AI Spam Report Reference Thread

[Free Market Capitalist]

But why were most of the highly ranked members that were found guilty in the past not tagged at all?

I don't know what specific cases you are referring to.

Many of them were left alone while the newbies or low ranked members are the ones that were tagged?

Again, I don't know what specific cases you are referring to. It may be that we DT members are quicker to take action against someone who has no history on the forum than against someone who has a positive reputation. But if there are repeated cases of copy-pasting AI-generated text, they should be tagged.

Any user that is in a campaign supposed to be tagged red if they are in a campaign, neutral tag is too mild as the punishment of their wrongdoings.

The DT system is decentralized, so what you think, and even what I think, doesn't matter as much as what the majority agrees upon. You can practice it yourself; I've seen that you've sent some feedback. But unless I'm mistaken, I see that you haven't built a trust list. If you believe someone is using the feedback system incorrectly, you should exclude them from your trust list, and conversely, add those who you believe are using it correctly.

You might wanna have a good look at:

LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system

[nutildah]

If you're accusing somebody of something, which you appear to be doing, its on you to produce the evidence to back the accusation. If you can't do it with what's already available then you can't do it, and you don't have a solid accusation.

What are you talking about, this is not enough proof?

1.) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66200415#msg66200415

You're missing the point. The point is you shouldn't ask people to supply you with additional proof or anything that might incriminate themselves. Its an unnecessary invasion of privacy. Its on you to substantiate your accusations, not them. With all due respect, if I had been around here for any number of years and an 18-month-old account demanded I supply them with screenshots, I'd tell them to go f themselves.


If we reverse the order of statements in this post, it becomes easier to understand:

Any user that is in a campaign supposed to be tagged red if they are in a campaign, neutral tag is too mild as the punishment of their wrongdoings.

But why were most of the highly ranked members that were found guilty in the past not tagged at all? Many of them were left alone while the newbies or low ranked members are the ones that were tagged?

Personally speaking, I have sympathy for people who have actually invested time into growing their own account, often for years and now, decades. I have no sympathy for somebody's 47th alt account, bought and resold to a sig campaign farmer who uses it to churn out spam like there's no tomorrow. So I am more likely to be forgiving to accounts with any sort of established personality than I am to accounts that are obviously farmed.

This is when it comes to the issue of AI spam, BTW. When it comes to everything else, I tag more senior accounts than just about anybody.

[Satofan44]

If you're accusing somebody of something, which you appear to be doing, its on you to produce the evidence to back the accusation. If you can't do it with what's already available then you can't do it, and you don't have a solid accusation.

What are you talking about, this is not enough proof?

1.) https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5456516.msg66200415#msg66200415

You're missing the point. The point is you shouldn't ask people to supply you with additional proof or anything that might incriminate themselves. Its an unnecessary invasion of privacy. Its on you to substantiate your accusations, not them. With all due respect, if I had been around here for any number of years and an 18-month-old account demanded I supply them with screenshots, I'd tell them to go f themselves.

While in principle I do agree with you, but I don't in this particular case. The accused, abhiseshakana claims that they are using ChatGPT for different reasons -- but not for copying information directly from ChatGPT. In this case, providing "evidence" as part of cooperation would exonerate the person if the claim is true. Why would it incriminate them unless what they claim is correct? Anyways, the privacy argument is weak for me because the chat history could be given only for the posts that are reported here and it is very unlikely that it would reveal anything about them. Nevertheless, it is possible that the history does not exist anyway. I don't have an account on those tools, and I could not produce evidence of my own use of it were it asked of me -- so that is a possibility to.

Personally speaking, I have sympathy for people who have actually invested time into growing their own account, often for years and now, decades. I have no sympathy for somebody's 47th alt account, bought and resold to a sig campaign farmer who uses it to churn out spam like there's no tomorrow. So I am more likely to be forgiving to accounts with any sort of established personality than I am to accounts that are obviously farmed.

This is when it comes to the issue of AI spam, BTW. When it comes to everything else, I tag more senior accounts than just about anybody.

The key is that they acknowledge their wrongs and stop I guess. However, if they refuse to acknowledge wrongdoing and persist with their activities I hope that you would change your mind regarding any user? In this particular case, I have not left a tag which is rare for me -- I have however stopped interacting to abhiseshakana in my thread and have written about my disappointment. I hope that they change their behavior soon.

We posted at practically the same time with similar reasoning.  

[memehunter]

You're missing the point. The point is you shouldn't ask people to supply you with additional proof or anything that might incriminate themselves.

am I?

Real cooperation would be to immediately post the screenshots of AI chatbot prompt history but of course as a foundational principle of natural law, you can not force some one to produce evidence against himself.  

Its an unnecessary invasion of privacy.

He himself told a story now it is up to him to substantiate that story. We have heard similar story. (Ok may be not too similar but there is a story to justify the high AI detection. The story teller was given the chance to substantiate back then.
Honestly, if there is a chance for him to refute the AI chatbot allegations, my HUMBLE request (NOT AN ORDER) seems the only way out. My concern was if he is telling the truth it might be helpful in the acceptable AI usage discourse. There is nothing like breaching privacy (I am not hacking his account lol). The burden of proof is upon him not us.  

Its on you to substantiate your accusations, not them.

It is been done by so many members already.

With all due respect, if I had been around here for any number of years and an 18-month-old account demanded I supply them with screenshots, I'd tell them to go f themselves.

With due respect, I am glad you get rid of that argument from your chest. you are free to call 'f' you to anybody, it is normal nowadays  


@Satofan44 it is amazing we both almost made the same argument at the same time lol there is some obvious logic in this I guess.

[AuchanX]

Another Copper member, who is posting using AI.
User:  Wildead Casino

Thank you for the welcome and for taking the time to look through both the website and the terms. We appreciate the detailed feedback.

Regarding the name, “Wildead” is not intended to imply anything negative. It is a brand name chosen for its bold and unconventional character, and we understand that different people may interpret it differently.

On the KYC topic, we want to clarify this clearly. We do not request KYC by default and we have not asked users to complete KYC as part of normal gameplay, in facts we have never asked a user for KYC. The reason KYC language exists in the terms is purely for legal and risk management purposes. Like most platforms operating globally, we reserve the right to request verification in exceptional circumstances such as suspected fraud, abuse, chargeback related activity, or regulatory pressure in specific jurisdictions. This does not mean routine KYC or mandatory verification for players.

We understand the concern around using the no KYC description, and the feedback is fair. Our intention is to communicate that KYC is not part of the standard user experience, not that verification could never exist under any circumstances. Transparency is important to us, and we will continue to improve how this is communicated to avoid confusion.

As for gaining attention on the forum, we are not relying on aggressive promotion but we are offer 20 free spins for the first 100 users - just send me a DM with your username. Our focus is on building credibility through a stable platform, clear communication, and delivering what we claim. Over time, we believe trust, consistent performance, and user feedback will speak louder than short term marketing tactics.

We appreciate you raising these points publicly and we are open to continued discussion and feedback as we grow.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 81% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Thank you for sharing your experience and for pointing these things out.

Regarding the registration issue, we are aware that some users experienced delayed email confirmation links. This has already been identified on our side, and improvements are being made to ensure verification emails arrive instantly and do not expire before being used. We appreciate your patience while this was happening.

On USDT deposits, you are correct that we currently support a limited number of networks. BSC is not available at the moment, but it is under consideration. For now, users can deposit USDT using other top tier networks such as solana, ethereum and more, and we will communicate clearly if additional networks are added.

As for Blackjack, we want to clarify that we do offer multiple Blackjack games from several different providers. They may not all be immediately visible unless you open the live casino or table games section, as some providers group Blackjack under different categories. If you did not manage to open them yet, that could explain why they appeared to be missing.

Thank you again for taking the time to give constructive feedback. It helps us improve both the platform and how information is presented to players.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 94% AI
Stealthwriter: 50%
Originality: 100% AI

Thank you for raising this concern, it is a valid topic and we understand why players are cautious about it.

To be completely clear, we have never asked a user for KYC and we do not intend or plan on enforce KYC before withdrawals. The clause in our terms exists purely as a legal safeguard and does not reflect our operational policy. We do not withhold winnings, we do not deny withdrawals based on regional excuses, and we do not force players to forfeit legitimate earnings.

Our approach is simple: if a player plays fairly and follows the rules, they get paid. Protecting player trust is more important to us than short term gain, and we are fully aware that abusing KYC policies is one of the fastest ways for a casino to lose its reputation.

We appreciate you voicing this publicly, and we take transparency and fair treatment of our players very seriously.

Copyleaks: AI not detected
Sapling: AI not detected
Stealthwriter: 71% AI
Originality: 100% AI

Thank you for the honest feedback, we appreciate you sharing your perspective.

When we talk about better bonuses, we are not referring to a long list of short term or high risk promotions. Our focus is on sustainable value for players. We offer up to 25% daily cashback, which is significantly higher than the industry standard. Even our lower cashback tiers are above what most casinos offer, and this applies consistently rather than as a one off promotion. You can read about our cashback tiers here: https://wildead.com/doc/cashback-bonus

We understand that this approach may feel more understated compared to casinos that rely on frequent flashy bonuses. Our goal is to build something stable and fair over time, while continuing to expand both promotions and features based on player feedback.

Thank you for the welcome and the good wishes, and we hope to introduce more things that stand out as the platform continues to evolve.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: AI not detected
Stealthwriter: 67% AI
Originality: 100% AI

[Abelly]

User: Victoria01

BNB is showing strength with a -0.27 correlation to Bitcoin over the past 30 days. While BTC slipped -6.1%, BNB climbed +9.8%, signaling clear outperformance.  On top of that, BNB’s deflationary auto-burn continues to cut supply each quarter, supporting price growth. Near-term targets point to $1,000, with a potential push toward $1,500 if Q4 momentum mirrors past cycles.

MYX has been on massive pump lately. The price has shot up from under $2 just a few weeks ago to around $16–18 now. That price surge pushed its market cap past $1.7 billion, putting it among the biggest names in DeFi. The pump isn’t just numbers either, major exchanges holding rewarding events like the BingX listing carnival with $60,000 rewards as well as trading activity on decentralized exchanges adding up to the surge, showing that retail traders are piling in.

Where do you see BNB and MYX heading next $1000 and $25?

Originality: 99% AI
Sapling: 99% AI
Stealthwriter: 75%
quillbot:27%

Michael Saylor has posted his usual orange dots again, and for anyone who has followed him for years, this is a familiar sign. Most times, those dots show up shortly before Strategy adds more Bitcoin to its holdings.

Data from saylortracker shows the company has now completed 89 Bitcoin purchases, holding about 660,624 BTC, currently valued close to $59 billion. Their average entry price is around $74,000 per BTC, and they are still sitting on roughly an 11% unrealized gain. Between December 1 and 8 alone, Strategy bought another 10,624 BTC at an average price of about $90,615, pushing their holdings to over 3% of Bitcoin’s total supply.

What makes this interesting is the timing. This signal is coming during BingX’s Weekly Featured Trading Championship, now in its second phase. Market moves like this don’t usually happen by accident. They favor traders who are prepared and paying attention.

Events like this reward consistency and smart positioning, not random trades. Since 2020, Strategy has continued to accumulate Bitcoin using share issuance and debt, treating BTC as a long-term treasury asset. So far this year, that approach has produced a Bitcoin yield of over 24%.

Trading isn’t only about charts. Fundamentals matter too. The question is how well traders can use moments like this to position themselves and stay competitive.

Originality: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 77%

Official Trump ($TRUMP) continues to climb, currently trading above $8.32 after a 16% surge from the previous day. Market data shows rising whale accumulation, strong buy pressure, and positive funding rates all pointing to growing investor confidence.

Momentum indicators hint that TRUMP’s bullish run could still have room to grow in the coming days. Same momentum building up $1USDT after getting listed on BingX Futures. Looking at the chart, token is showing early momentum, currently up +7.66% after a volatile 24-hour session and also shows a strong bounce from $0.02612 before facing resistance near $0.045, suggesting active trading interest and early market speculation.                                                                                                                                                                         

Both $TRUMP and $1USDT are showing strong setups, are they likely to be the next breakout?

Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 67%
quillbot:45% Ai

[Lucius]

User: Victoria01
~snip~

AI + shilling, a perfect combination. I've reported one or two posts just because of shilling, and with these reports I hope the mods will give a permanent ban as soon as possible.

[HustleZ]

I've caught this Generic Ai Shitposter who got merited by @OgNasty

User: havok1998

For the Ref.

1.

~snip~

Sapling Ai: 36% Ai generated. ( Inaccurate Because Tokens are more than Those available for basic users)
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated
Stealthwriter: 72% Ai Generated


2.

You've made an excellent point, and honestly, you're spot on about the utility ETFs bring to the table. Covered calls and income-generating strategies like BTCI are genuinely valuable tools that spot Bitcoin simply can't offer. For investors looking to optimize returns and create passive income streams, these products are a game-changer.

That said, there's a beautiful irony here worth noting: the very efficiency and income potential that make ETFs so attractive are also the mechanisms that transformed Bitcoin from a monetary revolution into just another financial instrument. The tools that let you maximize returns are the same tools that tied Bitcoin's fate to traditional markets. So, you're right that ETFs are excellent for finance, but that excellence came at a philosophical cost. Bitcoin gained institutional credibility and financial utility but lost the independence it was designed to have.

This was indeed a great insight , would definitely love to hear more of such views from other people.

Sapling Ai: 100% Ai Generated
GPTZero: 67% Ai Generated, 33% Mixed. So assumed Ai generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident

3.

Absolutely spot on. More income doesn't cure financial woes if habits stay unchecked; it's like fueling a leaky bucket. I've seen it time and again—people get a raise or windfall, and suddenly they're eyeing that new car or extra vacation, only to end up right back where they started.

Studies back this up: households earning 50% more often spend 70% more on lifestyle creep, from fancy cars and dining out to gadgets they don't need, leaving savings flat. The real issue? We humans love instant gratification, but true wealth is quieter—it's tracking every dollar, saying no to impulse buys, and letting compound interest do the heavy lifting.

Real wealth comes from discipline: start by tracking your spending for a month, practice delayed gratification (wait 30 days before big purchases), and invest steadily in low-cost index funds. Shift your mindset first—budget smart, automate savings into retirement or investments—and watch money grow over time. Fix the habits, and the prosperity sticks around, building a future you control.

Sapling Ai: 99.9% Ai generated
GPTZero: 100% Ai Generated
Originality Ai: 100% Confident
Bro is sharing big guides Expecting Merit, And believes we all are fools to not know That it is Ai Generated. I believe the user has changed hands or lost his mind because he is an old user but recently started posting Using Ai after a long Inactivity period And Has posted 2 big "guides" in one day. He became active Today.

Edit:

[Abelly]

User: Progress101

This is a well thought out framework, especially for people who keep postponing Bitcoin accumulation because they feel they must completely finish building an emergency fund first. I agree with the idea of making progress on both simultaneously, as long as survival money remains protected. The key point here is the principle: emergency funds must stay liquid and stress-free, while Bitcoin should be treated as a long-term reserve, not something to be touched during short-term challenges (very important to note)

Where I would add emphasis is on flexibility and income growth. Fixed allocation rules work better for stable incomes, but for alot of people, especially in volatile economies, adaptability matters more than strict ratios. DCA and starting small are strong habits because they remove emotion and promote consistency over time. When paired with deliberate efforts to increase income, this approach becomes far more sustainable and reduces the temptation to compromise either the emergency fund or long-term Bitcoin goals.

Originality: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 71% AI

Absolutely. It is very easy to overlook small beginnings, but that is often where your real growth starts from. No one becomes successful overnight, every big achievement begins with a single step. With Bitcoin or any investment in life, you don’t have to start with a whole unit. Even small, consistent contributions matter.

Over time, those small steps add up, and before you know it, you will be surprised at how far you have come. The most important thing is to start, stay consistent, and be patient. Remember, progress is progress no matter how small, and each step forward is a step closer to your goals. Don’t let the fear of starting small hold you back from building something meaningful.

Sapling: 100 AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Originality: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 75% AI

Baba say government don provide conducive environment and job opportunities, like for Nigeria abi you mean generally as government? Because right now, I no go lie you, I no fit even travel freely through some parts of this country without my family panicking small. The fear alone na enough stress on its own.
And for jobs, bro, I just graduate and na only me know wetin my eyes dey see here. Every application na long story, normally opportunities here na either connection or luck. Even the so-called 'empowerment programs' wey government dey advertise mostly end up with the same circle of people. Meanwhile, the average youth dey hustle every day just to survive.

I first look the topic and the local board before i reply, omo bro say government don provide all these things (security, job opportunities, conducive environment).... i don die my fans. Because which Nigeria we dey talk about exactly? The same one wey light no dey steady, insecurity dey rise, and cost of living don turn competition? No be like say we Nigerians lazy o, we just dey do everything with zero support, the streets dey cry every day, people dey relocate because dem no see hope again. Until the government stops talking about what they’ve “provided” and starts addressing what’s actually missing, things no go change.

Omo yes o, the government is to be blamed. Because when people dey struggle for basic needs like light, water, and safety, basically e means say leadership never still reach where e suppose reach.

Copyleaks: 100% AI
Sapling: 99 AI
Stealthwriter: 75% AI

[Ultegra134]

Another user, mostly active on the Nigerian board.

User: Progress101

Post 1.

This is a well thought out framework, especially for people who keep postponing Bitcoin accumulation because they feel they must completely finish building an emergency fund first. I agree with the idea of making progress on both simultaneously, as long as survival money remains protected. The key point here is the principle: emergency funds must stay liquid and stress-free, while Bitcoin should be treated as a long-term reserve, not something to be touched during short-term challenges (very important to note)

Where I would add emphasis is on flexibility and income growth. Fixed allocation rules work better for stable incomes, but for alot of people, especially in volatile economies, adaptability matters more than strict ratios. DCA and starting small are strong habits because they remove emotion and promote consistency over time. When paired with deliberate efforts to increase income, this approach becomes far more sustainable and reduces the temptation to compromise either the emergency fund or long-term Bitcoin goals.

GPTZero: 94% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 71% AI

Post 2.

Well now this is a very balanced take. Too often we see risk being framed as something unique to crypto, but as we know in reality, inaction carries its own risk, especially in an environment where inflation keeps eroding purchasing power and traditional opportunities are shrinking. The real issue, as you pointed out, is unfamiliarity and lack of education. learning reduces uncertainty, i mean it does not eliminate risk, but it helps you take calculated risks instead of emotional ones. alot of people missed early opportunities simply because they waited to feel “safe,” and by the time clarity came, prices had already adjusted. Starting small, accumulating gradually, and prioritizing knowledge is a far more sustainable approach than waiting indefinitely.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Copyleaks: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 75% AI

Post 3.

Well, you have explained this very well, especially the separation between value storage and liquidity for daily life. Treating Bitcoin as a long-term savings option while relying on stable income streams for expenses removes a lot of emotional pressure from decision-making. The DCA approach also makes sense because it builds discipline and reduces the temptation to react to short-term price movements. A lot of people get it wrong by mixing survival money with long-term holdings. Once your bills and responsibilities depend on BTC price action, panic and overtrading becomes almost inevitable. Financial freedom is more realistic when income generation funds daily life, and Bitcoin remains a protected reserve that benefits from time, not constant attention.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 67% AI

[nutildah]

You're missing the point.

am I?

Yes, and you're re-treading what we already went over. So now I'm kindly asking you to refrain from asking accounts you are making accusations against to supply you with screenshots, or anything. Its not just rude but lazy. For the 3rd time, its on you to produce the evidence. They owe you nothing.

[Satofan44]

You're missing the point.

am I?

Yes, and you're re-treading what we already went over. So now I'm kindly asking you to refrain from asking accounts you are making accusations against to supply you with screenshots, or anything. Its not just rude but lazy. For the 3rd time, its on you to produce the evidence. They owe you nothing.

For the 3rd time, it is evidence that would exonerate the accused and not convict him. Should the prosecution produce evidence that will exonerate the accused?   Read my previous post, it seems to be that there was a misunderstanding between intents and what was actually asked for. You are absolutely right for evidence that would confirm an accusation, the defendant does not need to produce that to incriminate himself. That is however not what is being asked.  

There is nothing wrong with the statement "If you have evidence that supports you defense, bring it forth".   If the story is true, of course I want an user to bring forth reasons for me to believe them.

[nutildah]

For the 3rd time, it is evidence that would exonerate the accused and not convict him.

For the 4th time, it doesn't matter. Don't ask people you are making accusations against to give you anything, regardless of whether you think it will help or hurt them. You're not a cop. Nobody owes you anything, and its not a silent admission of guilt if they don't provide you with what you ask.

This isn't a court, nor would I believe anyone here has any actual professional experience with legal proceedings. I do believe in basic decency, and that its easy for people to overinflate their sense of self importance if left unchecked.

[Satofan44]

For the 3rd time, it is evidence that would exonerate the accused and not convict him.

For the 4th time, it doesn't matter. Don't ask people you are making accusations against to give you anything, regardless of whether you think it will help or hurt them. You're not a cop. Nobody owes you anything, and its not a silent admission of guilt if they don't provide you with what you ask.

This isn't a court, nor would I believe anyone here has any actual professional experience with legal proceedings. I do believe in basic decency, and that its easy for people to overinflate their sense of self importance if left unchecked.

And what exactly is one supposed to say in cases like this if one wants to help someone defend themselves? Don't bring forth evidence if you have something that could help your case? Keep silent?

I think the intents of the posters here are confused. I was disappointed by this case when it appeared, I did not expect him to be an AI user. If he has things to prove his story, I'll gladly take a look at it but I or others are not even supposed to tell him to bring anything forth? I don't get your perspective at all here. Don't tell me I am not supposed to help anyone, I am not a cop.   I was glad to interact with this user prior to this case, of course I want them back to normal.

Isn't this just memehunter giving his opinion on what constitutes "cooperation" for him? Different members will have different personal thresholds for what constitutes cooperating on a case for them. For some just telling a good story will be enough, but for me it isn't. Stories is exactly how serial scammer AB de Royse777 managed to survive everything that he has done so far.

[nutildah]

And what exactly is one supposed to say in cases like this if one wants to help someone defend themselves? Don't bring forth evidence if you have some that could help your case? Keep silent?

Of course not. There's a difference between someone presenting evidence on their own accord and someone asking you to produce it. Look at the way the request is phrased, its not really even an honest request:

Please post the screenshots of prompt/s you gave to AI chatbots (with date and time). It seems that you are clearly over representing your posting abilities.

I say its "not really honest" because it is far too broad. What is even being asked for? Its like a court issuing a subpoena for someone's entire ChatGPT history, except this isn't a court and nobody has any real power. Its just needlessly invasive.

However, I don't use GPT Chat to answer a topic, let alone copy and paste from GPT Chat, as that would be highly inappropriate.

I use GPT Chat to:
- Look up bibliographical references/reliable references
- Look up the meaning or significance of satire that uses ironic language that I'm unfamiliar with
- Double-check the chronology of events

"So why would you take their word for it?" I don't necessarily take their word for it, but since you are the one making the accusation, its on you to prove he's lying, not him.

but I or others are not even allowed to tell him to bring anything forth? I don't get your perspective at all here
...
Isn't this just memehunter giving his opinion on what constitutes "cooperation" for him?

Alright well I can't stop you from doing what you want, obviously. But I will suggest everyone ignore your requests. Why? because its a rude practice and an unnecessary invasion of privacy, and if you have to resort to it, it means the case for whatever you're trying to prove is weak... you're either too lazy to connect the dots on your own or you had no case to begin with.

I believe this is a standard we should hold every type of forum investigation to.

[memehunter]

If you can't do it with what's already available then you can't do it, and you don't have a solid accusation.

For sure I can do it with what is already available (which is enough) but when reputed members immediately vouch for the account in question in some indirect sense, a discourse (in case the story is validated and true) is needed which is what my prime objective anyway.

its easy for people to overinflate their sense of self importance if left unchecked.

I think it applies to everyone and I am confident it will never be left unchecked from my side. 
It seems you think I do not have enough respect (or I do not understand the DT obligations quite yet) for members who have invested years on this forum. Well let me tell you it is quite the opposite. This respect has nothing to do with the discourse what we are having here.

Its like a court issuing a subpoena

NO, it sounded like that to you (may be for above mentioned reason). I was looking for a worthy technical discourse.

Now this is to @abhiseshakana (ofc in the politest sense possible for me), do you actually care about this discourse? You have not done anything to counter the trust feedback left by @Free Market Capitalist (rightly) which seems 'silent admission'. Ofc, you can choose to not reply but until then I am tagging you as an AI spammer.
and I will have my own wordings based on my judgement,

if someone needs to leave a tag for this I would just say "they claim to use Google Translate for their English posts", or something like it. Am of course open to other opinions.

[Ultegra134]

Junior Member using AI in a bunch of his posts. He occasionally adds a sentence or two of his own.

User: Firstfrost

Post 1.

My friends and I have been talking about which crypto might be undervalued right now. Our picks: XRP, BGB, ETH, SOL, and SUI.

1. XRP – SEC clarity could bring big investors, plus growing use in payments.
2. BGB – Linked to a top exchange, with burns, events like crazy48h phases and perks driving value.
3. ETH – Deflationary with staking/burns; upgrades and ETFs could push price up.
4. SOL – High trading and developer activity, strong on-chain numbers.
5. SUI – Fast adoption in gaming/DeFi, low fees, growing TVL.

What's your list or opinion..
Crypto is risky, these are just general observations this month. So NFA

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 100% AI
Undetectable: 73% AI

Post 2.

As one of the last launches of this year, here's how people are reacting to theoriq tge.. scrolling through X, the reaction has been mostly positive. People are talking about how the team rewarded long-term contributors, and the tech behind autonomous AI agents in DeFi is getting a lot of attention. Many are happy with the allocations, saying it's a "clean" launch that values real contribution over hype. Some participants from earlier this year got rewards worth $1.5k–$5k+, and presale buyers are seeing easy 2x gains. This is also difficult to get these days and recent launches have seen presale even in losses, I don't want to mention names ahah.

For now, The focus is now on staking, launchpool on exchanges and AlphaVault boosts, with 22k daily $THQ emissions and 3x boosts on AlphaVault (ETH yields). The mainnet is live, and people are excited about agent swarms for on-chain DeFi execution. There's a vibe of optimism, with users crediting the team for delivering in a tough market. Ongoing campaigns like the Kaito yapper event are also driving engagement, with users pushing leaderboards to get rewards. Overall, the community feels positive, and it's shifting focus to building and positioning for the future. Let's see if they live up to their expectations

Are you lucky to get in on the airdrop??

With very few corrections on GPTZero, such as adding a full stop (.) or deleting the last sentence he has written, AI usage is blown up to 75%
GPTZero: 74% AI
Stealthwriter: 67% AI
Undetectable: 50% AI

Post 3.

The crypto market seems different this week. Bitcoin’s rebounding over $110K didn’t come with the usual hype or wild volatility, just steady buying and quiet accumulation. ETH is also holding around $4K and even smaller caps seem to be regaining balance. It’s starting to look like a maturing phase where traders are learning patience instead of chasing every candle.  Overall sentiment feels more disciplined than it’s been in months.

GPTZero: 100% AI
Stealthwriter: 80% AI
Undetectable: 99% AI

[FinneysTrueVision]

This Legendary member participating in the HelloCasino signature campaign thought they could go unnoticed by AI detection tools if they simply removed the commas from their posts, but this is not the case.

Their BPIP profile shows that they were banned for almost 5 years. They have also sent a lot of merits to alt account farmers, so it wouldn’t surprise me if they were part of a farm, although I haven’t looked into that.

User: Zadicar

Post #1:

AI can definitely sharpen how someone looks at information but it does not change the nature of gambling itself. What it really does is reduce ignorance not remove uncertainty. When you use AI to pull historical data trends injuries line movement or team performance you are simply becoming more informed than someone betting blindly. That alone can improve decision quality but it does not create control over outcomes. Sports are living systems and no dataset can fully capture human behavior pressure or randomness that unfolds during a match.

The danger starts when people confuse better information with guaranteed results. AI models are built on patterns and probabilities and probabilities do not promise anything on a single event. A model can be correct 60 percent of the time and still lose badly if variance hits the wrong way. This is where many bettors get frustrated because they expect logic to overpower chance. Gambling does not reward logic consistently it only occasionally aligns with it.

originality.ai - 100% confident that’s AI
copyleaks - 100% AI content found

Post #2:

Money has a way of exposing parts of relationships that are usually hidden when everything is simple and informal. It is not always the money itself that causes the damage but what it reveals about values expectations and communication. When friends move from casual trust into structured financial commitments the rules change even if nobody clearly defines them. That shift alone can create pressure that friendship was never designed to handle.
Friendship works well on goodwill flexibility and emotional understanding. Business requires clarity accountability and sometimes tough decisions that do not feel friendly at all. When profits losses or control enter the picture people often discover they were never aligned in the first place.

copyleaks - 100% AI content found
gptzero.me - 100% AI generated

Post #3:

Many people overlook which is that cost in gambling is not only measured in money but also in time and mental energy. Someone might stay within a small budget and still slowly drift into a bad place if gambling starts consuming too much attention or becomes the main way they cope with stress. When that happens the activity stops being light entertainment and starts shaping habits and moods which is where problems usually begin.
Another issue is expectations. The moment gambling is treated as a way to fix something whether it is money problems boredom or emotional pressure it becomes dangerous. Expecting returns creates tension and that tension is exactly what fuels frustration after losses. When expectations are low and clear losses are already accepted the emotional swings are smaller and people walk away more easily. That is why two people can lose the same amount and react completely differently.

gptzero.me - 100% AI generated
decopy.ai - 68% AI
undetectable.ai - 82% AI probability

[Kazkaz27]

It seems to me that @howardsentell is attempting to argue that it is better that he (and other members using AI) are providing more sophisticated posts and better content that present the information in a better way rather than the negative that they happen to be using AI to put together their posts.

If he thinks that. So he should also think the forum is worthless or not "sophisticated" enough and shouldnt simply join the forum. He should just have a convo with an Ai which for him ahould be more useful and interesting. It is simple that the user is a generic shitposter who thinks he will Just copy/paste from an Ai and will Earn from Signatures without doing something. He thinks we are fools and dont understand anything and he can easily farm an account and Earn.

It’s projecting to think that because someone defends the use of AI to assume that person thinks the forum is worthless or not sophisticated. I defend the use of AI when it’s used to enhance an original thought/idea or to help speed mindless tasks alone. AI can certainly help a person make a more informed/sophisticated post/reply. It should be used to expand human consciousness. Unfortunately, many do not use it this way. It should not be relied on 100%. It’s a very effective tool though nonetheless and anyone who boycotts it will be left in the stone age.

[Karl_3000]

It’s projecting to think that because someone defends the use of AI to assume that person thinks the forum is worthless or not sophisticated. I defend the use of AI when it’s used to enhance an original thought/idea or to help speed mindless tasks alone. AI can certainly help a person make a more informed/sophisticated post/reply. It should be used to expand human consciousness. Unfortunately, many do not use it this way. It should not be relied on 100%. It’s a very effective tool though nonetheless and anyone who boycotts it will be left in the stone age.

No matter the excuses, I hate people that use AI to post on a forum. It is called a forum, an online place where people meet to gain from each other. It should not be a place for AI and spamming, this is not convincing enough at all. The people that I have gained knowledge from on this forum are not using AI to post. I do not know the reason AI is not discouraged on this forum.