Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[Norihiro]

I don't put too much in it, since this thing can be payed by intersted parties, you should be very-very careful with this ratings.

[uwouw0]

I think ICO ratings on website not 100% accurate, bucause if you interested to find your good project to invest only looking by rating its not sure that project will goal and profitable in the future, you must look how good team behind that project,concep, roadmap,wp, etc.

[marn6767]

I do not like to trust such sites. Because many projects are manipulating and raising their votes with money. Many projects that do not do business are shown and deceived as if they were going to do business through manipulations.

[Stiven1999]

I personally like ico rating like icobench.com, because it makes it easier for us to find ico that has been running, or still upcoming, and also not hard anymore to find out about the ico, because it has been described and in reviews

[ashlyvash00]

Me yes i believe in a ico rating. Because those people who rate on a ico is more professional on how to look on a ico. But to be sure i will look the ico personally to. But ico rating site help me to choose

[Firbolko]

Yes, I look at the ICO ratings when I choose a project in which I will participate.

[shayshaylaboogie]

IcoBench is still trustable, but there are a lot of the others that are not trustable anymore becauase most people already know that they are paid shills that get paid in order to put 4 - 5 starts over every project, so that is the reason of why i dont like them

[USScrypto]

I think, can only be used a references. Of course these sites have their processes and standards when giving such ratings. It doesn't mean that what they say is absolutely correct. they probably won't even reflect more than half of what the ICO is really worth.

[Nimbusrf]

when I choose ICO, I look at the rating table. although I do not trust the ratings.

[krodmandoon]

IcoBench is still trustable, but there are a lot of the others that are not trustable anymore becauase most people already know that they are paid shills that get paid in order to put 4 - 5 starts over every project, so that is the reason of why i dont like them

You are right, IcoBench is still OK, but we should never trust them blind. Most of them are not honest and the ratings are not fair. I hope that will time this will improve and will have more trustful ratings.

[Raidzin]

I don't trust ratings before investing I study the project myself

Support. Ratings are corrupt sites where a rating of those who are more willing to give for popularity. It is better to make yourself personally in every word and product that is described in white paper.

[jrvictor]

I think it's good to read other opinions and reviews, but anyway it's important to do your own research before investing money.

[bittick]

I think it's good to read other opinions and reviews, but anyway it's important to do your own research before investing money.

But it's definitely no good to read an opinion that's too subjective and literally can be considered advertisement than a review because they are giving a rating for money so it's really useless for us who really want to find a quality review, those kind of ICO rating is what I hate the most.

[windfaraday]

I am not trusting 100% with ICO ratings but for me, ICO ratings will be one of the way to decide that the ICO that held scam or not. Because in ICO ratings have some review about the ICO and most of ICO that listing in the ICO ratings aren't scam. But not all the project which is listing in the ICO ratings can trust because before join in the ICO we must learn and know about everything in the project.

[Robiaiya]

I believe Ico rating web sites to a certain extent the reason is Some of their ratings are not exactly be done .. Most of them are not honest and the ratings are not fair .. so it's better to do your own research as well

[phpartisanmaster]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Ico ratings are nothing because the growth of the coin in the market of an ico is depending on the developers job on how good they can market their own altcoins.

[$$$sparkles$$$]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I believe that these ratings were based on research and that the accuracy of the results are credible to a point that we can actually consider relying on them when it comes to choosing a project to invest in. Ratings may not be a 100% accurate, but at least we have something to check into when laying out our options.

[Hysicbtu]

I never tried but maybe rating might be helpful so that we can find the project is real, the team, project scope, future plan are clear and it is not a scam which steels your money and suddenly disappear.
 

 
 
 

[toygama]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.

So  the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!

ICO rating is just only for reference, it's good idea I think for me we should have established our own criteria in proper selection of good ICO. Team members, managers, platforms and the most important is the working product itself.

[stue]

Yes, I believe in the existence of ICO ratings. In my opinion, ICO branches help us in assessing the quality of ICO we have been following. An ICO will be said to succeed if in the rating that he has a high value and also the achievement of sales in accordance with the target or even exceeds the minimum expected target. ICO ratings also help us in seeing the prospect of ICO that we follow, ICO which has a good prospect in the future is ICO who meet all the above qualifications.