|
Sabretooth
|
 |
October 03, 2014, 01:56:24 PM |
|
|
Uno: uVcEaDQ5MXcYRjSGY1E7FXfrtxGk6QKnBm
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:00:36 PM |
|
we need to step up the game I have a feeling that rev 2.5 and rev 3 will not be too far from each other as Dan is already working on group chat that should have been a Rev3 release.
After the code reviews I believe xc will gain the crown of 1st crypto innovator as it should be.
I am not even concerned about any short term pricing of XC anymore. ... Yes, same here, all price info i have atm comes from remarks in this thread so i can gueass a range but thats about it. Used to run multiple actual price screens  But you are stretching it a bit with the shell bug. Was btw shocking to read some guy lost 750BTC over it. |
|
|
|
|
|
reebokasss
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:09:25 PM |
|
xc pierced 0,5 $ and BTC are still dropping everyday.. we need some good news!!
|
|
|
|
|
CryptoGretzky
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:15:47 PM |
|
we need to step up the game I have a feeling that rev 2.5 and rev 3 will not be too far from each other as Dan is already working on group chat that should have been a Rev3 release.
After the code reviews I believe xc will gain the crown of 1st crypto innovator as it should be.
I am not even concerned about any short term pricing of XC anymore. ... Yes, same here, all price info i have atm comes from remarks in this thread so i can gueass a range but thats about it. Used to run multiple actual price screens But you are stretching it a bit with the shell bug. Was btw shocking to read some guy lost 750BTC over it. The shellshock exploitation is not stretching it as much as the fud that XC has to endure from some other coin shills.... Its definitely within the realm of being exploited by NSA like the heart bleed bug. NSA knew about the heart bleed bug for years and have used it. How many years did the NSA knew about the shellshock bug this time? How many Linux based machine has been infected out there now? How many masternode based mixers? |
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:17:14 PM |
|
Have you seen the FIAT horror stories over at Moolah's subreddit? http://www.reddit.com/r/MoolahSome people have waited 4+ months for withdrawals. I would suggest that if you plan to use Mintpal's USD pairings that you start small and see if they've improved their FIAT services at all. |
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 03, 2014, 02:52:40 PM |
|
Read the entire post, lmao buncha kids. |
|
|
|
|
|
the_game1224
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:02:34 PM |
|
Happy Friday everyone! Haven't been on here as much lately and was just curious what the XC team members are working on right now? Sort of like what was listed in the old daily updates. Thanks and I hope everyone has a good weekend  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:23:31 PM |
|
Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer. Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle. eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud. But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in  ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?f14319b3154e5f6f1c0c46af46159d46308abb47b4e86710af23d8885e81d964.htm) Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs) Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D Overall ... am almost there ... |
|
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:32:03 PM |
|
Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer.
Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle.
eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud.
But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in
Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs)
Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D
Overall ... am almost there ...
It's Beautiful.... |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:33:12 PM |
|
Dan that is a Rev 3 feature in the road map sneaky you! |
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:39:15 PM |
|
I feel so out of the loop. I haven't been able to try XChat at all yet because I'm on a Mac.  |
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:40:38 PM |
|
Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer. Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle. eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud. But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in [img snip] ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?f14319b3154e5f6f1c0c46af46159d46308abb47b4e86710af23d8885e81d964.htm) Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs) Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D Overall ... am almost there ... Looks amazing! Wow, I can't wait for this to go live! |
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:43:16 PM |
|
Dan that is a Rev 3 feature in the road map sneaky you! The requests for group chat drove this feature to the top of the list!!!! On a side note, I've been contacted by several dev's on a various list of projects - just wanted to keep the community in the loop * Ruble Code review * Britcoin - license rev1 mixer code * Utility Coin - collaboration * Supernet - collaboration Dan |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:46:03 PM |
|
Dan, After the last time i asked did some research and now understand the need for re-entering the public key for Xchat. But at the same time i feel this will limit the adaptation of XChat by non tech/altcoin people, just because its just a lot of hassle & they have no idea what a private key is. For many i know a XC address looks crazy enough. Is there some (anon related) reason for not letting the wallet discover the public key by itself before encrypting the channel or do you think there is some way to build this tech into the core protocol before going public? grtz |
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:49:59 PM |
|
Ok, there will be limitations in my block explorer. Just finished a dynamic caching module in the back-end because some transactions where just to much for a browser to handle. eg: if one or more outputs are not spend i let the browser render the graph, if all outputs are spend the svg is served without the need for any end-user processing. Simply because unspend outputs can change the graph & i needed some simple & quick caching able to run in the cloud. But visualizing seemingly simple things can give crazy results, check this out: Thats a 6x times zoom in [snip] ( https://chainz.cryptoid.info/xc/tx.dws?f14319b3154e5f6f1c0c46af46159d46308abb47b4e86710af23d8885e81d964.htm) Just someone scraping together about 300 seperate inputs into a single tx-out without time-frame, this has nothing to do with anon (no multisigs) Funny to see how (only for XC) regulair Anon transactions are more easy to handle by a browser (visual tech wise) and how some people had concerns about bloat because of the XCoinshuffle thats part of the anon:D Overall ... am almost there ... Where do you get that stuff from? People say it looks awesome, but I honestly can't figure out why or even how to read it. Do you need to download a program for it? |
|
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:51:57 PM |
|
Dan that is a Rev 3 feature in the road map sneaky you! The requests for group chat drove this feature to the top of the list!!!! On a side note, I've been contacted by several dev's on a various list of projects - just wanted to keep the community in the loop * Ruble Code review * Britcoin - license rev1 mixer code * Utility Coin - collaboration * Supernet - collaboration Dan "Britcoin license Rev 1 mixer code" XC will license out it's mixer coding? |
|
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:55:15 PM |
|
Why are we collaborating with a coin that is 1 week old (utilitycoin)?
That sounds unwise to me... chances are they are a P&D coin just using collaboration with XC to help push that initial pump...
XC should really only be collaborating with coins that are established and well past that initial P&D phase...
|
|
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:55:38 PM |
|
Dan, After the last time i asked did some research and now understand the need for re-entering the public key for Xchat. But at the same time i feel this will limit the adaptation of XChat by non tech/altcoin people, just because its just a lot of hassle & they have no idea what a private key is. For many i know a XC address looks crazy enough. Is there some (anon related) reason for not letting the wallet discover the public key by itself before encrypting the channel or do you think there is some way to build this tech into the core protocol before going public? grtz I have a different solution for this, using a basic blockchain 2.0 service, the user can register a nickname/alias assigned to the public/private key pair which eliminates that process altogether. Thus you just add the "nickname/alias" Dan |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
atcsecure
|
|
October 03, 2014, 03:57:21 PM |
|
Why are we collaborating with a coin that is 1 week old (utilitycoin)?
That sounds unwise to me... chances are they are a P&D coin just using collaboration with XC to help push that initial pump...
I am in the information gathering stage currently and collecting information Dan |
Join the revolution - XC - Decentralized Trustless Multi-Node Private Transactions
|
|
|
|
