GVanelly
Member
 Offline
Activity: 247
Merit: 10
|
 |
September 02, 2014, 04:40:33 PM |
|
So since FCN is now delisted from poloniex it's time to explore new exchanges. Seems like everybody forgot about this voting https://comkort.com/vote#FCNCan't find FCN... is it even there? Too many coins... Looks like it's not there. Anyhow, i made it to that site and could not leave without voting. So my vote went to DafuqCoin  Oh god why I went there too. Was a hard choice, but i voted for sexcoin. Thay made a friggin sexcoin. |
|
|
|
Lyomon86
Member
Offline
Activity: 96
Merit: 10
|
|
September 02, 2014, 04:51:03 PM |
|
So since FCN is now delisted from poloniex it's time to explore new exchanges. Seems like everybody forgot about this voting https://comkort.com/vote#FCNCan't find FCN... is it even there? Too many coins... Looks like it's not there. Anyhow, i made it to that site and could not leave without voting. So my vote went to DafuqCoin Oh god why I went there too. Was a hard choice, but i voted for sexcoin. Thay made a friggin sexcoin. Soon it will become new rule 34 but rephrased. Remember rule 34? "If it exists, there is porn of it." So soon it will sound like "If it exists, there is coin called it's name." |
|
|
|
|
fatnlovelyfred
Member
Offline
Activity: 63
Merit: 10
|
|
September 03, 2014, 10:14:16 AM |
|
I think it's more about poloniex than the coin, eg quazarcoin was also delisted but then hitbtc added it now.. so I think it's a question of giving cnote coins publicity in right places which are reliable, that'll help reputation now. not sure if FCN is on the hitbtc voting but could be worth a go! Its just a shame to see technologically strong coins suffer from silly circumstances...  "Technologically strong" is the key word here. And i absolutely agree. |
|
|
|
|
|
djarot
|
|
September 03, 2014, 12:13:55 PM |
|
So since FCN is now delisted from poloniex it's time to explore new exchanges. Seems like everybody forgot about this voting https://comkort.com/vote#FCNI think it's more about poloniex than the coin, eg quazarcoin was also delisted but then hitbtc added it now.. so I think it's a question of giving cnote coins publicity in right places which are reliable, that'll help reputation now. not sure if FCN is on the hitbtc voting but could be worth a go! Its just a shame to see technologically strong coins suffer from silly circumstances... Tha's what i still don't understand. Coin is well mantained, has a formed community, and suddenly gets delisted from major exchange. I'm just thinking about Poloniex's following moves. Are they going to replace delisted coins? Sure they will... Look what's going on! New coins are mushrooming all over! I think the mushrooming has to be backed up by some tech, obviously cnote is not the only way forward but you gotta have some coins that can prove their foundation before poloniex will feel sheepish and do u-turn......or realise it's missing out on making a name for itself, if it's got staying power as an exchange (thats gotta be something to think about too...) I think it's more about poloniex than the coin, eg quazarcoin was also delisted but then hitbtc added it now.. so I think it's a question of giving cnote coins publicity in right places which are reliable, that'll help reputation now. not sure if FCN is on the hitbtc voting but could be worth a go! Its just a shame to see technologically strong coins suffer from silly circumstances... "Technologically strong" is the key word here. And i absolutely agree. To be honest as long as its even got support of devs and one decent exchange, that is half the battle to making it desirable...if anything FCN community is lucky right now, when you look around at various other alts! |
|
|
|
|
Unbelive
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
Invest & Earn: https://cloudthink.io
|
|
September 03, 2014, 12:14:59 PM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
|
|
|
|
|
slb
|
|
September 03, 2014, 01:42:10 PM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. |
|
|
|
|
Zickafa
|
|
September 04, 2014, 05:02:49 AM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. |
|
|
|
|
Karn
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 434
Merit: 250
"The mass of men lead lives of quiet desperation."
|
|
September 04, 2014, 05:20:30 AM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. |
“But it's a poor fellow who can't take his pleasure without asking other people's permission.” ― Hermann Hesse, Steppenwolf
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
|
September 04, 2014, 06:03:27 AM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. At least they've not delisted the 'stable' XMR, lol. |
|
|
|
|
|
Zickafa
|
|
September 04, 2014, 03:23:11 PM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. At least they've not delisted the 'stable' XMR, lol. I still want to know. People who work there, their desicions have to be based on smth. Or they are like: hey i don't like this coin, let's get rid of it. *posting announcement on the main page* |
|
|
|
|
BreakingBAD
Member
Offline
Activity: 93
Merit: 10
|
|
September 05, 2014, 05:15:24 PM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. At least they've not delisted the 'stable' XMR, lol. I still want to know. People who work there, their desicions have to be based on smth. Or they are like: hey i don't like this coin, let's get rid of it. *posting announcement on the main page* I was thiniking the same way. But that is what they did, and i don't think we will ever be told why. |
|
|
|
|
devphp
|
|
September 05, 2014, 05:22:44 PM |
|
Guess amphibian is back to vacation |
|
|
|
|
hakertajniak
Member
Offline
Activity: 504
Merit: 10
YOUC | John McAfee Supports
|
|
September 19, 2014, 07:23:39 AM |
|
Dead coin already?
|
|
|
|
|
TimeHacker
|
|
September 19, 2014, 07:43:29 AM |
|
Dead coin already?
not yet  |
|
|
|
little_kristof
Member
Offline
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
|
|
September 19, 2014, 08:35:26 AM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. At least they've not delisted the 'stable' XMR, lol. I still want to know. People who work there, their desicions have to be based on smth. Or they are like: hey i don't like this coin, let's get rid of it. *posting announcement on the main page* I was thiniking the same way. But that is what they did, and i don't think we will ever be told why. It could be small volume but this is not very clear, so it is not fair. They should give some statement. |
|
|
|
|
Kloks
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
|
|
September 30, 2014, 09:49:46 AM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. At least they've not delisted the 'stable' XMR, lol. I still want to know. People who work there, their desicions have to be based on smth. Or they are like: hey i don't like this coin, let's get rid of it. *posting announcement on the main page* I was thiniking the same way. But that is what they did, and i don't think we will ever be told why. It could be small volume but this is not very clear, so it is not fair. They should give some statement. Any news from Poloniex? |
|
|
|
|
bearishtrader
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 51
Merit: 0
|
|
October 01, 2014, 04:21:47 AM |
|
why was FCN removed from Poloniex?
Small volume that don't cover the expenses or polo is related to hitbtc. I might be wrong but i dont think delisted coins had the lowest volume. So the criteria by which coins were sorted stil remains unclear to me. Me to lol who knows why they do what they do. At least they've not delisted the 'stable' XMR, lol. I still want to know. People who work there, their desicions have to be based on smth. Or they are like: hey i don't like this coin, let's get rid of it. *posting announcement on the main page* I was thiniking the same way. But that is what they did, and i don't think we will ever be told why. It could be small volume but this is not very clear, so it is not fair. They should give some statement. Any news from Poloniex? I still have 30 or so FCN stashed away in my wallet. (crosses fingers) |
|
|
|
|
|
firedoner
|
|
October 02, 2014, 12:50:43 PM |
|
are there any working exchanges at all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rytir_fik
|
|
October 02, 2014, 05:02:50 PM |
|
are there any working exchanges at all?
I think hitbtc.com |
|
|
|
|
firedoner
|
|
October 13, 2014, 05:14:49 PM |
|
price increase on hitbtc
|
|
|
|
|
|
