Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[zimochka]

ICO ratings aren't true.
Someone advertises ICO making a share on Facebook, and someone advertises on their rating site and also gets money for it. Call it a "rating bounty campaign"  

[1714720355]

1714720355

[1714720355]

1714720355

[1714720355]

1714720355

[emsjvh]

Ico raitings are not so bad, first of  all they can filter total scam, so you dont need to look at garbage, secondly there is some nice options like KYC for team.

[kicauklaten]

ICO rating did not fully provide an objective assessment regarding the ICO. many of the ICO ratings even has a wrong assessment in the rating gives the ICO. many could be seen ICO scam also has a great value. of course, it could be said that the ICO rating cannot guarantee the success of ICO.

[beezunus]

at the moment I am looking for a good ICO also by looking at the rating because if it has a good rating then it means many people who believe with the ICO project so I will also choose to join

[vrabac68]

Yes i believe but still there are some web sites where advisors are giving rating to the ICOs so still you need to do research comprehensively and check on different places .
Its your hard earned money and you dont want to throw it to the scammers

[Spellwing]

I really do not believe in these ratings, but I'm looking at the icobench. Recently it seems to me that everything is bought

[Frob1992]

not anything is 100% proper there maximum ratings is probably wrong or might not cross as deliberate. a few ICOs can be rated very excessive and but on the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any fundamental trade or they may not yield any income.

[deloreswest]

Not at all. Ico ratings is just a way for some people to help us to know about the ico, i believe its use for marketing purpose ti spread awareness rather than to gain trust, for the start ico ratings not from a legal institution or trusted one, they just a paid team by the ico team. So i dont think we should trust the ico ratings at all.

[Blackpanther399]

I do not believe in ico rating mostly. I use them to know more about icos and their own ratings before i set out to make my own research. I use sites like icodrops to make the analysis and to see their ratings. This enables me to come to a conclusion and invest wisely 

[shackleford]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

I recommend that you do not pay attention to these sites. They are not particularly important now. Ratings can be wound artificial bots or custom work. I believe that it is necessary to look at the product itself the company. Is there currently a beta version of the site or app, depending on the product ... And these ratings are all " dust in the eyes "

[parneitak]

People often see that they are actually checking the real ico ratings as one of their referrals which are most selective to investors, but for me ico rating is one is just a guide and I'm not really believe in how quickly they rate some icos. But that would still depend on the willing investors how they would believe in this ICO rating.

[johnalyn]

I believed on it's rating even I just participate a scam ICO bit still there are a good one's that will gives you a better profit just be careful and researched of the ICO you will participate to earn good profit. It also gives me a additional knowledge of the currency that I need to know just like other currency that are going to lead this era.

[jyotsna060278]

It is really one of measurements of any new ICO project assessment of project, but we should also search detailed about any particular ICO project thoroughly before really investing in any new ICO.

[Tokoyami]

It is really one of measurements of any new ICO project assessment of project, but we should also search detailed about any particular ICO project thoroughly before really investing in any new ICO.

But only reference can be used. Of course these sites have their processes and standards when ranking them. That does not mean that what they say is really true. they probably will not even reflect more than half of the value of ICO.

[arpaul]

Believe it with your own analysis results only and not based on the site!  The site as it was only used as a reference only and is not necessarily true.  Sometimes on the site, there is a less good but sales success or otherwise.  So the assessment of the site that is not entirely true.

[Jpt]

I partly believe in ICO rating, though I have not participated in a ICO by ICO rating so far except for one that I am part of now. I think ICOs are rated by those involving in the project or its relatives or close people. However, what we bounty campaign participants can do is research and decide yourself before going for a new ICO by its rating.  

[litepresence]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Nope. I won't believe ICO rating at all time. But I will consider some time. We should not blindly go with ICO rating's.  Because many of the rating website are getting money from fake ICO and providing top ratings. But I will check ico schedule website.
There we can find top 10 ICO list. We could easily find best ico by researching yourself.

[i7claufe]

I don't totally believe with the ICO ratings but they can help little by little on how I can judge the cryptocurrency. Anyways out of all this, I do my own research on the ICO before investing on it. It all comes down to the effort we put into research regarding the ICO we are interested in. ICO ratings do a great part because I believe some websites(not all) have great ICO researching teams. That rating is the result of their hardwork

[onetwostep]

When we look at the comments here we see that no one in the forum ignores ico ratings. Ico ratings seem to be more important for new investors and inexperienced people Experienced people know that ico ratings can be raised by giving money

[absurde]

i do not believe ico ratings, ratings should be unbaised, fair and independent. But most of them ratings are overrated adn due to some relationships.