|
holyprofit
|
 |
October 04, 2014, 03:00:37 PM |
|
mintgox
It may be failure, but at least it's seamless as promised. |
|
|
|
|
|
hoertest
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:02:21 PM |
|
any news to be expected today?
|
|
|
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:08:04 PM |
|
And with that, mintpal went the way of the dinosaur!! poof!  Are you following http://blog.moolah.io/author/moolahch/? Complete about-turn every hour on what they say they are doing - they will not launch right now (due to "feedback"). Talk about doing a giant shit all over your brand. |
|
|
|
|
|
McHammer
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:37:59 PM |
|
XC needs news whales can pump a solid good coin but no pumpability all this game is about PUMP im loosing faith ... xc manager manages nhz  its all about money .... |
altcoincasinogulagshoppingshow FUD is good, look @altcoin prices ...
pls fud me hard via pm
id appriciate that.
|
|
|
|
MKAxe11
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:45:39 PM |
|
mintgox
It may be failure, but at least it's seamless as promised. Yup.. flawless failure  This V2 thing better be great when it's done!! AND they'd better add an XC/USD market to make up for this big... f**kup. I regret I didn't withdraw all my coins before they went in maintenance mode.  |
XChat:XJFcgcMqfdFxwXfqqfHPZs4uBomRfR6erQ / jwj2cnCPdf3uX53cyWyLreaJaDadj4BwqhdmhHcWFP5d
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:46:18 PM |
|
Teka We need to reach them after rev 2.5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ_Cv4wEE-cthey were talking about fire-chat and mesh networks in this one. They said that all the technologies with mesh net do not offer real privacy. for the bloat issue and third party vulnerability. XC is gonna blow their mind Edit: I made a comment in reply of their first comment talking about xc bitcoin magazine article about xc meshnet solution for privacy and I wanted to upvote it with different google accounts but when i go out from my profile and enter the other one I cannot see my comment there. that is my comment: Hi Guys have a look at Xcurrency fully private anononimous meshnet implemented. First Crypto to do that: bitcoinmagazine dot com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/ Watch the entire show, not bad. Some interesting points. Reddit wants it's own coin? Lets push XC |
|
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:47:34 PM |
|
XC needs news whales can pump a solid good coin but no pumpability all this game is about PUMP im loosing faith ... xc manager manages nhz its all about money .... It's ok to loose faith, sell me your XC for .001200000 XC/BTC |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:48:09 PM |
|
Teka We need to reach them after rev 2.5 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XQ_Cv4wEE-cthey were talking about fire-chat and mesh networks in this one. They said that all the technologies with mesh net do not offer real privacy. for the bloat issue and third party vulnerability. XC is gonna blow their mind Edit: I made a comment in reply of their first comment talking about xc bitcoin magazine article about xc meshnet solution for privacy and I wanted to upvote it with different google accounts but when i go out from my profile and enter the other one I cannot see my comment there. that is my comment: Hi Guys have a look at Xcurrency fully private anononimous meshnet implemented. First Crypto to do that: bitcoinmagazine dot com/16436/xcurrencys-new-trustless-ad-hoc-mesh-network/ Watch the entire show, not bad. Some interesting points. Reddit wants it's own coin? Lets push XC can you see my comment and upvote it? |
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 04, 2014, 03:49:17 PM |
|
mintgox
It may be failure, but at least it's seamless as promised. Yup.. flawless failure This V2 thing better be great when it's done!! AND they'd better add an XC/USD market to make up for this big... f**kup. I regret I didn't withdraw all my coins before they went in maintenance mode. After this you would trust them with your bank info? |
|
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:12:04 PM |
|
mintgox
It may be failure, but at least it's seamless as promised. Yup.. flawless failure This V2 thing better be great when it's done!! AND they'd better add an XC/USD market to make up for this big... f**kup. I regret I didn't withdraw all my coins before they went in maintenance mode. After this you would trust them with your bank info? If they use iDeal, they don't need your bank information. You can just buy stuff with it without the company knowing your information. |
|
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:18:52 PM |
|
Why is pizpie using his xc email for his nhz coin project? And have you looked at nhz roadmap? It parallels XC.
Seriously looks like a joke. No wonder XC is tanking. The project is confused as hell with team members "split" between two coins, code reviews praising the tech of competitors touting the same tech XC offers, collaborations with shit coins that have no credibility.
You all can keep blindly following Dan but to anyone on the outside these are major red flags.
|
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
 Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:21:05 PM |
|
Why is pizpie using his xc email for his nhz coin project? And have you looked at nhz roadmap? It parallels XC.
Seriously looks like a joke. No wonder XC is tanking. The project is confused as hell with team members "split" between two coins, code reviews praising the tech of competitors touting the same tech XC offers, collaborations with shit coins that have no credibility.
You all can keep blindly following Dan but to anyone on the outside these are major red flags.
lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places. like reviewing other anon coins / chat. like taking over nhz. etc, etc. |
|
|
|
|
|
MemoryShock
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:40:48 PM |
|
lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
like reviewing other anon coins / chat. like taking over nhz. etc, etc.
I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground. There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange), Utility for Content filtering (I'm guessing) in order to work out potential issues regarding malicious/illegal content and whatever else I missed. All of these things are necessary for XC to develop a wide range of features that are all built upon XC's advanced anonymity platform (which no other coin has despite collaboration; Rev 1 integrations don't count). All of these are necessary to create a user friendly and public friendly platform for when XC officially launches and beyond (ITO distribution). The coin reviews work to establish XC's reputation in the community. Everything has a purpose...a purpose designed to reinforce XC. And I'm surprised some people can't see that. I freaking love what XC is doing and have gotten to the point where I don't even watch the price anymore despite it being a major driving point for discussion by a relevant portion of contributors to this thread; I think it will come around. There are also other factors involved; BTC is down considerably and likely has an effect. Regardless...XC rocks and collaboration is not a sign of divided attention nor is it a sign of ship jumping. |
|
|
|
|
sugarboy321
|
|
October 04, 2014, 04:42:44 PM |
|
Why is pizpie using his xc email for his nhz coin project? And have you looked at nhz roadmap? It parallels XC.
Seriously looks like a joke. No wonder XC is tanking. The project is confused as hell with team members "split" between two coins, code reviews praising the tech of competitors touting the same tech XC offers, collaborations with shit coins that have no credibility.
You all can keep blindly following Dan but to anyone on the outside these are major red flags.
lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places. like reviewing other anon coins / chat. like taking over nhz. etc, etc. yup, guess you better sell me your XC. |
|
|
|
|
|
Longenecker
|
|
October 04, 2014, 05:03:43 PM
Last edit: October 04, 2014, 05:14:46 PM by Longenecker |
|
lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
like reviewing other anon coins / chat. like taking over nhz. etc, etc.
I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground. There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange), Are you delusional? Collaborations with Qibucks, for example, is completely different from the NHZ project. With NHZ, XC has routed Xander Shepherd (former dev for XC), and Pizpie (Marketing guy) to the NHZ project. And what do you know, the NHZ project is working to build anon transfers, encrypted messaging, and a decentralized asset exchange. Look familiar? It should, because this is in large what XC is attempting to accomplish. Now, explain to me how dividing the XC team to work on a second coin (which will ONLY divide & dilute investments) will be beneficial to XC? The coins roadmaps are nearly PARALLEL. But now XC resources are split and working to accomplish the same goals on another coin. It's fucking stupid. If money is the reason, fine, I can understand that. But let's be adults and say that is the reason. Quit trying to make it seem like this is beneficial for XC, because its not. It would be MORE beneficial if those resources spent time developing and fine-tuning these features for XC. Quit being mindless fanboys and use your heads. |
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 05:13:14 PM |
|
Quit being mindless fanboys and use your heads.
your in the wrong coin if this isn't what you want. |
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
October 04, 2014, 05:14:51 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
jibble
|
|
October 04, 2014, 05:15:14 PM |
|
Quit being mindless fanboys and use your heads.
your in the wrong coin if this isn't what you want. can you name a coin that doesn't? nope cos they all do |
|
|
|
|
|
KimmyF
|
|
October 04, 2014, 05:16:48 PM |
|
lol u guys just now getting it? xc isn't paying off for the devs so they have to bring their technology / focus other places.
...
I feel like this talking point has been run into the ground. There has been a trend with working with other devs...each coin has a different facet that applies to XC. Qibucks and the distribution of ad content for Web 3.0, Key for the honing of the OS, NHZ for the asset exchange (XC's future decentralized exchange), ... a decentralized asset exchange ... Really, must have missed that one or is MemoryShock correct |
|
|
|
|
robinwilliams
Member
Offline
Activity: 112
Merit: 10
|
|
October 04, 2014, 05:21:29 PM |
|
can you name a coin that doesn't? nope cos they all do
i would rank xc as the highest for blind shildom. Probably litecoin & darkcoin as #2/#3. really does crack me up what your devs are doing to your investment and it's somehow all a good thing lol other coins at least don't have their developers pushing other projects that are pretty much in 100% competition and have their shills say it's a good thing lol |
|
|
|
|
|
