⚽ UEFA Euro 2024 in Germany ⚽ - Qualifiers➡Group Stage➡1/8➡QF➡HF➡FINAL

[Juggy777]

To me, the rank of the favorites are:

• 1 France
• 2 Croatia
• 3 Spain
• 4 England
• 5 Italy
• 5 Germany
• 5 Portugal
• 6 Netherlands
• 7 Belgium

✂

I don't know.. are you sure that you want to place Croatia ahead of England? Unlike some of the other posters here, I usually don't underestimate Croatia. But I still believe that at this point France and England are the two strongest teams from the UEFA confederation. I would rather place Croatia at no.3. Spain and Italy are rebuilding their teams after the retirement of their senior players, so it will take some time to catch up with the top-3. BTW, Germany is now #15 in the FIFA rankings, which is three spots below Switzerland. I would think twice before placing them with Italy.

Croatia has become a team that has made a name for itself with its magnificent successes in recent years. They deserve to be in second place after France. Still, there is no big difference between them and England. England has better players from time to time. Also, Croatia has an older cast. After a few years, they can be an average team. Considering all these, England can take place in the ranking after France.

Honestly, in my opinion, the top 5 national teams have equal chances to become the new champions of Europe, with a slight advantage for France.
Spain has a very young team, and England has not yet shown its quality and so far they are unable to go all the way and finally win a trophy.
It seems to me that Germany is undeservedly high on this list, and I think that Croatia now has the necessary experience and knowledge to finally win a trophy.
I also have no confidence in the possibilities of the Netherlands and Belgium.

@Daniel91 Belgium and Netherlands have such a rich diversified squad of player’s and yet they struggle to compete and I just can’t understand why they’re unable to make use of their player’s. Furthermore I see nothing wrong with Croatia being placed second because they have shown that hunger to win and thus I expect them to compete fearlessly in the future too.

[swogerino]

To me, the rank of the favorites are:

• 1 France
• 2 Croatia
• 3 Spain
• 4 England
• 5 Italy
• 5 Germany
• 5 Portugal
• 6 Netherlands
• 7 Belgium

✂

I don't know.. are you sure that you want to place Croatia ahead of England? Unlike some of the other posters here, I usually don't underestimate Croatia. But I still believe that at this point France and England are the two strongest teams from the UEFA confederation. I would rather place Croatia at no.3. Spain and Italy are rebuilding their teams after the retirement of their senior players, so it will take some time to catch up with the top-3. BTW, Germany is now #15 in the FIFA rankings, which is three spots below Switzerland. I would think twice before placing them with Italy.

Croatia has become a team that has made a name for itself with its magnificent successes in recent years. They deserve to be in second place after France. Still, there is no big difference between them and England. England has better players from time to time. Also, Croatia has an older cast. After a few years, they can be an average team. Considering all these, England can take place in the ranking after France.

Honestly, in my opinion, the top 5 national teams have equal chances to become the new champions of Europe, with a slight advantage for France.
Spain has a very young team, and England has not yet shown its quality and so far they are unable to go all the way and finally win a trophy.
It seems to me that Germany is undeservedly high on this list, and I think that Croatia now has the necessary experience and knowledge to finally win a trophy.
I also have no confidence in the possibilities of the Netherlands and Belgium.

@Daniel91 Belgium and Netherlands have such a rich diversified squad of player’s and yet they struggle to compete and I just can’t understand why they’re unable to make use of their player’s. Furthermore I see nothing wrong with Croatia being placed second because they have shown that hunger to win and thus I expect them to compete fearlessly in the future too.

The ranked is based on latest performance of the teams in their latest games,this means that Belgium and Netherlands have not played that well otherwise they would be in better places,Croatia has been on the increase in their performance in games but they have a really big minus and that is the age of the squad,the super stars of Croatia are quite old in age compared to most of other teams and may be this will be their last Euro they will play together,last chance for this golden generation of Croatia to bring a so much desired title in the country.

[hahay]

You can't just win games with Haaland, I mean sure he is a good player but at the end of the day we are not going to see a lot of them all the time, it's just not going to work that well. We need to realize that we are going to end up with some trouble in the end if we keep this up and that's going to end up with a terrible result if we do not know what we are going to do.

I understand that Haaland is great but if you keep giving him the ball and expect him to score then it is going to end up with a loss. Sure he missed some games but the team sucks if that's their only plan, he might be good but he needs a decent team with him in order to win something, without him winning anything at all then we are not going to see a good result.

Yes indeed, after all Haaland is a great player which of course will make Haaland more closely guarded by opposing defenders. Therefore, it will make opposing defenders prioritize stopping Haaland's movements. So yes, from this style of play, then of course teamwork is very much needed and other Norwegian players cannot always depend solely on Haaland's skills and abilities. Also, with this result it seems that it will still be difficult for Norway to qualify, because so far Norway has only gotten four points from the four matches that have been played.

[Sithara007]

Yes indeed, after all Haaland is a great player which of course will make Haaland more closely guarded by opposing defenders. Therefore, it will make opposing defenders prioritize stopping Haaland's movements. So yes, from this style of play, then of course teamwork is very much needed and other Norwegian players cannot always depend solely on Haaland's skills and abilities. Also, with this result it seems that it will still be difficult for Norway to qualify, because so far Norway has only gotten four points from the four matches that have been played.

Being dependent on a single player doesn't always work well. And we have seen this in the case of teams like Portugal, Belgium and even for smaller teams like North Macedonia and Wales. But then, Norway is a very small country and the national league (Eliteserien) is not very popular. Recent downturn in their performance can be attributed to the overall decline due to smaller player pool. Norway is a country that is rapidly ageing, much like Danmark, Germany and Italy. And unlike France and England, they don't have a large migrant population who can inject fresh blood to the national team.

[beerlover]

Yes indeed, after all Haaland is a great player which of course will make Haaland more closely guarded by opposing defenders. Therefore, it will make opposing defenders prioritize stopping Haaland's movements. So yes, from this style of play, then of course teamwork is very much needed and other Norwegian players cannot always depend solely on Haaland's skills and abilities. Also, with this result it seems that it will still be difficult for Norway to qualify, because so far Norway has only gotten four points from the four matches that have been played.

Being dependent on a single player doesn't always work well. And we have seen this in the case of teams like Portugal, Belgium and even for smaller teams like North Macedonia and Wales. But then, Norway is a very small country and the national league (Eliteserien) is not very popular. Recent downturn in their performance can be attributed to the overall decline due to smaller player pool. Norway is a country that is rapidly ageing, much like Danmark, Germany and Italy. And unlike France and England, they don't have a large migrant population who can inject fresh blood to the national team.

They used to be a bit better but they were never a team that had any chance to win euro cup to be fair. When was the last time you saw Norway as the top three team to win any euro or world cup ever? I do not remember that happening anytime in the past, maybe it has happened back before I was alive, that is a possibility but I do not think that they were ever that great. So, with Haaland now on the field, they are still not that great and can't really make that much difference.

I would guess they will win "some" games, but they are not going to win it all, I do not see even a semi-finals for them neither, the very best ever they could hope for is a good draw against weaker teams hopefully, otherwise maybe not even qualify for it as well.

[Sithara007]

They used to be a bit better but they were never a team that had any chance to win euro cup to be fair. When was the last time you saw Norway as the top three team to win any euro or world cup ever? I do not remember that happening anytime in the past, maybe it has happened back before I was alive, that is a possibility but I do not think that they were ever that great. So, with Haaland now on the field, they are still not that great and can't really make that much difference.

I would guess they will win "some" games, but they are not going to win it all, I do not see even a semi-finals for them neither, the very best ever they could hope for is a good draw against weaker teams hopefully, otherwise maybe not even qualify for it as well.

I don't expect Norway to win major FIFA/UEFA competitions such as Euro cup. I don't even expect them to reach the semi-final stage of the Euro Cup. But the fact that they are struggling to even qualify for the main event is a concern for me. And it is so unfair to Erling Håland. But then, Norway is a small country of just 4 million people and they should be proud of whatever they have achieved so far. Anyway, for the current competition, the chances that Norway would be able to qualify are very slim. In all probability, it will be Spain and Scotland who will finish at no.1 and no.2 in Group A.

[doomloop]

Yes indeed, after all Haaland is a great player which of course will make Haaland more closely guarded by opposing defenders. Therefore, it will make opposing defenders prioritize stopping Haaland's movements. So yes, from this style of play, then of course teamwork is very much needed and other Norwegian players cannot always depend solely on Haaland's skills and abilities. Also, with this result it seems that it will still be difficult for Norway to qualify, because so far Norway has only gotten four points from the four matches that have been played.

Being dependent on a single player doesn't always work well. And we have seen this in the case of teams like Portugal, Belgium and even for smaller teams like North Macedonia and Wales. But then, Norway is a very small country and the national league (Eliteserien) is not very popular. Recent downturn in their performance can be attributed to the overall decline due to smaller player pool. Norway is a country that is rapidly ageing, much like Danmark, Germany and Italy. And unlike France and England, they don't have a large migrant population who can inject fresh blood to the national team.

They used to be a bit better but they were never a team that had any chance to win euro cup to be fair. When was the last time you saw Norway as the top three team to win any euro or world cup ever? I do not remember that happening anytime in the past, maybe it has happened back before I was alive, that is a possibility but I do not think that they were ever that great. So, with Haaland now on the field, they are still not that great and can't really make that much difference.

I would guess they will win "some" games, but they are not going to win it all, I do not see even a semi-finals for them neither, the very best ever they could hope for is a good draw against weaker teams hopefully, otherwise maybe not even qualify for it as well.

Here I agree with @Sithara007 as they need to do something if they want to increase their quality and performance, but things are looking not positive for them with limited sources, and secondly they also have no luxury of migrant population which contribute for the better results like we have in many other European countries.

With their currently quality and performance mostly they can stand at third or fourth into their groups for the top competitions and have no fair chance for any quality event few years back things were going good, and they were doing good as well but now in last few years they are completely down and having chances for staying at this level until they have any revolutionary change into their system.

[Daniel91]

To me, the rank of the favorites are:

• 1 France
• 2 Croatia
• 3 Spain
• 4 England
• 5 Italy
• 5 Germany
• 5 Portugal
• 6 Netherlands
• 7 Belgium

✂

I don't know.. are you sure that you want to place Croatia ahead of England? Unlike some of the other posters here, I usually don't underestimate Croatia. But I still believe that at this point France and England are the two strongest teams from the UEFA confederation. I would rather place Croatia at no.3. Spain and Italy are rebuilding their teams after the retirement of their senior players, so it will take some time to catch up with the top-3. BTW, Germany is now #15 in the FIFA rankings, which is three spots below Switzerland. I would think twice before placing them with Italy.

Croatia has become a team that has made a name for itself with its magnificent successes in recent years. They deserve to be in second place after France. Still, there is no big difference between them and England. England has better players from time to time. Also, Croatia has an older cast. After a few years, they can be an average team. Considering all these, England can take place in the ranking after France.

Honestly, in my opinion, the top 5 national teams have equal chances to become the new champions of Europe, with a slight advantage for France.
Spain has a very young team, and England has not yet shown its quality and so far they are unable to go all the way and finally win a trophy.
It seems to me that Germany is undeservedly high on this list, and I think that Croatia now has the necessary experience and knowledge to finally win a trophy.
I also have no confidence in the possibilities of the Netherlands and Belgium.

@Daniel91 Belgium and Netherlands have such a rich diversified squad of player’s and yet they struggle to compete and I just can’t understand why they’re unable to make use of their player’s. Furthermore I see nothing wrong with Croatia being placed second because they have shown that hunger to win and thus I expect them to compete fearlessly in the future too.

The ranked is based on latest performance of the teams in their latest games,this means that Belgium and Netherlands have not played that well otherwise they would be in better places,Croatia has been on the increase in their performance in games but they have a really big minus and that is the age of the squad,the super stars of Croatia are quite old in age compared to most of other teams and may be this will be their last Euro they will play together,last chance for this golden generation of Croatia to bring a so much desired title in the country.

I wouldn't completely agree with you.
Only two key players in the Croatian team are over 30 years old, Modrić at 37 and Perišić at 34. The retirement of these two after the EURO will not mean a big change of generations in the Croatian national team, although of course it will be a certain handicap.
However, Croatia still has a lot of young and talented players in the team like Gvardiol (soon to Manchester City) who is only 21 years old, Kovacic (Manchester City) who is 29 years old, Stanisic (Bayern) who is only 23 years old, Majer (Rennes) who is only 25 years old... so there is no need to worry about the future of the Croatian national football team.
I don't think this is the end of Croatia's golden generation and Croatia will be strong again at the EURO and at the next world cup.

[Docnaster]

To me, the rank of the favorites are:

• 1 France
• 2 Croatia
• 3 Spain
• 4 England
• 5 Italy
• 5 Germany
• 5 Portugal
• 6 Netherlands
• 7 Belgium

✂

I don't know.. are you sure that you want to place Croatia ahead of England? Unlike some of the other posters here, I usually don't underestimate Croatia. But I still believe that at this point France and England are the two strongest teams from the UEFA confederation. I would rather place Croatia at no.3. Spain and Italy are rebuilding their teams after the retirement of their senior players, so it will take some time to catch up with the top-3. BTW, Germany is now #15 in the FIFA rankings, which is three spots below Switzerland. I would think twice before placing them with Italy.

Croatia has become a team that has made a name for itself with its magnificent successes in recent years. They deserve to be in second place after France. Still, there is no big difference between them and England. England has better players from time to time. Also, Croatia has an older cast. After a few years, they can be an average team. Considering all these, England can take place in the ranking after France.

Honestly, in my opinion, the top 5 national teams have equal chances to become the new champions of Europe, with a slight advantage for France.
Spain has a very young team, and England has not yet shown its quality and so far they are unable to go all the way and finally win a trophy.
It seems to me that Germany is undeservedly high on this list, and I think that Croatia now has the necessary experience and knowledge to finally win a trophy.
I also have no confidence in the possibilities of the Netherlands and Belgium.

@Daniel91 Belgium and Netherlands have such a rich diversified squad of player’s and yet they struggle to compete and I just can’t understand why they’re unable to make use of their player’s. Furthermore I see nothing wrong with Croatia being placed second because they have shown that hunger to win and thus I expect them to compete fearlessly in the future too.

The ranked is based on latest performance of the teams in their latest games,this means that Belgium and Netherlands have not played that well otherwise they would be in better places,Croatia has been on the increase in their performance in games but they have a really big minus and that is the age of the squad,the super stars of Croatia are quite old in age compared to most of other teams and may be this will be their last Euro they will play together,last chance for this golden generation of Croatia to bring a so much desired title in the country.

I wouldn't completely agree with you.
Only two key players in the Croatian team are over 30 years old, Modrić at 37 and Perišić at 34. The retirement of these two after the EURO will not mean a big change of generations in the Croatian national team, although of course it will be a certain handicap.
However, Croatia still has a lot of young and talented players in the team like Gvardiol (soon to Manchester City) who is only 21 years old, Kovacic (Manchester City) who is 29 years old, Stanisic (Bayern) who is only 23 years old, Majer (Rennes) who is only 25 years old... so there is no need to worry about the future of the Croatian national football team.
I don't think this is the end of Croatia's golden generation and Croatia will be strong again at the EURO and at the next world cup.

The development in Croatia national team over the recent years has been very impressive to observe. There's a lot of young talents in the team and that's why the performance of the team wouldn't be much affected when the likes of Luka Modric and Ivan Perisic retires from international football.
Though the much talked-about golden generation of Croatia might be leaving the international scene very soon but they surely have good replacements for them

[Mame89]

You can't just win games with Haaland, I mean sure he is a good player but at the end of the day we are not going to see a lot of them all the time, it's just not going to work that well. We need to realize that we are going to end up with some trouble in the end if we keep this up and that's going to end up with a terrible result if we do not know what we are going to do.

I understand that Haaland is great but if you keep giving him the ball and expect him to score then it is going to end up with a loss. Sure he missed some games but the team sucks if that's their only plan, he might be good but he needs a decent team with him in order to win something, without him winning anything at all then we are not going to see a good result.

Erling Haaland is a player who needs support from the team, so if he doesn't have assists, it's hard for him to score goals. he actually won 1 vs 1 with the opposing defender. Only certain teams are rarely able to get this situation.

Being a striker, no matter how good, if he is closely guarded by opposing defenders (can't run freely) it will be difficult to score goals. I don't know what type of good striker to be. But in my opinion, as long as he finishes well and scores a lot of goals, he is considered a good striker. At Man City, even though Aguero and Jesus' skills were better, I saw a very big difference when Haaland was there. He can make the enemy ketar ketir. So it's true, as you said, Halland is a great player, but when playing for his country, he needs support from the team.

[wiss19]

Only two key players in the Croatian team are over 30 years old, Modrić at 37 and Perišić at 34. The retirement of these two after the EURO will not mean a big change of generations in the Croatian national team, although of course it will be a certain handicap.
However, Croatia still has a lot of young and talented players in the team like Gvardiol (soon to Manchester City) who is only 21 years old, Kovacic (Manchester City) who is 29 years old, Stanisic (Bayern) who is only 23 years old, Majer (Rennes) who is only 25 years old... so there is no need to worry about the future of the Croatian national football team.
I don't think this is the end of Croatia's golden generation and Croatia will be strong again at the EURO and at the next world cup.

Yeah I agree, recently we have impressive performance from the Croatia, and they are surely one of the best country which is producing good players in last decade with this advantage they can do better in coming years as well too many impressive players are in different big clubs in UEFA which have bright future and surely with these quality players things are not bad for the Croatian national team as well which have good history in the short time.

Even there is no doubt Modric is the most impressive player, but we will have few more in coming years which will be better or lower from him but surely will give good performance for their team as already mentioned above about few which are doing good in different countries.

[ILuckyGuyI]

Right after France I would favour England for the Euro 2024 title honestly. France are already a clear favourite now but nothing is guaranteed of course. They can always a face a team that know how to play against them to capture the advantage. Can it be England? Why wouldn't they? I watched their most recent head-to-head and England played really decently against them. Maybe France still won but it wasn't an easy one for them.

Watching a finale between France and England in the Euro 2024 would be really interesting to watch. The host country is Germany maybe but they are really in a desperate condition now with the current generation.

[Daniel91]

Right after France I would favour England for the Euro 2024 title honestly. France are already a clear favourite now but nothing is guaranteed of course. They can always a face a team that know how to play against them to capture the advantage. Can it be England? Why wouldn't they? I watched their most recent head-to-head and England played really decently against them. Maybe France still won but it wasn't an easy one for them.

Watching a finale between France and England in the Euro 2024 would be really interesting to watch. The host country is Germany maybe but they are really in a desperate condition now with the current generation.

Why not? Their match at the world cup in Qatar was very even and uncertain.
If Kane had scored a penalty goal at the end of their match to equalize the score, I have a feeling that England would have won in the end.
In my opinion, England were the better opponent for most of the game.
France won thanks to their experience and luck, but it could be a different story at the EURO.
England are now on par with France and can beat them, no doubt about that.
Apart from them, I also consider Italy, Spain and Croatia to be serious candidates for the title.
In any case, a very uncertain and high-quality competition awaits us.

[bering]

Right after France I would favour England for the Euro 2024 title honestly. France are already a clear favourite now but nothing is guaranteed of course. They can always a face a team that know how to play against them to capture the advantage. Can it be England? Why wouldn't they? I watched their most recent head-to-head and England played really decently against them. Maybe France still won but it wasn't an easy one for them.

Watching a finale between France and England in the Euro 2024 would be really interesting to watch. The host country is Germany maybe but they are really in a desperate condition now with the current generation.

England team under Gareth Southgate were playing very stable that after being an the finalist on Euro 2020 England also can able to performing well at world cup and for Euro 2024 qualification matches too England became an the team with the most goal productivity with 15 goals and their defense also very solid because from 4 matches England only conceded 1 goal so they have good opportunity to qualified as group champion

It could be good final match if both teams will met at final match of this competition later because France too has showing impressive performance lately and 12 points from 4 matches has been proven they were too strong on group B however recently England has been make a history for junior tournament that they were can able to being an the champion of Euro U-21 and England even has fantastic records they can gets the trophy without conceded goals so with this result probably will motivate England senior team to following their junior and gets the trophy from this tournament

[LUCKMCFLY]

At an increasingly old age, many other players have started to have no faith in Ronaldo and there have been many cases where one of his own team, if in front of the opponent's goal, prefers to shoot directly rather than having to provide feedback to Ronaldo to have a chance to score.
For the Portuguese national team, I admit Ronaldo has been very meritorious and has provided many goals for Portugal.
If it is said who will surpass Ronaldo's achievements in scoring goals, I have two player options, namely Mbappe and also Haaland.

It's not that, he also has a very bulky temper and ego
you must always play for the team and not for yourself, if you pass the ball to a teammate you have more chances to score, the team comes before you
at least so I think

Yes, I know that Ronaldo has a very big temperament and ego. Not infrequently, he often experiences debates and several small disputes with his team-mates.
But actually Ronaldo is a very great player and he even always manages to take advantage of opportunities to score goals, it's just that there have been several incidents where his team-mates have started not to trust Ronaldo to be able to score goals.
But this is also a natural thing because every player wants to have the opportunity to score goals and become a player who can bring his team to victory.

Keep in that Ronaldo not trusted and often fights with his own colleagues even though he is one of the greatest players.

Well, it is obvious that each person has a way of thinking about CR7, personally if I consider that he is one of the best in the world, what does his temperament have? Yes but why? because he wants to win all the time, which he will say, if you are in the Portugal team you have to give it all, that nothing is left, that your soul remains on the field, as it should be, it is your country that you are representing, And when he sees that his teammates don't give it their all, he gets like that, and I understand it, how many of us haven't gotten like that when we play soccer and see that others don't feel like it? are we happy? maybe when you play for the sake of playing, but in a championship you have to give everything, and that he has played 700 legal games with his country, that he scored the goal, that is worth seeing, for me he is still the best in the world next to Messi , and personally no other player of the quality of the two of them has come out.

Right after France I would favour England for the Euro 2024 title honestly. France are already a clear favourite now but nothing is guaranteed of course. They can always a face a team that know how to play against them to capture the advantage. Can it be England? Why wouldn't they? I watched their most recent head-to-head and England played really decently against them. Maybe France still won but it wasn't an easy one for them.

Watching a finale between France and England in the Euro 2024 would be really interesting to watch. The host country is Germany maybe but they are really in a desperate condition now with the current generation.

Why not? Their match at the world cup in Qatar was very even and uncertain.
If Kane had scored a penalty goal at the end of their match to equalize the score, I have a feeling that England would have won in the end.
In my opinion, England were the better opponent for most of the game.
France won thanks to their experience and luck, but it could be a different story at the EURO.
England are now on par with France and can beat them, no doubt about that.
Apart from them, I also consider Italy, Spain and Croatia to be serious candidates for the title.
In any case, a very uncertain and high-quality competition awaits us.

What they say is very true, I believe that France will always be one of the favorite teams to win any cup, and I also share what they think, Croatia is one of the strongest teams in the world, Italy will undoubtedly show a lot, for me Italian football is eager to do what they always do, win, and we cannot forget the Portugal team, it is a very complete team with good players, with great quality, this is something that could be said that Europe continues to rise level in soccer.

What I like about the teams in Europe is the training and the Schools they have for the children, because they are trained with good technique , that is why European football has always been of a high level, unlike the South American teams. that in a few countries there is excellent quality training, the teams have training on the streets, and it is incredible , it seems that this helps much more, you just have to look at BRAZIL, the case of Anthony, raised in the favelas , where his only objective it was to give his family a better life , now he is in Europe at the MU at the level of the Europeans , excelling from time to time , so the opportunities in Europe should be well taken Advantage of.

[sana54210]

Right after France I would favour England for the Euro 2024 title honestly. France are already a clear favourite now but nothing is guaranteed of course. They can always a face a team that know how to play against them to capture the advantage. Can it be England? Why wouldn't they? I watched their most recent head-to-head and England played really decently against them. Maybe France still won but it wasn't an easy one for them.

Watching a finale between France and England in the Euro 2024 would be really interesting to watch. The host country is Germany maybe but they are really in a desperate condition now with the current generation.

Considering how well they have done so far, I am guessing that everyone is favoring France easily, yet the biggest threat they have is that a lot of their players are young as well, not all of course but plenty of young stars in that team which means that they are going to be favorites for many upcoming tournaments, at least until 2030 world cup.

In the end, France and England has proved everyone how good they were but they could meet again like last time and that could cause them not to face at finals, and that would be a shame but it gives another team a chance. If you meet either of them on the finals, it doesn't matter which team is playing, at the final game it's just one win takes it all situation and anything could happen.

[Sithara007]

Considering how well they have done so far, I am guessing that everyone is favoring France easily, yet the biggest threat they have is that a lot of their players are young as well, not all of course but plenty of young stars in that team which means that they are going to be favorites for many upcoming tournaments, at least until 2030 world cup.

In the end, France and England has proved everyone how good they were but they could meet again like last time and that could cause them not to face at finals, and that would be a shame but it gives another team a chance. If you meet either of them on the finals, it doesn't matter which team is playing, at the final game it's just one win takes it all situation and anything could happen.

There is no doubt that France is the strongest team in UEFA at this point. And only England can give them some sort of a competition. But there is no guarantee that France will be able to maintain their dominance in the long term. We all saw what happened during the 2022 FIFA World Cup finals. Argentina completely dominated the match for the first 80 minutes, as there was hardly any co-ordination between French players. Having good players alone will not work, if the players doesn't bond together as a team.

[OcTradism]

There is no doubt that France is the strongest team in UEFA at this point. And only England can give them some sort of a competition. But there is no guarantee that France will be able to maintain their dominance in the long term. We all saw what happened during the 2022 FIFA World Cup finals.

France have a very strong team but it does not guarantee titles for them. They won World Cup 2018, failed in Euro 2020 and played well in World Cup 2022. They have a very golden generation that can help them to win more titles in Euro and World Cup.

England are a bit far behind France and they need to win one title to be recognized. A runner up in Euro 2020 is not enough. They can hope that a treble winning of Manchester City including Champions League will help their national team gain big success. We see Spain, Germany got a lot of positive impacts from their club success.

Argentina completely dominated the match for the first 80 minutes, as there was hardly any co-ordination between French players. Having good players alone will not work, if the players doesn't bond together as a team.

Argentina will have to face with uncertain future without Messi. He does not want to play for Argentina in another World Cup and even he wants, Argentina have to prepare for a future non-Messi future.

[swogerino]

Considering how well they have done so far, I am guessing that everyone is favoring France easily, yet the biggest threat they have is that a lot of their players are young as well, not all of course but plenty of young stars in that team which means that they are going to be favorites for many upcoming tournaments, at least until 2030 world cup.

In the end, France and England has proved everyone how good they were but they could meet again like last time and that could cause them not to face at finals, and that would be a shame but it gives another team a chance. If you meet either of them on the finals, it doesn't matter which team is playing, at the final game it's just one win takes it all situation and anything could happen.

There is no doubt that France is the strongest team in UEFA at this point. And only England can give them some sort of a competition. But there is no guarantee that France will be able to maintain their dominance in the long term. We all saw what happened during the 2022 FIFA World Cup finals. Argentina completely dominated the match for the first 80 minutes, as there was hardly any co-ordination between French players. Having good players alone will not work, if the players doesn't bond together as a team.

Argentina is a great team developing itself in these last years with Messi as an even greater team,they lost the final of the World Cup in 2014 and they won it in 2022 so their form was excellent and it was the best team of the whole World Cup.In the Euro though France yes it is the most promising team to win the Euro but let's not forget Germany who is the host and is playing in front of their home fans willing to ask a forgiveness for what they achieved in the last years and wanting to be one of the most prestigious teams like they deserve too,then of course England is the best team,let's also not forget a very young age as a team for Spain who are growing together,I think it will be disputed between these teams the Euro 2024.

[Sithara007]

Argentina is a great team developing itself in these last years with Messi as an even greater team,they lost the final of the World Cup in 2014 and they won it in 2022 so their form was excellent and it was the best team of the whole World Cup.In the Euro though France yes it is the most promising team to win the Euro but let's not forget Germany who is the host and is playing in front of their home fans willing to ask a forgiveness for what they achieved in the last years and wanting to be one of the most prestigious teams like they deserve too,then of course England is the best team,let's also not forget a very young age as a team for Spain who are growing together,I think it will be disputed between these teams the Euro 2024.

Argentina will survive without Messi. They have good depth in player pool. But I can't say whether they will be able to defend the trophy in 2026 without Messi. They have a very well balanced team with youngsters like Julián Álvarez, Nicolás González, Alexis Mac Allister and Enzo Fernández providing enough support to veteran players like Ángel Di María, Rodrigo De Paul and Messi. France also have a similar setup, but then the ci-ordination between different payers is not that great. Argentina on the other hand has excellent team cohesion.