synechist
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
 |
October 13, 2014, 03:26:19 PM |
|
[UtilityCoin]
Hi all I can confirm that Dan specifically requested that nothing from Util be published without his prior review, but they went ahead regardless. Dan is, however, interested in consulting with Util, specifically regarding their http-vpn tech. Most importantly, the intention is for all collaboration to benefit XC. In this case, our plans will benefit XC massively. I can't release details just yet, but it's quite likely that we'll let the word out tomorrow or the next day. It's a particularly major development. You said that as well for QiBucks, but I have yet to see something happen with that. Can we have a bit more information about that collaboration please? Think we may have to wait for 'tomorrow or the next day' for that. My guess is XC nodes as exit nodes for their VPN, or something similar. It's bigger news than that. [Cryptico, now that's a tease ;-).] |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:31:44 PM |
|
[UtilityCoin]
Hi all I can confirm that Dan specifically requested that nothing from Util be published without his prior review, but they went ahead regardless. Dan is, however, interested in consulting with Util, specifically regarding their http-vpn tech. Most importantly, the intention is for all collaboration to benefit XC. In this case, our plans will benefit XC massively. I can't release details just yet, but it's quite likely that we'll let the word out tomorrow or the next day. It's a particularly major development. You said that as well for QiBucks, but I have yet to see something happen with that. Can we have a bit more information about that collaboration please? Think we may have to wait for 'tomorrow or the next day' for that. My guess is XC nodes as exit nodes for their VPN, or something similar. It's bigger news than that. [Cryptico, now that's a tease ;-).] Please let it be something big, like the ITO date. I could use something to cheer me up. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:35:10 PM |
|
[UtilityCoin]
Hi all I can confirm that Dan specifically requested that nothing from Util be published without his prior review, but they went ahead regardless. Dan is, however, interested in consulting with Util, specifically regarding their http-vpn tech. Most importantly, the intention is for all collaboration to benefit XC. In this case, our plans will benefit XC massively. I can't release details just yet, but it's quite likely that we'll let the word out tomorrow or the next day. It's a particularly major development. You said that as well for QiBucks, but I have yet to see something happen with that. Can we have a bit more information about that collaboration please? Think we may have to wait for 'tomorrow or the next day' for that. My guess is XC nodes as exit nodes for their VPN, or something similar. It's bigger news than that. [Cryptico, now that's a tease ;-).] in Console ........ SYNECHIST |
|
|
|
|
|
YESEYEneedDIGI
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 23
Merit: 0
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:44:13 PM |
|
Time to fold, I'm out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Crypto-in-tha-blood
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:45:28 PM |
|
[UtilityCoin]
Hi all I can confirm that Dan specifically requested that nothing from Util be published without his prior review, but they went ahead regardless. Dan is, however, interested in consulting with Util, specifically regarding their http-vpn tech. Most importantly, the intention is for all collaboration to benefit XC. In this case, our plans will benefit XC massively. I can't release details just yet, but it's quite likely that we'll let the word out tomorrow or the next day.
It's a particularly major development.Sweet....that sounds like a bit of good news and hopefully a boost to reverse this negative trend over the last few weeks. I have been buying, so it's nice to hear. Can't wait. |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:47:01 PM |
|
Fuck who is the lucky bastard who got the last XC sell order?
Envy envy envy.....
|
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:50:37 PM |
|
Hi guys, been away a few days, just having a catch up. That WSJ article is good. Agree we should mention XC in the comments at least. I really hope XC is going to be on the road to being the first to "decentralise everything" and while doing all these collabs, is collecting up all the good bits of code and implementing it somehow. I'm sure it's all much more complex than this but if Dan is helping out others I would presume they are helping us out back in some beneficial way. Suprise suprise the other team released the news first again, but for some reason this time I dont mind. Gotta trust the team basically at this point. It's a gamble, but I've already taken it. Looking forward to hearing more about this particular collab anyway. Cheers for the update Snynechist.  |
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
|
SouthernBTC
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:51:14 PM |
|
The reason other teams continue to ignore Dan's requests to hold off on collaboration announcements is they are trying to pump their coins. Anyone who has been part of our community for some time is already used to it, hope it benefits xcurrency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:52:02 PM |
|
Time to fold, I'm out.
were you the last sell order? |
|
|
|
|
Crypto-in-tha-blood
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:54:14 PM |
|
The reason other teams continue to ignore Dan's requests to hold off on collaboration announcements is they are trying to pump their coins. Anyone who has been part of our community for some time is already used to it, hope it benefits xcurrency.
Yep....see this time and time again. Funny it never has any effect on XC though. |
|
|
|
|
|
G-Bert
|
|
October 13, 2014, 03:58:49 PM |
|
The reason other teams continue to ignore Dan's requests to hold off on collaboration announcements is they are trying to pump their coins. Anyone who has been part of our community for some time is already used to it, hope it benefits xcurrency.
Exactly, and I can't really be arsed with trying to catch the pump and dump any more. The sooner everyone does the same, the sooner the truly innovative coins will rise to the top. Imo. |
XChat XJkVnYD4N4oSjNStgbAUD6UyWuBTWuMRgv
public key fuYPYmK4Sj57PkU2NKg1gKW91euMKkstQPeeexUcxnb8
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:02:27 PM |
|
The reason other teams continue to ignore Dan's requests to hold off on collaboration announcements is they are trying to pump their coins. Anyone who has been part of our community for some time is already used to it, hope it benefits xcurrency.
Yep....see this time and time again. Funny it never has any effect on XC though. Do you think that XC's price would've stayed constant throughout a season where most alts took a dive if it wasn't for Dan's reputation, which ensured XC's legitimacy and trustworthiness? Do you think that, say, XC's upcoming web 3.0 distributed content server will have no effect? I think that Dan's collaborations have a pervasively beneficial effect on XC. And what's likely to be the most significant effect of all is what we're going to announce very soon. It would not be possible unless Dan was widely known, highly regarded, and in personal communication with various projects. |
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:03:08 PM |
|
Time to fold, I'm out.
were you the last sell order? How much was the last sell order? |
|
|
|
|
|
hoertest
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:08:11 PM |
|
The reason other teams continue to ignore Dan's requests to hold off on collaboration announcements is they are trying to pump their coins. Anyone who has been part of our community for some time is already used to it, hope it benefits xcurrency.
Yep....see this time and time again. Funny it never has any effect on XC though. Do you think that XC's price would've stayed constant throughout a season where most alts took a dive if it wasn't for Dan's reputation, which ensured XC's legitimacy and trustworthiness? Do you think that, say, XC's upcoming web 3.0 distributed content server will have no effect? I think that Dan's collaborations have a pervasively beneficial effect on XC. And what's likely to be the most significant effect of all is what we're going to announce very soon. It would not be possible unless Dan was widely known, highly regarded, and in personal communication with various projects. no need for defense mode Arlyn. we take it with a smile meanwhile. looking forward to that news. is this beyond the utility collab since you mentioned Dans widespread reputation beeing the reason? |
|
|
|
|
|
MKAxe11
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:16:19 PM |
|
Fuck who is the lucky bastard who got the last XC sell order?
Envy envy envy.....
Last 24h on bittrex was me.  CLOSED DATE OPENED DATE TYPE BID/ASK UNITS FILLED XC UNITS TOTAL XC ACTUAL RATE COST / PROCEEDS 10/13/2014 17:21:16 10/11/2014 18:37:58 Buy 0.00116500 114.40971375 300.86543347 0.00116499 0.13362052 only got about 114 XC filled though. also this weekends low was 0.00107946, didn't had funds left at that point  |
XChat:XJFcgcMqfdFxwXfqqfHPZs4uBomRfR6erQ / jwj2cnCPdf3uX53cyWyLreaJaDadj4BwqhdmhHcWFP5d
|
|
|
|
Crypto-in-tha-blood
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:18:03 PM |
|
The reason other teams continue to ignore Dan's requests to hold off on collaboration announcements is they are trying to pump their coins. Anyone who has been part of our community for some time is already used to it, hope it benefits xcurrency.
Yep....see this time and time again. Funny it never has any effect on XC though. Do you think that XC's price would've stayed constant throughout a season where most alts took a dive if it wasn't for Dan's reputation, which ensured XC's legitimacy and trustworthiness? Do you think that, say, XC's upcoming web 3.0 distributed content server will have no effect? I think that Dan's collaborations have a pervasively beneficial effect on XC. And what's likely to be the most significant effect of all is what we're going to announce very soon. It would not be possible unless Dan was widely known, highly regarded, and in personal communication with various projects. no need for defense mode Arlyn. we take it with a smile meanwhile. looking forward to that news. is this beyond the utility collab since you mentioned Dans widespread reputation beeing the reason? I did not mean for you go on the defensive Arlyn. I'm in XC, and plan to be for a very long time. In fact I've picked up 9k in the last few weeks. I didn't mean that there were no underlying effects of the collaborations. I just meant, visually, you see the jumps the other coins have, but XC remains the constant. |
|
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:24:21 PM |
|
Do you think that, say, XC's upcoming web 3.0 distributed content server will have no effect?
Any estimates on when that could be expected to be working and usable, considering the amount of effort for example the chat feature has required so far? In what complexity range does web 3.0 lie compared to the chat? |
|
|
|
|
|
cryptico
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:27:29 PM |
|
Do you think that, say, XC's upcoming web 3.0 distributed content server will have no effect?
Any estimates on when that could be expected to be working and usable, considering the amount of effort for example the chat feature has required so far? In what complexity range does web 3.0 lie compared to the chat? Mesh-net infrastructure is already on though. That is a major part of web 3.0 content distribution. Correct me if I'm wrong Arlyn. |
|
|
|
|
illodin
|
|
October 13, 2014, 04:29:06 PM |
|
Do you think that, say, XC's upcoming web 3.0 distributed content server will have no effect?
Any estimates on when that could be expected to be working and usable, considering the amount of effort for example the chat feature has required so far? In what complexity range does web 3.0 lie compared to the chat? Mesh-net infrastructure is already on though. That is a major part of web 3.0 content distribution. Correct me if I'm wrong Arlyn. Is the content stored in the blockchain? |
|
|
|
|
|
