1XBIT.COM ᐉ 7 BTC WB ᐉ Altcoin Betting ᐉ no KYC ᕗ Instant payouts

[Marvelman]

We can only guess who would like to join the 1xbit signature campaign. If everyone gets a red trust automatically, we won't find out, because no one wants to spoil their account and prefere make safe money from other campaigns.

Why would anyone in their right mind want to promote a proven scam? Do you honestly believe that all people are this corrupt?

The accusation of scam is based on complaints of users. 1xbit claims that accounts of this users have been blocked because of cheating. Unfortunately, this is a word against word and neither side gives conclusive evidence. Whether it is a scam or safety action of 1xbit security team depends only on who you believe more.

I trust this community. If most DT members rate this casino as a scam, then I believe them to be one.
If 1xbit truly respected this community, they would do things like other casinos have done before to clear their names.

[Erdogan]

We can only guess who would like to join the 1xbit signature campaign. If everyone gets a red trust automatically, we won't find out, because no one wants to spoil their account and prefere make safe money from other campaigns.

Why would anyone in their right mind want to promote a proven scam? Do you honestly believe that all people are this corrupt?

The accusation of scam is based on complaints of users. 1xbit claims that accounts of this users have been blocked because of cheating. Unfortunately, this is a word against word and neither side gives conclusive evidence. Whether it is a scam or safety action of 1xbit security team depends only on who you believe more.

I trust this community. If most DT members rate this casino as a scam, then I believe them to be one.
If 1xbit truly respected this community, they would do things like other casinos have done before to clear their names.

After all, 1xbit does a lot to rebuild its opinion all the time.
A special thread has been created in which 1xbit support responds to complaints: 1xBit.com Coming back to Bitcointalk, Solving all the issues.

Here is a list of positively considered complaints (it has not been updated for some time, now there are more of them):

We have combined issues posted by bitcointalk users so you can see the progress and decide everything for yourself.

Fully restored accounts:
1) Tim1996, 1 ETH
2) h4ns, 4,3 BTC
3) Aeshman, 10 mBTC
4) 2kevin2, sum not mentioned
5) MrBrightside1, 7,4 BTC

Refund cases:
1) sezulus, 59 mBTC
2) Fabi86000, 20 ETH
3) jennyoller, 40 mBTC
4) Holen88, 100 mBTC
5) Blogab, 63 mBTC (+hashes)
6) bestneon8, sum not mentioned
7) zekiman, sum not mentioned
8') elninnohameni, 200 mBTC
9) sammichael, sum not mentioned
10) dammlyn, 4,6 LTC
11) aksez, sum not mentioned
12) haluktr, 68 mBTC
13) merceniumeras, sum not mentioned
14) bleedrulez, 20 mBTC
15) zackhirarmador, 154 mBTC
16) kullerimer, sum not mentioned
17) manul-ayn, 133 mBTC
18) polinagil, $460 usd

Total amount of resolved issues in this thread already exceeds: 13 BTC

I understand that you believe this community, but it's also worth doing your own research before taking someone's word for it.

[Haunebu]

I trust this community. If most DT members rate this casino as a scam, then I believe them to be one.
If 1xbit truly respected this community, they would do things like other casinos have done before to clear their names.

Agreed. Shills like @Erdogan cannot come up with valid, legitimate reasons to defend a scam site like 1xbit which is why they manufacture nonsense on a regular basis even though they are aware of the fact that it's pointless.

I remember Bestchange being accused in a similar manner when they initially joined this forum, but almost all of their negative ratings were gone after they proved their legitimacy.

1xbit will never be able to replicate the same since they clearly don't care about their reputation in this forum and keep focusing on advertising in order to attract as many gullible gamblers as possible.

[Erdogan]

I trust this community. If most DT members rate this casino as a scam, then I believe them to be one.
If 1xbit truly respected this community, they would do things like other casinos have done before to clear their names.

Agreed. Shills like @Erdogan cannot come up with valid, legitimate reasons to defend a scam site like 1xbit which is why they manufacture nonsense on a regular basis even though they are aware of the fact that it's pointless.

I remember Bestchange being accused in a similar manner when they initially joined this forum, but almost all of their negative ratings were gone after they proved their legitimacy.

1xbit will never be able to replicate the same since they clearly don't care about their reputation in this forum and keep focusing on advertising in order to attract as many gullible gamblers as possible.

I am amazed at your stubbornness in ignoring the facts. What I am writing here is my opinion based on the facts that I am presenting. Of course, you too can have your opinion and I will respect it, but if you take part in the discussion, comment on specific facts, not opinions taken from the air.

[Marvelman]

/cut/
I understand that you believe this community, but it's also worth doing your own research before taking someone's word for it.

Joining this community is part of my research, otherwise there is no point in being here. The opinion of other members (especially DT members with a good reputation) outweighs anything that comes from the casino in question if not backed up by concrete evidence. All 1xbit's claims are pointless without confirmation from the other side.

I am amazed at your stubbornness in ignoring the facts. What I am writing here is my opinion based on the facts that I am presenting. Of course, you too can have your opinion and I will respect it, but if you take part in the discussion, comment on specific facts, not opinions taken from the air.

But Haunebu is right, though. The facts support his claims.

As decodx pointed out, and according to your account history, you have been shilling scams before. Considering this, you are not expressing your opinion, but you are being paid by the scam casino for doing shill work. Furthermore, your trust rating is filled with multiple scam accusations, so it makes sense that if you have scammed before, you will do so again. Those are the facts.

[Erdogan]

/cut/
I understand that you believe this community, but it's also worth doing your own research before taking someone's word for it.

Joining this community is part of my research, otherwise there is no point in being here. The opinion of other members (especially DT members with a good reputation) outweighs anything that comes from the casino in question if not backed up by concrete evidence. All 1xbit's claims are pointless without confirmation from the other side.

I am amazed at your stubbornness in ignoring the facts. What I am writing here is my opinion based on the facts that I am presenting. Of course, you too can have your opinion and I will respect it, but if you take part in the discussion, comment on specific facts, not opinions taken from the air.

But Haunebu is right, though. The facts support his claims.

As decodx pointed out, and according to your account history, you have been shilling scams before. Considering this, you are not expressing your opinion, but you are being paid by the scam casino for doing shill work. Furthermore, your trust rating is filled with multiple scam accusations, so it makes sense that if you have scammed before, you will do so again. Those are the facts.

This discussion is not about what comments someone left on this account. After all, I am not trying to convince you to my words, but I am presenting you the facts.
Anyone who cannot argue with the facts starts talking about what is written in the comments about this account. It means you cannot answer to this points, so you have no arguments, that's all.

[JohnBitCo]

/cut/
I understand that you believe this community, but it's also worth doing your own research before taking someone's word for it.

Joining this community is part of my research, otherwise there is no point in being here. The opinion of other members (especially DT members with a good reputation) outweighs anything that comes from the casino in question if not backed up by concrete evidence. All 1xbit's claims are pointless without confirmation from the other side.

I am amazed at your stubbornness in ignoring the facts. What I am writing here is my opinion based on the facts that I am presenting. Of course, you too can have your opinion and I will respect it, but if you take part in the discussion, comment on specific facts, not opinions taken from the air.

But Haunebu is right, though. The facts support his claims.

As decodx pointed out, and according to your account history, you have been shilling scams before. Considering this, you are not expressing your opinion, but you are being paid by the scam casino for doing shill work. Furthermore, your trust rating is filled with multiple scam accusations, so it makes sense that if you have scammed before, you will do so again. Those are the facts.

This discussion is not about what comments someone left on this account. After all, I am not trying to convince you to my words, but I am presenting you the facts.
Anyone who cannot argue with the facts starts talking about what is written in the comments about this account. It means you cannot answer to this points, so you have no arguments, that's all.

My only question from you is why only you on the forum (along with few other paid advertisers) think that 1XBIT is not a scam. Are rest of the bitcointalk members are out of their mind that they can't see the good progress at 1XBIT    
We can respect your point of view, but tell me why all others are too dumb to understand and convince from your arguments.
Try to think with a cool mind, if no one agrees with your point of view, then there is something wrong with your judgment.

[Erdogan]

~

My only question from you is why only you on the forum (along with few other paid advertisers) think that 1XBIT is not a scam. Are rest of the bitcointalk members are out of their mind that they can't see the good progress at 1XBIT    
We can respect your point of view, but tell me why all others are too dumb to understand and convince from your arguments.
Try to think with a cool mind, if no one agrees with your point of view, then there is something wrong with your judgment.

I have been participating in the 1xbit signature campaign for 10 months and I always get paid on time and honestly.
When it comes to complaints made by users, some are considered positively and some negatively. If 1xbit security team blocks someone's account, it is definitely doing it for a specific reason, so it is obvious that there are fewer mistakes and therefore fewer complaints are considered positively. When complaint is considered negatively, neither party can provide evidence that have right, so it is a word against the word. It's up to you who you believe. As I wrote earlier, 1xbit is very honest with me, so it is natural that I sympathize with them more.

[JohnBitCo]

~

My only question from you is why only you on the forum (along with few other paid advertisers) think that 1XBIT is not a scam. Are rest of the bitcointalk members are out of their mind that they can't see the good progress at 1XBIT    
We can respect your point of view, but tell me why all others are too dumb to understand and convince from your arguments.
Try to think with a cool mind, if no one agrees with your point of view, then there is something wrong with your judgment.

I have been participating in the 1xbit signature campaign for 10 months and I always get paid on time and honestly.
When it comes to complaints made by users, some are considered positively and some negatively. If 1xbit security team blocks someone's account, it is definitely doing it for a specific reason, so it is obvious that there are fewer mistakes and therefore fewer complaints are considered positively. When complaint is considered negatively, neither party can provide evidence that have right, so it is a word against the word. It's up to you who you believe. As I wrote earlier, 1xbit is very honest with me, so it is natural that I sympathize with them more.

That's understandable that they are paying their signature participants on time and therefore we do not hear any voice on that aspect. If they haven't been paying you, you would not have been praising them.
My question is about the gambling site 1xbit itself. Yes, we hear people complain but I don't see any resolution given in the favor of the players.  By the way, do you ever played at 1xbit with your money?

[Erdogan]

~

My only question from you is why only you on the forum (along with few other paid advertisers) think that 1XBIT is not a scam. Are rest of the bitcointalk members are out of their mind that they can't see the good progress at 1XBIT    
We can respect your point of view, but tell me why all others are too dumb to understand and convince from your arguments.
Try to think with a cool mind, if no one agrees with your point of view, then there is something wrong with your judgment.

I have been participating in the 1xbit signature campaign for 10 months and I always get paid on time and honestly.
When it comes to complaints made by users, some are considered positively and some negatively. If 1xbit security team blocks someone's account, it is definitely doing it for a specific reason, so it is obvious that there are fewer mistakes and therefore fewer complaints are considered positively. When complaint is considered negatively, neither party can provide evidence that have right, so it is a word against the word. It's up to you who you believe. As I wrote earlier, 1xbit is very honest with me, so it is natural that I sympathize with them more.

That's understandable that they are paying their signature participants on time and therefore we do not hear any voice on that aspect. If they haven't been paying you, you would not have been praising them.

I wrote that I simply cannot have a bad opinion about them because they are honest with me. I think it is completely natural.

My question is about the gambling site 1xbit itself. Yes, we hear people complain but I don't see any resolution given in the favor of the players. 

I don't know how you managed to overlook my post on what 1xbit does to rebuild its reputation, as I posted it just few posts above:

~
After all, 1xbit does a lot to rebuild its opinion all the time.
A special thread has been created in which 1xbit support responds to complaints: 1xBit.com Coming back to Bitcointalk, Solving all the issues.

Here is a list of positively considered complaints (it has not been updated for some time, now there are more of them):

We have combined issues posted by bitcointalk users so you can see the progress and decide everything for yourself.

Fully restored accounts:
1) Tim1996, 1 ETH
2) h4ns, 4,3 BTC
3) Aeshman, 10 mBTC
4) 2kevin2, sum not mentioned
5) MrBrightside1, 7,4 BTC

Refund cases:
1) sezulus, 59 mBTC
2) Fabi86000, 20 ETH
3) jennyoller, 40 mBTC
4) Holen88, 100 mBTC
5) Blogab, 63 mBTC (+hashes)
6) bestneon8, sum not mentioned
7) zekiman, sum not mentioned
8') elninnohameni, 200 mBTC
9) sammichael, sum not mentioned
10) dammlyn, 4,6 LTC
11) aksez, sum not mentioned
12) haluktr, 68 mBTC
13) merceniumeras, sum not mentioned
14) bleedrulez, 20 mBTC
15) zackhirarmador, 154 mBTC
16) kullerimer, sum not mentioned
17) manul-ayn, 133 mBTC
18) polinagil, $460 usd

Total amount of resolved issues in this thread already exceeds: 13 BTC

I understand that you believe this community, but it's also worth doing your own research before taking someone's word for it.

This list is not up-to-date because at least a few of the complaints that have been positively considered recently are not here yet.

By the way, do you ever played at 1xbit with your money?

Yes, I was playing on 1xbit platform with the money I deposited, but unfortunately without any successes that would make withdrawal meaningful.
I promised that if I manage to win something nice, I will withdraw it and definitely tell here about it.

[nantz_ragasa721]

I still waiting more than 2 months for my account to be unlock.
They locked my account and dont give me login.
I have there deposit 500 usd in cryptocurrency and have that money in my account.
they not speak to me anymore. what to do ? why you hold my deposited money? It is not fair and it is garbage. i want my money back , only my deposit if can
my account  user is 379210585

[Naficopa]

I still waiting more than 2 months for my account to be unlock.
They locked my account and dont give me login.
I have there deposit 500 usd in cryptocurrency and have that money in my account.
they not speak to me anymore. what to do ? why you hold my deposited money? It is not fair and it is garbage. i want my money back , only my deposit if can
my account  user is 379210585

Before the weekend, you were informed that the request for clarification had been forwarded to the security team:

~

You should have been received explanation from our security team already.

We will forward your account number to them to check if everything is alright.

Unfortunately, the way via Bitcointalk is usually more time consuming than direct correspondence with security team via email, so you will probably have to be a bit more patient.

[Slow death]

My suggestion to 1xbit.com

You are getting lots of negative feedback for scamming players because you guys are making a mistake.

Stake also freezes accounts but they have a great reputation because they know how to do t smartly. Here are my suggestions:

1- As per terms and conditions you can ask the customer anything in the name of KYC. Stake forces users to submit passport or their balance is gone. You can start asking "letter from the president" else your funds are gone.

2- Like stake has hired some puppets, you need to hire some trusted members. Yes it costs money but look they defend you against all the victims and go as far as tagging the victim himself as one of the stake puppet does.

you have a good imagination, i would particularly recommend you to apply to be a hollywood movie director because your theory would make a good movie. but leaving that aside. you need to understand that your problem and the problems being posed in this thread are different things, you were wrong and you know it, while on this site people are being deceived. you can test this site if you think all the people complaining in this thread are lying

[Naficopa]

My suggestion to 1xbit.com

You are getting lots of negative feedback for scamming players because you guys are making a mistake.

Stake also freezes accounts but they have a great reputation because they know how to do t smartly. Here are my suggestions:

1- As per terms and conditions you can ask the customer anything in the name of KYC. Stake forces users to submit passport or their balance is gone. You can start asking "letter from the president" else your funds are gone.

2- Like stake has hired some puppets, you need to hire some trusted members. Yes it costs money but look they defend you against all the victims and go as far as tagging the victim himself as one of the stake puppet does.

you have a good imagination, i would particularly recommend you to apply to be a hollyood movie director because your theory would make a good movie. but leaving that aside. you need to understand that your problem and the problems being posed in this thread are different things, you were wrong and you know it, while on this site people are being deceived. you can test this site if you think all the people complaining in this thread are lying

Actually, the advice is good, but not posssible to introduce due to 1xBit policy and past situation on Bitcointalk.

1 - 1xBit is fully anonymous and will remain so, so for sure no one will be asked for KYC verification (However I admit that I would prefer the verification to be. Hopefully this will change someday and help eliminate a lot of misunderstanding.)

2 - It would be possible if DT members stopped giving red trust to all participants of the 1xBit signature campaign.

[Slow death]

Actually, the advice is good, but not posssible to introduce due to 1xBit policy and past situation on Bitcointalk.
1 - 1xBit is fully anonymous and will remain so, so for sure no one will be asked for KYC verification (However I admit that I would prefer the verification to be. Hopefully this will change someday and help eliminate a lot of misunderstanding.)

this: " 1xBit is fully anonymous ", I wonder if they are protecting customers or are they hiding from the authorities? it's not possible that they prefer to receive negative feedback here on the forum and have a bad reputation and still not accept giving data from people who supposedly they think are lying even when the account owners themselves have allowed them to give their data to DT members evaluate the data that the security team of that site has that proves that certain customers are cheating.

2 - It would be possible if DT members stopped giving red trust to all participants of the 1xBit signature campaign.

I'm not in favor of leaving negative feedback on the member account of this subscription campaign, but I'm in favor of leaving neutral feedback and after the person leaves the campaign, remove it. I think it's the most sensible

[noormcs5]

2 - It would be possible if DT members stopped giving red trust to all participants of the 1xBit signature campaign.

I'm not in favor of leaving negative feedback on the member account of this subscription campaign, but I'm in favor of leaving neutral feedback and after the person leaves the campaign, remove it. I think it's the most sensible

How come it is more appropriate to remove the feedback once the person has left the campaign ? A person has promoted a scam site for weeks/months and once he stop promoting it (or the campaigns stops), you remove the red feedback . In that case, the person has nothing to lose as he can continue apply in campaigns. The persons have promoted scam site for money and hence the tag should remain forever.

[Slow death]

2 - It would be possible if DT members stopped giving red trust to all participants of the 1xBit signature campaign.

I'm not in favor of leaving negative feedback on the member account of this subscription campaign, but I'm in favor of leaving neutral feedback and after the person leaves the campaign, remove it. I think it's the most sensible

How come it is more appropriate to remove the feedback once the person has left the campaign ? A person has promoted a scam site for weeks/months and once he stop promoting it (or the campaigns stops), you remove the red feedback . In that case, the person has nothing to lose as he can continue apply in campaigns. The persons have promoted scam site for money and hence the tag should remain forever.

there are people who change, you cannot think that people do not change. today they can make mistakes and tomorrow they will be people who have changed and started fighting scams. that's what I'm talking about

[noormcs5]

2 - It would be possible if DT members stopped giving red trust to all participants of the 1xBit signature campaign.

I'm not in favor of leaving negative feedback on the member account of this subscription campaign, but I'm in favor of leaving neutral feedback and after the person leaves the campaign, remove it. I think it's the most sensible

How come it is more appropriate to remove the feedback once the person has left the campaign ? A person has promoted a scam site for weeks/months and once he stop promoting it (or the campaigns stops), you remove the red feedback . In that case, the person has nothing to lose as he can continue apply in campaigns. The persons have promoted scam site for money and hence the tag should remain forever.

there are people who change, you cannot think that people do not change. today they can make mistakes and tomorrow they will be people who have changed and started fighting scams. that's what I'm talking about

Yes mistakes do happen and people tends to change their opinion. But for that people need to quit before the end of the signature campaign.
If anyone quits now , we can think he has changed his mind but if they say that they changed their mind once the signature campaign has ended, then at least i can't believe them.   

[Naficopa]

Actually, the advice is good, but not posssible to introduce due to 1xBit policy and past situation on Bitcointalk.
1 - 1xBit is fully anonymous and will remain so, so for sure no one will be asked for KYC verification (However I admit that I would prefer the verification to be. Hopefully this will change someday and help eliminate a lot of misunderstanding.)

this: " 1xBit is fully anonymous ", I wonder if they are protecting customers or are they hiding from the authorities? it's not possible that they prefer to receive negative feedback here on the forum and have a bad reputation and still not accept giving data from people who supposedly they think are lying even when the account owners themselves have allowed them to give their data to DT members evaluate the data that the security team of that site has that proves that certain customers are cheating.

To tell the truth, I don't know what their goals are, but the explanation seems to make sense (about anonimity):

That would surely lift most of the complaints off, but back in 2015 our intentions were to make as anonymous casino as possible (when crypto and all that stuff appeared).
Ain't much changed since then - we added email KYC and that's all what have changed about anonymity.

Despite the fact that if someone would like to, he could probably buy an identity, as I wrote, the implementation of the KYC requirement would definitely solve a lot complaints. Probably, 1xbit analysts judge it differently.

[Slow death]

2 - It would be possible if DT members stopped giving red trust to all participants of the 1xBit signature campaign.

I'm not in favor of leaving negative feedback on the member account of this subscription campaign, but I'm in favor of leaving neutral feedback and after the person leaves the campaign, remove it. I think it's the most sensible

How come it is more appropriate to remove the feedback once the person has left the campaign ? A person has promoted a scam site for weeks/months and once he stop promoting it (or the campaigns stops), you remove the red feedback . In that case, the person has nothing to lose as he can continue apply in campaigns. The persons have promoted scam site for money and hence the tag should remain forever.

there are people who change, you cannot think that people do not change. today they can make mistakes and tomorrow they will be people who have changed and started fighting scams. that's what I'm talking about

Yes mistakes do happen and people tends to change their opinion. But for that people need to quit before the end of the signature campaign.
If anyone quits now , we can think he has changed his mind but if they say that they changed their mind once the signature campaign has ended, then at least i can't believe them.   

I understand this part, I left negative feedback on the OP account because I don't think it's fair what his site does to people, they are stealing and cheating people. but I didn't leave negative feedback on the signature campaign participants' account because honestly they already entered the campaign with negative feedback and then it's up to them to analyze if they think it's fair and correct to be promoting a scam site, I prefer to let it be themselves to put their hands on their conscience and analyze whether it is fair and correct to promote a scam site.

Actually, the advice is good, but not posssible to introduce due to 1xBit policy and past situation on Bitcointalk.
1 - 1xBit is fully anonymous and will remain so, so for sure no one will be asked for KYC verification (However I admit that I would prefer the verification to be. Hopefully this will change someday and help eliminate a lot of misunderstanding.)

this: " 1xBit is fully anonymous ", I wonder if they are protecting customers or are they hiding from the authorities? it's not possible that they prefer to receive negative feedback here on the forum and have a bad reputation and still not accept giving data from people who supposedly they think are lying even when the account owners themselves have allowed them to give their data to DT members evaluate the data that the security team of that site has that proves that certain customers are cheating.

To tell the truth, I don't know what their goals are, but the explanation seems to make sense (about anonimity):

That would surely lift most of the complaints off, but back in 2015 our intentions were to make as anonymous casino as possible (when crypto and all that stuff appeared).
Ain't much changed since then - we added email KYC and that's all what have changed about anonymity.

Despite the fact that if someone would like to, he could probably buy an identity, as I wrote, the implementation of the KYC requirement would definitely solve a lot complaints. Probably, 1xbit analysts judge it differently.

i still think they are just using this argument that they are anonymous just because they want to hide from governments and continue with their scam