BitLucy.com 🎰 no more in bitcointalk

[arwin100]

It is also better that a site is offline for a longer period of time, so that they can certainly check all functionalities on the site. If you go online on May 26, and then errors come up again, the site would be under construction again. I have to say that it is bad advertising for a gambling site that has only just been operational. Won't be good for the confidence of many players. A lot will have to be done if they want to restore their reputation to some extent, because things don't go smoothly. My suspicion is that they do not use an Igaming provider.

Agree because if they keep their operations going and they have huge issues running for sure there will be more gamblers encounter problem by using their site, for sure this will give another head ache to them so doing this will give them more time to settle things and if they change provider because their current existing one is not a good one then that will be more better because choosing what's best can make people satisfy to their experiences upon playing. If people worried about reputation for sure trust will be back once they operate smoothly without issues after this.

[1714248617]

1714248617

[1714248617]

1714248617

[Hamphser]

It is also better that a site is offline for a longer period of time, so that they can certainly check all functionalities on the site. If you go online on May 26, and then errors come up again, the site would be under construction again. I have to say that it is bad advertising for a gambling site that has only just been operational. Won't be good for the confidence of many players. A lot will have to be done if they want to restore their reputation to some extent, because things don't go smoothly. My suspicion is that they do not use an Igaming provider.

Agree because if they keep their operations going and they have huge issues running for sure there will be more gamblers encounter problem by using their site, for sure this will give another head ache to them so doing this will give them more time to settle things and if they change provider because their current existing one is not a good one then that will be more better because choosing what's best can make people satisfy to their experiences upon playing. If people worried about reputation for sure trust will be back once they operate smoothly without issues after this.

Issues and problems are something that can't really be avoided which it is understandable or something normal for them to fix out everything if they do like to remain into this market or industry because bad experiences could really lead into rejection or being ignored because gamblers doesn't really like hassle or headache whenever they do play that's why it's better to fix everything up before making out some launching.

I've seen their signature is back or up at the moment which does signifies that they are back on track.

[Dewi Aries]

Issues and problems are something that can't really be avoided which it is understandable or something normal for them to fix out everything if they do like to remain into this market or industry because bad experiences could really lead into rejection or being ignored because gamblers doesn't really like hassle or headache whenever they do play that's why it's better to fix everything up before making out some launching.

I've seen their signature is back or up at the moment which does signifies that they are back on track.

As I said before the signature campaign is a sign that that they will be back in a few days between 28-29 May the team is currently working
And I don't think they will miss the Champions League final moment this is an opportunity for Bitlucy to offer the best experience and something that attracts the attention of new users.

[FanEagle]

It's funny how they become the cause of the issue and be the first users to throw stones. Users who never got to make any deposit but had to abuse the sites bonus system and hope to make withdrawals haven't placed bets on them. All business are profit oriented and I don't see how they expect to be paid given that fact. The situation is, once they exhaust there bonus offer on one account, they move to the next and continue to open multiple accounts until they come up with a win eventually from bonus offers. It's certainly not for the best.

Am just glad that, they did expose some loopholes in the system to the site developers and as we've observed lately, Royse777 and the BitLucy team aren't relenting in fixing the bugs on the site. We are sure to have an optimum working site soon, more options and a better functionality to it.
Stay enthusiast still and your patience for best offers on BitLucy will pay off.

Of course they will be fixing it, and that shows how true to their word they are and how legit they are. There are problems in many casinos but usually we do not see people that type of situation at all. There is nothing that we need to worry about bitlucy and they are working towards making this to be a great website and it will stay that way for sure.

I believe that it is going to be quite good and its going to be a no problem, we are going to enjoy this website for many years. The more money they make, the more marketing they will start to make and we are going to hear this name a lot more in the next 1 year, then they will be in the top dogs level.

[Eureka_07]

It is also better that a site is offline for a longer period of time, so that they can certainly check all functionalities on the site. If you go online on May 26, and then errors come up again, the site would be under construction again. I have to say that it is bad advertising for a gambling site that has only just been operational. Won't be good for the confidence of many players. A lot will have to be done if they want to restore their reputation to some extent, because things don't go smoothly. My suspicion is that they do not use an Igaming provider.

Bitlucy wants to give a better service to their customers. That is the reason why there are maintenance that are happening. Issues that arrives during these times will always get resolved. Extending day of maintenance also a normal thing when it comes to these.
Never heard of Igaming provider, can you share to us more about that?

[Dewi Aries]

It is also better that a site is offline for a longer period of time, so that they can certainly check all functionalities on the site. If you go online on May 26, and then errors come up again, the site would be under construction again. I have to say that it is bad advertising for a gambling site that has only just been operational. Won't be good for the confidence of many players. A lot will have to be done if they want to restore their reputation to some extent, because things don't go smoothly. My suspicion is that they do not use an Igaming provider.

Bitlucy wants to give a better service to their customers. That is the reason why there are maintenance that are happening. Issues that arrives during these times will always get resolved. Extending day of maintenance also a normal thing when it comes to these.
Never heard of Igaming provider, can you share to us more about that?

Bitlucy is scheduled to be back online tomorrow they missed the champions league moment but it's okay if this repair is more important
By the way what I know Igaming is a software provider for casino/sportsbook if you want to launch a new casino iGaming is one that can help another provider is hub88.

[Zackgeno96]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

[Dewi Aries]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

Man as far as I know the problem is not from the provider but from users who abuse bonuses , I don't think the problem is this complicated because only by removing the bonus or update the requirements the problem is solved, we don't know what update they did so it will take longer. we'll find out tomorrow and see if there really a change of provider.

[Maus0728]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

Man as far as I know the problem is not from the provider but from users who abuse bonuses , I don't think the problem is this complicated because only by removing the bonus or update the requirements the problem is solved, we don't know what update they did so it will take longer. we'll find out tomorrow and see if there really a change of provider.

Indeed. I don't see why people keep insisting that making a gambling platform is easy. Yes, you can have providers to do the work for you, but purchasing a service of a gambling provider for their platform would just milk their profits in a long term, whilst having their own and develop everything from the ground up (of course having game providers as well) would stood their company strong in a long term. I just didn't get it why people keep looking at the tip of the ice berg and not on all complexity behind. I saw Royse looked for a devOps software engineer, and I know somethings cooking up.

[shasan]

Abusing the bonus system of an online casino site is a serious violation.  If such actions are carried out systematically, they can lead to the bankruptcy of any casino...  Therefore, BitLusy was forced to take such measures. 

Abusing bonus system or anything is very much effecting negatively to any business. To run a good business especially gambling business the owner/admin of the business should be aware about the abusers and take appropriate steps to avoid those. In this case functionality should be made perfectly and should hire perfect developer.

[stomachgrowls]

Abusing the bonus system of an online casino site is a serious violation.  If such actions are carried out systematically, they can lead to the bankruptcy of any casino...  Therefore, BitLusy was forced to take such measures. 

Abusing bonus system or anything is very much effecting negatively to any business. To run a good business especially gambling business the owner/admin of the business should be aware about the abusers and take appropriate steps to avoid those. In this case functionality should be made perfectly and should hire perfect developer.

They are much aware and would definitely be that minding off  about abuses and exploits which could possibly happen into their bonuses thats why they had made out big overhaul or changes in the site

which clearly be seen basing on the site condition or status at the moment which is on preparing for the huge change which does indicates that they had already sorted or resolved out the  problem
and take measures on avoiding it on happening in on the second time around.

[danadc]

Abusing the bonus system of an online casino site is a serious violation.  If such actions are carried out systematically, they can lead to the bankruptcy of any casino...  Therefore, BitLusy was forced to take such measures. 

Abusing bonus system or anything is very much effecting negatively to any business. To run a good business especially gambling business the owner/admin of the business should be aware about the abusers and take appropriate steps to avoid those. In this case functionality should be made perfectly and should hire perfect developer.

They are much aware and would definitely be that minding off  about abuses and exploits which could possibly happen into their bonuses thats why they had made out big overhaul or changes in the site

which clearly be seen basing on the site condition or status at the moment which is on preparing for the huge change which does indicates that they had already sorted or resolved out the  problem
and take measures on avoiding it on happening in on the second time around.

Well, the errors are learned, now with the help of Royse and all the orientation he can give them will be a great casino, I am very sure that it will happen, you just have to be patient, just imagine having to review all that amount From system abusers is something that takes a long time, and correcting all the bugs that are presented is very difficult, this is a company that like all when they start with Gambling go through many difficulties, it is like all start of a business, company , it is difficult, sometimes losses are recorded, we cannot fall on them for some errors they could have had, and I see with great positivism the future of this platform.

[stomachgrowls]

Abusing the bonus system of an online casino site is a serious violation.  If such actions are carried out systematically, they can lead to the bankruptcy of any casino...  Therefore, BitLusy was forced to take such measures. 

Abusing bonus system or anything is very much effecting negatively to any business. To run a good business especially gambling business the owner/admin of the business should be aware about the abusers and take appropriate steps to avoid those. In this case functionality should be made perfectly and should hire perfect developer.

They are much aware and would definitely be that minding off  about abuses and exploits which could possibly happen into their bonuses thats why they had made out big overhaul or changes in the site

which clearly be seen basing on the site condition or status at the moment which is on preparing for the huge change which does indicates that they had already sorted or resolved out the  problem
and take measures on avoiding it on happening in on the second time around.

Well, the errors are learned, now with the help of Royse and all the orientation he can give them will be a great casino, I am very sure that it will happen, you just have to be patient, just imagine having to review all that amount From system abusers is something that takes a long time, and correcting all the bugs that are presented is very difficult, this is a company that like all when they start with Gambling go through many difficulties, it is like all start of a business, company , it is difficult, sometimes losses are recorded, we cannot fall on them for some errors they could have had, and I see with great positivism the future of this platform.

There's no such thing about perfect system yet on every business there would be always a chance or tendency of fails or errors which would really be a reason for losing money due to that one but it doesnt mean that it would be an enough reason for them to stop.

Plus having the back-up or support of known member of this forum and handles out well in terms of marketing and other means then no surprise that they do able to recover up and now
they are coming back with having more secure site.

Hope there would be no holes once again for people to make abuse so that they wont be completely shutting down their doors.

[dezoel]

Well, the errors are learned, now with the help of Royse and all the orientation he can give them will be a great casino, I am very sure that it will happen, you just have to be patient, just imagine having to review all that amount From system abusers is something that takes a long time, and correcting all the bugs that are presented is very difficult, this is a company that like all when they start with Gambling go through many difficulties, it is like all start of a business, company , it is difficult, sometimes losses are recorded, we cannot fall on them for some errors they could have had, and I see with great positivism the future of this platform.

Casinos could have a bit of a problem when they are first starting out, doesn't mean that they would not be a great place to gamble. Look at primedice/stake for example, they had 2000+ bitcoins stolen from them when they first started out, it was hufflepuff that took it, and he kept on doing that later on as well if I am not wrong. So, they had to learn the hard way how they could get away from all of that and fix the issue and still be a great place.

We are talking about 2000 btc here, even though it wasn't insane amount of money at the time, it was still a huge amount for a new casino and today it is 60 million dollars if they had it. Bitlucy didn't had that much of a trouble, and yet fixed it and will get back soon enough.

[Strongkored]

Casinos could have a bit of a problem when they are first starting out, doesn't mean that they would not be a great place to gamble. Look at primedice/stake for example, they had 2000+ bitcoins stolen from them when they first started out, it was hufflepuff that took it, and he kept on doing that later on as well if I am not wrong. So, they had to learn the hard way how they could get away from all of that and fix the issue and still be a great place.

If I'm not mistaken Roobet also had problems with their initial launch and see how they are now growing and becoming one of the most popular casinos in this forum, so problems are very likely faced at the first launch but the most important thing is the handling of the problems encountered, and Bitlucy keeps trying to make things work

[Wind_FURY]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

Man as far as I know the problem is not from the provider but from users who abuse bonuses , I don't think the problem is this complicated because only by removing the bonus or update the requirements the problem is solved, we don't know what update they did so it will take longer. we'll find out tomorrow and see if there really a change of provider.

The most efficient, and probably the only update a casino can do for fraud prevention is KYC. Fraud/cheat detection through software alone is an unsolvable problem. Cheaters, the smart ones, always find a flaw in the system, then exploit it, causing the developers to patch the flaw, then cheaters find another flaw for the developers to patch again. It's the same problem in everything that involves software.

[Dewi Aries]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

Man as far as I know the problem is not from the provider but from users who abuse bonuses , I don't think the problem is this complicated because only by removing the bonus or update the requirements the problem is solved, we don't know what update they did so it will take longer. we'll find out tomorrow and see if there really a change of provider.

The most efficient, and probably the only update a casino can do for fraud prevention is KYC. Fraud/cheat detection through software alone is an unsolvable problem. Cheaters, the smart ones, always find a flaw in the system, then exploit it, causing the developers to patch the flaw, then cheaters find another flaw for the developers to patch again. It's the same problem in everything that involves software.

Implementing KYC is also not the most efficient way may be efficient to prevent bonus abuse but users don't like KYC
You probably know most gamblers avoid KYC if it is implemented here then Betlucy will lose to compete with casinos without KYC
But if it is applied to some suspicious users then it can be considered and must be explained in the T&C.

[Wind_FURY]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

Man as far as I know the problem is not from the provider but from users who abuse bonuses , I don't think the problem is this complicated because only by removing the bonus or update the requirements the problem is solved, we don't know what update they did so it will take longer. we'll find out tomorrow and see if there really a change of provider.

The most efficient, and probably the only update a casino can do for fraud prevention is KYC. Fraud/cheat detection through software alone is an unsolvable problem. Cheaters, the smart ones, always find a flaw in the system, then exploit it, causing the developers to patch the flaw, then cheaters find another flaw for the developers to patch again. It's the same problem in everything that involves software.

Implementing KYC is also not the most efficient way may be efficient to prevent bonus abuse but users don't like KYC
You probably know most gamblers avoid KYC if it is implemented here then Betlucy will lose to compete with casinos without KYC

But if it is applied to some suspicious users then it can be considered and must be explained in the T&C.

That doesn't make the efficiency and convenience of KYC to prevent cheating and multi-accounting any lesser. But if you believe it's not the most efficient way to handle it, then what would be the more efficient/better way? We have seen none that could replace KYC. We've had seen the same evolution happen with KYC in centralized exchanges. It's just simply easier, more cost-effective, and more efficient for any centralized service.

[ultrloa]

If I were in the management of bitlucy, I would consider switching to an Igaming provider. Then you have everything ready and the software and platforms are 100% reliable and also extensively tested. You can now remove a few mistakes, but those mistakes will come back another time in a different form. You have just started advertising on the forum, now is the time to switch platforms.

Man as far as I know the problem is not from the provider but from users who abuse bonuses , I don't think the problem is this complicated because only by removing the bonus or update the requirements the problem is solved, we don't know what update they did so it will take longer. we'll find out tomorrow and see if there really a change of provider.

The most efficient, and probably the only update a casino can do for fraud prevention is KYC. Fraud/cheat detection through software alone is an unsolvable problem. Cheaters, the smart ones, always find a flaw in the system, then exploit it, causing the developers to patch the flaw, then cheaters find another flaw for the developers to patch again. It's the same problem in everything that involves software.

Implementing KYC is also not the most efficient way may be efficient to prevent bonus abuse but users don't like KYC
You probably know most gamblers avoid KYC if it is implemented here then Betlucy will lose to compete with casinos without KYC

But if it is applied to some suspicious users then it can be considered and must be explained in the T&C.

That doesn't make the efficiency and convenience of KYC to prevent cheating and multi-accounting any lesser. But if you believe it's not the most efficient way to handle it, then what would be the more efficient/better way? We have seen none that could replace KYC. We've had seen the same evolution happen with KYC in centralized exchanges. It's just simply easier, more cost-effective, and more efficient for any centralized service.

If there are users who can buy more identity to use for KYC then they most likely do this but I believe this is not happening on a casino because they will spend more from this and its no sense to make it just to gamble on multiple accounts. I also believe that KYC procedures lessen up the abuse and I see the platform implement this deal up with legit users and not those abuser who intend to do multiple accounts just to abuse their promotions.

[Mr.right85]

Update:

To as many that have been waiting on the BitLucy.com site to come up, it is live already. You can visit and game on. I guess same procedures to a re-registration would apply as before with your previous user and mails in order to have a track back to you original balance before the site upgrade. Hope its wht most of us expect.

I guess Royse777 would be clearing most of us soon. Until then, am happy to let us all know that the site is live again. Visit, register and game on.