Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[xKARELx]

I try to believe him, but very often he leads me and all the predictions do not come true, although I would very much like that the information was reliable and not false

[bountyhunter2018]

I don't really trust the rating of ICO. Although many have the good rating but not in terms of their sales. so it's just as an additional course if for me. the product and the team will determine whether the ICO could not succeed and, if what is done and the results are good then, by all means, ICO will be successful and have a lot of funds.

[Walionn]

No. I prefer to search for my own research and rely on the fundamental part of the project. They must have a working product and a solid team.

[Rainbow009]

I've seen many a project, with great ratings which friend in the crypto community.
I personally prefer to do my own research. Although, I've also been wrong in my hypothesis of projects too.
I believe in DYOR (do your own research)

[CaptainCaptcha]

I think that ICO ratings are really misleading,  you have to do the research yourself and with trustworthy sources, websites that TOP the best ICOs are generally paid to do that and they don't offer the reliabilty you need while investing your money.

[dmerrifield9844]

I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites.

[uwatere]

if I think ico rank is just a guide and I do not really believe because most of the judgments are based on the investigations that are there. I think this is the best recourse ICO now.

[Maxbold123]

 ICO rating is crap and can not in anyway reflect the future of any project. I bought some coin earlier this year based on their ICO rating during the early period of this year and what I got was a huge loss. In fact, they never made it to any exchange.

[otto2012]

Even projects with the highest ratings can fail on sale. So do not pay attention to this.

[Vasilisochka]

Yes, I trust the ICO rating, but only made by a certain group that has been tested by me many times.

[GWS My Boy]

Ranked ICO actually really helps us in finding project ICO. But we should be able to re-checked because of not all the ICO project within this site properly. Because there have been many projects that do not fit in with the expectations. There is a project that runs only ICO is not until the end of ICO and the sale of tokens is very bad.

right, enough to help to search ICO only then we should be able to process it ourselves by searching for information existing in the project, such as the development team, the product will be generated then whether it can surprise different impacts on other ICO so as to attract more investors and have a manager who is experienced in bringing the ICO, hopefully not affected by the rating but what the content in the project.

[mediation]

I don't prefer to invest to ıcos because we saw a lot of scam about ıcos and a lot of people perefer to stay away from ıcos because of these reasons.

[stasiulman]

Some months ago, here, I faced a theme about icobench, and an author claimed that all their rates are custom-made. I'm certainly embarrassed by those experts who are doing rates on projects. On the other hand, this is normal things, even if they are custom-made, the platform needs to earn somehow, I hope that all ratings are custom.

[mrspumpkin]

I don't like ico rating. Most of the time they are not objective and use speculations. Therefore, I believe that no one believes in them.

[max6575]

to helps as rendering lists of index with different unit of indication as trader to work on decision with selection of point on objectives,
to collects of return as displacing use of option with the submission of funds on exchange with the trading market.

[JeffreyElvis]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

Not at all, I think they are crappy way of scamming people. The only way you can get good ICOs is upon your own research. I do my own study in this case, I think examination is important part of conclusion and research reduces the risk by many numbers. A good ICO can’t be found like this, I would suggest you to read the whitepapers of few ICOs, find out what their opponents are and what difficulties can they face in coming years.

ICOs work for me so I would go with ICOs and I do invest in Alts as well. I think there are many ICOs out there that are. Research is important part of finding a good deals, I would suggest you read the whitepapers of few ICOs like Liven and Redcab.

[ProofOfLambo]

Most people looking for ICOs do look in ICO Bench or similar ones, but that will only give you a first clue about the ICO. Nothing replaces YOR.

[Snaic]

I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.

Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.

So let's discuss ICO Rating!

The making of ratings is a rather rough and unreliable business. It is created by people without the use of technical means on the basis of only subjective assessments. Therefore, such ratings can not be accurate. They should be viewed, but you should not rely on them completely. In any case, when choosing an ICO investment project, you should conduct your own research and make a decision based on all the information received.

[Granit0]

I want to believe that ICO rating sites have criteria they use in conducting their reviews, ranging from the team members, project quality, whitepaper and some other factors. I think some rating site such as icobench could be trusted. But it is also advised that individuals do indepth research in prospective ICO's you're willing to invest.

[pumbum]

high ratings can only be the result of a good fee for these sites. on the other hand, how can one recognize an innovative technology if it does not yet have any practice? in any way, respectively, and the rating may be either low or it may not be at all. so I think that need navigate on these sites, but not entirely, and all same try to think creatively and critically under attachments