Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 09:49:56 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ... 294 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [POOL][Scrypt][Scrypt-N][X11] Profit switching pool - wafflepool.com  (Read 465522 times)
tachyon_john
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 02:50:55 PM
 #2941

I've been having the same issue as a few others since the new stratum server came online.  As I write this, two of my 3 GPUs are idle while the third is hard at work.  They idle for between 10 seconds and 5 minutes, which is ridiculous.  What can I do to fix this?

My current CudaMiner command:

Code:
"C:\Miners\cudaminer.exe" -R 1 -C 1 -d 0 -a scrypt -o "stratum+tcp://uswest.wafflepool.com:3333" -u [address] -p x

I don't have much mining power (600kH/s) so I can't afford to have them idle for so long.

How exactly do you know they're idling?

I have also observed the same behavior on 3 machines, and I have been collecting logs of GPU utilization through nvidia-smi which correlate to the cudaminer log I'm also keeping.  I ran cudaminer with "-P" so I've also got a lot of the network protocol.  I captured this happening probably ten times last night.  It occurs on machines that are also connected to different stratum endpoints.  So it's not just an issue with useast, or uswest, for example.


I should also add that the observed idle periods are occasionally quite long, often 15 to 20 seconds.  This seems like a very long time to me.  When it occurs, no timeouts or errors are printed by cudaminer, so from its point of view there is no problem.  This behavior began when wafflepool switched to the new stratum code the other day.  Prior to that, I never observed this behavior before.
1714297796
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714297796

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714297796
Reply with quote  #2

1714297796
Report to moderator
The trust scores you see are subjective; they will change depending on who you have in your trust list.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714297796
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714297796

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714297796
Reply with quote  #2

1714297796
Report to moderator
xia0mingx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 02:52:12 PM
 #2942

why is shift time reduced back to previous duration?  Shocked sorry for being noob for asking, but it doesnt affect my mining performance right? i only have a 1 MH/s rig. Sad
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 02:53:28 PM
 #2943

I have also observed the same behavior on 3 machines, and I have been collecting logs of GPU utilization through nvidia-smi which correlate to the cudaminer log I'm also keeping.  I ran cudaminer with "-P" so I've also got a lot of the network protocol.  I captured this happening probably ten times last night.  It occurs on machines that are also connected to different stratum endpoints.  So it's not just an issue with useast, or uswest, for example.


I should also add that the observed idle periods are occasionally quite long, often 15 to 20 seconds.  This seems like a very long time to me.  When it occurs, no timeouts or errors are printed by cudaminer, so from its point of view there is no problem.  This behavior began when wafflepool switched to the new stratum code the other day.  Prior to that, I never observed this behavior before.

Any chance you have the protocol dump around when they're idling?  Might let me know whats being sent/not being sent during that time...
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 02:55:35 PM
 #2944

why is shift time reduced back to previous duration?  Shocked

Duration wasn't changed, count was changed.  It is just a matter of how we were keeping track of shares on the backend.  This is mostly due to changes today for the following:

Worker stats are updated.
You should now see (on the stats page) your reject rate per worker, and stats coming from the stats page are now a ~15min average (instead of 5min average), in an attempt to have fewer people email me telling me their hashrate jumps around a lot.
xia0mingx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 02:59:00 PM
 #2945

on the stats page, it says I have 3.5% stale rate but on my miner it says only 0.3% rejected. is there something else I need to put into account? thanks pw Smiley
MPBG
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 03:00:43 PM
 #2946

It's good to see your stales, I'm at 1.40%, which should be a little bit high I think, but it's fine.
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 03:02:29 PM
 #2947

on the stats page, it says I have 3.5% stale rate but on my miner it says only 0.3% rejected. is there something else I need to put into account? thanks pw Smiley

This could be as simple as variance in shares/stales.  If your 0.3% is over 24hrs, and just in the last 15min there was a burst, we'd be showing the burst, and yours wouldn't.  Can you reset your stats locally, wait 15min and see how they line up?
dexu
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 155
Merit: 100



View Profile
March 21, 2014, 03:02:50 PM
 #2948

STALE 0.00% good to know .. Wink
xia0mingx
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 17
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 03:26:03 PM
 #2949

on the stats page, it says I have 3.5% stale rate but on my miner it says only 0.3% rejected. is there something else I need to put into account? thanks pw Smiley

This could be as simple as variance in shares/stales.  If your 0.3% is over 24hrs, and just in the last 15min there was a burst, we'd be showing the burst, and yours wouldn't.  Can you reset your stats locally, wait 15min and see how they line up?

Yup, you are right. 0.3% is over 24 hours. And the stale rate is now 0.00% on stats page. Thanks Smiley
Pfool
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 100


View Profile WWW
March 21, 2014, 03:27:38 PM
 #2950

why is shift time reduced back to previous duration?  Shocked

Duration wasn't changed, count was changed.  It is just a matter of how we were keeping track of shares on the backend.  This is mostly due to changes today for the following:

Worker stats are updated.
You should now see (on the stats page) your reject rate per worker, and stats coming from the stats page are now a ~15min average (instead of 5min average), in an attempt to have fewer people email me telling me their hashrate jumps around a lot.

Yeah !

Is it possible to add the reject rate in the API ?

Thank you

Thanx Wink
BTC: 19wv8FQKv3NkwTdzBCQn1AGsb9ghqBPWXi
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 03:40:49 PM
 #2951

on the stats page, it says I have 3.5% stale rate but on my miner it says only 0.3% rejected. is there something else I need to put into account? thanks pw Smiley

This could be as simple as variance in shares/stales.  If your 0.3% is over 24hrs, and just in the last 15min there was a burst, we'd be showing the burst, and yours wouldn't.  Can you reset your stats locally, wait 15min and see how they line up?

Yup, you are right. 0.3% is over 24 hours. And the stale rate is now 0.00% on stats page. Thanks Smiley

Yep, could have been something as simple as us jumping on a small coin, and seeing a slightly higher reject rate during that time Smiley\\

Is it possible to add the reject rate in the API ?

Yep, gimme a bit here Smiley
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 03:46:08 PM
 #2952

API now includes stalerate, returned as a % of overall hashrate.  Hashrate include stale hashrate.

For example, if your miner submitted 1MHs, of which half was rejected, "hashrate" would show 1000000, "stalerate" would show 50.00.
gaalx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 411
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 21, 2014, 05:19:30 PM
 #2953

pw, mintcoin in coin balances - stuck? Thank you.

poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 05:42:28 PM
 #2954

pw, mintcoin in coin balances - stuck? Thank you.

Please see any of the posts about this.  Thank you.
ziddey
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 16
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 05:55:09 PM
 #2955

Please see any of the posts about this.  Thank you.

BTC address I've been mining with is now invalid. Any way to move the balance to a different address?
No longer have access to 1Hk2vF17rc2v7uoGLk4i25fr8wGemaGESH

Thank you
cleanbaldy
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 06:08:50 PM
 #2956

Have we determined why Wafflepool isn't showing correct khash yet?

Not only that, with the lower reported khash than before the server was changed, the payouts are not equal anymore.   My BTC / Day / 1mH is LITERALLY going off of the falsely reported khash numbers.

I'm losing out on 21% of my khash.  That's HUGE.

Something broke when you switched to the new server.  Might want to take a look...    
I've had reports on my reddit post about this.   Everyone is seeing it.  

Money = the reason we're here with you Smiley   You've been amazing thus far.   One or two days of tweaking and fixing a config is fine.  

If this continues, you may have people thinking you're stealing 20% of their money.   Money makes people believe crazy things...  


Secondary, something else changed last night at around 10:30, when the East server crashed for an hour?   Still tweaking?   The KHash issue did not get fixed, if that's what was going on...

https://i.imgur.com/ofjzQMk.jpg
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 06:22:58 PM
 #2957

Please see any of the posts about this.  Thank you.

BTC address I've been mining with is now invalid. Any way to move the balance to a different address?
No longer have access to 1Hk2vF17rc2v7uoGLk4i25fr8wGemaGESH

Thank you

Nope.  Won't move funds from one address to another unless you can sign a message with the first address.  Its the only way for me to be sure you're not stealing someone else's coins.  Sorry Sad
poolwaffle (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 322
Merit: 254


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 06:24:50 PM
 #2958

Have we determined why Wafflepool isn't showing correct khash yet?

Not only that, with the lower reported khash than before the server was changed, the payouts are not equal anymore.   My BTC / Day / 1mH is LITERALLY going off of the falsely reported khash numbers.

I'm losing out on 21% of my khash.  That's HUGE.

Something broke when you switched to the new server.  Might want to take a look...    
I've had reports on my reddit post about this.   Everyone is seeing it.  

Money = the reason we're here with you Smiley   You've been amazing thus far.   One or two days of tweaking and fixing a config is fine.  

If this continues, you may have people thinking you're stealing 20% of their money.   Money makes people believe crazy things...  


Secondary, something else changed last night at around 10:30, when the East server crashed for an hour?   Still tweaking?   The KHash issue did not get fixed, if that's what was going on...



Maybe I'm confused as to what you're showing in that graph... Nothing looks like the hashrate dropped by 20% anywhere in that graph...
rallasnackbar
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 196
Merit: 100


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 06:41:02 PM
 #2959

The problem is the high "vardiff" that causes small miners like gridseed and usb miners to show incorrect numbers.
I mined on ghash.io while they had bonus, and because of the low difficulty, the khash on their website is much more stable on small units.

Are there any chance that wafflepool will get a lower vardiff than 512??
tachyon_john
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 28
Merit: 0


View Profile
March 21, 2014, 06:43:36 PM
 #2960

I have also observed the same behavior on 3 machines, and I have been collecting logs of GPU utilization through nvidia-smi which correlate to the cudaminer log I'm also keeping.  I ran cudaminer with "-P" so I've also got a lot of the network protocol.  I captured this happening probably ten times last night.  It occurs on machines that are also connected to different stratum endpoints.  So it's not just an issue with useast, or uswest, for example.


I should also add that the observed idle periods are occasionally quite long, often 15 to 20 seconds.  This seems like a very long time to me.  When it occurs, no timeouts or errors are printed by cudaminer, so from its point of view there is no problem.  This behavior began when wafflepool switched to the new stratum code the other day.  Prior to that, I never observed this behavior before.

Any chance you have the protocol dump around when they're idling?  Might let me know whats being sent/not being sent during that time...

Yes, I have been logging both the protocol and the GPU utilization for the last 12 hours or so, so I should have several examples of where this occurs in my log.
Right now I see it happening again at about 1:40pm central time...idle for about 1 minute and 45 seconds before it recovered.  No errors from cudaminer when it happens, but no activity either.  Same cudaminer binary worked fine for the last 2-3 weeks before the stratum change.  I can send you a PM with a gzipped copy of the logs if you like.  I sent you a short log snippet already last night, but sending the whole log may be more useful for you.
Pages: « 1 ... 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 [148] 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 ... 294 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!