Do you believe in ICO Ratings?

[thsaudtl1]

It is the rating system that is an important part of the ICO project choice. We can look at ICO grades on sites such as ICOBench, ICOHolder, and ICOrating. However, it is difficult to say that ICOs with high scores here are mostly successful.
Perhaps because the ICO's internal content may be a poor project, as the rating score is falsely raised, it is necessary to analyze ICO's project more closely with the opinions of the experts and the distribution of scores.
And the most important thing is that you have to decide not only the grade but also other complex factors such as marketing, duration of investment, and distribution of high-level letters and partners in ICO project selection.

[1714581229]

1714581229

[1714581229]

1714581229

[1714581229]

1714581229

[1714581229]

1714581229

[1714581229]

1714581229

[matanglawin]

I do believe that ratings somehow has a relationship with a particular project. The projects that are being released are all having potential but only those that are promising  are those that are becoming popular which would positively affect the future of a particular crypto which is proven by ethereum and Bitcoin.

[vendy86]

I read the story of one person who shared information about how the staff of rating agencies could give you almost any rating for 300-500 dollars according to your desire. They traded these ratings. Therefore, I have not trusted these people for a long time.

this is the reason why i dont believe ico ratings.most of them sell it for money.if you wanna get hight rating you have to pay them.if you dont pay,your ratings will be around 2 until 3 from 5.
the best way is do own research.dont put your money based on another persons review.

[SugeshTrade]

I'm looking into ICO rating, but we cannot believe them for a 100% since as any other rating, they can be bought by ICO owners. I recommend you to make your own research before investing in Icos.

[Tanzion27]

Though sometimes these sites ICObench and ICOrating gives a great idea of the rate of every ICO but sometimes they failed. So for me it's not 100% reliable, but I'm still using it if I need to know the background of a ICO, for now I'm satisfied with the Information they gathered.

[saifanik]

Yes,I believe in ICO ratings but sometime the scam project use the same ratings like a good one.That's why,we are confused to see the ratings.But honestly we believe in ICO ratings.

[VuLDK]

I' m pretty sure that's because through the reviews we' re going to have a general view of ico , when we get this evaluation , you can analyze a lot of information and capture the useful information for the purpose of investing. Some ico also use this way to deceive and discredit investors , so to investigate the survey from reliable sources

[labilabi22]

saya kurang percaya pada Peringkat ICO karana rating situs ICO belum tentu semuanya benar masih banyak yang harus diperiksa, sebaiknya kita memiliki referensi dalam memilih proyek yang bagus serta  berhati-hati dalam menginvestasikan uang ke dalam ICO projeck

[ololajulo]

Some of the ratings on the sites are done by computer/ automatic setting, standards that the ICO project teams are use to,which make it easy for ICO teams to satisfy those requirements. I only use them to check other project details like the amount raised, ico price etc. I prefer the private spreadsheet which trackrecord has proven their genuity, mostly around 80% success. The websites are mostly financially influenced, among other incentives. Most people that are involve in private spreadsheet also incure their money, showing the projects they invested on the spreadsheet.

[Tamila]

For others maybe they consider the rating of a particular ICO as an added factor but for me, I am not that dependent on those sites, I do my own research and it's just an instinct whether I would participate in that ICO or not. After all, you can not blame those rating sites if your investments failed.

[Borisb52]

Personally, I do not trust all these ICO ratings. Any rating can be paid and ordered. Therefore, when choosing an ICO company, I first of all trust only my own analysis. And I advise you to do the same.

[dlouulmusthofa]

ICO rating has its own criteria, but did not rule out any errors in the assessment because the success or failure of ICO can be known through its progress at presale

[conected]

I trust the ratings. But every time, I try to conduct an additional independent analysis of the project in order to understand whether it is worth investing in such a project.

- I think you should not trust too much on the rating, you should trust your analysis as what you are doing before investing because everything in crypto can be faked, information from the rating can be faked very easily as long as you have money. In my country there are always the same situations, product owners pay for other people to spread the goodness of the product, this is a great strategy, it attracts a lot of people despite the product is not as good as what it is advertised.

[Kuzja]

I view this as an additional criterion in the choice, but I do not consider it to be the main and fundamental one. For a picture as a whole, it's worth paying attention to it.

[AnCapFree]

it depends on which website you visit and the author of the newspaper. I suggest you should access in some good websites such as hacked.com to read the review. They can give you about 80% good advice

[Nananeko]

Definitely no, I don't believe any ICO raitings. I think that people should have some analytic skills, and decide for themselves, without any help.

[Natium]

Not all sources behave honestly. Many of them are ready to higly appreciate even a useless and stupid project for money. So you should always rely only on your own knowlegde.

[WalkerIVIV]

I trust the ratings. But every time, I try to conduct an additional independent analysis of the project in order to understand whether it is worth investing in such a project.

- I think you should not trust too much on the rating, you should trust your analysis as what you are doing before investing because everything in crypto can be faked, information from the rating can be faked very easily as long as you have money. In my country there are always the same situations, product owners pay for other people to spread the goodness of the product, this is a great strategy, it attracts a lot of people despite the product is not as good as what it is advertised.

So many people are lazy to DYOR. that's why the majority of them are getting scammed caused by scam icos that paid the ico rating site to give their scammy project a good rating or even the best rating.
At least the project must have MVP before try to create any ico.

[bizzargin]

Quite a bit. My confidence was blown after I found out the story about how buying feedback about the projects on these rating sites.

[Techfrog]

I don't believe on them anymore, most of them are fake and just paid reviews to some of the sites that are offering ratings. That is why i am always tryign to avoid checking them before investing in any kind of project, because i only trust on my knowledge