zumzero
|
|
November 06, 2013, 06:53:19 PM |
|
I would like to sell ONE share for just ONE million dollars. I can prove ownership of said share. First to see WILL buy. Full years MOT.
I'll consider it if it comes with a new set of boots, a rear bidet and no more than 3 in the V5.
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
November 06, 2013, 07:27:51 PM |
|
Good lord. Two more pages of silly nannies going at it.
Queue the Benny Hill music... again.
Says the man who caused uproar and a slanging match on here yesterday that went to well over a page! And it was based on falsehood! Pot - Kettle - Black. nahhh purely your opinion. but yeah, I'll dance to some Benny Hill music anytime, as I've said before; this thread has become pure entertainment fodder. especially today, what's with all the fake bidding?
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
November 06, 2013, 07:32:51 PM |
|
Also, if you haven't noticed;
I contribute useful information (of which I have been handsomely tipped for) unlike whinny useless-post silly nannies like freddy zoom zoom zero and steuyUK...
|
|
|
|
finlof
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:06:26 PM |
|
now this is "The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread" that I know and love... people calling each other names, discussing off-topic items, and arguing about pure speculation.
|
|
|
|
LorenzoMoney
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:07:47 PM Last edit: November 06, 2013, 08:31:30 PM by LorenzoMoney |
|
Just got a phone call from a young woman, obviously working at a call center in a country, not the United States where the national language is Tagalog who said she was calling on behalf of Butterfly Labs and that they were offering a 20% discount to all previous customers for the purchase of any product on their website.
Of course, I am amazed by that and considering how long everyone had to wait for the previous shipments, am not ready to take a risk with BFL again. But it would mean that their 600 GH Monarch would go for $3744 That is $6.74 per GH. What are the ActM machines selling for per GH?
|
|
|
|
lammedraak
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 24
Merit: 0
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:16:37 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
neilol
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:17:42 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
|
|
|
|
JoTheKhan
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:21:34 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
If the price of one BTC is up (by quite a bit) from when the price of the machines were already set. Then why does the price of the machine need to go down? Won't they now mine more BTC than they are worth. For Example if you could buy a machine for $1000 that mined 10 BTC in its lifetime with BTC at $100 each, and then BTC now is worth $200 each, wouldn't the price of the machine be a much better deal than before, and actually should cost more, not less?
|
|
|
|
zumzero
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:24:02 PM |
|
now this is "The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread" that I know and love... people calling each other names, discussing off-topic items, and arguing about pure speculation.
Ahhh, shut up. Your mother swims out to meet sailors.
|
|
|
|
neilol
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:37:50 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
If the price of one BTC is up (by quite a bit) from when the price of the machines were already set. Then why does the price of the machine need to go down? Won't they now mine more BTC than they are worth. For Example if you could buy a machine for $1000 that mined 10 BTC in its lifetime with BTC at $100 each, and then BTC now is worth $200 each, wouldn't the price of the machine be a much better deal than before, and actually should cost more, not less? More of a function of difficulty rising much faster than BTC price, you cant sell unprofitable miners, which is what these will be in Dec at the current difficulty trajectory.
|
|
|
|
EskimoBob
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 910
Merit: 1000
Quality Printing Services by Federal Reserve Bank
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:38:07 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
Like how low? How about 1 Silver Unit (1 module), Dec 2013 delivery, for 200 USD, so you can make 40 USD profit by end of March 2014.
|
While reading what I wrote, use the most friendliest and relaxing voice in your head. BTW, Things in BTC bubble universes are getting ugly....
|
|
|
finlof
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:49:33 PM |
|
now this is "The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread" that I know and love... people calling each other names, discussing off-topic items, and arguing about pure speculation.
Ahhh, shut up. Your mother swims out to meet sailors. proving my point man, proving my point...
|
|
|
|
knybe
|
|
November 06, 2013, 08:55:27 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
If the price of one BTC is up (by quite a bit) from when the price of the machines were already set. Then why does the price of the machine need to go down? Won't they now mine more BTC than they are worth. For Example if you could buy a machine for $1000 that mined 10 BTC in its lifetime with BTC at $100 each, and then BTC now is worth $200 each, wouldn't the price of the machine be a much better deal than before, and actually should cost more, not less? Yeah that's what I was thinking, are we purely doing ROI based on bitcoin amount? Or does the fiat value of bitcoin come into play as well? At some point, as fiat value keeps going up, these machines are more valuable indeed… and will be more in demand.
|
|
|
|
zumzero
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:04:32 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
If the price of one BTC is up (by quite a bit) from when the price of the machines were already set. Then why does the price of the machine need to go down? Won't they now mine more BTC than they are worth. For Example if you could buy a machine for $1000 that mined 10 BTC in its lifetime with BTC at $100 each, and then BTC now is worth $200 each, wouldn't the price of the machine be a much better deal than before, and actually should cost more, not less? Yeah that's what I was thinking, are we purely doing ROI based on bitcoin amount? Or does the fiat value of bitcoin come into play as well… At some point, as fiat value keeps going up, these machines are more valuable indeed… and more in demand. Computer processing power rises exponentially. Mining difficulty rises exponentially. Cost of hardware undergoes exponential decay. Bitcoin value rises exponentially. We become rich beyond our wildest dreams and plug straight into the matrix. Welcome to the singularity.
|
|
|
|
minerpart
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
IIIIII====II====IIIIII
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:12:17 PM |
|
without question the prices of ACTM machines will need to drop by the end of the year, I think everyone knows this. What we don't know how thin the margins already are.
If the price of one BTC is up (by quite a bit) from when the price of the machines were already set. Then why does the price of the machine need to go down? Won't they now mine more BTC than they are worth. For Example if you could buy a machine for $1000 that mined 10 BTC in its lifetime with BTC at $100 each, and then BTC now is worth $200 each, wouldn't the price of the machine be a much better deal than before, and actually should cost more, not less? Yeah that's what I was thinking, are we purely doing ROI based on bitcoin amount? Or does the fiat value of bitcoin come into play as well… At some point, as fiat value keeps going up, these machines are more valuable indeed… and more in demand. Computer processing power rises exponentially. Mining difficulty rises exponentially. Cost of hardware undergoes exponential decay. Bitcoin value rises exponentially. We become rich beyond our wildest dreams and plug straight into the matrix. Welcome to the singularity. ha ha ha I want a pint of what your drinking. It's a nice scenario! A lot of you silly posters on here are forgetting - we are a mining company FIRST and a mining hardware seller to retail/bulk chip buyers SECOND. So........ (please read this slowly if you are a regular forum poster) we make money if we can pump out large chip numbers, get them super glued to boards and start them mining. IN SUMMARY: Can we get enough chip volume from eASIC - I'd say CHECK Do we have enough glue for chip assembly? CHECK What about an internet connection??? OHHHHHHH SHIT!SOMEONE PLEASE get on to AOL!
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:16:56 PM |
|
Also, if you haven't noticed;
I contribute useful information (of which I have been handsomely tipped for) unlike whinny useless-post silly nannies like freddy zoom zoom zero and steuyUK...
Major LOL Useful information like 'Get out of BitFunder TODAY or you are ruined' Yeah dude, whatever, have you been imbibing or do you always over-estimate your usefulness round here? If you disappeared up your own jaxy no one would notice - oh hold on, I think you just did.
|
|
|
|
Ozymandias
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:17:58 PM |
|
I hate to be a downer, but wouldn't rising fiat/btc price actually hurt our hardware sales? I could easily be thinking through this the wrong way, but we are a bitcoin company - our shares our priced in bitcoins and our dividends are paid in bitcoins. If we keep the cost of our machines the same with respect to fiat it will necessarily decrease the bitcoin cost (since usd/btc is on a significant uptrend) thus decreasing the revenue per machine. The other side of that, is with rising price is rising demand for mining equipment so I suppose we could be selling more units at a lower btc price, but I'm not exactly (or even remotely) sure whether the price/demand curves intersect in our favor or against it.
Actually, thinking a little further, with a rising btc price, it may even be wise to focus more on our farm than on sales as we will be perpetually making less and less btc on sales as usd/btc continues to go up and in a double whammy, the more hardware we produce to sell, the higher the difficulty, and the less profit we derive from our farm.
Thoughts, opinions, math, corrections?
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:31:54 PM |
|
What a horrendously boring question. No FUD, no insults and no outlandish predictions.
Come on - get back on track.
TO DA MOON!!
ya dick.
|
|
|
|
Ozymandias
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:35:57 PM |
|
What a horrendously boring question. No FUD, no insults and no outlandish predictions.
Come on - get back on track.
TO DA MOON!!
ya dick.
I apologize, I'm all for the rah rah rah bullishness vs the-sky-is-falling bearishness (plus assorted malcontents on either side), but I was hoping to get a little signal before the noise overtook this thread for another couple of pages.
|
|
|
|
zumzero
|
|
November 06, 2013, 09:37:18 PM |
|
What is it with these serious questions dudes? This is the ActM thread ffs! Who wants bitch slapped first?
|
|
|
|
|