[XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos

[G-Bert]

Hey Guys,

https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/523573566336299008/photo/1

Let me know what resolution sizes you would like. Current ones are: 1440p and 1080p

Looks cool. Any reason why you left out XCurrency?

THE XC3NHZXST is XC, NHZ and XST. I've realised its hard to see so the never version has been tweaked to reflect that.

How come those 3 are combined?

[Teka]

Hey Guys,

https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/523573566336299008/photo/1

Let me know what resolution sizes you would like. Current ones are: 1440p and 1080p

Looks cool. Any reason why you left out XCurrency?

THE XC3NHZXST is XC, NHZ and XST. I've realised its hard to see so the never version has been tweaked to reflect that.

How come those 3 are combined?

No particular order, I chose the ones that I came up with first.

Here is the inspiration: http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/WO2002092668A1/imgf000033_0001.png

[mig5000]

Still nobody really answered my previous question...

Having 10 coins on the blocknet is nice and sweat but there is no legit coin in that list imo. No smart contract coins and etc.

Have you guys asked to sys , via, bc if they'd like to take part in this ?

Also Sys already have market function, wouldn't it be practical to talk with them ?

[policymaker]

Hey Guys,

https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/523573566336299008/photo/1

Let me know what resolution sizes you would like. Current ones are: 1440p and 1080p

thats really cool, id love a neat wallpaper to replace my doge one, 1080p plz

[IMJim]

Still nobody really answered my previous question...

Having 10 coins on the blocknet is nice and sweat but there is no legit coin except XC in that list imo. No smart contract coins and etc.

Have you guys asked to sys , via, bc if they'd like to take part in this ?

Also Sys already have market function, wouldn't it be practical to talk with them ?

I fixed your sentence for ya......at least I hope that better clarifies what you were saying lol:-)

I agree, sys would be a great project to see included in Blocknet!!

[ib88]

Still nobody really answered my previous question...

Having 10 coins on the blocknet is nice and sweat but there is no legit coin in that list imo. No smart contract coins and etc.

Have you guys asked to sys , via, bc if they'd like to take part in this ?

Also Sys already have market function, wouldn't it be practical to talk with them ?

I direct you to this post:

The entire summer, I watched the XC thread and there were many points where people were dissatisfied.  Why?  Because they were expecting a pump.  They were expecting something right then and there.  But I also saw continued development.  Relevant tech doesn't just get built over night and XC didn't get built over night.  I wonder what would have happened if XC had delivered REV1 and been happy?  We would have continued from coin to coin with many scams and much volatility.  Instead, we have a solid foundation that is looking like that "Bulletproof" claim is going to hold water.  Not only that, we have a coin that is set-up to distribute content in the near future.  The base is there and the tech is going to be something that I will use...much less other coins that I have invested in and then bailed on because I didn't see think that the dev had vision beyond a flavor of the month feature (not to diss them, I feel the crypto currency community is the largest R&D movement of our time and aside from obvious scams we need all of the input we can get).

Which brings me to my next point.  The coins on the list have unique features that can not only benefit XC but other coins...and ultimately the end user.  Util is working on programing how to filter malicious content to avoid risk to people who use their VPN (and now Blocknet).  SSD came up with stenographic transactions - coin movement embedded in pictures taken from pictures that you take from your smart phone.  XST has some pretty awesome SMS capabilities.  Fibre beat keylogging programs by creating an android like swiping pattern password for their wallet and have also released their own OS.  LXC decided to work on sidechains (sidechains!).  And my mentions aren't the sole focus of any coin I referenced or the full spectrum of what the combined dev force of all the coins included are capable of.  But these are all features that people want to use...and while I speak for myself, I think that they can come up with features that I and others will want to use.

Enabling the devs of each coin to work on what they do best to create something that will work together and bring an ultimately friendly and secure user experience is awesome. I don't see a joke here.  I see the beginning of another development process that will create the foundation for more innovation...and everyone working together only gets us there faster.  

Excellent Post - and great summary of some of the tech these coins are working on

I also bet a lot of other coins are waiting in the wings to see how it pans out initially before joining. Also regardless whether a coin has anything useful to offer, their userbase is exposed to XC and its technology. That can only be good for XC.

[G-Bert]

Hey Guys,

https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/523573566336299008/photo/1

Let me know what resolution sizes you would like. Current ones are: 1440p and 1080p

Looks cool. Any reason why you left out XCurrency?

THE XC3NHZXST is XC, NHZ and XST. I've realised its hard to see so the never version has been tweaked to reflect that.

How come those 3 are combined?

No particular order, I chose the ones that I came up with first.

Here is the inspiration: http://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/WO2002092668A1/imgf000033_0001.png

Ah I see. you could always add extra bits to it so there is seperate area for each currency.

If more coins join up it could end up looking more like this lol...

[synechist]

Still nobody really answered my previous question...

Having 10 coins on the blocknet is nice and sweat but there is no legit coin except XC in that list imo. No smart contract coins and etc.

Have you guys asked to sys , via, bc if they'd like to take part in this ?

Also Sys already have market function, wouldn't it be practical to talk with them ?

I fixed your sentence for ya......at least I hope that better clarifies what you were saying lol:-)

I agree, sys would be a great project to see included in Blocknet!!

Heh. Every single coin in the Blocknet has been chosen for its genuine innovation.

Some are very small, but carefully chosen nonetheless.

Of course I'm all for some big coins joining too. That'll be great!

[IMJim]

Still nobody really answered my previous question...

Having 10 coins on the blocknet is nice and sweat but there is no legit coin except XC in that list imo. No smart contract coins and etc.

Have you guys asked to sys , via, bc if they'd like to take part in this ?

Also Sys already have market function, wouldn't it be practical to talk with them ?

I fixed your sentence for ya......at least I hope that better clarifies what you were saying lol:-)

I agree, sys would be a great project to see included in Blocknet!!

Heh. Every single coin in the Blocknet has been chosen for its genuine innovation.

Some are very small, but carefully chosen nonetheless.

Of course I'm all for some big coins joining too. That'll be great!

Yeah I know........ I was just being a smart ass:-)

I actually went and delved into most of the coins listed the other when I asked you for the list.  Had not even heard of a few of them, was surprising impressed with all but one of them.  Sadly that was not the one that backed out, but I won't mention any names.  Am honestly now trying to collect around 5 or 6 of them now.  The only one I was invested in prior to the Blocknet announcement though was XC.

[Mountaingoat]

Hey Guys,

https://twitter.com/DrasticRaven/status/523573566336299008/photo/1

Let me know what resolution sizes you would like. Current ones are: 1440p and 1080p

1600*900
1280*720

[policymaker]

Dan, unfortunately I noticed that the network bandwith bug isnt gone, I left the XC wallet open for like an hour and it started slowing me down again, I was able to identify the bug by running a network speedtest while shutting down the client.

[landcrab]

I know all the new stuff coming on the XC platform is exciting, and assume the dev(s) are working on this, but a wallet that doesn't randomly crash would be nice, any news on when the XC wallet will be fixed, until recently it has been 100% stable. Blocknet blah blah, give us a stable wallet please so I have confidence my investment is safe.

[AltCoinBuddah]

I know all the new stuff coming on the XC platform is exciting, and assume the dev(s) are working on this, but a wallet that doesn't randomly crash would be nice, any news on when the XC wallet will be fixed, until recently it has been 100% stable. Blocknet blah blah, give us a stable wallet please so I have confidence my investment is safe.

I'm sure it can be fixed pretty easy. Hopefully soon.

[hoertest]

Still nobody really answered my previous question...

Having 10 coins on the blocknet is nice and sweat but there is no legit coin in that list imo. No smart contract coins and etc.

Have you guys asked to sys , via, bc if they'd like to take part in this ?

Also Sys already have market function, wouldn't it be practical to talk with them ?

I direct you to this post:

The entire summer, I watched the XC thread and there were many points where people were dissatisfied.  Why?  Because they were expecting a pump.  They were expecting something right then and there.  But I also saw continued development.  Relevant tech doesn't just get built over night and XC didn't get built over night.  I wonder what would have happened if XC had delivered REV1 and been happy?  We would have continued from coin to coin with many scams and much volatility.  Instead, we have a solid foundation that is looking like that "Bulletproof" claim is going to hold water.  Not only that, we have a coin that is set-up to distribute content in the near future.  The base is there and the tech is going to be something that I will use...much less other coins that I have invested in and then bailed on because I didn't see think that the dev had vision beyond a flavor of the month feature (not to diss them, I feel the crypto currency community is the largest R&D movement of our time and aside from obvious scams we need all of the input we can get).

Which brings me to my next point.  The coins on the list have unique features that can not only benefit XC but other coins...and ultimately the end user.  Util is working on programing how to filter malicious content to avoid risk to people who use their VPN (and now Blocknet).  SSD came up with stenographic transactions - coin movement embedded in pictures taken from pictures that you take from your smart phone.  XST has some pretty awesome SMS capabilities.  Fibre beat keylogging programs by creating an android like swiping pattern password for their wallet and have also released their own OS.  LXC decided to work on sidechains (sidechains!).  And my mentions aren't the sole focus of any coin I referenced or the full spectrum of what the combined dev force of all the coins included are capable of.  But these are all features that people want to use...and while I speak for myself, I think that they can come up with features that I and others will want to use.

Enabling the devs of each coin to work on what they do best to create something that will work together and bring an ultimately friendly and secure user experience is awesome. I don't see a joke here.  I see the beginning of another development process that will create the foundation for more innovation...and everyone working together only gets us there faster.  

Excellent Post - and great summary of some of the tech these coins are working on

I also bet a lot of other coins are waiting in the wings to see how it pans out initially before joining. Also regardless whether a coin has anything useful to offer, their userbase is exposed to XC and its technology. That can only be good for XC.

this. i hope doge or ltc join . they offer userbase more so than tech but thats important too. wether you run a mixer or you hold ltc and wouldn't have bothered selling and buying into XC just for one important transaction. this way they can still try the superior tech coins. in this regard Blocknet is also a super effective advertising vehicle. still though they also benefit by offering their users a wider range of additional services.  

i think some time down the road enableing the xbridge will be considert a mandatory service to all new coin developers more so than a salespitch or pump vehicle. the next few smaller coins will experience a nice pump though when joining. but this will get less and less the more the list grows to the point where the blocknet resembles the current crypto ecosystem just in better and more userfriendly.

[infinitechaos]

I know all the new stuff coming on the XC platform is exciting, and assume the dev(s) are working on this, but a wallet that doesn't randomly crash would be nice, any news on when the XC wallet will be fixed, until recently it has been 100% stable. Blocknet blah blah, give us a stable wallet please so I have confidence my investment is safe.

These wallet releases have clearly been stated to be test releases.

If you're not into testing and helping fix bugs then download the last stable release.

I'll try and track it down for you.

[MKAxe11]

I know all the new stuff coming on the XC platform is exciting, and assume the dev(s) are working on this, but a wallet that doesn't randomly crash would be nice, any news on when the XC wallet will be fixed, until recently it has been 100% stable. Blocknet blah blah, give us a stable wallet please so I have confidence my investment is safe.

These wallet releases have clearly been stated to be test releases.

If you're not into testing and helping fix bugs then download the last stable release.

I'll try and track it down for you.

Latest stable would be XCurrency_2.49.08e.exe
But Dan must have put it down by accident and replaced with XCurrency_2.49.08iW.exe (which is not stable for me)

Best version I can recommend for now is http://downloads.xc-official.com/testing/v2.49/XCurrency_2.49.08.exe

[MetaMorphius]

I know all the new stuff coming on the XC platform is exciting, and assume the dev(s) are working on this, but a wallet that doesn't randomly crash would be nice, any news on when the XC wallet will be fixed, until recently it has been 100% stable. Blocknet blah blah, give us a stable wallet please so I have confidence my investment is safe.

These wallet releases have clearly been stated to be test releases.

If you're not into testing and helping fix bugs then download the last stable release.

I'll try and track it down for you.

This is the correct idea. The latest wallet is a test.

[sugarboy321]

Wanted to share this, sounds like IBM is making something similar to the blockweb.

No chance of this being open sourced.

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/ibm-building-e-currency-platform/

Would it be cool if a major software company made it's own altcoin to join the blockweb?

[PlatinumExpress]

Wanted to share this, sounds like IBM is making something similar to the blockweb.

No chance of this being open sourced.

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/ibm-building-e-currency-platform/

Would it be cool if a major software company made it's own altcoin to join the blockweb?

Most companies don't want anything to do with sharing and cooperation with other companies unless they are in support roles for each other and certainly not with competing peers.

[sugarboy321]

Wanted to share this, sounds like IBM is making something similar to the blockweb.

No chance of this being open sourced.

http://letstalkbitcoin.com/ibm-building-e-currency-platform/

Would it be cool if a major software company made it's own altcoin to join the blockweb?

Most companies don't want anything to do with sharing and cooperation with other companies unless they are in support roles for each other and certainly not with competing peers.

Yeah your right, the publicity would be great. I do not think Dan would let Microsoft anywhere near the code.