HoboNickels - HBN - High Fast Stake - Version 2.0! More Secure, Less Intensive

[acdc]

any chance HBN will be added to staisybit cloud staking site?

[forzendiablo]

why dont we raise money to get HBN to ccex or bittrex? cryptsy seems dying.......................

[HCLivess]

I prefer bittrex
or poloniex.

I cannot get in touch with these guys 

[pazor_true]

I prefer bittrex
or poloniex.

I cannot get in touch with these guys 

at poloniex  try this
https://www.poloniex.com/coinRequest

[HCLivess]

I prefer bittrex
or poloniex.

I cannot get in touch with these guys 

at poloniex  try this
https://www.poloniex.com/coinRequest

I tried that yesterday and also a year ago to no avail, 0 response.
I bet some service guy reads that and dismisses immediately.

[HCLivess]

Memory exaustion bug fix (applies to NVC forks):
https://github.com/ppcoin/ppcoin/pull/104

I suggested it to github here:
https://github.com/Crypto-Expert/HoboNickels/commit/c5fdce5c3b46ac730d1918671ddfbefa52b9ca1f

[HCLivess]

I updated the leveldb to version 1.8
My first real try with github, hope I did it well

[HCLivess]

I also started comparing the code for litestake so I can understand it better:

HBN on the left, HYP on the right

https://www.diffchecker.com/uwwijnti (kernel.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/dvcxtwjo (wallet.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/y8av2ylm (main.cpp)

Code:

	/** Presstab - HyperStake hashing
    bnTargetPerCoinDay.SetCompact(nBits);		I redesigned the hashing iteration in a few ways. 
    int64_t nValueIn = txPrev.vout[prevout.n].nValue;		Code Reorginization - Instead of iterating the hashing in wallet.cpp, it is iterated in kernel.cpp inside of checkstakekernelhash, this allows
the iteration to not need to initialize the variables for every iteration. This is also true for the stake modifier, which was previously
    uint256 hashBlockFrom = blockFrom.GetHash();		calculated for each iteration. 
liteStake - Previously the staking process would continuosly rehash the same hashes over and over, needlessly taking up valuable CPU power.
    CBigNum bnCoinDayWeight = CBigNum(nValueIn) * GetWeight((int64_t)txPrev.nTime, (int64_t)nTimeTx) / COIN / (24 * 60 * 60);		I have added a std::map that tracks the block height and the last time the wallet hashed on this height. Depending on your staking settings,
    targetProofOfStake = CBigNum(bnCoinDayWeight * bnTargetPerCoinDay).getuint256();		the wallet will not begin a new round of hashing until after a certain amount of time has passed, or a new block is accepted. This time delay
can be found in main.cpp bitcoinminer(). This means that there will be 1-5 seconds of hashing with the CPU once every few minutes, compared to
    // Calculate hash		continued hashing with the CPU.
    CDataStream ss(SER_GETHASH, 0);		**/

[HCLivess]

I was exploring that explorer idea and I found out that I could either run it on the raspberry pi or my tronsmart AW80, but both devices are taken, one for critical production and free space levels are quite low (blame the Chinese for bad board linux builds). So I would first perhaps do it in an isolated vmachine, but certainly not this year

[a_cat_named_joe]

Hey. HC Livess. I really like what you are trying to do, although I'm not sure what it is that you are trying to do! I'd like to do the same! I'm trying to bring myself up to speed coding-wise. Keep it up. We need people like you!

[a_cat_named_joe]

Do you beg like Horus aka. jdtmp4 "the crypto hobo" (who btw this coin was themed after), because you are one of his socks ?

Hippie Tech. I've seen your negative FUD posts elsewhere, as well as here. What a stupid cunt you are!!! Anyone looking at your trust rating here might ask why you bother, you worthless waste of space https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=31553 You can't even communicate in plain English.

Are you trying to say that Tranz is Horus, is "the crypto hobo"? If you are, so fucking what! Are you saying that HoboNickels is backed by Cryptsy's knowledge and expertise? If you are, then that will make me buy it all the more.

Cryptsy isn't exactly my favourite of the month. Far from it. But c'mon. Explain yourself. You've intrigued me with your hidden, hysterical, history. Tell us all about Tranz, Horus and Cryptsy. Enlighten us. I suspect that you have nothing relevant to say. It's not enough to reference John Pilger et al in your arse-end. C'mon. Give us the benefit of your extensive knowledge, you horrible piece of shit.

[cryptmebro]

Do you beg like Horus aka. jdtmp4 "the crypto hobo" (who btw this coin was themed after), because you are one of his socks ?

Hippie Tech. I've seen your negative FUD posts elsewhere, as well as here. What a stupid cunt you are!!! Anyone looking at your trust rating here might ask why you bother, you worthless waste of space https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=31553 You can't even communicate in plain English.

Are you trying to say that Tranz is Horus, is "the crypto hobo"? If you are, so fucking what! Are you saying that HoboNickels is backed by Cryptsy's knowledge and expertise? If you are, then that will make me buy it all the more.

Cryptsy isn't exactly my favourite of the month. Far from it. But c'mon. Explain yourself. You've intrigued me with your hidden, hysterical, history. Tell us all about Tranz, Horus and Cryptsy. Enlighten us. I suspect that you have nothing relevant to say. It's not enough to reference John Pilger in your arse-end. C'mon. Give us the benefit of your extensive knowledge, you horrible piece of shit.

This was a dead issue until you fed the troll

[a_cat_named_joe]

Do you beg like Horus aka. jdtmp4 "the crypto hobo" (who btw this coin was themed after), because you are one of his socks ?

Hippie Tech. I've seen your negative FUD posts elsewhere, as well as here. What a stupid cunt you are!!! Anyone looking at your trust rating here might ask why you bother, you worthless waste of space https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=31553 You can't even communicate in plain English.

Are you trying to say that Tranz is Horus, is "the crypto hobo"? If you are, so fucking what! Are you saying that HoboNickels is backed by Cryptsy's knowledge and expertise? If you are, then that will make me buy it all the more.

Cryptsy isn't exactly my favourite of the month. Far from it. But c'mon. Explain yourself. You've intrigued me with your hidden, hysterical, history. Tell us all about Tranz, Horus and Cryptsy. Enlighten us. I suspect that you have nothing relevant to say. It's not enough to reference John Pilger in your arse-end. C'mon. Give us the benefit of your extensive knowledge, you horrible piece of shit.

This was a dead issue until you fed the troll

I don't preclude the possibility that he might have something to say. I very much doubt it though. I'd like to explore more. So c'mon Hippie Tech here's your chance to be taken seriously.

[Zenithar]

Do you beg like Horus aka. jdtmp4 "the crypto hobo" (who btw this coin was themed after), because you are one of his socks ?

Hippie Tech. I've seen your negative FUD posts elsewhere, as well as here. What a stupid cunt you are!!! Anyone looking at your trust rating here might ask why you bother, you worthless waste of space https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;u=31553 You can't even communicate in plain English.

Are you trying to say that Tranz is Horus, is "the crypto hobo"? If you are, so fucking what! Are you saying that HoboNickels is backed by Cryptsy's knowledge and expertise? If you are, then that will make me buy it all the more.

Cryptsy isn't exactly my favourite of the month. Far from it. But c'mon. Explain yourself. You've intrigued me with your hidden, hysterical, history. Tell us all about Tranz, Horus and Cryptsy. Enlighten us. I suspect that you have nothing relevant to say. It's not enough to reference John Pilger in your arse-end. C'mon. Give us the benefit of your extensive knowledge, you horrible piece of shit.

This was a dead issue until you fed the troll

I don't preclude the possibility that he might have something to say. I very much doubt it though. I'd like to explore more. So c'mon Hippie Tech here's your chance to be taken seriously.

yeah.
you shouldn't call someone a cunt and worthless piece of space, then expect an answer though.

[a_cat_named_joe]

Obviously, if I have offended anyone other than Hippie Tech, then I would extend an apology. But to besmirch someone's character like he has done with Tranz, that makes him the lowest of the low in my book and worthy of some basic AngloSaxon connotation. Let's not mince words. He's a dickhead (Pron. 'dik-hed'. Noun. Course slang. A stupid, contemptible, or obnoxious person. An idiot).

I wouldn't expect him to answer in any event if, as expected, there is no real substance in the aspersions he has cast. He obviously leads a mundane life and has to stoop to trolling to be noticed. It's Christmas, so let's be kind and give him a little of the attention he so desperately craves.

[HCLivess]

http://wiki.hobonickels.info/index.php?title=History_of_HoboNickels

the history is right here

[a_cat_named_joe]

http://wiki.hobonickels.info/index.php?title=History_of_HoboNickels

the history is right here

Thanks. I was aware of this thumbnail HoboNickels history early on and was so impressed with how it performed that I decided that this was a coin to invest in. I liked the Hobo Nickels association and thought that it encapsulated what a cryptocoin should be: something created out of something to produce greater value. In marketing terms, I thought the name HoboNickels was good 'positioning'.

[presstab]

I also started comparing the code for litestake so I can understand it better:

HBN on the left, HYP on the right

https://www.diffchecker.com/uwwijnti (kernel.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/dvcxtwjo (wallet.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/y8av2ylm (main.cpp)

Code:

	/** Presstab - HyperStake hashing
    bnTargetPerCoinDay.SetCompact(nBits);		I redesigned the hashing iteration in a few ways. 
    int64_t nValueIn = txPrev.vout[prevout.n].nValue;		Code Reorginization - Instead of iterating the hashing in wallet.cpp, it is iterated in kernel.cpp inside of checkstakekernelhash, this allows
the iteration to not need to initialize the variables for every iteration. This is also true for the stake modifier, which was previously
    uint256 hashBlockFrom = blockFrom.GetHash();		calculated for each iteration. 
liteStake - Previously the staking process would continuosly rehash the same hashes over and over, needlessly taking up valuable CPU power.
    CBigNum bnCoinDayWeight = CBigNum(nValueIn) * GetWeight((int64_t)txPrev.nTime, (int64_t)nTimeTx) / COIN / (24 * 60 * 60);		I have added a std::map that tracks the block height and the last time the wallet hashed on this height. Depending on your staking settings,
    targetProofOfStake = CBigNum(bnCoinDayWeight * bnTargetPerCoinDay).getuint256();		the wallet will not begin a new round of hashing until after a certain amount of time has passed, or a new block is accepted. This time delay
can be found in main.cpp bitcoinminer(). This means that there will be 1-5 seconds of hashing with the CPU once every few minutes, compared to
    // Calculate hash		continued hashing with the CPU.
    CDataStream ss(SER_GETHASH, 0);		**/

Any luck porting that over?

[Argon18]

I also started comparing the code for litestake so I can understand it better:

HBN on the left, HYP on the right

https://www.diffchecker.com/uwwijnti (kernel.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/dvcxtwjo (wallet.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/y8av2ylm (main.cpp)

Code:

	/** Presstab - HyperStake hashing
    bnTargetPerCoinDay.SetCompact(nBits);		I redesigned the hashing iteration in a few ways. 
    int64_t nValueIn = txPrev.vout[prevout.n].nValue;		Code Reorginization - Instead of iterating the hashing in wallet.cpp, it is iterated in kernel.cpp inside of checkstakekernelhash, this allows
the iteration to not need to initialize the variables for every iteration. This is also true for the stake modifier, which was previously
    uint256 hashBlockFrom = blockFrom.GetHash();		calculated for each iteration. 
liteStake - Previously the staking process would continuosly rehash the same hashes over and over, needlessly taking up valuable CPU power.
    CBigNum bnCoinDayWeight = CBigNum(nValueIn) * GetWeight((int64_t)txPrev.nTime, (int64_t)nTimeTx) / COIN / (24 * 60 * 60);		I have added a std::map that tracks the block height and the last time the wallet hashed on this height. Depending on your staking settings,
    targetProofOfStake = CBigNum(bnCoinDayWeight * bnTargetPerCoinDay).getuint256();		the wallet will not begin a new round of hashing until after a certain amount of time has passed, or a new block is accepted. This time delay
can be found in main.cpp bitcoinminer(). This means that there will be 1-5 seconds of hashing with the CPU once every few minutes, compared to
    // Calculate hash		continued hashing with the CPU.
    CDataStream ss(SER_GETHASH, 0);		**/

Any luck porting that over?

Not if he smart.
Problems with ya hash changes,
1. what keeps a programmer from changin his back to running at 60 seconds,
answer : nuthin , which could give him an edge in staking

2. Ya do realize it lowers the difficulty numbers and weakens the security.

Just Sayin,
AG18

[presstab]

I also started comparing the code for litestake so I can understand it better:

HBN on the left, HYP on the right

https://www.diffchecker.com/uwwijnti (kernel.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/dvcxtwjo (wallet.cpp)
https://www.diffchecker.com/y8av2ylm (main.cpp)

Code:

	/** Presstab - HyperStake hashing
    bnTargetPerCoinDay.SetCompact(nBits);		I redesigned the hashing iteration in a few ways. 
    int64_t nValueIn = txPrev.vout[prevout.n].nValue;		Code Reorginization - Instead of iterating the hashing in wallet.cpp, it is iterated in kernel.cpp inside of checkstakekernelhash, this allows
the iteration to not need to initialize the variables for every iteration. This is also true for the stake modifier, which was previously
    uint256 hashBlockFrom = blockFrom.GetHash();		calculated for each iteration. 
liteStake - Previously the staking process would continuosly rehash the same hashes over and over, needlessly taking up valuable CPU power.
    CBigNum bnCoinDayWeight = CBigNum(nValueIn) * GetWeight((int64_t)txPrev.nTime, (int64_t)nTimeTx) / COIN / (24 * 60 * 60);		I have added a std::map that tracks the block height and the last time the wallet hashed on this height. Depending on your staking settings,
    targetProofOfStake = CBigNum(bnCoinDayWeight * bnTargetPerCoinDay).getuint256();		the wallet will not begin a new round of hashing until after a certain amount of time has passed, or a new block is accepted. This time delay
can be found in main.cpp bitcoinminer(). This means that there will be 1-5 seconds of hashing with the CPU once every few minutes, compared to
    // Calculate hash		continued hashing with the CPU.
    CDataStream ss(SER_GETHASH, 0);		**/

Any luck porting that over?

Not if he smart.
Problems with ya hash changes,
1. what keeps a programmer from changin his back to running at 60 seconds,
answer : nuthin , which could give him an edge in staking

2. Ya do realize it lowers the difficulty numbers and weakens the security.

Just Sayin,
AG18

You can change the parameters via RPC in HYP, anyone can change to 60 seconds that wants to.