♨️🎲 WINDICE.io 🎲 Contests 🏆 TvT 🔰 Progressive Faucet💰 Jackpots 🎁❤

[barbara44]

The prize the first winner won has a significant value. Assuming that this gambler has lost 1% of the wagering amount, he has won a big profit.
I expected much more wagering amount to be needed to win the first place. Because in the latest 3-day contest, the first winner had wagered 14 BTC. This was a 4-day contest and I expected even higher amounts.

It is really not that important because the top one is spending so much money to be the top one, rodolman has won before and he knows that if you want to beat the opponents then you need to not only gamble a lot but also you need to make sure the others are not close to you.

The difference being too close kinda means to me that others didn't really go for the top place, if rodolman wanted to we know he could make 10+ btc easily, he has done that before and he could do it again, he has that kinda cash, now he doesn't have to, nobody has to but if they want the first place that is kinda the requirement, so you either do it or you don't. If you leave it to gods at the last second then you need to accept the fact that you may not be the first one at this competition, we now have our third different winner in 5-6 competitions, good parity.

[Quidat]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

Does secret on gambling exist? No there's no such thing.You can make bets which do had the highest probability or chances of winning just for you
to gain or increase up that wager volume of yours but doesnt mean it will be a completely safe haven for you to continue. One loss will really result into
a long cope-uping scenario.It doesnt matter if you do bet big or small, automate small amounts with high chances or make big bets on 2x multiplier. All does counts.

[panjul07]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

I believe most dice game strategies has been shared in this forum already. No matter whether we are going to wager for competition or not, the result will always depend on our luck. There is no secret at all and there is no strategies that guarantee small minus for high wagering amount, even if you are going to use the highest winning chance but there is still a chance that we may lose all balance before wagering big amount as you may get some losing streak many times if you are in a bad luck. Just use your own strategy, even if there is someone say that strategy A B or C works for them to wager as much as possible but it may not work on you.

[livingfree]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

[Zicadis]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs

[ralle14]

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs

Others or most don't believe on strategies that are being shared because it doesn't work out for everyone even if it was shared our luck is still a factor. They keep it to themselves because people would give doubts to their strategy. You don't need to spend much just to find which strategy works for you since most if not all bitcoin gambling sites have very small minimums on dice.

[wxxyrqa]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs

You are absolutely right and that is why I never pay attention to any tips and examples of strategies, not only in gambling, but also in trading.  I’m just starting to understand gambling and have already realized one thing, that the main thing is to effectively use the capabilities of faucet, which provides a resource to get the first balance and understand how dice work.  Everything else is, first of all, luck, because I do not see another factor of influence on the result.

[redsun114]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

There has been a lot of talk about a lot of possibilities of increasing the volume without losing too much but in the end whatever method you use its going to end up with 1% house edge possibility, all you can do is to make sure you lose that amount instead of too much.

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

[atjiat]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

There has been a lot of talk about a lot of possibilities of increasing the volume without losing too much but in the end whatever method you use its going to end up with 1% house edge possibility, all you can do is to make sure you lose that amount instead of too much.

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

Why do many users talk about high stakes, as if this greatly affects the results of the game?  When I use the minimum bets, with a multiplier of 2 and a chance of 50%, then I achieve very good success.  But if I start using a big bet, and change the settings, then I lose it anyway, even if the first rounds are successful.

[Betwrong]

Most likely this is a secret, but still I’ll ask. Are there any setups for automatic dice to stay in a small minus, but wind up the volume for the competition? But most likely whoever uses this just will not tell me

No, there's no secret. It's called a strategy which they come up at the very last minute of the contest.

It's about the bankroll that you have and most that has bigger bankrolls has higher chance of winning not just gambing alone but also in the contest.

A pretty good answer to Battareus' question was given by veleten here:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5116500.msg52948963#msg52948963

What you say may be a cause of confusion for some people, and I'll explain why. Yes, bigger bankroll gives you a higher chance of winning a wagering contest if you follow the strategy described by veleten, but NO, you don't have a higher chance of winning in gambling in general playing with a higher bankroll. The chances of winning a big amount are higher with higher bets, that's true, but the chances of losing a big amount are higher as well, and we shouldn't forget about that.

[SquallLeonhart]

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

[Lakai01]

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Thanks for sharing that story! In my opinion there is no strategy which works in the long run. All of those strategies I ve seen (and used) only work for a very short time frame until a loss streak kicks in and erases your bank roll in no matter of time. Its clear why: If there would be a strategy which really works casinos wouldnt allow it to be used or would have software in place which detects such a strategy and ban you.

[livingfree]

These are usually, trade secrets that not many would tell you about and if they do then don't instantly believe them as they might have said something just to confuse you. These strategies aren't usually shared as it takes time and money to devise them and I'd be surprised if someone was to share theirs

Yeah, it's a 'secret' then why would they end up letting others know it? is that how they're too generous enough to give it up to others? and if someone tells that he has a working strategy, don't believe it and it wouldn't work in windice or any other dice site.

Unless someone shares his strategy but there would be a disclaimer that there's no guarantee on it.

[Betwrong]

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

[panjul07]

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.

[dunfida]

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.

It doesnt matter actually because any strategy can really be applied as long it would count into its total wagered amount because even if the gambler

doesnt mind too much on how much he do wager, he would still end up those statistics because the only common goal in mind is on how to last longer
while we do play neither you are aiming for the competition or not.

[suzanne5223]

Just to give an example if you gamble with minimum for too long with highest possible win odds then you will have played longer and have a higher wagered, if you gamble 5 btc all at the same time than you may either win 5 btc or lose 5 btc and end your quest for high volume. So, one is riskier with higher reward, the other is guaranteed loss but at least guaranteed better chance to have a long wagered with less risk of losing all your money. There are plenty of methods to try and test for it, not all works and in the end its all luck.

That is the trick here, some guy may try something and find a success with it whereas some other guy using the same exact strategy may end up losing a lot. I can tell you I had a great strategy and it worked for a long time but then it failed spectacularly.

I used to gamble with 10k satoshi each bet and put a 1.3x odd winning, it usually won and whenever I lost I actually x10 my bet and put 100k satoshi which meant I usually recovered and also made even more, now sometimes even that failed but I was making decent amount until one day I lost 3 times in a row and that emptied my whole bankroll. So, something that worked for me for weeks actually ended up costing me a lot with just one bad streak. Its not a great idea to use others strategy because it may not end up working out for you.

Winning a wagering contest and winning money with your gambling are two different goals, and one shouldn't mix up them. You lost your whole bankroll because you set 1000% increase on loss, and no wonder that 3 reds in a row drained your balance. But when you are trying to win a wagering contest, you shouldn't increase your bet size on loss. Basically, you accept that your profit is going to be negative, but you'll wager much bigger amount with the same balance, and will get a prize.

For me, he is not mixing two goals here. He is just trying not to lose too much while competing for the wagering contest. If he tends to play fixed flat amount all the time during the contest then he may lose more, that's why he mixed the strategy in order to have better statistic during the contest. Obviously the risk is indeed bigger if he increase the bet amount, but there is also a chance for him to recover something that he have lost while wagering. All in all, it is all about preferences while someone is participating in wagering contest. Some players prefer to have flat bet amount and some others prefer to have mixed strategies.

It doesnt matter actually because any strategy can really be applied as long it would count into its total wagered amount because even if the gambler

doesnt mind too much on how much he do wager, he would still end up those statistics because the only common goal in mind is on how to last longer
while we do play neither you are aiming for the competition or not.

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

[dunfida]

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

[jostorres]

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

Does it matter or does it not matter also depends on the person. Some people want to gamble longer without losing too much, some people want to gamble to win money, so how you gamble depends on what you want from gambling. Some people want to just gamble and not care about competition, some people gamble just for competition, and some people gamble both to win and also be part of the competition at the same time.

Now, all of those people also have tens of different methods to approach what they are trying to achieve all of which combined makes for a big amount of ways to gamble. Hence at the end of the day only thing that matters is what you want to achieve with your gambling, if you are going for something specific then you need to do something specific as well.

[bering]

It does matter buddy because the user purpose are the wagering contest, to also win his bet and to have longer wagering time, so it better if he mix strategy but I won't advise him to use the martingale strategy due to the risk involve.
@Betwrong was right the guy was actually mixing things.

Martingale strat is considerable on catching up a wagering contest but it is more riskier same as you said but still an ideal way on catching up numbers.

Its a matter of choice though or simply if you can able to handle it but for me it is way more better on catching up high multipliers with that minimum bet strat.

For pursuing wagering contests i suggest to you just stick to the normal bets such as 2x payout and do not use martingale strategy because it will dried your balance rapidly and the worst thing if you use that method for the contests is you will run out your money but at the end of contests you cannot reach good position to get prizes