ManeBjorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1004
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 19, 2014, 11:15:11 PM |
|
You are correct not enough people know to ask them about it. I will put in an official request as well. I am surprised that the software for the S4 is as buggy as it is usually they do better work on it. I know the very first iteration was a mess but the work around was ok then the next was better and the last best yet but still not working great with other pools. I really thought after they saw the mess with the ASICMiner controller they would make sure they did not have issues with theirs. Bitmain messed up a bit on this one. Still a great miner but not as good as it could be. I'm just glad the pool works! Now if only Bitmain would fix the S4 so I can point it here and get the hash I'm suppose to be getting, it'd be a good day.
Do you have other hashpower pointed here? Maybe run a stratum proxy and point your hashpower through it ... and once the proxy difficulty gets up to 1024, point your S4(s) to it. M Thanks for the suggestion. I've got the S-4s pointed to CK until this gets resolved. I've still got my dragons pointed here. I was spoiled early on, so these current payouts really aren't a big deal if I miss a couple. I'd suggest asking Bitmain to switch to BFGMiner, which can request a (starting) difficulty from Eligius among many other benefits. They sent a S1 for development a long time ago, but never followed up with documentation or future products. I can only guess they believe there might be a lack of demand - in which case their customers need to be more vocal in expressing the need to them.
|
|
|
|
-ck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 1644
Ruu \o/
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 19, 2014, 11:20:21 PM |
|
Now if only Bitmain would fix the S4 so I can point it here and get the hash I'm suppose to be getting, it'd be a good day.
Since they didn't fix it themselves, I've submitted fixes for them. You can grab my binary and install it manually in the meantime, or wait for them to include the fixes and create new firmware.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
bgibso01
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 19, 2014, 11:31:16 PM |
|
Now if only Bitmain would fix the S4 so I can point it here and get the hash I'm suppose to be getting, it'd be a good day.
Since they didn't fix it themselves, I've submitted fixes for them. You can grab my binary and install it manually in the meantime, or wait for them to include the fixes and create new firmware. Yeah, I saw your fix in the S4 thread. I was going to give Bitmain a couple days to update and if not then grab it myself. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2014, 09:48:34 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
wedgy2k
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2014, 09:51:56 PM |
|
Any Namecoin news please?
|
|
|
|
Luke-Jr
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2576
Merit: 1186
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2014, 09:54:08 PM |
|
Peter Todd seems to have an axe to grind with Blockstream, so I'd take it with a grain of salt. I'm not aware of any pool deals Austin is making, though it would make sense for him to be talking to pools about supporting merged-mined sidechains. AFAIK he's not been in touch with wizkid057 on this topic, nor tried to negotiate any pool "deals" through me. Disclosure: While I only represent myself, not the company as a whole, I am personally working with Blockstream.
|
|
|
|
RoadStress
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1007
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 23, 2014, 10:43:56 PM |
|
Peter Todd seems to have an axe to grind with Blockstream, so I'd take it with a grain of salt. I'm not aware of any pool deals Austin is making, though it would make sense for him to be talking to pools about supporting merged-mined sidechains. AFAIK he's not been in touch with wizkid057 on this topic, nor tried to negotiate any pool "deals" through me. Disclosure: While I only represent myself, not the company as a whole, I am personally working with Blockstream. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 24, 2014, 03:57:31 PM Last edit: October 25, 2014, 03:15:15 PM by BCwinning |
|
I set my payout higher than the default; but for whatever reason the pool keeps putting me in que at .01 I've set it several times but it seems to have a mind of its own. I'm glad it pays out timely.
I figure since I set it higher than default, at the very least it would pay at the default amount. If I was doing it wrong.. But I signed it and it said ok.. Obviously the changes I set take affect so that part is working, just not when I want it. am I speaking in tongues?
|
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 24, 2014, 04:30:24 PM |
|
Peter Todd seems to have an axe to grind with Blockstream, so I'd take it with a grain of salt. I'm not aware of any pool deals Austin is making, though it would make sense for him to be talking to pools about supporting merged-mined sidechains. AFAIK he's not been in touch with wizkid057 on this topic, nor tried to negotiate any pool "deals" through me. Disclosure: While I only represent myself, not the company as a whole, I am personally working with Blockstream. No one has contacted me regarding any of this.
|
|
|
|
noobtrader
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 01:40:20 AM |
|
eligius is down, it doesnt receive hashrate.
|
"...I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of relying solely on altruism...", satoshi@vistomail.com
|
|
|
wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 01:47:01 AM |
|
DDoS attack from someone trying to extort Eligius for 2 BTC... working on it.
|
|
|
|
mavericklm
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 02:14:06 AM Last edit: October 26, 2014, 03:26:50 PM by mavericklm |
|
Fuck'em!!!!!!!!! him, her, them!!!!! Woke up 15minutes ago(is the middle of the night here!) in a pool of BEeEEEP BEEEEeP BEEEeEP BEEeEEP BEEEeeEP BEeeEEEP BEeeEEEP BeeEEEEP BEEEeeEP BEEEEP BEeEEEP BEEEeEP wizkid057 thank you for all your work!!! ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Back to bed! kiss ya ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 02:14:56 AM |
|
everything should be back online. let me know if there are any ongoing issues
|
|
|
|
noobtrader
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 02:18:09 AM |
|
DDoS attack from someone trying to extort Eligius for 2 BTC... working on it.
thanks for the info, pool is ok now it seem ?
|
"...I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of relying solely on altruism...", satoshi@vistomail.com
|
|
|
wizkid057 (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1223
Merit: 1006
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 02:18:55 AM |
|
DDoS attack from someone trying to extort Eligius for 2 BTC... working on it.
thanks for the info, pool is ok now it seem ? everything should be back online. let me know if there are any ongoing issues
|
|
|
|
noobtrader
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 03:02:25 AM |
|
thanks. DDoS attack from someone trying to extort Eligius for 2 BTC... working on it.
thanks for the info, pool is ok now it seem ? everything should be back online. let me know if there are any ongoing issues
|
"...I suspect we need a better incentive for users to run nodes instead of relying solely on altruism...", satoshi@vistomail.com
|
|
|
BCwinning
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 03:03:37 PM Last edit: October 26, 2014, 03:19:21 PM by BCwinning |
|
everything should be back online. let me know if there are any ongoing issues
[2014-10-26 11:00:55] Pool 0 stratum share submission failure [2014-10-26 11:02:38] Pool 0 communication resumed, submitting work and I still would like to know why my payout that I set isn't paying out at that amount; but a lower amount. it appears it just arbitrarily pays what it fees like once it's above the default. not that it fucking matters , you still making money either way right..
|
The New World Order thanks you for your support of Bitcoin and encourages your continuing support so that they may track your expenditures easier.
|
|
|
GrapeApe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 04:22:25 PM Last edit: October 26, 2014, 05:17:06 PM by GrapeApe |
|
everything should be back online. let me know if there are any ongoing issues
[2014-10-26 11:00:55] Pool 0 stratum share submission failure [2014-10-26 11:02:38] Pool 0 communication resumed, submitting work and I still would like to know why my payout that I set isn't paying out at that amount; but a lower amount. it appears it just arbitrarily pays what it fees like once it's above the default. not that it fucking matters , you still making money either way right.. I'm wondering did you sign the changes you made with your mining address? You seem to be the only one with this problem so it's probably you.
|
|
|
|
|
dexX7
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1026
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
October 26, 2014, 11:02:20 PM |
|
Hey Luke-Jr,
FYI: I was curious how many non-financial transactions there are and used your prefix list to identify gamble transactions. Then I compared the total number of transactions for SatoshiDice with the sum of the total number of transactions of the 15 addresses listed on satoshidice.com based on the data provided by blockchain.info.
Turns out the prefix based filter identified 11'677'989 transactions at height 327'115 while the actual number based on full hashes was 11'124'066 at height 327'120 +-2.
Under the assumption those 15 addresses are the only relevant ones, then that's about half a million false positives.
|
|
|
|
|