BC.GAME - CASINO-SPORTBOOK, OFFICIAL SPONSOR LEICESTER CITY!

[Agbe]

Not taking sides or anything, and I haven`t even followed what`s been going on with BC.GAME, which used to be one of my/our favorite sites.

Nevertheless, I am still gambling/betting there from time to time, and personally, I haven`t had any issues with withdrawals.

Sad to see that their rep went downhill

Congratulations for the streaks win of the few games. And nobody knows why they did what they did and left the forum. The accusations were too many and their responding system was very poor to handle those cases and for leaving the forum, people took them as scamming casino. Or maybe they want to rebuild their casino again in the third time. Casinos that like to continue their business amidst  the scam accusations pay withdrawal instantly to some so they will support the system. That is the same method 1xbit is using too.

[Findingnemo]

~
Thanks for the graph.
Honestly, I knew Stakes was leading the market from a long time and continued to do so, but I would have never imagined they had over the fifty percent of the market share as they do...
Also, I thought Rainbet and BC held a bigger share of the market as well, but they seem to be minuscule when compared to Stake.

It actually helps to set things in perspective on the huge amount of money it is trusted in some casinos while others are outright being ignored by the bulk of the gambling community.

For some reason I also expected Freebitcoin to have a privileged position on this graph, but it is not the case either...

If I am not wrong, BC was next to Rainbet in the market share in the previous years, but their recent unsolved cases might have driven them away from the trusted platforms, I guess.

Stake is always the best, because of the only reason they always process the withdrawals faster.

That is something I have also noticed about Stake, their withdrawals are very fast, it makes me assume they have indeed invested much money into their automated software so relatively small withdrawals reach wallets of their gamblers as fast as possible.

I also remember the occasion the Bitcoin network started to get over-flooded with ordinals and NTFs within the main Blockchain, making people to increase their fees in order to get miners to accept their transactions. Stake actually chose to pay withdrawal fees out their own pocket, in order to guarantee their gamblers to enjoy the same seamless experience they had before the congestion of the mempool.

Only a casino of it's size could have done something like that in order to take care of the experience of their gamblers.

That is a sign of a casino we can trust because they care about their reputation and users for the long term, and ordinals were there for short term and if they increased the burden on the withdrawal fee for the user then it might cause them some loss in their userbase in the longer term. And every casino can do that because transactions are done in batches that saves fee a lot compared to what they charge yet not every platform took that intiative.

[Zwei]

Not taking sides or anything, and I haven`t even followed what`s been going on with BC.GAME, which used to be one of my/our favorite sites.

to give you a somewhat of a TLDR, their support went retarded, it was impossible to get any help if you had an issue, too many problems with their INR fiat deposits that at some point the scam accusation board was full of just those topics, problems with rejected KYC, increased house edge from 1% to 5%, then back to 2% on most originals, bankruptcy in curacao to avoid paying wins, performative CEO change, and other stuff which is slipping my mind right now, but the nail in the coffin for them here on the forum was this case: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5543228.0

[BitcoinHunt3r]

And nobody knows why they did what they did and left the forum. The accusations were too many and their responding system was very poor to handle those cases and for leaving the forum, people took them as scamming casino. Or maybe they want to rebuild their casino again in the third time. Casinos that like to continue their business amidst  the scam accusations pay withdrawal instantly to some so they will support the system. That is the same method 1xbit is using too.

Some people suspect that this casino is controlled by different owners well maybe this is the reason why the service/support feels worse, I still remember when the withdrawal problem from one of the users on this forum reached $7 million precisely in July 2024 and it was successfully completed but entering 2025 everything seems to have changed and new accusations unresolved, it's suspected  this is the new owner phase. If you have an account here, you may have noticed that since then there no more promo/bonus offers via email, right? even though we usually get it at least once a month. Yeah I'm not accusing this casino scam but we should be more careful.

[Slow death]

Sad to see that their rep went downhill

In my opinion, what happened with this casino might be one of those cases where two or more people create a business, and when the business achieves great success, but only one of the partners receives more attention, the other partners decide to take their share of the partnership and leave the casino. As a result, the person who remains managing the casino has little cash flow but many clients to pay, and even so, doesn't inform all the clients and doesn't close the casino. They prefer to continue with the business. I saw that they have many complaints against them on Trustpilot and are making an effort to respond to each complaint. But they are not responding to the scam accusation against them in this forum.

[Kavelj22]

Sad to see that their rep went downhill

In my opinion, what happened with this casino might be one of those cases where two or more people create a business, and when the business achieves great success, but only one of the partners receives more attention, the other partners decide to take their share of the partnership and leave the casino. As a result, the person who remains managing the casino has little cash flow but many clients to pay, and even so, doesn't inform all the clients and doesn't close the casino. They prefer to continue with the business. I saw that they have many complaints against them on Trustpilot and are making an effort to respond to each complaint. But they are not responding to the scam accusation against them in this forum.

And they stopped cooperating with holydarkness as a mediator after he acted as a contact bridge and succeeded to help solving many disputes. Instead, they created an account who showed many acts of unprofessionalism. However, many others still use bcgame without issues which confirm it is a selective scam, just like 1xbit and 1xbet. I guess they avoid being in dispute with users from some juridictions or with high reputed profiles like efialtis as they know his status in bitcointalk forum. I would never suggest to anybody to use bcgame casino and advice for efialtis to avoid using it especially there are a lot of better alternatives.

[Odusko]

Sad to see that their rep went downhill

In my opinion, what happened with this casino might be one of those cases where two or more people create a business, and when the business achieves great success, but only one of the partners receives more attention, the other partners decide to take their share of the partnership and leave the casino. As a result, the person who remains managing the casino has little cash flow but many clients to pay, and even so, doesn't inform all the clients and doesn't close the casino. They prefer to continue with the business. I saw that they have many complaints against them on Trustpilot and are making an effort to respond to each complaint. But they are not responding to the scam accusation against them in this forum.

Too bad for Bc game to end that way, because their hard a whole lot of presence here in this forum an if something like that should be happening within the team, destroying the existing brand that have achieved success in the market is not the only wise and open decision, at least a dissatisfied team mate should move n and start another casino and allow the other's to run the old company

[Hispo]

Sad to see that their rep went downhill

In my opinion, what happened with this casino might be one of those cases where two or more people create a business, and when the business achieves great success, but only one of the partners receives more attention, the other partners decide to take their share of the partnership and leave the casino. As a result, the person who remains managing the casino has little cash flow but many clients to pay, and even so, doesn't inform all the clients and doesn't close the casino. They prefer to continue with the business. I saw that they have many complaints against them on Trustpilot and are making an effort to respond to each complaint. But they are not responding to the scam accusation against them in this forum.

In that case, BC and their associates were supposed to have some signed agreement in which the capital which was investment and what supposed to be used to keep the casino going was supposed to stay within the casino itself, in order to keep it going indefinitely, of course, giving each one of those associates their part of the earning of the business.

It is not fair a service which rely so heavily on trust and initial investment to go south because partners decided to go each one on their way.

I did not know that was the situation of BC game, I just thought they ran out of money because of some bad business choices, I didn't know it was about founders going sauer to one another.

[Slow death]

I guess they avoid being in dispute with users from some juridictions or with high reputed profiles like efialtis as they know his status in bitcointalk forum.

They no longer care about this forum, but I believe they are using the strategy employed by major scammers, which consists of paying people who own review sites with a large number of referrals. This way, they ensure they don't have to pay people without influence, and the casino scam continues to receive more new customers from review sites. This type of scam is something done by major scammers; it's all well-studied and well-planned. But part of the blame lies with people who don't research other sources and immediately rush to create an account at the casino.

I did not know that was the situation of BC game, I just thought they ran out of money because of some bad business choices, I didn't know it was about founders going sauer to one another.

I was just speculating about what might have happened in the past with this casino scam. It could also be that the owner stole money and then realized he needed more and reopened the casino. Because this casino had stopped operating for a while in the past and then resumed activities and became a scam again, if I'm not mistaken.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Sad to see that their rep went downhill

In my opinion, what happened with this casino might be one of those cases where two or more people create a business, and when the business achieves great success, but only one of the partners receives more attention, the other partners decide to take their share of the partnership and leave the casino. As a result, the person who remains managing the casino has little cash flow but many clients to pay, and even so, doesn't inform all the clients and doesn't close the casino. They prefer to continue with the business. I saw that they have many complaints against them on Trustpilot and are making an effort to respond to each complaint. But they are not responding to the scam accusation against them in this forum.

You have a very good point but such shouldnt be, if two or more person's managed to start a business that turned out very successful, the number one priority should be the business and how to sustain it to keep it successful, priority shouldnt to walk away collecting a share of the business revenue that could put the business in great danger.

I would say that it's probably a bunch of kids who started this casino and obviously lack the right knowledge to keep the business running after without issues after their accidental success.
Assuming what you said is really what happened, what could they have done differently? What they could have done differently is that those who wants to leave the business and wants their share from the business revenue, they would have to make do with an amount that won't put the business at risk, the business can owe them and pay little by little until they are paid off completely, in a case where they refuse this, then the one who is left to manage the business can take the matter to court for settlement.

My thought.