SCAM: Bitcoin SV (BSV) - fake team member and plagiarized white paper

[actmyname]

Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer".

But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too.

"I said that in order to obfuscate my identity. I wanted to remain anonymous while I was under the identity of Satoshi Nakamoto."

probably something like that, eh?

[1713501735]

1713501735

[1713501735]

1713501735

[JayJuanGee]

However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.

Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer".

But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too.

Craigs a person who knows about all things, but when you actually see the vast majority of things that he says, the full-of-shitness tends to emanate, especially the longer that he talks.

[Iamtutut]

However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.

Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer".

But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too.

He has copyright Common Law.

[nutildah]

I really hope, You do not have a degree in math and logic.
If you state something false or nonsense, You have to counter with FACTS and arguments that make sense.
The fact You dislike the claim, does not mean it is false.

It is clear to me, some like You, do prefer to do politics, public relation to undermine my work or
promote their own vision.

You state there are grammatical errors in the tweets @realsatoshin. But You do not quote them.
There are a lot of tweets in that account. As there are at moments typo.

Hey, thanks for joining us.

I can perfectly understand that perhaps the white paper was professionally edited and proofread by a native English speaker, but its highly doubtful that every single post on this forum and email he ever sent was as well. Even non-public emails sent to the likes of Gavin Andresen contain perfect or near-perfect English.

Satoshi never capitalized "you" unless it was the first word in a sentence. He also put 2 spaces in between his sentences:

That means a lot coming from you, Hal.  Thanks.

I just pulled up this post as an example, his English is flawless, not one error or anything potentially confusing about it:

Piling every proof-of-work quorum system in the world into one dataset doesn't scale.

Bitcoin and BitDNS can be used separately.  Users shouldn't have to download all of both to use one or the other.  BitDNS users may not want to download everything the next several unrelated networks decide to pile in either.

The networks need to have separate fates.  BitDNS users might be completely liberal about adding any large data features since relatively few domain registrars are needed, while Bitcoin users might get increasingly tyrannical about limiting the size of the chain so it's easy for lots of users and small devices.

Fears about securely buying domains with Bitcoins are a red herring.  It's easy to trade Bitcoins for other non-repudiable commodities.

If you're still worried about it, it's cryptographically possible to make a risk free trade.  The two parties would set up transactions on both sides such that when they both sign the transactions, the second signer's signature triggers the release of both.  The second signer can't release one without releasing the other.

I don't have to point out all of your errors because they are consistent, speak for themselves, and can be independently verified by anybody.

Having said all that, at least we are in agreement that CSW is not Satoshi.

And by the way, you have magnificent hair. I have to admit I'm a bit jealous.

[Phinnaeus Gage]

However for someone who claims to be a lawyer you would expect more careful use of language.

Let's not forget, CSW explicitly claims to be a lawyer, while Satoshi explicitly asserted, "I am not a lawyer".

But I'm sure Craig has an excuse for that, too.

CSW: Through the advise of David Kleiman, I sometimes had/have to obfuscate who I was, is, and am going to be.

[gentlemand]

https://decrypt.co/8155/8155

One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court.

This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud.

I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),”

[Iamtutut]

https://decrypt.co/8155/8155

One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court.

This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud.

I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),”

House of cards falling apart.

I just twitted your link to Mc Cormack, he liked it. 

[nutildah]

https://decrypt.co/8155/8155

One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court.

This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud.

I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),”

In court documents Wright said:

Moreover, no one would reasonably enter into business dealings with someone thought to be a fraud.

... which makes me wonder why anybody would buy BSV; perhaps those who do are simply "unreasonable."

[Phinnaeus Gage]

https://decrypt.co/8155/8155

One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court.

This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud.

I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),”

In court documents Wright said:

Moreover, no one would reasonably enter into business dealings with someone thought to be a fraud.

... which makes me wonder why anybody would buy BSV; perhaps those who do are simple "unreasonable."

"Reason dictates that a fork of a fork is the true Bitcoin.
Now if you'll excuse me, I need to patent my wheel invention cuz it goes 'round and 'round on the short bus I take to CoinGeek conventions."

Full disclosure: Nobody's the wiser that I edited the above quote five times due to simple grammatical errors, perhaps occurring cuz my first cup of covfefe hadn't kicked in yet or I'm a fuckin idiot on Thursday mornings.

Edit: hasn't is now hadn't.

Edit: Tuesday is now penned on Thursday. Checking for proper usages of comas now.

[Hueristic]

And the hits keep on a comin' ...

Facebook should forget Libra, launch stablecoin on Bitcoin SV

"I need to meditate on this for a sec. Currently, I'm the number-one asshole in the world, but if I team up with crypto's number-one asshole, then together we'll be able to rule the universe."

Oh fuck, this one killed me!

https://decrypt.co/8155/8155

One of his other many cases has been given the boot by a UK court.

This one's because Roger Ver called him a fraud.

I like this passage - 'Wright had failed to provide sufficient evidence of “the global reputation he enjoys and, more particularly, the extent to which it has been damaged. There is no other evidence as to the extent of the Claimant’s reputation in the UK (or elsewhere),”

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

[TheNewAnon135246]

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

Welcome to law.

I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.

[gentlemand]

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend.

Welcome to law.

I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.

Are they basically of the same premise to this case?

[TheNewAnon135246]

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend.

Welcome to law.

I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.

Are they basically of the same premise to this case?

Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is.

[Iamtutut]

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend.

Welcome to law.

I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.

Are they basically of the same premise to this case?

Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is.

He has no reputation to sustain in his residence country (according to what he said this time because in his BS copyright claim he's a resident in NY), so he has even less reputation to be damaged elsewhere.

He's a clown, only he doesn't know it.

[Hueristic]

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend.

Welcome to law.

I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.

Are they basically of the same premise to this case?

Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is.

So Peter McCormack can use this as precedent and the no harm to rep should stand up for Hodlonaut as CSW cannot prove he has any rep worthy of defense.

[BitcoinNewsMagazine]

Arthur van Pelt (@MyLegacyKit) posts today that CSW claims to be able and plans to crash BCH and BTC in 2021:

[tippytoes]

I especially liked this

Speaking to Decrypt, Ver hailed victory. “[Wright] had to pay me £60,000 ($73,000) for the legal fees too,” he said.

.

I'm amazed Craigy has $730 to his name. I presume tonight he'll have to polish Calvin's Austin Allegro with extra vigour and mow his lawn with them nice stripes this weekend.

Welcome to law.

I assume the cases against Hodlonaut and Peter McCormack will end the same way.

Are they basically of the same premise to this case?

Yeah, similar cases. Hodlonaut isn't located in the UK, Peter McCormack is.

He has no reputation to sustain in his residence country (according to what he said this time because in his BS copyright claim he's a resident in NY), so he has even less reputation to be damaged elsewhere.

He's a clown, only he doesn't know it.

Or maybe he knows it but pretend not knowing it for the sake of publicity.  He is like banking on his media's presence to get value for this coin but in reality, there's nothing in it. I wonder how long naive people will support this project. 

[Phinnaeus Gage]

This fucker needs to exit the gene pool before his wife, Ramona Watts, starts getting ideas in her head that she wants to hear the pitter-patter of little Satoshis around her home.

[gentlemand]

This fucker needs to exit the gene pool before his wife, Ramona Watts, starts getting ideas in her head that she wants to hear the pitter-patter of little Satoshis around her home.

I am truly staggered that anyone would want to let him line their uterus with his filthy, teeming sperm let alone get hitched in a legally binding manner. Just goes to show there's someone for everyone, even him.

In other news his wee hobby appears to be forking in all sorts of directions - https://twitter.com/BitMEXResearch/status/1157684825572151298

A 210mb block messed with those non $20,000 nodes.

[TheNewAnon135246]

Arthur van Pelt (@MyLegacyKit) posts today that CSW claims to be able and plans to crash BCH and BTC in 2021:

Craig Wright truely is a fucking idiot.