Bitcoin Forum
April 26, 2024, 05:29:43 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 [146] 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 ... 425 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [CLOSED] BTC Guild - Pays TxFees+NMC, Stratum, VarDiff, Private Servers  (Read 902902 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic.
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 01:11:22 AM
 #2901

After a few people having the same issues in IRC, here's a quick guide on some common issues:


1) Extremely high HW Error rate with virtually no hash rate.  This is almost always due to power issues.  The chip is not receiving full power from your hub/port most likely.  If you're running many chips, unplug them all, plug them in one at a time, run it for a few minutes, and confirm that it's getting shares.  All ASICs will have HW Errors to some degree, but anything over 1-2% after 10 minutes is where there may be something very wrong.

2) Chips not showing up in bfgminer/cgminer.  This is the same as #1.  Cheap powered hubs will not be providing enough power to each port, and as a result the chips won't be acknowledged by bfgminer/cgminer.



USB Hubs:

There are virtually no hubs out there under $50 that will power more than 4 or 5 Block Erupters at once.  If you are determined to buy cheaper hubs, you will need to plan on running only 4 per hub.  The only hubs I have confirmed as being safe to run more than 4 miners are:

Rosewill 10-port hubs:  These are 4A @ 5v.  This means it is safe to run 7 Block Erupters.  You do not want to push the hub to the max power supply rating!
Anker 10-port hubs:  These run 4A @ 12v.  This means it is safe to run a full 10 Block Erupters without worry.


On any other hub:  Look at the power rating.  Factor in 0.6A per Block Erupter to give it safety.  Running a low grade PSU at it's max rating could eventually result in damaging any or all chips plugged into the hub, and undesirable performance even if it does not actually damage the chips.

Quoting this on a new thread page just so nobody misses it.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
1714152583
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714152583

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714152583
Reply with quote  #2

1714152583
Report to moderator
1714152583
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714152583

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714152583
Reply with quote  #2

1714152583
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
July 06, 2013, 01:27:03 AM
 #2902

I use mostly Anker hubs, but also run a couple of cheap hubs using an upgraded 4 Amp power supply.  For some reason, my Raspberry Pi doesn't seem to like the more expensive Anker hubs.    

I've had no problem running 9 Erupters (plus a USB fan) in a cheap 10 port USB hub after upgrading to one of these power adapters:

http://www.siig.com/it-products/usb/accessories/5v-4a-power-adapter-for-usb-3-0-hubs.html

A word of warning, though - the brand of hub you use DOES matter.  As one example, I can't get D-Link 7 port hubs to work with the Raspberry Pi, or with any of the direct USB zadig installed libusb drivers on a Windows box.
mdude77
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1540
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 02:16:50 AM
 #2903

Ankers are working flawlessly for me.

M

I mine at Kano's Pool because it pays the best and is completely transparent!  Come join me!
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 02:50:21 AM
 #2904

I use mostly Anker hubs, but also run a couple of cheap hubs using an upgraded 4 Amp power supply.  For some reason, my Raspberry Pi doesn't seem to like the more expensive Anker hubs.    

I've had no problem running 9 Erupters (plus a USB fan) in a cheap 10 port USB hub after upgrading to one of these power adapters:

http://www.siig.com/it-products/usb/accessories/5v-4a-power-adapter-for-usb-3-0-hubs.html

A word of warning, though - the brand of hub you use DOES matter.  As one example, I can't get D-Link 7 port hubs to work with the Raspberry Pi, or with any of the direct USB zadig installed libusb drivers on a Windows box.


I would recommend against running 10 devices on a 5v 4A adapter.  While it might work...you're really playing with fire there.  9 erupters + fan should be pulling 5.0-5.2A.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
July 06, 2013, 04:46:33 AM
 #2905

It's not an issue for my setup - I run the RPi off a 3 amp supply and Vcc of the two power adapters ties together via the USB port- so there's 7 A available (minus what the Rpi itself draws, which is almost nothing) at the hub for the BEs.   The BEs have lots of juice, probably the biggest danger with this setup is that something in the cheap hub will melt (but I haven't had a problem yet, knock on wood...)

It might be an issue if I was trying to do that using a standard USB port on a old desktop computer or laptop, but most modern computers provide at least an AMP at their USB ports to allow for charging phones and iPads.  You can get by with the cheaper hubs, but it is better to just spend the cash and get Anker hubs.  
AvL42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 06, 2013, 05:35:59 AM
 #2906

I saw on a screen-shot posted recently, that someone with a bunch of block erupters
was still running with lowest "Minimum Difficulty", sending found shares each second.
I think that is quite a waste of network ressources and might even reduce your asics'
performance.

As I think many people don't know that feature yet, I suggest you try the following:

- On BTCGuild webpage (after logging in, of course), click to the "Workers" tab.
- look at the column titled "Minimum Difficulty"
- for each "worker" (or just for the one) select for example "4 (4-8GH/s ASIC)" or
    an even larger number instead of the standard "1 (CPU/GPU Miner)"

Now, your mining software will no longer report each dust particle it mined, but only about
nuggets of less ridiculous size.  It will then seem in cgminer's output as if you got fewer shares,
but if you watch your dashboard, you'll see that each of those fewer shares counts the respective
multiple. (Note also, that these "dust particles" aren't technically productive at all. They are like
finding three-leaf clovers while searching for four-leaf ones - merely a proof that one is spending
effort on examining clovers.)

Btw., not every pool offers this adjustment. Fortunately, BTCGuild does Smiley

PS: If you try it, and if you really get a noticeable performance win from it,
   then I'd be happy about a small tip Wink     (1AvL42MQeAZSki3cC4ZDvmngRJ5mkDGuJc)
   

eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 05:43:49 AM
 #2907

I saw on a screen-shot posted recently, that someone with a bunch of block erupters
was still running with lowest "Minimum Difficulty", sending found shares each second.
I think that is quite a waste of network ressources and might even reduce your asics'
performance.

BTC Guild utilizes variable difficulty, so even if you don't do these steps, you don't stay at diff=1 for more than a minute if you're a fast miner.  The pool allows miners to fluctuate between 12 and 40 shares per minute before adjustment.  The target is 20~25 shares per minute.

However, if you do run a large farm, or extremely fast ASIC, setting a minimum difficulty is useful in preventing the initial burst of traffic you would see otherwise prior to a diff adjustment (although the pool is quite aggressive with adjusting new connections to proper difficulties).

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
AvL42
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 216
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 06, 2013, 06:13:53 AM
 #2908

I saw on a screen-shot posted recently, that someone with a bunch of block erupters
was still running with lowest "Minimum Difficulty", sending found shares each second.
I think that is quite a waste of network ressources and might even reduce your asics'
performance.

BTC Guild utilizes variable difficulty, so even if you don't do these steps, you don't stay at diff=1 for more than a minute if you're a fast miner.  The pool allows miners to fluctuate between 12 and 40 shares per minute before adjustment.  The target is 20~25 shares per minute.

However, if you do run a large farm, or extremely fast ASIC, setting a minimum difficulty is useful in preventing the initial burst of traffic you would see otherwise prior to a diff adjustment (although the pool is quite aggressive with adjusting new connections to proper difficulties).

I'm glad to read, that the parameter won't stick at 1 for those not explicitly setting it,
but my impression is, that it is still far too low - i.e. too much reporting.

My recommendation would be to give it a try and increase the Min.Diff setting until the rate
of reported shares drops to about one in a minute or even one every few minutes.

At least, for those miners whose machine is not on the same LAN with the btcguild servers Wink
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 04:07:42 PM
Last edit: July 06, 2013, 07:14:06 PM by Trongersoll
 #2909

I use mostly Anker hubs, but also run a couple of cheap hubs using an upgraded 4 Amp power supply.  For some reason, my Raspberry Pi doesn't seem to like the more expensive Anker hubs.    

I've had no problem running 9 Erupters (plus a USB fan) in a cheap 10 port USB hub after upgrading to one of these power adapters:

http://www.siig.com/it-products/usb/accessories/5v-4a-power-adapter-for-usb-3-0-hubs.html

A word of warning, though - the brand of hub you use DOES matter.  As one example, I can't get D-Link 7 port hubs to work with the Raspberry Pi, or with any of the direct USB zadig installed libusb drivers on a Windows box.


I would recommend against running 10 devices on a 5v 4A adapter.  While it might work...you're really playing with fire there.  9 erupters + fan should be pulling 5.0-5.2A.

I don't think so. if you look at the paper that came with the ankar, i'm pretty sure it says not to exceed 7 Amps. I think they effectively add their 4A to the 3A available from the port they are plugged into. 10 devices shouldn't be a worry... I think.
ak49er
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 250


Buy, sell and store real cryptocurrencies


View Profile
July 06, 2013, 05:02:36 PM
 #2910

Did you get new stock in on Friday?  Are you expecting to start shipping again on Monday?

eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 05:39:31 PM
 #2911

Did you get new stock in on Friday?  Are you expecting to start shipping again on Monday?

I got the first part of the next batch (~75% of the units on order) yesterday.  I only did limited testing yesterday, but I'm starting to test all the units today and tomorrow.  I expect to be shipping out a large bulk of orders Monday.  I expect most (if not all) backordered units to be shipped out by Wednesday (remaining units won't be here til Monday).

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 06, 2013, 05:51:16 PM
 #2912

An email went out recently to high speed users informing them of private server access details for DDoS mitigation/protection.  This server has been around a long time, and with the exception of a few early attacks when the private server wasn't properly isolated, it has kept high end users online during attacks.  This post is just confirming that those emails did originate from BTC Guild.

Additional invites will go out to private servers more regularly in the future.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
BenTuras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 07, 2013, 12:28:25 PM
Last edit: July 07, 2013, 02:17:56 PM by BenTuras
 #2913

hi guys, can you please check the most recent link of the Payments & Withdrawals, Payout Detail list ?
My link is very odd: http://www.blockchain.info/tx-index/16346 -
normally it is http://www.blockchain.info/tx-index/11379818794826794643202f25cf1644a6746ba61f983cc48800f504aae51f38
so the most recent link points to a very old block ?!

Obviously, the payment that would normally have been done isn't there Sad

moved to -->> https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=251729.msg2673743#msg2673743

I am selling in stock OneStringMiner boards, based on the Bitfury chips. Have a look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495536.0
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 07, 2013, 05:58:54 PM
 #2914

Payments are temporarily paused.  Something happened last night and somebody was paid a lot more than they should have been.  All failed payouts will be resent once funds are transferred back to the hot wallet and I find out what happened.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
BenTuras
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 1001



View Profile
July 07, 2013, 06:40:40 PM
 #2915

Payments are temporarily paused.  Something happened last night and somebody was paid a lot more than they should have been.  All failed payouts will be resent once funds are transferred back to the hot wallet and I find out what happened.
Thanks.

I am selling in stock OneStringMiner boards, based on the Bitfury chips. Have a look here: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=495536.0
SilentSonicBoom
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250



View Profile WWW
July 07, 2013, 07:21:25 PM
 #2916

Payments are temporarily paused.  Something happened last night and somebody was paid a lot more than they should have been.  All failed payouts will be resent once funds are transferred back to the hot wallet and I find out what happened.
Hopefully you find the problem soon. Good luck!

quest
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 336
Merit: 250


View Profile
July 07, 2013, 08:22:37 PM
 #2917

Payments are temporarily paused.  Something happened last night and somebody was paid a lot more than they should have been.  All failed payouts will be resent once funds are transferred back to the hot wallet and I find out what happened.
Thanks for update, do you have a timeframe on fixing the situation?
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 07, 2013, 08:56:19 PM
 #2918

Payments are temporarily paused.  Something happened last night and somebody was paid a lot more than they should have been.  All failed payouts will be resent once funds are transferred back to the hot wallet and I find out what happened.
Thanks for update, do you have a timeframe on fixing the situation?

Broken payouts (bad txid) have been removed from payout history.  I've manually issued two automatic payout runs (one for large and one for small).

I'm expecting manual payouts and automatic payouts to resume normally within the next 2 hours.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
Trongersoll
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 501



View Profile
July 07, 2013, 10:38:23 PM
 #2919

Have you heard from Friedcat? i saw that he was in touch with canary and he is starting another group buy. Roll Eyes
eleuthria (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1750
Merit: 1007



View Profile
July 07, 2013, 10:43:43 PM
 #2920

Have you heard from Friedcat? i saw that he was in touch with canary and he is starting another group buy. Roll Eyes

Some new units are being ordered, yes.  Store should be open (US Only until I catch up, I'm very sorry international users) later in the week once I get a tracking #.

RIP BTC Guild, April 2011 - June 2015
Pages: « 1 ... 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 [146] 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 ... 425 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!