[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency

[smooth]

If any of this has any relevance to Monero, I can't find it. Why are you posting about darknote here?

Probably because jwinterm brought it up and subjected the topic to extensive criticism:

My mistake. I thought the comment of mine to which dNote replied was on the dNote thread. However, it was indeed here, in reply to jwinterm.

[1715689448]

1715689448

[1715689448]

1715689448

[onetwentyfive]

Hi, quick question..

I had 17.771058420000 XMR in my wallet, and I transferred 17.67 to Polo. Immediately after I transferred it said:

balance: 0.001058420000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

which is correct. When I refreshed and saw the transfer go through (purple text) it then said:

balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

What happened to the 0.001058420000? Believe me, I'm not sweating 0.001058420000 XMR. I'm just curious, is a tiny balance like that just zeroed out? If so, I will be much more precise in the future with my transfer amounts to make sure that nothing is lost.

Thank you, and continue to kick ass!

[jwinterm]

Hi, quick question..

I had 17.771058420000 XMR in my wallet, and I transferred 17.67 to Polo. Immediately after I transferred it said:

balance: 0.001058420000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

which is correct. When I refreshed and saw the transfer go through (purple text) it then said:

balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

What happened to the 0.001058420000? Believe me, I'm not sweating 0.001058420000 XMR. I'm just curious, is a tiny balance like that just zeroed out? If so, I will be much more precise in the future with my transfer amounts to make sure that nothing is lost.

Thank you, and continue to kick ass!

I think it got added to your tx fee, since it would be unspendable with current fee structure anyway. It is kinda weird that it showed up as locked balance, but then disappeared, I agree...

[pandacoin]

Monero is number 2 with 13578 votes on Cryptsy voting list.

[onetwentyfive]

Hi, quick question..

I had 17.771058420000 XMR in my wallet, and I transferred 17.67 to Polo. Immediately after I transferred it said:

balance: 0.001058420000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

which is correct. When I refreshed and saw the transfer go through (purple text) it then said:

balance: 0.000000000000, unlocked balance: 0.000000000000

What happened to the 0.001058420000? Believe me, I'm not sweating 0.001058420000 XMR. I'm just curious, is a tiny balance like that just zeroed out? If so, I will be much more precise in the future with my transfer amounts to make sure that nothing is lost.

Thank you, and continue to kick ass!

I think it got added to your tx fee, since it would be unspendable with current fee structure anyway. It is kinda weird that it showed up as locked balance, but then disappeared, I agree...

Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?

[jwinterm]

Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?

Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time).

[smooth]

Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?

Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time).

Agree however in answer to the original question, you don't want your pool to do that. You want the minimum number of transactions sent to you since that will make it easiest for you to spend at the lowest cost. So you should request that your pool improve their payouts or switch.

[iCEBREAKER]

Monero is number 2 with 13578 votes on Cryptsy voting list.

It almost looks bad for them not adding Monero now

"Welcome to Craptsy - Where we support all manner of Shitcoins but not a major coin like Monero unless you bribe us!"

[OrientA]

Monero is number 2 with 13578 votes on Cryptsy voting list.

It almost looks bad for them not adding Monero now

"Welcome to Craptsy - Where we support all manner of Shitcoins but not a major coin like Monero unless you bribe us!"

That is the spirit of Craptsy.

[samaricanin]

These are scamers monero.rs,pool not working anymore

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=791015.msg9063025#msg9063025

[onetwentyfive]

Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?

Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time).

Agree however in answer to the original question, you don't want your pool to do that. You want the minimum number of transactions sent to you since that will make it easiest for you to spend at the lowest cost. So you should request that your pool improve their payouts or switch.

Agreed, I did think it was unusual. I've reached out to them with the suggestion. Thanks for the prompt replies.

The one question remains: Will a high # of transactions (in my case 46 to transfer 17.6XMR) cause the transfer to take longer? Or was it just a glitch on Polo's side that made it take 24 hours to arrive?

[smooth]

Aha, yes.. I looked up the transaction ID and the fee was 0.101058420000. It did take a hella long time to go through too, like over 24 hours. I thought maybe because there was a lot of transactions in the transfer. The pool I'm on pays in odd numbers, not like most pools where it's a static .3 or .5. It pays like .39441698 and that comes through as 2 transactions: .30000000 and .09441698. I just counted, it was 46 transactions. Would that make it take a long time? Should I break it down into smaller amounts?

Nah, probably want to send in as large of tx as possible, to minimize impact of 0.1 fee and additional dust fee. Might want to try mining at a different pool that pays out in slightly larger and more regular amounts though (like 0.5 every time).

Agree however in answer to the original question, you don't want your pool to do that. You want the minimum number of transactions sent to you since that will make it easiest for you to spend at the lowest cost. So you should request that your pool improve their payouts or switch.

Agreed, I did think it was unusual. I've reached out to them with the suggestion. Thanks for the prompt replies.

The one question remains: Will a high # of transactions (in my case 46 to transfer 17.6XMR) cause the transfer to take longer? Or was it just a glitch on Polo's side that made it take 24 hours to arrive?

It can take somewhat longer (since the transaction is larger, so might take a while to fit into a block -- normally this happens within a few minutes), but 24 hours is extreme. That does indeed sound like a glitch on their side.

[novag]

Monero will grow price and difficult!

[bigj]

This is a great time to BUY Monero :-) It won't get much cheaper.

[superresistant]

This is a great time to BUY Monero :-) It won't get much cheaper.

You may be right, it doesn't seems to go lower.
I've been waiting for a long time with my buy orders but no dump is happening.
Time to buy then.

[David Latapie]

We clarified the situation regarding the funding on the moderated thread. Should lower the concerns.

[Techone]

This is a great time to BUY Monero :-) It won't get much cheaper.

The time and price seems right to buy. Indeed.
When the GUI wallet hits the shelf and Craptsy lists the coin, many wait-for-good-opportunity folks will be sorry   
Just think of the guy who spent 10000BTC to buy a pizza back in 2010...

If you already got some BTC, you can sit on it while heading for two figure numbers in value or you can invest in an altcoin of your trust.
Not long until one XMR has a higher value than one LTC or DRK.

[Nekomata]

XMR is the future.

[TheUniporn]

ccedk opened the monero markets

[NewLiberty]

ccedk opened the monero markets

That was pretty fast, good for them.