[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[Ozziecoin]

https://www.facebook.com/jamie.redman.374/posts/1456311001299910?comment_id=1456449717952705&offset=0&total_comments=12&notif_t=feed_comment_reply

That's just sad. If he has done the review, he should have released it.

well obviously he is NOT done with the review right !
Otherwise he would have told us ... and specially you !
 

He can't say the tech works publicly unless he has done the review. So, he must have done the review and not released it.

[Jestah]

Just wanted to share my success!

2014-08-19 xxxxxxx CDarkSendPool::EnableHotColdMasterNode() - Enabled! You may shut down the cold daemon.send version message: version 70035    

[thunderdrum2]

I totally agree with Evan's sentiment...  Let all the weak hands leave the coin... Current price means nothing...

If you're still accumulating this should be the happiest few days of your life...

 
Truth been told.

I can't believe that i still have chance to accumulate my DRK in such a low price. Now, my only concerning is how many DRK i will get in this period. Because, DRK project has great potential, based on the genius idea of Masternode Network, i think after RC5 (IP obfuscate) DRK-Tor may be showed up as the first Application that DRK project provide to the people. Just like HTTP/FTP/SMTP/POP/IMAP/ based on the TCP/IP.

I'm also exciting that on this situation, i see so many great people that understand the tremendous potential of the DRK project and stand out to support it (and accumulate it  )

Leave the Dev team do their own work. You will thank them for their hard work that make DRK great in future! I know it's a tough time in the crypto world. But after joining the RC4 testing, i do believe DRK will stand up and stand up first~! There is no other crypto project has the Innovation and potential as we have in DRK project~!

[Ozziecoin]

In a parallel world: Drk would be open source, AA would be singing its praises, KA confirms strong anonymity, a material chunk of the Btc community abandons Btc in favour of Drk, people forgive and forget the large mining at start and markets spring up around Drk that a copy cat clone can't replicate quickly enough.

Ozziecoin,

At this time, i dont see what can do open source for DRK. (RC4, RC5 .....)

I have a question, if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?

I dont tel its good or bad, just want to know.

Firstly, Drk forked from Ltc which is a fork of Btc. And under the licensing, all developments on top of the code must be open source.

I could have chosen Ltc or Drk - didn't make much difference but I thought privacy is important, so selected Drk.

Drk then closed source the code, which is why it is in trouble. Us using Drk or some other privacy tech is fine. When Dark Wallet is released, we can easily switch to that.

The primary purpose of Ozziecoin is not to make money. It is to build a viable future currency for Aussies. We are not interested in Drk's core market.

Regardless of what we do, Drk must stand on it's own feet. If a secondary coin can steal the number one position then there is something wrong with Drk.

Ltc could never come within 10% of Btc's marketcap. Drk being afraid of us is a joke. Drk should do right by the community, the licensing agreement and its investors. And I am one of those investors.

[luigi1111]

In a parallel world: Drk would be open source, AA would be singing its praises, KA confirms strong anonymity, a material chunk of the Btc community abandons Btc in favour of Drk, people forgive and forget the large mining at start and markets spring up around Drk that a copy cat clone can't replicate quickly enough.

Ozziecoin,

At this time, i dont see what can do open source for DRK. (RC4, RC5 .....)

I have a question, if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?

I dont tel its good or bad, just want to know.

Firstly, Drk forked from Ltc which is a fork of Btc. And under the licensing, all developments on top of the code must be open source.

I could have chosen Ltc or Drk - didn't make much difference but I thought privacy is important, so selected Drk.

Drk then closed source the code, which is why it is in trouble. Us using Drk or some other privacy tech is fine. When Dark Wallet is released, we can easily switch to that.

The primary purpose of Ozziecoin is not to make money. It is to build a viable future currency for Aussies. We are not interested in Drk's core market.

Regardless of what we do, Drk must stand on it's own feet. If a secondary coin can steal the number one position then there is something wrong with Drk.

Ltc could never come within 10% of Btc's marketcap. Drk being afraid of us is a joke. Drk should do right by the community, the licensing agreement and its investors.

This is not actually true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litecoin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

With that said, I'm in favor of open source sooner rather than later. I don't see much risk in any clones taking off, but there's a slight chance I guess.

[stealth923]

K Atlas comments on DRK prices
(from FB) ....>>

 

As I said before, fundamentals are rock solid and I will continue to buy - we are going to change crypto history!

[drkwarrior]

ozziecoin, what you doing back here, you said you were leaving. you are a troll who has been repeating the same shit for over a week.
Wheres your drk thief friend dyslexic zombie, has he returned people mn funds yet??
shut the fuck up about open source, whens its ready it will happen.

[Ozziecoin]

In a parallel world: Drk would be open source, AA would be singing its praises, KA confirms strong anonymity, a material chunk of the Btc community abandons Btc in favour of Drk, people forgive and forget the large mining at start and markets spring up around Drk that a copy cat clone can't replicate quickly enough.

Ozziecoin,

At this time, i dont see what can do open source for DRK. (RC4, RC5 .....)

I have a question, if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?

I dont tel its good or bad, just want to know.

Firstly, Drk forked from Ltc which is a fork of Btc. And under the licensing, all developments on top of the code must be open source.

I could have chosen Ltc or Drk - didn't make much difference but I thought privacy is important, so selected Drk.

Drk then closed source the code, which is why it is in trouble. Us using Drk or some other privacy tech is fine. When Dark Wallet is released, we can easily switch to that.

The primary purpose of Ozziecoin is not to make money. It is to build a viable future currency for Aussies. We are not interested in Drk's core market.

Regardless of what we do, Drk must stand on it's own feet. If a secondary coin can steal the number one position then there is something wrong with Drk.

Ltc could never come within 10% of Btc's marketcap. Drk being afraid of us is a joke. Drk should do right by the community, the licensing agreement and its investors.

This is not actually true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litecoin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

With that said, I'm in favor of open source sooner rather than later. I don't see much risk in any clones taking off, but there's a slight chance I guess.

The market has dropped already. Continuing with closed source will only hurt Drk further because markets are not likely to form around a closed source coin. I might be wrong, but it appears the market agrees.  By year end, Dark Wallet will end that debate and Drk will have lost the ecash opportunity to Btc. Even if Drk is open sourced at that stage, it will probably be too late.

[Ozziecoin]

In a parallel world: Drk would be open source, AA would be singing its praises, KA confirms strong anonymity, a material chunk of the Btc community abandons Btc in favour of Drk, people forgive and forget the large mining at start and markets spring up around Drk that a copy cat clone can't replicate quickly enough.

Ozziecoin,

At this time, i dont see what can do open source for DRK. (RC4, RC5 .....)

I have a question, if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?

I dont tel its good or bad, just want to know.

Firstly, Drk forked from Ltc which is a fork of Btc. And under the licensing, all developments on top of the code must be open source.

I could have chosen Ltc or Drk - didn't make much difference but I thought privacy is important, so selected Drk.

Drk then closed source the code, which is why it is in trouble. Us using Drk or some other privacy tech is fine. When Dark Wallet is released, we can easily switch to that.

The primary purpose of Ozziecoin is not to make money. It is to build a viable future currency for Aussies.

Regardless of what we do, Drk must stand on it's own feet. If a secondary coin can steal the number one position then there is something wrong with Drk.

Ltc could never come within 10% of Btc's marketcap. Drk being afraid of us is a joke. Drk should do right by the community, the licensing agreement and its investors.

Thx for all informations.
But my question is : if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?
I never tel your are right or not to do that, i dont tel is good or bad, just ask a question.

Answer is we don't know but I know privacy is important.

[bigrcanada]

ozziecoin, what you doing back here, you said you were leaving. you are a troll who has been repeating the same shit for over a week.
Wheres your drk thief friend dyslexic zombie, has he returned people mn funds yet??
shut the fuck up about open source, whens its ready it will happen.

.
thanks drk warrior.... ill activate and list ozziecoin to the ever growing list...... procedure.... wait for it.... yes.... "IGNORE"  sun glasses on    

edit: is ozziecoin trolling and stirring shit or asking solid questions,  group?  from what i can see he is always bashing and trashing darkcoin and promoting other technology in our forum... i vote for troll... smells and acts like a troll it must be.  Ozziecoin explain why you feel the need to bash or be added to the growing list of ignored peeps.

[doubleredrolex]

Ive probably hit ignore on half the people here lol

[Ozziecoin]

In a parallel world: Drk would be open source, AA would be singing its praises, KA confirms strong anonymity, a material chunk of the Btc community abandons Btc in favour of Drk, people forgive and forget the large mining at start and markets spring up around Drk that a copy cat clone can't replicate quickly enough.

Ozziecoin,

At this time, i dont see what can do open source for DRK. (RC4, RC5 .....)

I have a question, if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?

I dont tel its good or bad, just want to know.

Firstly, Drk forked from Ltc which is a fork of Btc. And under the licensing, all developments on top of the code must be open source.

I could have chosen Ltc or Drk - didn't make much difference but I thought privacy is important, so selected Drk.

Drk then closed source the code, which is why it is in trouble. Us using Drk or some other privacy tech is fine. When Dark Wallet is released, we can easily switch to that.

The primary purpose of Ozziecoin is not to make money. It is to build a viable future currency for Aussies. We are not interested in Drk's core market.

Regardless of what we do, Drk must stand on it's own feet. If a secondary coin can steal the number one position then there is something wrong with Drk.

Ltc could never come within 10% of Btc's marketcap. Drk being afraid of us is a joke. Drk should do right by the community, the licensing agreement and its investors.

This is not actually true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litecoin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

With that said, I'm in favor of open source sooner rather than later. I don't see much risk in any clones taking off, but there's a slight chance I guess.

It appears you could be right about being allowed to close source the code. I don't know. My impression is that the copyright is retained by Litecoin and they can enforce that.

Specifically:

Because the MIT license grants the right to sublicense, any distributor of MIT-licensed code has the right to grant a license to the entire code base,[dubious – discuss] including components that were originally licensed under the MIT license by third parties.  

Whatever is the legal position, it should be acknowledged that none of this would have been possible without Satoshi's creation and he made it open source for a reason.

[Dusty11]

Don't worry you'll get your open source. Closer than ever now.

[Toninho]

   =   

We have a proof

For everything else you have DRK

[AlexGR]

In a parallel world: Drk would be open source, AA would be singing its praises, KA confirms strong anonymity, a material chunk of the Btc community abandons Btc in favour of Drk, people forgive and forget the large mining at start and markets spring up around Drk that a copy cat clone can't replicate quickly enough.

Ozziecoin,

At this time, i dont see what can do open source for DRK. (RC4, RC5 .....)

I have a question, if DRK open source, do you use it for Ozziecoin ?

I dont tel its good or bad, just want to know.

Firstly, Drk forked from Ltc which is a fork of Btc. And under the licensing, all developments on top of the code must be open source.

I could have chosen Ltc or Drk - didn't make much difference but I thought privacy is important, so selected Drk.

Drk then closed source the code, which is why it is in trouble. Us using Drk or some other privacy tech is fine. When Dark Wallet is released, we can easily switch to that.

The primary purpose of Ozziecoin is not to make money. It is to build a viable future currency for Aussies. We are not interested in Drk's core market.

Regardless of what we do, Drk must stand on it's own feet. If a secondary coin can steal the number one position then there is something wrong with Drk.

Ltc could never come within 10% of Btc's marketcap. Drk being afraid of us is a joke. Drk should do right by the community, the licensing agreement and its investors.

This is not actually true:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Litecoin
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License

With that said, I'm in favor of open source sooner rather than later. I don't see much risk in any clones taking off, but there's a slight chance I guess.

The market has dropped already. Continuing with closed source will only hurt Drk further because markets are not likely to form around a closed source coin. I might be wrong, but it appears the market agrees.  By year end, Dark Wallet will end that debate and Drk will have lost the ecash opportunity to Btc. Even if Drk is open sourced at that stage, it will probably be too late.

Everyone and their grandma comes here to whine about price finding something to say.

"It's the lack of faucets"
"It's the open source"
"It's the initial distribution"
"It's the trolls"
"It's the masternodes getting miners income"
"It's Evan"
"It's <insert whatever here>"

...thing is, price went to 0.028 with lack of faucets, closed source, initial distribution being what it is, trolls flooding the place, etc etc etc. Thus the theories don't hold water because a theory must be able to explain and predict, and in terms of prediction noone predicted that all these "problematic" factors (according to each one of the whiners) would take DRK from 0.001 to 0.028. Thus the theories are flawed and are only used to bitch and leverage stuff towards certain directions, or are used to troll.

[bigrcanada]

Holy fuck really... thanks Captian Obvious.  I suppose we could also add the great creator there in the credits for creating life which created Satoshi,  which created BTC  blah blah blah.   give your head sake mate. The original  kernel of the code came from somewhere.... BIG FUCKN DEAL! The remaining code has been ultra a million times by thousands of coders.... wooopy doooo!   I didn't realize this  forum  had become a history class.

[Ozziecoin]

ozziecoin, what you doing back here, you said you were leaving. you are a troll who has been repeating the same shit for over a week.
Wheres your drk thief friend dyslexic zombie, has he returned people mn funds yet??
shut the fuck up about open source, whens its ready it will happen.

.
thanks drk warrior.... ill activate and list ozziecoin to the ever growing list...... procedure.... wait for it.... yes.... "IGNORE"  sun glasses on    

edit: is ozziecoin trolling and stirring shit or asking solid questions,  group?  

Add, don't add - does not bother me in the slightest. Actually, I already had drkwarrior on my ignore list and had no idea what he was saying. He was always rude and had nothing intelligent to say. A pure pump and dumper.

I think my record shows I have been balanced - neither pumping or attacking. Just pointing out perspectives. You guys that hit ignore on me and even Shojayxt have fallen in love with the idea of Drk.

The reality is that the Btc community avoided RC4. Also, Drk is not gaining the support it richly deserves. The start of the coin was bad enough but was then compounded by changes to the block reward midway.  Serious investors are going to do the research and find out these things. I even tried to defend the coin saying it was a mistake. In reality, I could be the fool and the devs could be real crooks. Who knows the real story?

If you go over my past postings, you will see I suggested a name change very early on. I also suggested creating a shapeshift.io type service to try and get fresh Btc into Drk.

Instead, Drk went closed source and became ostracised from the Btc community, killing my investment with it.

As the coin value plummeted, I said nothing. I did not even attack Camo, whereas some of you guys turned on him. I got no joy from seeing people's investments get killed.

Humans are inherently unreliable - one time your friend and another time turning on you. In fact, add me to the ignore list please. Your opinion matters not to me. I think I'm starting to believe shojayxt for calling bigrcanada a "professional investor". You're actually behaving like thugs I know.

[Ozziecoin]

Everyone and their grandma comes here to whine about price finding something to say.

"It's the lack of faucets"
"It's the open source"
"It's the initial distribution"
"It's the trolls"
"It's the masternodes getting miners income"
"It's Evan"
"It's <insert whatever here>"

...thing is, price went to 0.028 with lack of faucets, closed source, initial distribution being what it is, trolls flooding the place, etc etc etc. Thus the theories don't hold water because a theory must be able to explain and predict, and in terms of prediction noone predicted that all these "problematic" factors (according to each one of the whiners) would take DRK from 0.001 to 0.028. Thus the theories are flawed and are only used to bitch and leverage stuff towards certain directions, or are used to troll.

I'm sorry for your losses AlexGR but it was pretty clear the Btc community did not care about a closed source anon solution. RC4 proved that to me. I tested the tech and even spoke positively about it but no new money was incoming. That's why I started saying that Drk had to open source and create markets to bring in fresh money. I then said Drk should create some kind of Btc mixing service to get new funds in. As I was ignored, I became very afraid about the coin value because it was already falling after RC4 was released.

[Dusty11]

Everyone and their grandma comes here to whine about price finding something to say.

"It's the lack of faucets"
"It's the open source"
"It's the initial distribution"
"It's the trolls"
"It's the masternodes getting miners income"
"It's Evan"
"It's <insert whatever here>"

...thing is, price went to 0.028 with lack of faucets, closed source, initial distribution being what it is, trolls flooding the place, etc etc etc. Thus the theories don't hold water because a theory must be able to explain and predict, and in terms of prediction noone predicted that all these "problematic" factors (according to each one of the whiners) would take DRK from 0.001 to 0.028. Thus the theories are flawed and are only used to bitch and leverage stuff towards certain directions, or are used to troll.

I'm sorry for your losses AlexGR but it was pretty clear the Btc community did not care about a closed source anon solution. RC4 proved that to me. I tested the tech and even spoke positively about it but no new money was incoming. That's why I started saying that Drk had to open source and create markets to bring in fresh money. I then said Drk should create some kind of Btc mixing service to get new funds in. As I was ignored, I became very afraid about the coin value because it was already falling after RC4 was released.

All you give a shit about is the price. Don't give yourself an aneurysm.

[Propulsion]

Everyone and their grandma comes here to whine about price finding something to say.

"It's the lack of faucets"
"It's the open source"
"It's the initial distribution"
"It's the trolls"
"It's the masternodes getting miners income"
"It's Evan"
"It's <insert whatever here>"

...thing is, price went to 0.028 with lack of faucets, closed source, initial distribution being what it is, trolls flooding the place, etc etc etc. Thus the theories don't hold water because a theory must be able to explain and predict, and in terms of prediction noone predicted that all these "problematic" factors (according to each one of the whiners) would take DRK from 0.001 to 0.028. Thus the theories are flawed and are only used to bitch and leverage stuff towards certain directions, or are used to troll.

Well said. Stop looking for a scapegoat. People trade; the price reacts. It can not always go up.

P.S. you forgot:

"It's because it's unmoderated"
"It's because of Camosoul and his guns"
"It's because of Eltito not keeping us updated 24/7 on constant status updates like what toothpaste Evan is using to brush his teeth with"
"It's because Tesla doesn't accept Darkcoin for a model S"
"so on and so forth"