I made some updates on frontend of http://src.coinmine.pl which should reflect correct values of hasrates, etc.

So far pool is running very stable!

feeleep

whats the share diff on your pool? im sometimes going 7+ mins without a share (and missing rounds) with 550kh

Hi - I lowered diff 2x now but lets see how it works during the night (it shows as equivalent to litecoin diff = 2 )

[mullick]

Please update to the lates client hopefully all will be well from here on out

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=241445.0

[longtampong]

"The most secure coin"

Lots of miners can't even download the blockchain to help secure the coin. lol

Its intentional and part of the so called "fair launch" added ALL the addnodes and wallet wont connect, the UPnP options is disabled in the windows QT client.
Worst launch this week, had expected more of Baritus but the aim of this fail-launch was obviously instamining..