LiQio
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1181
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 06, 2014, 02:30:58 PM |
|
Hi sorry to be clear I cannot log on, both sites https://www.dgex.com and https://www.bter.com are not loading for me , coming up with connection to server interrupted... wondering if it is just me, or a wider problem. thanks. access working for me
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
February 06, 2014, 02:32:20 PM |
|
Can anyone explain how i send nxt to solaris wallet??
what do you mean, solaris is just a client no wallet.
|
|
|
|
empowering
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1078
Merit: 1441
|
|
February 06, 2014, 02:35:46 PM |
|
Hi sorry to be clear I cannot log on, both sites https://www.dgex.com and https://www.bter.com are not loading for me , coming up with connection to server interrupted... wondering if it is just me, or a wider problem. thanks. access working for me Ok thank you.
|
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds"
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 06, 2014, 02:37:58 PM Last edit: February 06, 2014, 02:50:01 PM by CIYAM Open |
|
FYI - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=431513.msg3049193;topicseen#new (some important reading wrt having a "Turing complete" scripting language by some of the better known names in this forum). (btw - good to see CfB posting in that topic)
|
|
|
|
pinarello
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 266
Merit: 100
NXT is the future
|
|
February 06, 2014, 02:43:33 PM |
|
Can anyone explain how i send nxt to solaris wallet??
You cant use the Solaris client to send or receive right now, its still in beta. As of now, you can't send NXT, register aliases or anything else that requires your account secret. As such, you will currently not be asked for your secret in the NXT Solaris client https://nextcoin.org/index.php?topic=2793.0http://nxtsolaris.wordpress.com/works perfect for me sending, receiving.
|
|
|
|
lucky88888
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 404
Merit: 250
https://nxtforum.org/
|
|
February 06, 2014, 02:50:38 PM |
|
Hello fellow nxters! and nxters soon to be!Proudly Presenting you: A Nxt Forging Competition, where the lowest amount of balance that a person forges wins! I will host this first competition and may host further competitions after this if i have time and money. I hope that this will become one of our traditions in nxt and i hope one day we will have someone able to forge something with a single nxt in their balance! REWARDS:1000nxt+Donations ( Donations to 1102421650298945743 ) Time: Competition starts after Block 59500, Expires after 20,000 blocks @ 79,500 and winner will be announced.All entries shall be submitted in here: https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=744Any entries elsewhere will not be counted. I am promoting forums.nxtcrypto.org and promoting nxt forging. I am just a random person, i just thought people wanted to move from btt to forums.nxtcrypto.org. For more infos please visit https://forums.nxtcrypto.org/viewtopic.php?f=2&t=744 Anyone up for it?
|
Fuck Mt.Gox! Fuck Mintpal! Fuck Bter! FUCK kyc! Protect yourself use MGW! SUPERNET! Recommended ASSET ->InstantDex : Lead Dev Jl777 (decentralized multi currency instant exchange) Recommended ASSET -> Jinn : Lead Dev Come-from-Beyond (ternary processors!) https://nxtforum.org/news-and-announcements/(ann)-jinn/
|
|
|
mcjavar
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:00:01 PM |
|
Can anyone explain how i send nxt to solaris wallet??
You cant use the Solaris client to send or receive right now, its still in beta. As of now, you can't send NXT, register aliases or anything else that requires your account secret. As such, you will currently not be asked for your secret in the NXT Solaris client https://nextcoin.org/index.php?topic=2793.0http://nxtsolaris.wordpress.com/works perfect for me sending, receiving. This client is so cool and has so much functionalities. There are only 2 problems with it: closed source and 132MB.
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:01:32 PM |
|
Can anyone explain how i send nxt to solaris wallet??
You cant use the Solaris client to send or receive right now, its still in beta. As of now, you can't send NXT, register aliases or anything else that requires your account secret. As such, you will currently not be asked for your secret in the NXT Solaris client https://nextcoin.org/index.php?topic=2793.0http://nxtsolaris.wordpress.com/works perfect for me sending, receiving. This client is so cool and has so much functionalities. There are only 2 problems with it: closed source and 132MB. will become open source.
|
|
|
|
marcus03
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:03:33 PM |
|
Can anyone explain how i send nxt to solaris wallet??
You cant use the Solaris client to send or receive right now, its still in beta. As of now, you can't send NXT, register aliases or anything else that requires your account secret. As such, you will currently not be asked for your secret in the NXT Solaris client https://nextcoin.org/index.php?topic=2793.0http://nxtsolaris.wordpress.com/works perfect for me sending, receiving. This client is so cool and has so much functionalities. There are only 2 problems with it: closed source and 132MB. Regarding closed source: Look at the roadmap. Regarding size: I wanted to do it hassle-free to make it easy for new users, so both, the NXT core and the jre are included. Once my release cycle slows down, I'll offer client-only downloads (without core and jre).
|
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:06:21 PM |
|
Regarding size: I wanted to do it hassle-free to make it easy for new users, so both, the NXT core and the jre are included. Once my release cycle slows down, I'll offer client-only downloads (without core and jre).
+1
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:07:23 PM |
|
Here r seamless textures for the NXT hexagon, I decided that Marble would look better than ivory-on-slate:
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:10:02 PM |
|
After reading some of the potential problems with implementing a "Turing complete" scripting language I wonder if it might not be better to "wait and see" how things go with Ethereum before "jumping on board".
(at least IMO the concerns are enough to perhaps bump this feature down a step or two below other features being either considered or currently developed)
|
|
|
|
opticalcarrier
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:14:04 PM |
|
yes thanks to the creator of peerexplorer crimi666 creating and spreading FUD in his peerexplorer thread on nextcoin. That is the source of this article's 'facts', and is the same thread that I referred to yesterday where I was attacked while trying to explain weights/forging differences. oh well.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:14:22 PM |
|
After reading some of the potential problems with a "Turing complete" scripting language I wonder if it might not be better to "wait and see" how things go with Ethereum before "jumping on board".
(at least IMO the concerns should perhaps bump this feature down a step or two below other features being either considered or developed)
I think that we could run Scripting on a parallel chain. Main chain won't be hurt if something goes wrong. Btw, simple opcodes require much less resources to execute than opcodes handling blocks and transactions. If we can't use 1 opcode = X NXT fee approach then we could add SHA256 and other crypto stuff. Anyway we have to use modified Voting System to set fee multiplier for each opcode.
|
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:16:16 PM |
|
yes thanks to the creator of peerexplorer crimi666 creating and spreading FUD in his peerexplorer thread on nextcoin. That is the source of this article's 'facts'. There is so much nonsense in that article that we don't even need to refute it.
|
|
|
|
Isildur23
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:18:30 PM |
|
Black marble looks great!
|
Ties are a prison for the soul...
|
|
|
Come-from-Beyond
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2142
Merit: 1010
Newbie
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:19:47 PM |
|
Black marble looks great!
It's the white one with reversed colors.
|
|
|
|
CIYAM
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1890
Merit: 1086
Ian Knowles - CIYAM Lead Developer
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:21:42 PM |
|
I think that we could run Scripting on a parallel chain. Main chain won't be hurt if something goes wrong.
Very interested to see how this "parallel chain" stuff is going to work - and yes I guess it could be the safest way to do the "smart contracts". Am guessing that if we approach it that way then the 100+ TPS should not be affected by this or other ideas that could also be put into "parallel chains". Maybe this is the "real ace" that Nxt has up its sleeve?
|
|
|
|
okaynow
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:22:51 PM |
|
Regarding closed source: Look at the roadmap. Regarding size: I wanted to do it hassle-free to make it easy for new users, so both, the NXT core and the jre are included. Once my release cycle slows down, I'll offer client-only downloads (without core and jre).
Marcus thanx for your effort. I just upgraded to NRS 0.6 and deleted the 1.6 solaris files. Is your 1.6 running with 0.6 already? Can you be as fast as JL is?
|
1PeecNu1J8VNKpgR13nasMZWLcMZrwNJfc
|
|
|
bitcoinpaul
|
|
February 06, 2014, 03:23:22 PM |
|
After reading some of the potential problems with a "Turing complete" scripting language I wonder if it might not be better to "wait and see" how things go with Ethereum before "jumping on board".
(at least IMO the concerns should perhaps bump this feature down a step or two below other features being either considered or developed)
I think that we could run Scripting on a parallel chain. Main chain won't be hurt if something goes wrong. Btw, simple opcodes require much less resources to execute than opcodes handling blocks and transactions. If we can't use 1 opcode = X NXT fee approach then we could add SHA256 and other crypto stuff. Anyway we have to use modified Voting System to set fee multiplier for each opcode. +1
|
|
|
|
|