synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 18, 2014, 02:54:39 PM |
|
Mountaingoat hates empty space. Heh! I do. You see why? Looks nice and clean to me. ;-) I generally add spaces to my posts. It can give them a more appealing appearance.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 18, 2014, 02:59:50 PM |
|
Mountaingoat hates empty space. Heh! I do. You see why? Looks nice and clean to me. ;-) I generally add spaces to my posts. It can give them a more appealing appearance. You sneaky... I don't like it when a post has more enters than it should have.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:01:46 PM |
|
Mountaingoat hates empty space. Heh! I do. You see why? Looks nice and clean to me. ;-) I generally add spaces to my posts. It can give them a more appealing appearance. You sneaky... I don't like it when a post has more enters than it should have. Fair enough. But "enters" are a logical function. On Bitcointalk they're inflexibly tied to a spatial function. There's no need for that. So: anarchy against the spatial effect of the enter function is the order of the day. Up with beautiful spacing!
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
Mountaingoat
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:10:23 PM |
|
Mountaingoat hates empty space. Heh! I do. You see why? Looks nice and clean to me. ;-) I generally add spaces to my posts. It can give them a more appealing appearance. You sneaky... I don't like it when a post has more enters than it should have. Fair enough. But "enters" are a logical function. On Bitcointalk they're inflexibly tied to a spatial function. There's no need for that. So: anarchy against the spatial effect of the enter function is the order of the day. Up with beautiful spacing! It is, if there are more than 2 enters after a sentence, it needs to merge in with the previous ones and with that it should disappear.
|
|
|
|
|
cyberhacker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1330
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:14:50 PM |
|
any one tested mac version xchat?
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:17:51 PM |
|
any one tested mac version xchat?
Yes, I have, and there are some issues that Dan is aware of and working on fixes for with the latest test release for Mac OSX.
|
|
|
|
tr8kr
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:20:30 PM |
|
It is, if there are more than 2 enters after a sentence, it needs to merge in with the previous ones and with that it should disappear.
Cartesian <> a N A r c H i C Just joking ! No need to be upset about some [return] not placed where it must be ! <doors
|
|
|
|
infinitechaos
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:27:32 PM |
|
It's been great watching the market react to sub 100k XC. After Mintpal tanked, which was XC's biggest exchange by volume and order book, it was easy for the price to tank. The rest of the exchanges all had only a few BTC at most of buy support above 100k, of course that bottom was going to be tested post-Mintpal. But what I've seen since then shows me that there is massive interest yet in the market for XC and that our market is willing to make a transition to a new exchange. Looking at the order book fill up in Bittrex shows me that what we've really had is one huge double-bottom at ~80k (one in June and one now). It's only upwards from here. If you can increase your position, do it. This show is just getting started and the timing with everything is perfect. The perfect storm is brewing.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:32:25 PM |
|
It's been great watching the market react to sub 100k XC. After Mintpal tanked, which was XC's biggest exchange by volume and order book, it was easy for the price to tank. The rest of the exchanges all had only a few BTC at most of buy support above 100k, of course that bottom was going to be tested post-Mintpal. But what I've seen since then shows me that there is massive interest yet in the market for XC and that our market is willing to make a transition to a new exchange. Looking at the order book fill up in Bittrex shows me that what we've really had is one huge double-bottom at ~80k (one in June and one now). It's only upwards from here. If you can increase your position, do it. This show is just getting started and the timing with everything is perfect. The perfect storm is brewing. Interesting perspective. A huge double bottom of this sort is also generally analysed as a corrective triangle from an Elliott Wave perspective. The initial pump was wave 1 (up). The last several months was wave 2 (down) The next wave is wave 3 (up higher than wave 1) This will be followed by wave 4 (down, and can often take a very long time, like BTC's last 10 months, which was a corrective triangle) Finally wave 5 (big push upwards).
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
tr8kr
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:36:21 PM |
|
my windows wallet v0.9.2.49.08i.2.XCurrency-REV2. is constantly crashing after some time i dont know why but a windows message box appear with problem on runtime. Yesterday i was testing the xchat with gumpty and ursay(mac) and ursay message was not received no problem with me and gumpty but that was really slow between message seeing a block waiting to synchro each time before seeing a message.
|
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:38:33 PM |
|
Love the phrase .. "which seems more serious" My impression is that he's an SDC whale who's trying to protect his monopoly over there -
|
|
|
|
biskyb33
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:39:55 PM |
|
It's been great watching the market react to sub 100k XC. After Mintpal tanked, which was XC's biggest exchange by volume and order book, it was easy for the price to tank. The rest of the exchanges all had only a few BTC at most of buy support above 100k, of course that bottom was going to be tested post-Mintpal. But what I've seen since then shows me that there is massive interest yet in the market for XC and that our market is willing to make a transition to a new exchange. Looking at the order book fill up in Bittrex shows me that what we've really had is one huge double-bottom at ~80k (one in June and one now). It's only upwards from here. If you can increase your position, do it. This show is just getting started and the timing with everything is perfect. The perfect storm is brewing. Interesting perspective. A huge double bottom of this sort is also generally analysed as a corrective triangle from an Elliott Wave perspective. The initial pump was wave 1 (up). The last several months was wave 2 (down) The next wave is wave 3 (up higher than wave 1) This will be followed by wave 4 (down, and can often take a very long time, like BTC's last 10 months, which was a corrective triangle) Finally wave 5 (big push upwards). thanks, arlyn.
|
XChat XLo9fHrgmhwzUJxQwkvTq1oWAoMqXHwCVi PubKey 2
|
|
|
holyprofit
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:41:48 PM |
|
It's been great watching the market react to sub 100k XC. After Mintpal tanked, which was XC's biggest exchange by volume and order book, it was easy for the price to tank. The rest of the exchanges all had only a few BTC at most of buy support above 100k, of course that bottom was going to be tested post-Mintpal. But what I've seen since then shows me that there is massive interest yet in the market for XC and that our market is willing to make a transition to a new exchange. Looking at the order book fill up in Bittrex shows me that what we've really had is one huge double-bottom at ~80k (one in June and one now). It's only upwards from here. If you can increase your position, do it. This show is just getting started and the timing with everything is perfect. The perfect storm is brewing. Interesting perspective. A huge double bottom is also generally analysed as a corrective triangle from an Elliott Wave perspective. The initial pump was wave 1 (up). The last several months was wave 2 (down) The next wave is wave 3 (up higher than wave 1) This will be followed by wave 4 (down, and can often take a very long time, like BTC's last 10 months, which was a corrective triangle) Finally wave 5 (big push upwards). s**t - the tanking yesterday was such an obvious gift I'm kicking myself for missing out. Our volume is pretty big on bittrex now - don't we get added to bitcoinwisdom automatically? - or do we have to hassle them - we would be in the top few on their list right now.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:48:33 PM |
|
It's been great watching the market react to sub 100k XC. After Mintpal tanked, which was XC's biggest exchange by volume and order book, it was easy for the price to tank. The rest of the exchanges all had only a few BTC at most of buy support above 100k, of course that bottom was going to be tested post-Mintpal. But what I've seen since then shows me that there is massive interest yet in the market for XC and that our market is willing to make a transition to a new exchange. Looking at the order book fill up in Bittrex shows me that what we've really had is one huge double-bottom at ~80k (one in June and one now). It's only upwards from here. If you can increase your position, do it. This show is just getting started and the timing with everything is perfect. The perfect storm is brewing. Interesting perspective. A huge double bottom is also generally analysed as a corrective triangle from an Elliott Wave perspective. The initial pump was wave 1 (up). The last several months was wave 2 (down) The next wave is wave 3 (up higher than wave 1) This will be followed by wave 4 (down, and can often take a very long time, like BTC's last 10 months, which was a corrective triangle) Finally wave 5 (big push upwards). s**t - the tanking yesterday was such an obvious gift I'm kicking myself for missing out. Our volume is pretty big on bittrex now - don't we get added to bitcoinwisdom automatically? - or do we have to hassle them - we would be in the top few on their list right now. We gotta hassle. And tip.
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
|
URSAY
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1974
Merit: 1010
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:50:29 PM |
|
We gotta hassle. And tip.
Politely suggest.
|
|
|
|
synechist
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1190
Merit: 1000
To commodify ethicality is to ethicise the market
|
|
October 18, 2014, 03:54:57 PM |
|
|
Co-Founder, the Blocknet
|
|
|
TheGer
|
|
October 18, 2014, 04:02:56 PM |
|
Question for then Devs.
With XC current able to be used at ATM to withdraw funds, with Blocknet will people be able to use any coin connected to the Blocknet to directly withraw from those ATM's.
eg. Coin XXX is on the Blocknet, they send XXX coins through the Blocknet and they get converted to be used with the ATM.
|
|
|
|
Anduril_FotW
|
|
October 18, 2014, 04:03:53 PM |
|
Dammit, my XC are still being held hostage at Mintpal...
Are there people here who managed to withdraw them already ?? Getting a bit nervous...
|
"The Blade that was Broken shines again!"
|
|
|
|