[POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com

[jedimstr]

Question, please help.

I decided to try out wafflepool, mined at about 3kh/s through over 48 hours, i was monitoring my miners via stats and they were reflecting an active hashrate while my profits kept staying at 0. Asked some people around, and they said to wait until sunday to get paid.
Well, Sunday came around ans is now almost over, and still nothing. I did not get paid, to my estimate it should have been aprox 0.030 BTC for 48hours at 3kh/s. Way above the minimal payment amount.
Does anyone have any ideas?

Account address?

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49

3kh/s is extremely extremely small.  That's the output of a single core, many year old, cpu.
There's no way that would be worth 0.030 BTC at Wafflepool in 48 hours. You're calculations are wrong.

Consider that yesterday's output at 1MH/s was 0.00453937 BTC.  For the last 48 hours it was 0.00908785 BTC for 1MH/s

1MH/s is 1000kh/s.  So there is NO WAY that 3kh/s would even approach 0.030 BTC for 48 hours.

Looking at your address on Waffle's site, you're not even registering that much... everything is just 0's.

[ukrv1p]

Question, please help.

I decided to try out wafflepool, mined at about 3kh/s through over 48 hours, i was monitoring my miners via stats and they were reflecting an active hashrate while my profits kept staying at 0. Asked some people around, and they said to wait until sunday to get paid.
Well, Sunday came around ans is now almost over, and still nothing. I did not get paid, to my estimate it should have been aprox 0.030 BTC for 48hours at 3kh/s. Way above the minimal payment amount.
Does anyone have any ideas?

Account address?

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49

3kh/s is extremely extremely small.  That's the output of a single core, many year old, cpu.
There's no way that would be worth 0.030 BTC at Wafflepool in 48 hours. You're calculations are wrong.

Consider that yesterday's output at 1MH/s was 0.00453937 BTC.  For the last 48 hours it was 0.00908785 BTC for 1MH/s

1MH/s is 1000kh/s.  So there is NO WAY that 3kh/s would even approach 0.030 BTC for 48 hours.

Looking at your address on Waffle's site, you're not even registering that much... everything is just 0's.

Sorry,

I did mean 3 MHash,

i have one rig running at 2550khash and another at 550 average. 2 seperate workers.

so if 0.0045, then i calculate 0.027, still ....

[jedimstr]

Question, please help.

I decided to try out wafflepool, mined at about 3kh/s through over 48 hours, i was monitoring my miners via stats and they were reflecting an active hashrate while my profits kept staying at 0. Asked some people around, and they said to wait until sunday to get paid.
Well, Sunday came around ans is now almost over, and still nothing. I did not get paid, to my estimate it should have been aprox 0.030 BTC for 48hours at 3kh/s. Way above the minimal payment amount.
Does anyone have any ideas?

Account address?

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49

3kh/s is extremely extremely small.  That's the output of a single core, many year old, cpu.
There's no way that would be worth 0.030 BTC at Wafflepool in 48 hours. You're calculations are wrong.

Consider that yesterday's output at 1MH/s was 0.00453937 BTC.  For the last 48 hours it was 0.00908785 BTC for 1MH/s

1MH/s is 1000kh/s.  So there is NO WAY that 3kh/s would even approach 0.030 BTC for 48 hours.

Looking at your address on Waffle's site, you're not even registering that much... everything is just 0's.

Sorry,

I did mean 3 MHash,

i have one rig running at 2550khash and another at 550 average. 2 seperate workers.

so if 0.0045, then i calculate 0.027, still ....

Well something else is wrong then with the way you setup with Waffle because that address is showing 0 hashrate. What are the exact usernames you're using?  Are you using just the address or address_workerName for your two rigs?

[ukrv1p]

Question, please help.

I decided to try out wafflepool, mined at about 3kh/s through over 48 hours, i was monitoring my miners via stats and they were reflecting an active hashrate while my profits kept staying at 0. Asked some people around, and they said to wait until sunday to get paid.
Well, Sunday came around ans is now almost over, and still nothing. I did not get paid, to my estimate it should have been aprox 0.030 BTC for 48hours at 3kh/s. Way above the minimal payment amount.
Does anyone have any ideas?

Account address?

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49

3kh/s is extremely extremely small.  That's the output of a single core, many year old, cpu.
There's no way that would be worth 0.030 BTC at Wafflepool in 48 hours. You're calculations are wrong.

Consider that yesterday's output at 1MH/s was 0.00453937 BTC.  For the last 48 hours it was 0.00908785 BTC for 1MH/s

1MH/s is 1000kh/s.  So there is NO WAY that 3kh/s would even approach 0.030 BTC for 48 hours.

Looking at your address on Waffle's site, you're not even registering that much... everything is just 0's.

Sorry,

I did mean 3 MHash,

i have one rig running at 2550khash and another at 550 average. 2 seperate workers.

so if 0.0045, then i calculate 0.027, still ....

Well something else is wrong then with the way you setup with Waffle because that address is showing 0 hashrate. What are the exact usernames you're using?  Are you using just the address or address_workerName for your two rigs?

I am not mining on it currently, i switched back to multipool until i figure the waffle issue out. At the time that i was mining, that address was showing 3mhash.

Here is my config:

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49.worker1:d=512  on cudaminer. Similar on CgMiner on the other machine.

[jedimstr]

I am not mining on it currently, i switched back to multipool until i figure the waffle issue out. At the time that i was mining, that address was showing 3mhash.

Here is my config:

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49.worker1:d=512  on cudaminer. Similar on CgMiner on the other machine.

Found your problem.  You used a period in your username instead of underscore.

It's supposed to be btcaddress_worker not btcaddress.worker on Wafflepool.

[ukrv1p]

I am not mining on it currently, i switched back to multipool until i figure the waffle issue out. At the time that i was mining, that address was showing 3mhash.

Here is my config:

1F9uQEwkxnXsw4JJaGBNeThRYpshS7dg49.worker1:d=512  on cudaminer. Similar on CgMiner on the other machine.

Found your problem.  You used a period in your username instead of underscore.

It's supposed to be btcaddress_worker not btcaddress.worker on Wafflepool.

Kicking myself in the head, thnx man. So take it there is no way to get back what ive already mine/done for them?

Ill change my 500khash system an d see if the numbers start populating, then if it works i will switch over the 2.5mhash rig.

[Mrboot]

Guys,

What do you think will the prof go higher then 0,005 again someday or is it a dieing business ?

Cause can use some higher prof need to fund new mining gear

[azebro]

Guys,

What do you think will the prof go higher then 0,005 again someday or is it a dieing business ?

Cause can use some higher prof need to fund new mining gear

I'd like to see 0.01 back 

Unlikely though.
Factors are:

1. Network hashrate - with asics entering mainstream probably will not drop driving difficulty even higher
2. Recent constant bad news in media re BTC
3. Tons of "shit coins"

Many others...

Lets see what next few weeks will bring, the time may come very soon to sell all GPUs on ebay and either invest in asics or focus only on trading...

A.

[Mrboot]

Then i hope they will just focus on trading only i have 8 mh/s on asics running

Just hope some extra coins will be added

Damn come on rise !!!!!! its less then litecoin if you take away the fee off it

[willingtonthird]

Has WP changed their daily payout schedule to something less frequent?

I've got more than .01 sitting in earned (not yet sent) and last payout was 2 days ago.

[Mrboot]

Other people have problems with showing hashrate mine says 6.79 mh/s while my miners say 8.2 mh/s

Has WP changed their daily payout schedule to something less frequent?

I've got more than .01 sitting in earned (not yet sent) and last payout was 2 days ago.

idk just mining for 2 days on this pool i give it a go !!

[dogechode]

Has WP changed their daily payout schedule to something less frequent?

I've got more than .01 sitting in earned (not yet sent) and last payout was 2 days ago.

I think I am having the same issue, didn't get a payout yesterday (believe I should have.)

[induktor]

Hello
Is something wrong with the payout?
I have 0.021 and still haven't received the payment, it's been two days since the last one.
tnx
EDIT: Paid I was starting to worry, glad it is working.

[Mrboot]

I have been paid out aswell at least it shows i did.

How long will it take before shown on something like cryptsy ?
Cause so far i got paid out but its not shown anywere !
Can you please answer admin.

Kind regards,

Edit; sorted great jobs just always make me nerveus

[imall4btc]

Hey everyone,

Just a small question: I started mining on this pool over 12 hours ago and there were no stale shares (my config files includes the parameter "--no-submit-stale") but suddenly a few hours back my stats started giving stale percentage varying from 3-6%. How come all of a sudden such stale rate popped in, and when I've the correct parameter in place to avoid such thing?? I'm a bit newbie to this, so sorry for asking this noob question.

Thank you

[jedimstr]

Hey everyone,

Just a small question: I started mining on this pool over 12 hours ago and there were no stale shares (my config files includes the parameter "--no-submit-stale") but suddenly a few hours back my stats started giving stale percentage varying from 3-6%. How come all of a sudden such stale rate popped in, and when I've the correct parameter in place to avoid such thing?? I'm a bit newbie to this, so sorry for asking this noob question.

Thank you

Get rid of --no-submit-stale.
Mining software (CGMiner, SGMiner, etc) expect a single Blockchain not multiple changing ones on coin switching pools.  They'll think shares are stale when they are perfectly valid.  So you should always submit everything on multi-coin pools or you'll be throwing perfectly good work away.

That also goes for p2pool nodes as well.

[imall4btc]

Hey everyone,

Just a small question: I started mining on this pool over 12 hours ago and there were no stale shares (my config files includes the parameter "--no-submit-stale") but suddenly a few hours back my stats started giving stale percentage varying from 3-6%. How come all of a sudden such stale rate popped in, and when I've the correct parameter in place to avoid such thing?? I'm a bit newbie to this, so sorry for asking this noob question.

Thank you

Get rid of --no-submit-stale.
Mining software (CGMiner, SGMiner, etc) expect a single Blockchain not multiple changing ones on coin switching pools.  They'll think shares are stale when they are perfectly valid.  So you should always submit everything on multi-coin pools or you'll be throwing perfectly good work away.

That also goes for p2pool nodes as well.

Thanks for your reply. Edited my config. file and removed this parameter from it.

P.S. Btw, so now I can expect a 3%-6% stale rate without worrying about it?

[jedimstr]

Hey everyone,

Just a small question: I started mining on this pool over 12 hours ago and there were no stale shares (my config files includes the parameter "--no-submit-stale") but suddenly a few hours back my stats started giving stale percentage varying from 3-6%. How come all of a sudden such stale rate popped in, and when I've the correct parameter in place to avoid such thing?? I'm a bit newbie to this, so sorry for asking this noob question.

Thank you

Get rid of --no-submit-stale.
Mining software (CGMiner, SGMiner, etc) expect a single Blockchain not multiple changing ones on coin switching pools.  They'll think shares are stale when they are perfectly valid.  So you should always submit everything on multi-coin pools or you'll be throwing perfectly good work away.

That also goes for p2pool nodes as well.

Thanks for your reply. Edited my config. file and removed this parameter from it.

P.S. Btw, so now I can expect a 3%-6% stale rate without worrying about it?

Yeah I wouldn't worry about that amount.  And worry more about what the pool reports than what your mining software is reporting.

[imall4btc]

Hey everyone,

Just a small question: I started mining on this pool over 12 hours ago and there were no stale shares (my config files includes the parameter "--no-submit-stale") but suddenly a few hours back my stats started giving stale percentage varying from 3-6%. How come all of a sudden such stale rate popped in, and when I've the correct parameter in place to avoid such thing?? I'm a bit newbie to this, so sorry for asking this noob question.

Thank you

Get rid of --no-submit-stale.
Mining software (CGMiner, SGMiner, etc) expect a single Blockchain not multiple changing ones on coin switching pools.  They'll think shares are stale when they are perfectly valid.  So you should always submit everything on multi-coin pools or you'll be throwing perfectly good work away.

That also goes for p2pool nodes as well.

Thanks for your reply. Edited my config. file and removed this parameter from it.

P.S. Btw, so now I can expect a 3%-6% stale rate without worrying about it?

Yeah I wouldn't worry about that amount.  And worry more about what the pool reports than what your mining software is reporting.

jedimstr, pool is reporting 3%-6% stale rate, not the miner....

[poolwaffle]

jedimstr, pool is reporting 3%-6% stale rate, not the miner....

This is well within reason.  When you mine smaller coins, you'll see a higher reject rate (5-8% normally), and when mining larger coins you'll see a low reject rate (0-1%), it will average out to around 3% and is completely normal, and evenly distributed across the pool.