Bargraphics
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:22:01 PM |
|
You guys might see it go offline, I'm trying to set the other one up and running into some issues (probably my own faults but I'll keep you guys updated)
|
|
|
|
MilkyWayMasta
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:22:37 PM |
|
Is it good or bad? Plain English!
747Gh/s average so far. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
|
tempestb
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:28:03 PM |
|
375gh... ![Undecided](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/undecided.gif) If you look under workers it will be called Prospector1 - Give it time (like 23 minutes) to get a decent hashrate going on the chart. It will look really low until it has been up for the full 23 minutes.
![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=https%3A%2F%2Fi.imgur.com%2F8E1sj6T.png&t=663&c=r7UcP2cCIIVnTw) That's all well and good, but if you look at your time stamp and my time stamp, I checked it almost an hour after you posted that it was up. That's some long 23 minutes. Good to see it's faster than that.
|
1D7JwRnoungL1YQy7sJMsqmA8BHkPcKGDJ We mine as we dream... Alone
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:28:40 PM |
|
Is it good or bad? Plain English!
747Gh/s average so far. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Hah before we say that's what it is, what the pool reports is what matters.
|
|
|
|
kleeck
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:33:09 PM |
|
Is it good or bad? Plain English!
747Gh/s average so far. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Hah before we say that's what it is, what the pool reports is what matters. Is there often a big discrepancy between the local report and the pool report?
|
|
|
|
gjpminingco
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:34:32 PM |
|
The Main Question is How fast does it Run Stable???
I saw it in the Pic Running 747ghs but is that stable and is that a true speed???
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:40:40 PM |
|
Is it good or bad? Plain English!
747Gh/s average so far. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Hah before we say that's what it is, what the pool reports is what matters. Is there often a big discrepancy between the local report and the pool report? there can be. his screenshot shows a 5% error rate which is pretty high. (should be 1% or less) his eligius page shows that it was in the 375-400GH range, but went offline for the last 10min or so. maybe tweaking up the hashrate a bit.
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:44:39 PM |
|
I have a USB issue where if I plug two of the HashFast boards in it kills CGMiner so only one can be plugged in right now. (It might just be that one port and I have someone bringing a hub just in case)
Otherwise yes CGMiner appears to be giving very high stats compared to what is being reported on Eligius. I used MrTeals recommendation and I'm trying to wait and see what Eligius reports now.
|
|
|
|
kleeck
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:45:01 PM |
|
Is it good or bad? Plain English!
747Gh/s average so far. ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Hah before we say that's what it is, what the pool reports is what matters. Is there often a big discrepancy between the local report and the pool report? there can be. his screenshot shows a 5% error rate which is pretty high. (should be 1% or less) his eligius page shows that it was in the 375-400GH range, but went offline for the last 10min or so. maybe tweaking up the hashrate a bit. Good to know. Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:50:43 PM Last edit: April 03, 2014, 10:10:11 PM by klondike_bar |
|
the 747GH hashrate is an error, i would not be surprised if it was some issue with the reported difficulty being 256 vs 512 or other similar 2x issue. (ie: actual hashrate of 375GH) The board is definitely the first-gen hashfats. AFAIK the yoli evo will be a differnt chip design in order to get higher speeds (an h80i or similar cooling solution would seriously struggle to move more than 500W of heat)^i stand corrected. the same chip is in both the 400Gh baby jet and the 800Gh yoli evo. and the H80i can presumably cool an overclocked top-end CPU that reaches 550W or power draw
|
|
|
|
Bargraphics
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:51:13 PM |
|
Switching to GHash.io just until I can get the average hashrate. Will post screenshots of it and then when I know they are working fine move them back to Eligius for Public Viewing.
|
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:53:11 PM |
|
Switching to GHash.io just until I can get the average hashrate. Will post screenshots of it and then when I know they are working fine move them back to Eligius for Public Viewing.
you should keep on eligius - other than the annoying 22.5min delay it is the best pool IMO. either way, looking forwards to reports on the 1min, 5min and 15min from ghash
|
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:53:19 PM |
|
The board is definitely the first-gen hashfats. AFAIK the yoli evo will be a different chip design in order to get higher speeds So there are gen 1 and gen 2 HF GN chips? (an h80i or similar cooling solution would seriously struggle to move more than 500W of heat) And that is another thing that didn't add up. Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #VIUPsRDqFMWGnUZo
|
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
|
|
|
Ozymandias2
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:55:10 PM |
|
So the board shipped is really similar to a first gen HF, just with double the hashrate and a Coolit cooler that i don't understand the source off.
The cooler is Bargraphics personally provided cooler as coolers do not come with the boad
|
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:57:14 PM |
|
The cooler is Bargraphics personally provided cooler as coolers do not come with the boad Yes, I'm sorry. What i wanted to say is that this cooler is not on sale, so i was curious of it's origin Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #bRAVu0bSr7uk829t
|
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
|
|
|
Ozymandias2
Member
![*](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/star.gif)
Offline
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 09:58:32 PM |
|
The board is definitely the first-gen hashfats. AFAIK the yoli evo will be a different chip design in order to get higher speeds So there are gen 1 and gen 2 HF GN chips? I did not hear about a second hash-fast chip and nothing they said would indicate they had to 2 gens of chips. AFAIK the yoli evo board is simply able to handle the chips designed capacity. Of course if I'm wrong, I welcome corrections. The cooler is Bargraphics personally provided cooler as coolers do not come with the boad Yes, I'm sorry. What i wanted to say is that this cooler is not on sale, so i was curious of it's origin Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #bRAVu0bSr7uk829tAh, I see, can't help there unfortunately but I'm sure there would be several to many potential customers that would like to know as well ![Tongue](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/tongue.gif)
|
|
|
|
cedivad
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1001
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 10:03:10 PM |
|
I did not hear about a second hash-fast chip [...] And this is why i asked to reapeat it, since that it's what he wrote... Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #PMmuN0Lp4lJG3WzS
|
My anger against what is wrong in the Bitcoin community is productive: Bitcointa.lk - Replace "Bitcointalk.org" with "Bitcointa.lk" in this url to see how this page looks like on a proper forum (Announcement Thread)Hashfast.org - Wiki for screwed customers
|
|
|
klondike_bar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1005
ASIC Wannabe
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 10:03:27 PM |
|
The board is definitely the first-gen hashfats. AFAIK the yoli evo will be a different chip design in order to get higher speeds So there are gen 1 and gen 2 HF GN chips? after a closer look, i guess not. It looks like hashfast could basically push the chip from 400GH/250W to 500Gh to 800GH/720W. I jumped the gun a bit assuming it was a totally different chip revision that was able to double the speed http://hashfast.com/hashfast-announces-fastest-bitcoin-mining-chip-in-the-world/ so it is entirely possible with the right board design the prospector1 could actually push well past 500GH... ps: i was half-wrong on the H80i. apparently some new high-end CPUs actually do reach >550W when overclocked heavily. Presumably it COULD cool up to a 720W chip
|
|
|
|
Stuartuk
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
April 03, 2014, 11:32:33 PM |
|
Anything is possible when you work out the number of weeks in a year by multiplying 4 x 12 = 48.
|
|
|
|
|