🔥🔥🔥 BC.GAME - CASINO AND SPORTSBOOK | 200% BONUS - PROMO CODE #BCLCFC 🔥🔥🔥

[Z-tight]

They didn't really expect the player to get so much support from the forum which is probably why they released his rightful winnings which just goes to show how shady they truly are.

I don't know why you are spreading fud against this casino, but i think you should stop it, if you followed the scam accusation thread until the end, i am sure you would have seen that the reason why the case was not resolved asap is due to reasons beyond their control. They didn't pay simply because that member got support from the community, but because they are a reputable platform, however, it is not rare to see users like you who fud against reputable casinos.

[KingsDen]

They didn't really expect the player to get so much support from the forum which is probably why they released his rightful winnings which just goes to show how shady they truly are.

I don't know why you are spreading fud against this casino, but i think you should stop it, if you followed the scam accusation thread until the end, i am sure you would have seen that the reason why the case was not resolved asap is due to reasons beyond their control. They didn't pay simply because that member got support from the community, but because they are a reputable platform, however, it is not rare to see users like you who fud against reputable casinos.

I am surprised that someone is still pushing hate and scandal about a casino that paid in full $7m. It is purely unacceptable.
As long as this forum is concerned, but BC games and the guy that shared $7k to few forum users have established and strengthen their reputations in this forum. And this should be a standard on which others should stand and operate.

[tabas]

BCD seems the same as another gambling token, I have experience playing that token PBR on betcoin.ag, it almost the same, but in BC.GAME no top up feature like betcoin.ag where if the user out of balance, they can free get top up follow the button to get 1 PBR free every 12 hours. yeah, maybe this is quite interesting if we have honest player, but quite risky to abuse if they create multiple accounts to cheated system.

Just additional info, they're also going to launch $BC coin soon. It's different from BCD and they've posted it on their forum as well as I've posted it here in the past pages.
https://forum.bc.game/topic/15976-introducing-the-bc-token-empowering-the-future-of-crypto-gaming/
Although there is still information needed and no exact date when it's going to be launched.

I can't wait for it. but it might cause confusion if entered together with BCD on the website

Let's all wait for it because it seems that there's going to be an airdrop for those that are active on bc.game. Well, as for confusion, I don't think that there will be. As bc.game's concern, they will separate it or soon merge it. I don't know but let's all wait for the updates of it and look forward to it.

[xLays]

I still do not understand why the user tipped LM with a big amount of $7K. Was he the one who helped the user with his scam accusation or was it a one of goodwill gesture?

Not only LM, but six more users got 7K each from that player. Actually, he promised to do a giveaway worth $75K if he gets his seven million dollars. After he received the fund, one user posted about it, and then the player randomly picked seven users from the scam accusation thread (Mostly those who helped him) and tipped 7K each, which was a total of 49K USD.

Isn't it amazing? But I don't think anyone should expect a tip from a player to help their case. But this case is a bit different. The player himself announced the giveaway which is why some people got lucky to win 7K each. 

I think I would do the same if I recovered 7,000,000 dollars and someone helped me gain some attention in the community I would give a reward, even just a small one. I just hope like memehunter said, that he doesn't gamble again or go back to gambling. That 7,000,000 dollars could be enough for retirement. I don't know where Justincase78 is from, but if he's from the Philippines, that amount of money won't be easily spent.

bc.game got a lot of attention because of this case. Someone predicted it right. lol

[Cantsay]

They didn't really expect the player to get so much support from the forum which is probably why they released his rightful winnings which just goes to show how shady they truly are.

I don't know why you are spreading fud against this casino, but i think you should stop it, if you followed the scam accusation thread until the end, i am sure you would have seen that the reason why the case was not resolved asap is due to reasons beyond their control. They didn't pay simply because that member got support from the community, but because they are a reputable platform, however, it is not rare to see users like you who fud against reputable casinos.

I had to look more closely at the account and discovered that it’s the alt of Haunebu who claimed to have been asked by bcgame to submit his documents for verification despite having less than $50 in the account - he did call them “scam” for requesting kyc because according to him a casino was supposed to demand kyc for account that has managed to hit big wins and also has large balances and they requesting it for an account that’s worth nothing is a scam.

That’s probably the reason he still writes this way about bcgame despite them being the first casino in Bitcointalk to payout a user $7,000,000 in a single go.

[Haunebu]

They didn't pay simply because that member got support from the community, but because they are a reputable platform, however, it is not rare to see users like you who fud against reputable casinos.

Says the guy who is advertising them on a regular basis within this forum. You do realise that this site messed up royally in the past and rose back up and are messing up again recently, don't you? Think!

I had to look more closely at the account and discovered that it’s the alt of Haunebu who claimed to have been asked by bcgame to submit his documents for verification despite having less than $50 in the account - he did call them “scam” for requesting kyc because according to him a casino was supposed to demand kyc for account that has managed to hit big wins and also has large balances and they requesting it for an account that’s worth nothing is a scam.

Any casino that requests KYC for small amounts where nothing shady was involved is a scam and anyone with a half-decent brain understands that much. Think!

That’s probably the reason he still writes this way about bcgame despite them being the first casino in Bitcointalk to payout a user $7,000,000 in a single go.

Wrong as usual. Sportsbet.io payed a way bigger amount to a particular gambler who wrote about his experience in this forum sometime back.

[Cantsay]

Any casino that requests KYC for small amounts where nothing shady was involved is a scam and anyone with a half-decent brain understands that much. Think!

Like I said before, the amount in an account does not necessarily need to be huge before a casino can ask for kyc documents to be submitted.

I’ve read so many users complaining that casinos are using “KYC” as an excuse to hold back big winnings and now we have someone that’s complaining of them holding back small money - that they should instead just hold account with large funds and only request kyc from those ones.

Wrong as usual. Sportsbet.io payed a way bigger amount to a particular gambler who wrote about his experience in this forum sometime back.

Go to the thread you mentioned I should be the first or second person to made a congratulatory post there - right now we’re talking about an account that’s was blocked by a casino, if they wanted to scam it had any shady intentions it would be easier for them to just waved the case by accusing the user of multi accounting or something else that goes against their ToS but instead nothing like that came up and they paid in full while for sports bet.io nothing happened to the account and I’m sure if the account was suspected of being involved in a shady scheme that withdrawal won’t have gone well the way it did.

[Z-tight]

I had to look more closely at the account and discovered that it’s the alt of Haunebu who claimed to have been asked by bcgame to submit his documents for verification despite having less than $50 in the account -

Oh, thank you for clarifying what their problem is to me, i just knew it had to be from someone who felt hard done by. It is their choice to think the way they do, good thing's that nobody but them believes what they say, so it is not a big problem.

Says the guy who is advertising them on a regular basis within this forum. You do realise that this site messed up royally in the past and rose back up and are messing up again recently, don't you? Think!

It is not about that, but you can say whatever you want. Before you call them shady, you have to bring proof that they are, and your complaint about the kyc requirement is not proof that they are a shady casino.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

That’s probably the reason he still writes this way about bcgame despite them being the first casino in Bitcointalk to payout a user $7,000,000 in a single go.

Yes they paid, but why praising them for that?
The player won fair and square, so why was there even an issue in the first place? I am 100% sure they tried everything to not pay him, otherwise they wouldn't have dragged this for weeks.

Also there is more to the story which you don't know. BC still is what it is, not trustworthy in my opinion.

And as it was said before, sp.io and stake also paid millions in 1 go to their players before, so BC is defiitely not the first and they only paid because they had a gun to their head.

[Learn Bitcoin]

The player won fair and square, so why was there even an issue in the first place? I am 100% sure they tried everything to not pay him, otherwise they wouldn't have dragged this for weeks.

Also there is more to the story which you don't know. BC still is what it is, not trustworthy in my opinion.

And as it was said before, sp.io and stake also paid millions in 1 go to their players before, so BC is defiitely not the first and they only paid because they had a gun to their head.

I have a similar point of view as yours which I posted in my last post in this thread. Casinos always look for every of their TOS to void big winnings. Even in this case, the Bc game support agent accused the player of using 3rd party software to manipulate the games even though it's not possible for a support agent to check it. It proves that this is typical behaviour of these casino who usually do not pay big winnings. I am glad that the player did not played on 3rd party slots or sportsbook. Otherwise they could have take another month to investigate and later deny the payment saying he violated several rules etc etc. Especially when a new scam accusation raising every other weeks.

[pakhitheboss]

Like I said before, the amount in an account does not necessarily need to be huge before a casino can ask for kyc documents to be submitted.

What you are saying is correct because today after a long time, when I logged in using my credentials that I gave for the signature campaign, the casino was asking me to complete my KYC. I simply clicked on the crossed icon as to avoid it. I was not able to capture the image or got a screenshot at that time. Then later on after reading your reply I thought why not again logout and then see whether the pass KYC gets popup.

It again did and it maybe was due to prolonged inactivity the KYC window came up or it is location specific. I am unable to share the video now due to some weird technical reason from my side. I will quote this reply  of mine or will edit this reply of mine by tomorrow to prove that BC is asking KYC when they want to even if you have zero balance.

[arwin100]

The player won fair and square, so why was there even an issue in the first place? I am 100% sure they tried everything to not pay him, otherwise they wouldn't have dragged this for weeks.

Also there is more to the story which you don't know. BC still is what it is, not trustworthy in my opinion.

And as it was said before, sp.io and stake also paid millions in 1 go to their players before, so BC is defiitely not the first and they only paid because they had a gun to their head.

I have a similar point of view as yours which I posted in my last post in this thread. Casinos always look for every of their TOS to void big winnings. Even in this case, the Bc game support agent accused the player of using 3rd party software to manipulate the games even though it's not possible for a support agent to check it. It proves that this is typical behaviour of these casino who usually do not pay big winnings. I am glad that the player did not played on 3rd party slots or sportsbook. Otherwise they could have take another month to investigate and later deny the payment saying he violated several rules etc etc. Especially when a new scam accusation raising every other weeks.

But guess they don't find anything and the player come up clean that's why he receive his winnings and we should be glad that both parties has been settled already.

We could also see that BC.game is capable to pay such huge amount of winnings to their player. Although it really end up well on side of the winner since he experience first a lot of stress before he successful take his winning. Also we could see that the affected winner is already happy with the result so lets still give a credit for BC.game for releasing such huge amount of money to the winner since if this happen to other questionable casino provably he won't get anything from those casino especially that money is so huge.

[pakhitheboss]

Please read my previous reply: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088875.msg64432053#msg64432053
Click the link to see the screen capture: https://youtu.be/bn3UmugaIdU?si=FNSIobYweOCKvKxQ
Do remember that this account was whitelisted when I first joined the signature campaign as weekly payments were supposed to paid in the casino wallet. That means they can ask anyone to pass KYC as per their TOS. This guy is creating issues which does not mean anything.

[Cantsay]

Do remember that this account was whitelisted when I first joined the signature campaign as weekly payments were supposed to paid in the casino wallet. That means they can ask anyone to pass KYC as per their TOS. This guy is creating issues which does not mean anything.

Concerning the whitelisting I don’t think the account ever got whitelisted - I remember when the CM came and made a post concerning it that he got a response from bcgame team that they won’t be able to do it and we have to make the 1x wagering requirement before we’d be able to withdraw - he also gave us some extra during the next week payment to cover for that problem.

I’ll try and look for the post I.e if I can still find it though.

[Haunebu]

Yes they paid, but why praising them for that?
The player won fair and square, so why was there even an issue in the first place? I am 100% sure they tried everything to not pay him, otherwise they wouldn't have dragged this for weeks.

Also there is more to the story which you don't know. BC still is what it is, not trustworthy in my opinion.

Exactly! It's pretty damn evident that this shady site tried everything in their power to delay and possibly and not payout his winnings for as long as possible. Only their proper supporters are supporting this sort of crappy tactics.

Even in this case, the Bc game support agent accused the player of using 3rd party software to manipulate the games even though it's not possible for a support agent to check it. It proves that this is typical behaviour of these casino who usually do not pay big winnings.

Yeah. Very few crypto gambling sites payout big wins quickly after verifying KYC sadly based on what I observed over time.

[Coin_trader]

Please read my previous reply: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088875.msg64432053#msg64432053
Click the link to see the screen capture: https://youtu.be/bn3UmugaIdU?si=FNSIobYweOCKvKxQ
Do remember that this account was whitelisted when I first joined the signature campaign as weekly payments were supposed to paid in the casino wallet. That means they can ask anyone to pass KYC as per their TOS. This guy is creating issues which does not mean anything.

It’s always a case to case basis when it comes to casino account KYC. I still have my account unverified on BC until now even though I deposited huge amount before and do a lot of withdrawals.

But I do encounter casino ask KYC immediately after few deposits and withdrawal so this KYC thingy is solely based on the casino security preference because they can trigger it anytime. I think they are using the casino activity most of the time for the KYC.

But some casino indeed using it to delay or potentially forfeit the big wins especially if they have suspicions that the account original owner is from restricted country since they knew if users use VPN to hide their IP.

[Kavelj22]

They didn't really expect the player to get so much support from the forum which is probably why they released his rightful winnings which just goes to show how shady they truly are.

I don't know why you are spreading fud against this casino, but i think you should stop it, if you followed the scam accusation thread until the end, i am sure you would have seen that the reason why the case was not resolved asap is due to reasons beyond their control. They didn't pay simply because that member got support from the community, but because they are a reputable platform, however, it is not rare to see users like you who fud against reputable casinos.

I am surprised that someone is still pushing hate and scandal about a casino that paid in full $7m. It is purely unacceptable.

It is true that bcgame paid $7 million, but it did not go smoothly enough to say that the casino dealt with the issue with absolute integrity. The casino system tried hard to avoid paying that amount, using every excuse as an excuse, and every excuse that does not work allows it to gain more time to search for a new excuse. Perhaps unfortunately for them (and fortunately for the user) the user recorded all his activity in playing Dice and did not leave any loophole that the casino could use against him. At one point, they offered him a settlement to pay a small portion of the amount, but he refused and stuck to his position, and I personally advised him to discuss the settlement in order to save as much as he could.

It is true that bcgame paid the full amount, but I do not exonerate it at all and recommend dealing with it with caution, especially for high-profile players. It may not be very safe to deal with millions of dollars without preparing all the evidence to ensure proper treatment later.

I also believe that the forum plays a major role in making the plaintiff's voice heard and making the casino pay the necessary attention to it. Otherwise, the problem could have continued for a longer time, even if it had ended in favor of the plaintiff.

[OcTradism]

It’s always a case to case basis when it comes to casino account KYC. I still have my account unverified on BC until now even though I deposited huge amount before and do a lot of withdrawals.

But I do encounter casino ask KYC immediately after few deposits and withdrawal so this KYC thingy is solely based on the casino security preference because they can trigger it anytime. I think they are using the casino activity most of the time for the KYC.

But some casino indeed using it to delay or potentially forfeit the big wins especially if they have suspicions that the account original owner is from restricted country since they knew if users use VPN to hide their IP.

Casino or centralized exchange, if people want to use it for a long time, it's better to complete KYC before sending your big fund to account on a casino or a centralized exchange. It's mainly because with more eyes from governments and their authorities on cryptocurrency industry and companies operate in this field, they will create more regulations that are surely stricter with time. So casinos and centralized exchanges will have less choices or even no choice than adjust their Terms of Service to KYC mandatory on all users.

Now things are strict in the USA. and Europe but soon it will spread globally and KYC mandatory will become a new standard in cryptocurrency and casinos that accept cryptocurrency.

KYC will become worst at policy level and wil no longer be case by case like now.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Please read my previous reply: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5088875.msg64432053#msg64432053
Click the link to see the screen capture: https://youtu.be/bn3UmugaIdU?si=FNSIobYweOCKvKxQ
Do remember that this account was whitelisted when I first joined the signature campaign as weekly payments were supposed to paid in the casino wallet. That means they can ask anyone to pass KYC as per their TOS. This guy is creating issues which does not mean anything.

It’s always a case to case basis when it comes to casino account KYC. I still have my account unverified on BC until now even though I deposited huge amount before and do a lot of withdrawals.

But I do encounter casino ask KYC immediately after few deposits and withdrawal so this KYC thingy is solely based on the casino security preference because they can trigger it anytime. I think they are using the casino activity most of the time for the KYC.

But some casino indeed using it to delay or potentially forfeit the big wins especially if they have suspicions that the account original owner is from restricted country since they knew if users use VPN to hide their IP.

There are several factors that contribute to a casino deciding to whether and who to ask to verify his or her account, just like you mentioned about casinos knowing when a user is making use of VPN possibly as a way to hide their true ip address, specially when the gambler is gambling from a restricted country, such a user is likely to trigger the kyc verification system faster then other persons who are not using VPN to play.

And also myself, my Bc.game account is also still unverified, I am not a very frequent gambler though, but I definitely over time have played alot on this casino, withdrawn some nice sum of amount of money which ordinarily should trigger the kyc system if it was on any other random casino, but that didn't happen on BC, this goes to show that maybe Bc is not really heads-on on collecting customers data, but care more about giving customers the satisfaction they need.

[Pandu Geddon]

There are several factors that contribute to a casino deciding to whether and who to ask to verify his or her account, just like you mentioned about casinos knowing when a user is making use of VPN possibly as a way to hide their true ip address, specially when the gambler is gambling from a restricted country, such a user is likely to trigger the kyc verification system faster then other persons who are not using VPN to play.

And also myself, my Bc.game account is also still unverified, I am not a very frequent gambler though, but I definitely over time have played alot on this casino, withdrawn some nice sum of amount of money which ordinarily should trigger the kyc system if it was on any other random casino, but that didn't happen on BC, this goes to show that maybe Bc is not really heads-on on collecting customers data, but care more about giving customers the satisfaction they need.

My BC account has also not been verified yet. But yesterday when I opened the account, I experienced some quite long loading. When it opened, I was suddenly asked to do KYC verification. It seems like it has to be connected to a camera directly, and I accessed it via a PC that is not supported by a webcam. Maybe I will access it via a smartphone first to do the verification. It seems like it will be easier via a smartphone.