[ANN][DASH] Dash (dash.org) | First Self-Funding Self-Governing Crypto Currency

[bigrcanada]

Hope u all listened to me... i called the first major break out 4 min before when we crossed.... then i told u to set your EMAS to 21 50 100 200.... its the magic parameters just look it told me when to sell perfectly...


Remember I am no longer a troll Im here with all of you SET EMAS TO 21 50 100 200 and have AMAZING PARAMETERS

That's solid advice, pookie.

Told u...Ive gone dark... i was here for first rise now Im Back for a much BIGGER rise.... glad to be back Happy to help people with TA... BTW if we break that BLUE LINE... buy... buy a fuck ton

P.S. why do I have the feeling Open Bazzar will be accepting Dark.... They said they already had an alt in line

Last time I was in this thread my posts were all deleted.  I don't come here much.

Yup...join the club...for some reasong...BCT finds it important to delete alot of my "on topic" posts...so to don't feel singled out.

[bigrcanada]

Rocketship if we get back above .0055.
JL

Rocket.ship.
The SS DRK has liftoff.

"W" bottom (http://thepatternsite.com/bigw.html) on every timeframe 2 hours and below. Daily timeframe needs a break above .01 with higher volume than what we say yesterday to confirm that we're now in an uptrend.
Everything I see points to the lower-.008 region as next target because there's little to no resistance here immediately above us, this is all momentum movements.
Support at .005; don't break that or .0045 because that would suck.

Overall, this is all fine and dandy, but DRK needs to break .01 to really make this thing look peachy again.
JL

Mid-Upper-.008 hit; wow. Your move now, DRK.
I'm taking some off the table though. If it breaks .01 I may regret that. Overall though this kind of rate of increase ain't sustainable much longer.

Sure it is. Its correcting itself from the past weeks of price manipulation and poor market conditions. It could go back to where it was before at 0.020 easy.

Yeah and remember 0.020 isn't worth as much as it was back then since bitcoin is down a bit so not that surprising if we see it.

We'll see what happens in the next 12 hours. Seems like the biggest changes happen around 2am my time so about 8 hours from now. Thats usually when the action begins. I would love to see 0.020 to 0.030 in the next 30 days

wow bro....slow down on that!  I for one would rather see a slow steady growth based on coin progress.... 30 days to 0.03 would be someone or group doing crazy pumping...in which case it will have to crash.  no thanks...slow but steady wins the race! 

[Ozziecoin]

Will they pay $1 a day? I won't. https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/pages/buy-vpn/

Thats a centralised service....This is DarkTor you moron - a decentralised anonymous internet service. Evan said its 50 cents, which millions would pay for.
Cant believe you are still trolling here

***Ignore for good***

So, why would I need high level privacy for? Most people are just downloading pirated movies or going to sites they can't access due to Gov't blocks. A VPN is more than enough. Tor is way more than that. It's overkill and used for child porn, hacking and really dangerous stuff. I'm just questioning why millions of people would pay $1/day for anonymity they don't need. The economics don't stack up for me.  I'm putting this out there so people look at this more objectively. Those that have me on ignore, the feeling is mutual.

Edit: so classy of you to call me a "moron". Thanks, I guess.

[janos666]

This is bonkers. Do you really think gold has less value because it has real-world uses? Do you believe it would go down in price if some vastly worthwhile new use was found for it making lots of people want to use it beyond the people who already wanted it for it's other uses and value?

It's not that it's value would go down if a real world use was found, it's the fact that it ceases to be of monetary value if it goes out of circulation due to its utility.

Most of the world's gold supply isn't stuck in people's teeth or in your home Hi-Fi contacts. It's sitting in vaults doing nothing but functioning as a monetary unit.

A monetary medium that also has a utility value DOES detract from its monetary value because it makes it a targetable commodity in its own right and therefore inefficient in it's monetary role. Cryptos are almost perfect in this sense because they have almost zero utility value. They are pure monetary tokens and are therefore one step closer to monetary perfection than gold was.

If you really need it spelled out, think of it this way - a funfair uses plastic tokens as "money" to pay for rides. Those plastic tokens are almost worthless in the hardware shop where they only have utility value. On the other hand, inside the "funfair economy" their value accrues to maybe 10,000% of their utility value. The difference is their monetary value when used as a currency - i.e. the price you pay for their "monetary role".

Now lets say you increase the utility value of those plastic tokens by having them perform a function - say, monitoring your heartbeat. Now they will perform less well in a monetary role because a load of them go out of circulation and eventually there's not enough left to effectively use as a currency. A few are still traded and have high value (higher than before even possibly) but they're not used as a currency any more due to being a poor monetary medium.

Finally, one day along comes another company selling cheaper heartrate monitors and blows away the valuation because we no longer have "universal adoption", just utility in a very specific sector.

I don't see this as a real problem for many different reasons.

1: Gold supply has actual physical limits, Crypto does NOT (that limit is as virtual as the currency itself).

It is impossible to get more Gold than what the Universe - or more practically Earth - has to offer and it's not practical to trade smaller amounts than what you can see with your naked eyes and/or measure fairly accurately with fairly simple equipment. It wouldn't be feasible to trade with 0.00001 grams of gold. You can't even see it, you can't measure it with a simple scale, etc...

Crypto is practically unlimited. We already have a lot of decimal places and I think it's possible to add more. You have virtually infinite number of coin portions. You can buy and handle your 0.00001 gram of "gold" the exact same way as you would buy and handle your 1 kilogram gold bullion (and you don't need machines to move your 1000 kg worth of bullions, your wallet always has a similarly small size...).


2: I don't think this service will ever have a significant impact. A few people might use it from time to time but won't be as popular as some people might anticipate.

3: I guess this is just one of many possible services which could all have different effects on the usability/price/etc of the coin. It won't look like as the main selling point, just an extra.

[BossBee]

Lets all freak out again and see if we can bring it down to .001   

[Ignition75]

This is bonkers. Do you really think gold has less value because it has real-world uses? Do you believe it would go down in price if some vastly worthwhile new use was found for it making lots of people want to use it beyond the people who already wanted it for it's other uses and value?

It's not that it's value would go down if a real world use was found, it's the fact that it ceases to be of monetary value if it goes out of circulation due to its utility.

Most of the world's gold supply isn't stuck in people's teeth or in your home Hi-Fi contacts. It's sitting in vaults doing nothing but functioning as a monetary unit.

A monetary medium that also has a utility value DOES detract from its monetary value because it makes it a targetable commodity in its own right and therefore inefficient in it's monetary role. Cryptos are almost perfect in this sense because they have almost zero utility value. They are pure monetary tokens and are therefore one step closer to monetary perfection than gold was.

If you really need it spelled out, think of it this way - a funfair uses plastic tokens as "money" to pay for rides. Those plastic tokens are almost worthless in the hardware shop where they only have utility value. On the other hand, inside the "funfair economy" their value accrues to maybe 10,000% of their utility value. The difference is their monetary value when used as a currency - i.e. the price you pay for their "monetary role".

Now lets say you increase the utility value of those plastic tokens by having them perform a function - say, monitoring your heartbeat. Now they will perform less well in a monetary role because a load of them go out of circulation and eventually there's not enough left to effectively use as a currency. A few are still traded and have high value (higher than before even possibly) but they're not used as a currency any more due to being a poor monetary medium.

Finally, one day along comes another company selling cheaper heartrate monitors and blows away the valuation because we no longer have "universal adoption", just utility in a very specific sector.

I don't see this as a real problem for many different reasons.

1: Gold supply has actual physical limits, Crypto does NOT (that limit is as virtual as the currency itself).

It is impossible to get more Gold than what the Universe - or more practically Earth - has to offer and it's not practical to trade smaller amounts than what you can see with your naked eyes and/or measure fairly accurately with fairly simple equipment. It wouldn't be feasible to trade with 0.00001 grams of gold. You can't even see it, you can't measure it with a simple scale, etc...

Crypto is practically unlimited. We already have a lot of decimal places and I think it's possible to add more. You have virtually infinite number of coin portions. You can buy and handle your 0.00001 gram of "gold" the exact same way as you would buy and handle your 1 kilogram gold bullion (and you don't need machines to move your 1000 kg worth of bullions, your wallet always has a similarly small size...).


2: I don't think this service will ever have a significant impact. A few people might use it from time to time but won't be as popular as some people might anticipate.

3: I guess this is just one of many possible services which could all have different effects on the usability/price/etc of the coin. It won't look like as the main selling point, just an extra.

I see the initial application for this being a decentralised exchange and marketplace, am I wrong?

[drkwarrior]

ozziecoin u lil troll fuck. Your only here because you want back into drk because you sold cheap,lol. well time to panic...

Here comes the boom

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

[Brilliantrocket]

Looks like we're edging towards .008.

[Propulsion]

ozziecoin u lil troll fuck. Your only here because you want back into drk because you sold cheap,lol. well time to panic...

Here comes the boom

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

What happened with this? Last I heard he was having trouble with a MN. Something about a vanished wallet address or something.

[Ignition75]

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

Did that money not find it's way back to the MN owners?

[HiddenDark]

Will they pay $1 a day? I won't. https://www.privateinternetaccess.com/pages/buy-vpn/

Thats a centralised service....This is DarkTor you moron - a decentralised anonymous internet service. Evan said its 50 cents, which millions would pay for.
Cant believe you are still trolling here

***Ignore for good***

If you've got noting to hide, you've got nothing to fear

[drkwarrior]

Its time to move these walls up..

Bears should hide, the bulls are back

[drkwarrior]

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

Did that money not find it's way back to the MN owners?

no only a few got there money back, the rest lost there drk. DZ is AWOL

[Ozziecoin]

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

Did that money not find it's way back to the MN owners?

That's a terrible thing to say. I don't even know who DZ is.  We are certainly not friends. I think DZ is MIA. Unfortunately, I think he did not refund people's money.

[Ozziecoin]

Let me see, Drkwarrior, created 19 July 2014.

"To investors...please dont expect drk to rise more than 40-50% after rc4 release. Any high price predictions will only lead to dissapointment and greed may even cause you to dump. DRK is here for the long term, it will have slow steady growth because of new buy support forming after each rc version. 
So keep expections realistic, buy into a masternode or share a node and remain patient because best things come to those who wait."

[Ozziecoin]

Another gem on Aug 09 from Drkwarrior:

what if drk makes it big time and we all become rich and powerful?.

[Ignition75]

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

Did that money not find it's way back to the MN owners?

That's a terrible thing to say. I don't even know who DZ is.  We are certainly not friends. I think DZ is MIA. Unfortunately, I think he did not refund people's money.

That was a low blow, ignore it, you are not responsible for anyone else's actions but your own.  I even remember you were critical of him in that thread and told him to pull his head in...

[Ozziecoin]

ps , ozziecoin is friend of dyslexic zombie who stole peoples masternodes.

Did that money not find it's way back to the MN owners?

That's a terrible thing to say. I don't even know who DZ is.  We are certainly not friends. I think DZ is MIA. Unfortunately, I think he did not refund people's money.

That was a low blow, ignore it, you are not responsible for anyone else's actions but your own.  I even remember you were critical of him in that thread and told him to pull his head in...

Yes I did criticise DZ. In the past DZ was stand up with refunding people that had put money into Btc ASICS. When DZ said he couldn't get money out of his first MN due to "staking", I told him there was no staking and the coins can always be transferred out. Either through incompetence or theft, DZ did not return the coins in that first MN and I think also another one. That's on him. I told him it was dodgy but he never answered.

[drkwarrior]

Let me see, Drkwarrior, created 19 July 2014.

"To investors...please dont expect drk to rise more than 40-50% after rc4 release. Any high price predictions will only lead to dissapointment and greed may even cause you to dump. DRK is here for the long term, it will have slow steady growth because of new buy support forming after each rc version. 
So keep expections realistic, buy into a masternode or share a node and remain patient because best things come to those who wait."

yea so true, thanks for reposting my comment

[Ozziecoin]

Another from drkwarrior 14 Aug, just before the mega dump. Check the charts yourself: http://www.cryptocoincharts.info/v2/pair/drk/btc/mintpal/6-months

drk will be number 2 now defo 100%. Dump any shitcoins you may have because the biggest whale group has left.
This is a very good time to buy his cheap btc and buy cheap drk. This sale wont last long

How would drkwarrior know there was a whale group? Did he know the dump was going to happen all along?